SECTION
5 ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY CAPITAL STOCK
5.3 |
Assimilative
Capacity of Freshwater Systems |
|
|
|
5.3.4 |
Sustainability
Appraisal |
|
|
|
5.3.4.1 |
The
preceding review of the quality of watercourses
in Hong Kong and the trends in pollutant
levels indicates that whilst many of the
rivers are still not compliant with each
individual WQO, significant improvements
in water quality have been achieved in recent
years, and the overall compliance level
has steadily increased. Much of this improvement
can be attributed to extension of the sewerage
network to rural areas previously unserved
by sewers or treatment plant, improvements
in agricultural and chemical waste management,
as well as a decline in agricultural intensity
generally. Implementation of further work
programmed in the SMPs should continue to
bring about benefits through reduced organic
pollutant loadings.
|
|
|
5.3.4.2 |
Nevertheless,
a number of issues threaten the long term
quality and assimilative capacity of freshwater
systems in Hong Kong. Pollution of watercourses
through illegal dumping of waste materials
(see Paragraph 5.3.3.1) and contravention
of discharge consents poses a threat to
enhancement of assimilative capacity. Measures
to address these problems lie either in
encouraging better practice and environmental
protection through education programmes
or through penalising offenders through
stiffer fines and greater enforcement of
regulations. Abstraction of freshwater from
rivers (also see Paragraph 4.2.1.27) for
use in irrigation, homes and industry also
affects water quality, particularly during
dry weather conditions when river flows
are already low. Further abstraction of
water results in reduced dilution capacity
such that in some cases, the dry season
flows of rivers are largely made up of effluent
discharges.
|
|
|
5.3.4.3 |
The
alteration and conversion of natural streams
to drainage channels enhances the natural
capacity of freshwaters to assimilate floodwaters
and drainage, but can result in water quality
impacts. In addition, channelisation results
in a loss of ecological capital stock since
drainage channels (which are usually constructed
from flat concrete) cannot be colonised
by normal stream assemblages of flora and
fauna. Unless more advanced channel designs
which allow for some ecological mitigation
are used, this process is simply substituting
ecological capital stock for assimilative
capital stock. There are examples of EIA
studies which have resulted in drainage
channel designs which provide for ecological
mitigation, such as the Main Drainage Channels
for Yuen Long and Kam Tin which feature
specially constructed mangrove platforms.
|
|
|
5.3.4.4 |
In
addition, the development of drainage works
to relieve flooding or provide for urbanisation
in areas of the north west New Territories
also has implications for ecological capital
in Hong Kong. Since these wetland areas are
of particular ecological importance (see Paragraphs
4.2.1.23 - 4.2.1.26, Terrestrial Habitats
and Species), the effects of new works on
habitats such as wetlands, fish ponds and
gei wais should be considered at a strategic
level (eg through Stormwater Drainage Master
Plans) as well as through individual project
level assessment such as EIA. |
|
|
|