香港特別行政區政府 環境保護署
香港品牌形象
搜尋 網頁指南 聯絡我們
圖像
主頁
環評與規劃
環境影響評估條例
網上環評
關於環評與規劃
策略性環境評估
環境管理工具
指引與參考資料
搜尋此部份
環境保護互動中心 部門刊物 環保標準及統計資料
空氣 廢物 環評與規劃
噪音 水質 環境保育
空白 主目錄 空白

研究報告

SECTION 5 ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY CAPITAL STOCK

5.3 Assimilative Capacity of Freshwater Systems
   
5.3.4 Sustainability Appraisal
   
5.3.4.1

The preceding review of the quality of watercourses in Hong Kong and the trends in pollutant levels indicates that whilst many of the rivers are still not compliant with each individual WQO, significant improvements in water quality have been achieved in recent years, and the overall compliance level has steadily increased. Much of this improvement can be attributed to extension of the sewerage network to rural areas previously unserved by sewers or treatment plant, improvements in agricultural and chemical waste management, as well as a decline in agricultural intensity generally. Implementation of further work programmed in the SMPs should continue to bring about benefits through reduced organic pollutant loadings.

   
5.3.4.2

Nevertheless, a number of issues threaten the long term quality and assimilative capacity of freshwater systems in Hong Kong. Pollution of watercourses through illegal dumping of waste materials (see Paragraph 5.3.3.1) and contravention of discharge consents poses a threat to enhancement of assimilative capacity. Measures to address these problems lie either in encouraging better practice and environmental protection through education programmes or through penalising offenders through stiffer fines and greater enforcement of regulations. Abstraction of freshwater from rivers (also see Paragraph 4.2.1.27) for use in irrigation, homes and industry also affects water quality, particularly during dry weather conditions when river flows are already low. Further abstraction of water results in reduced dilution capacity such that in some cases, the dry season flows of rivers are largely made up of effluent discharges.

   
5.3.4.3

The alteration and conversion of natural streams to drainage channels enhances the natural capacity of freshwaters to assimilate floodwaters and drainage, but can result in water quality impacts. In addition, channelisation results in a loss of ecological capital stock since drainage channels (which are usually constructed from flat concrete) cannot be colonised by normal stream assemblages of flora and fauna. Unless more advanced channel designs which allow for some ecological mitigation are used, this process is simply substituting ecological capital stock for assimilative capital stock. There are examples of EIA studies which have resulted in drainage channel designs which provide for ecological mitigation, such as the Main Drainage Channels for Yuen Long and Kam Tin which feature specially constructed mangrove platforms.

   
5.3.4.4 In addition, the development of drainage works to relieve flooding or provide for urbanisation in areas of the north west New Territories also has implications for ecological capital in Hong Kong. Since these wetland areas are of particular ecological importance (see Paragraphs 4.2.1.23 - 4.2.1.26, Terrestrial Habitats and Species), the effects of new works on habitats such as wetlands, fish ponds and gei wais should be considered at a strategic level (eg through Stormwater Drainage Master Plans) as well as through individual project level assessment such as EIA.

 

Back to topBackTable of ContentNext

 

   
 
2005 版權標誌| 重要告示

最近修訂日期: 二零零五年十二月二十二日