SECTION
3 NATURAL RESOURCES CAPITAL STOCK
3.2 |
Land
Use and Land Supply |
|
|
|
|
Pollution
Pressures |
|
|
3.2.2.8 |
In
addition to development and disturbance
pressures, pollution pressures either in
the form of toxic contaminants or solid
waste dumping, also act upon the existing
land use and land supply capital stock.
Although there is the potential for remediation
of these sites, given the costs and time
involved, it is clear that pollution has
devalued the stock of these land resources.
Over 4,000 terrestrial sites have been identified
as 'black spots' by Lands Department's Black
Spot Task Force. These sites form an inventory
of non-conforming land uses, locations of
public health concern and illegal dumping
sites. A total of 18 site classifications
are used in the database of blackspots which
may be summarised as follows:
- container
vehicle parking and repairing; container
depots and yards;
- construction
materials, equipment and machinery;
- vehicle
storage, car dumps, vehicle repair workshops
and vehicle parts;
- timber
and logs, ceramic/pottery products, paper,
other rubbish;
- tanks
and cans and scrap metal; and
- other
uses and vacant sites.
|
|
|
Development
Pressures |
|
|
3.2.2.9 |
Whilst
many of the blackspots are located in urban
areas and follow patterns of built development,
there are also rural sites including illegal
uses such as container storage yards. EPD
has published guidelines for the investigation
and remediation of three types of site where
former land uses involving petrol filling
stations, boatyards and vehicle repair/dismantling
workshops may have given rise to land contamination
(EPD 1999a). While this programme is driven
by the need to liberate land for development,
remediation of such areas undoubtedly will
benefit the environmental health and safety
conditions and amenity value of the area.
|
|
|
3.2.2.10 |
In
addition to identified black spot areas,
littering and illegal disposal of refuse
(fly tipping) in Country Parks is also a
continuing pressure on land resources. Litter
collected within Hong Kong's country parks
has remained steady in recent years between
3,600 tonnes in 1991/92 and 3,400 tonnes
in 1997/98, whilst visitor numbers have
grown during this period from 10.2 million
to 10.7 million per year. Although these
figures are clearly a function of effort
as well as of the mass of waste disposed,
regular media reports of the problem of
litter indicate that conditions are not
improving. Unauthorised waste disposal on
both large and small scales in Hong Kong
is causing despoilation of the landscape
(natural resources capital stock), health
risks (assimilative capacity natural stock),
and hazards to wildlife (ecological resources
capital stock). Litter in the terrestrial
and marine environment is discussed in Paragraph
4.3.2.9 and 4.3.3.7 respectively) and
waste disposal issues are discussed in Section
3.5 - Solid Waste.
|
|
|
|
3.2.3 |
Sustainability
Appraisal |
|
|
|
3.2.3.1
|
An
evaluation of the sustainability of Hong
Kong's land resources comprises both the
sustainability of land supply and the sustainability
of the land uses applied to the current
available stock of land (see Figure
3.2e for a summary of issues associated
with the land use and land supply capital
stock). The natural resources capital stock
provided by the availability and characteristics
of Hong Kong's land resources include a
diverse range of developed areas, natural
and managed habitats and urban open space.
These natural resource features not only
provide valuable areas for expansion of
the human built environment, but also constitute
the foundation of many ecological, assimilative
capacity, heritage, landscape and recreational
values in Hong Kong. When managing land
supply and land use it is essential to appreciate
the multiple benefits that particular areas,
and the land resources as a whole, may embody.
|
|
|
3.2.3.2 |
Consideration
of land use issues is often dominated by
the provision of land for development. Given
the growing population of Hong Kong, its
demand for development, and the finite land
resources suitable for development in the
SAR, it is apparent that the demands cannot
continue to be sustained at current rates
without significant erosion of the natural
resources capital stock as a whole. These
pressures and conflicts will continue to
test the strength of designated protection
for land conservation areas. For these reasons,
it is essential to value the true worth
of protected areas, through scientific research
and public education, and to ensure that
all critically important areas are adequately
protected under the existing planning and
policy frameworks. Where land is approved
for development it is crucial that on-site
and off-site impacts are minimised whenever
possible through such means as efficient
use of space, provision of environmentally
sensitive features and proper attention
to works control and monitoring.
|
|
|
3.2.3.3 |
Without
the above measures it is likely that additional
valuable natural resource features will
be lost unless alternatives can be found
to ease development pressures by substituting
other areas for development. Alternatives
to development of natural land include reclamation
or urban renewal, although neither option
is without its drawbacks. Another alternative
would involve explicit or tacit diversion
of development into the regional hinterland
(ie Guangdong Province). However, this option
would likely have important implications
for Hong Kong's economy and society and
would require close liaison with the Mainland's
authorities. These issues will be addressed
by the next Territorial Development Strategy,
the review of which will begin shortly.
|
|
|
3.2.3.4 |
In
summary, as it is not possible to sustain
the stock of land supply in Hong Kong indefinitely,
alternatives to continued development of
natural areas in the SAR will ultimately
need to be identified. In the meantime,
the stock of available land resources can
be maximised by environmentally sensitive
planning, wise use of existing land resources
to promote re-development, and avoidance
of uses which permanently damage or degrade
lands. Weighing the importance of conserving
an area against the benefits of developing
it should be based on a holistic valuation
of all capital stock functions (ie natural
resource, ecological, assimilative capacity
and heritage) provided by land resources.
|
|
|
|