VOCs
The
average concentrations of VOCs between winter
and summer at the three monitoring stations are
shown in Figure 4.2g.
Winter to summer VOC concentration ratios are
listed in Table 4.2a.
Most
of the VOC concentrations in the winter were higher
than those measured in the summer, with the winter
to summer VOC concentration ratios being larger
than 1. Since these five pollutants were mainly
from vehicle exhaust and the evaporation of fuels,
the higher temperatures in summer increased the
evaporation of VOCs and solar radiation increased
the photochemical reaction rates and thus decreased
the concentrations of VOCs.
In
general, there were many possible reasons that
could have affected the concentrations of VOCs
in the winter and in the summer. More rainy days
in the summertime caused a washout effect of pollutants,
thus accumulation of VOCs was less than that in
the wintertime. VOCs can also be removed from
the particulates under dry and wet deposition.
Chemical removal, especially by Hydroxide (OH)
radicals, is important during the summertime.
But the distance to the emission source is also
a crucial factor influencing the concentration
levels. The nearer to the emission source, the
less influencing certain factors become, like
the washout effect and photochemical reactions.
Therefore, it should be noted that the ratio varies
depending on whichever factor(s) dominates at
that particular station.
Table
4.2a Winter to Summer VOC Concentration
Ratios
|
VOCs
(ugm-3) |
Central/Western |
Tsuen
Wan |
PolyU
|
1,3-butadiene |
1.11 |
0.85 |
0.49 |
Tetrachloroethylene |
1.31 |
1.49 |
0.75 |
Benzene
|
2.03 |
1.55 |
1.06 |
Methyl
chloride
|
2.08 |
0.79 |
1.24 |
Trichloroethylene |
0.68 |
0.88 |
0.81 |
Carbonyls
The
average concentrations of carbonyls between winter
(November to February) and summer (May to August)
at the three monitoring stations are shown in
Figure 4.2h. Winter
to summer carbonyls concentration ratios were
listed in Table 4.2b.
There
are many potential factors that could affect the
concentrations of carbonyls in the winter and
in the summer. Both ratios at PolyU station were
less than 1, which means the concentrations of
carbonyls were higher in summer than those in
winter. There might have been a potential source
for carbonyls at PolyU station during summertime
that resulted in the higher concentrations when
compared to wintertime. Acetaldehyde and formaldehyde
are very volatile organic compounds and so the
higher temperatures in summer may have increased
the evaporation of carbonyls. Furthermore, acetaldehyde
and formaldehyde might be the by-product of photochemical
reactions under high solar radiation in summer.
This indicates that chemical photooxidation is
one of the most important secondary sources of
acetaldehyde and formaldehyde.
Table
4.2b Winter to Summer Carbonyls Concentration
Ratios
|
Carbonlvs
(ugm-3) |
Central/Western |
Tsuen
Wan |
PolyU
|
Acetaldehyde |
1.54 |
1.15 |
0.54 |
Formaldehyde |
1.14 |
0.89 |
0.48 |
PAHs
The
average concentrations of PAHs between winter
and summer at the three monitoring stations are
shown in Figure 4.2i.
Winter to summer PAHs concentration ratios are
listed in Table 4.2c.
All
PAHs concentrations in the winter were higher
than those measured in the summer. The winter
to summer PAH concentration ratios were larger
than 1, the ratios at Central/Western and Tsuen
Wan station were even larger than 2. The high
concentrations of PAHs during winter at Central/Western
and Tsuen Wan station were probably due to less
photochemical degradation of PAHs in the atmospheric
environment. These reactions are dependent on
the intensity of solar radiation received and
the prevailing wind speed. More rainy days in
the summertime causes the washout effect of pollutants.
This effect is significant for PAHs because PAHs
are attached to the particulate, therefore the
concentrations of PAHs are low after a rainy day,
especially when the stations are not near to the
source (Central/Western and Tsuen Wan station).
For PolyU station, the winter to summer ratios
were less than the other two stations. This could
have been because it was situated near the source
(on-road vehicles) so that the washout effect
was minimized.
Table
4.2c Winter to Summer PAH Concentration
Ratios
|
PAHs
(ngm-3) |
Central/Western |
Tsuen
Wan |
PolyU |
Anthracene |
3.15 |
5.16 |
1.18 |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
2.85 |
2.94 |
1.08 |
Benzo(a)pyrenne
|
6.15 |
2.98 |
1.28 |
Chrysene
|
3.00 |
2.47 |
1.99 |
|