香港特別行政區政府 環境保護署
香港品牌形象
搜尋 網頁指南 聯絡我們
圖像
主頁
環評與規劃
環境影響評估條例
網上環評
關於環評與規劃
策略性環境評估
環境管理工具
指引與參考資料
搜尋此部份
環境保護互動中心 部門刊物 環保標準及統計資料
空氣 廢物 環評與規劃
噪音 水質 環境保育
空白 主目錄 空白

研究報告

Chapter 7 ECOLOGICAL FIELD SURVEY RESULTS - ECOLOGICAL VALUE ASSESSMENT

7.1 ECOLOGICAL VALUE ADJUSTMENT BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS
   
 
7.1.7 Mangrove (Indicative Ecological Value: High)
   
 

Most of the mangrove sites were considered high ecological value after field assessment as they supported moderate to high species diversity, and were subject to little or no human disturbance. The largest patch of mangrove surveyed was located at Pak Nai (Site 77) which comprised approximately 4.5 ha of land area. The mangrove at So Lo Pun was found to be densely vegetated with mangrove trees and supported high species diversity. Some mangrove patches, though small in size, eg Tai Ho Wan (Site 80), supported a comparable species diversity to those of larger sizes (eg So Lo Pun) and, therefore, a high ecological value was assigned.

Some habitats were found to have been disturbed by villagers, eg Pak Nai where some mangrove trees were cut to make a path to the mudflat located on the seaward side of the mangrove. The large mangrove patch at Tai O is also subject to disturbance from footpath reconstruction.

The mangrove at Tai Tam has been reported to have totally disappeared based on the field visit conducted in May 1996 (Tam and Wong 1997). However, the mangrove there (Site 82) was found during the field surveys for this Study to support a number of mangrove species, diverse epifauna, and was free from human disturbance. Despite its small size, the habitat is believed to be expanding as many tree mangrove seedlings, especially Excoecaria agallocha, were observed (see Table G7 of Annex G for details).

Some of the identified mangrove sites have had their ecological value downgraded to medium because of the severe disturbance from pollution or development that the habitats are subject to (Table 7.1i). The mangrove at Yuen Long, in particular, had been adversely affected by urban development and only a small patch was observed during the field visit.

Table 7.1i Rationale for Ecological Value Adjustment of Mangrove Habitats based on Field Surveys
Site No. Site Name Sub-site

Ecological Value After Field Assessment

Rationate for Ecological Value Re-adjustment
76 Yuen Long a Medium Odorous and black-coloured water was seen flowing from nearby areas to the mangrove habitat. Part of the sediment substratum was black in colour (indicating anoxic conditions).
78 Tai O b Medium Habitat disturbed by rubbish dumping and supported comparatively low epifaunal species diversity. Part of the sub-site was cleared for development.
79 San Tau & Tung Chung a Medium Highly turbid water flowing into the habitat area.
c Medium Part of the habitat had been adversely affected by urban development. Highly turbid waters were seen flowing into the habitat area. Disturbance due to visitors and bulldozer was observed.
d Medium Part of the habitat had been adversely affected by urban development. Highly turbid waters were seen flowing into the habitat area. Habitat supported comparatively low epifaunal species diversity.
e Medium Part of the habitat had been cleared for development.
83 Pak Sha Wan a Medium Highly turbid waters were seen flowing into the habitat area. Habitat supported comparatively low epifaunal species diversity.
b Medium Highly turbid waters were seen flowing into the habitat area. Habitat supported comparatively low epifaunal species diversity.
84 Wong Chuk Wan a Medium

Habitat supported comparatively low epifaunal species diversity.

   
Back to topBackTable of ContentNext

 

   
 
2005 版權標誌| 重要告示

最近修訂日期: 二零零五年十二月二十二日