Table
7.1f Rationate for Ecological Value Adjustiment
of Freshwater/ Brackish Wetland Habitats
based on Field Surveys |
Site
No.
|
Site
Name
|
Sub-site |
Ecological
Value After Field Assessment
|
Rationale
for Ecological
Value Re-adjustment |
43 |
Nam
Sha Po |
c |
Medium |
Habitat
was small in size (< 0.01ha) and supported
comparatively low species diversity. Water
was highly turbid and black in colour.
The odour of hydrogen sulphide was noted. |
44 |
Pak
Nai |
j |
Medium |
Habitat
was very small in size (<10-4 ha) and
supported comparatively low species diversity. |
q |
Medium |
Water
was highly turbid and dark brown in colour. |
46 |
Tai
Lam Chung |
p |
Medium |
Habitat
was small in size (< 0.01ha) and supported
comparatively low species diversity. |
47 |
Kam
Tin |
a |
Medium |
Habitat
was adversely affected by urban development
as part of the wetland had been cleared
for development purposes. |
48 |
Ma
On Kong |
i |
Medium |
Water
was highly turbid and dark brown in colour.
The odour of hydrogen sulphide was noted.
Part of the sub-site had been filled for
development. |
50 |
Fanling |
d |
Medium |
Habitat
was small in size (< 0.01ha) and supported
comparatively low species diversity. |
g |
Medium |
Part
of the sub-site had been cleared for development.
Habitat was small in size (< 0.01ha)
and supported comparatively low species
diversity. |
51 |
Ting
Kok |
e |
Medium |
Part
of the sub-site had been cleared for development. |
52 |
Shap
Sze Heung |
b |
Medium |
Part
of the sub-site had been cleared for development. |
53 |
Ho
Chung |
h |
Medium |
Water
was black in colour and the odour of hydrogen
sulphide was noted. Part of the sub-site
had been cleared for development. Habitat
was also disturbed by rubbish dumping. |
54 |
Pan
Long Wan |
a |
Medium |
Part
of the sub-site had been cleared for development. |
b |
Medium |
Habitat
was small in size (< 0.01ha) and supported
comparatively low species diversity. Water
was brown in colour. |
61 |
South
Lantau |
i |
Medium |
Water
was highly turbid and brown in colour.
The odour of hydrogen sulphide was noted.
Part of the sub-site had been cleared for
development. Habitat was also disturbed
by rubbish dumping. |
k |
Medium |
Habitat
was very small in size (<10-4 ha) and
supported comparatively low species diversity. |
q |
Medium |
Habitat
disturbed by rubbish dumping and supported
comparatively low species diversity. |
163 |
Sham
Chung |
d |
Medium |
Habitat
had been adversely affected by development
and part of the sub-site area had been
cleared for construction purposes. |
165 |
Sheung
Miu Tin |
a |
Medium |
Habitat
was small in size (< 0.01ha) and supported
comparatively low species diversity. |
Table
7.1g Rationale for Ecological Value Adjustment
of Re-identified Freshwater/ Brackish
Wetland Habitats based on Field Surveys |
Site
No. |
Site
Name |
Sub-site |
Initially
Mapped Habitat Type |
Ecological
Value After Field Assessment
|
Rationale
for Ecological Value Re-adjustment |
120 |
Kat
Hing Wai |
s |
Fishpond/
Gei Wai |
Medium |
Habitat
supported comparatively low species diversity
and was adversely affected by development. |
121 |
Kam
Tin |
g |
Fishpond/
Gei Wai |
Medium |
Habitat
supported comparatively low species diversity
and was affected by pollution as indicated
by the black-coloured, odorous waters. |
h |
|
Medium |
Habitat
supported comparatively low species diversity. |
j |
|
Medium |
Habitat
supported comparatively low species diversity. |
p |
|
Medium |
Habitat
supported comparatively low species diversity. |
122 |
Ngau
Tam Mei |
a |
|
Medium |
Habitat
supported comparatively low species diversity. |
g |
|
Medium |
Habitat
supported comparatively low species diversity
and was affected by pollution as indicated
by the highly turbid, dark-coloured waters. |