An
examination of the dataset revealed that the concentration
of TBT in sediments taken from most of the sampling
stations were reported below the analytical detection
limit of 20 mg Sn kg-1 dry weight. Figure
2.3b shows the mean concentration of TBT detected
in sediments collected from each sampling station
during the December 1998, January, June and August
1999 surveys.
Sediments
from 7 of the 10 sampling stations were reported
as containing TBT concentrations at or below the
analytical detection limit. The three stations
which reported values above the detection limit
during at least one of the four sampling periods
were VS3 in Victoria Harbour (20.8, 36.2, 34.6
and 46.6 mg Sn kg-1 in December 1998, January,
June and August 1999, respectively); WS1 which
is located south of Tsing Yi (81.8, 103.0, 107.0
and 93.0 mg Sn kg-1 in December 1998, January,
June and August 1999, respectively); and, Station
NS4 located in Urmston Road where TBT in sediments
was found at 39.2 mg Sn kg-1 during August 1999
sampling. TBT was reported below detection limits
(ie 20.0 mg Sn kg-1 dry weight) at Station NS4
in the three previous surveys conducted.
The
routine monitoring dataset gathered by EPD on
sediment chemistry does not include measurement
of TBT levels. No ERL, LCEL or ISQV-Low values
are presently available for TBT and levels found
above detection limits in these surveys cannot
be given either non-exceedance (ie uncontaminated)
or exceedance (ie contaminated) criteria. TBT
concentrations determined in this Study may, however,
be compared with datasets obtained in previous
studies in Hong Kong. Data are available from
a variety of other studies and these have been
compared with the data gathered during the Environmental
Baseline Surveys. Other datasets compared consisted
of the following studies:
-
Tributyltin
Contamination in Coastal Sediments in Hong
Kong(13)) ;
-
Strategic
Sediment Sampling Program (SSSP)(14)) ; and,
-
A
Study of Tributyltin Contamination of the
Marine Environment in Hong Kong(15)) .
The
majority of samples collected during the above
studies were taken from sites suspected of being
contaminated with TBT, such as typhoon shelters,
marinas, marine traffic areas, mooring areas and
container terminals. The studies also sampled
reference areas, however, that were supposedly
remote from sources of possible TBT contamination.
These locations included areas such as the West
Lamma Channel (EPD Station SS3), southern Lamma
(within the South Lamma Potential Marine Park
/ Marine Reserve) and outer Tathong Channel (EPD
Station ES2 that was also sampled in the present
study).
Concentrations
of TBT at stations VS3 and WS1 were similar to
those recorded from other moderately contaminated
sites sampled in the above studies such as Stonecutters
Island (84 mg Sn kg-1), but less than sites where
TBT contamination was considered high, eg Causeway
Bay Typhoon Shelter (11,618 mg Sn kg-1), Aberdeen
Marina (3,468 mg Sn kg-1) and the Rambler Channel
(1,970 mg Sn kg-1).
The
environmental significance of the TBT values recorded
in the present Study are discussed in more detail
in Section 4.2.
(6)EVS
(1996) Review of Contaminated Mud Disposal Strategy
and Status Report on Contaminated Mud Disposal
Facility at East Sha Chau. Prepared for CED.
(7)Long
ER et al (1996) Development and evaluation of
sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal
waters. Ecotoxicology. Cited in EVS 1996 Op cit.
(8)Mouchel
(1996) Strategic Sewage Disposal Scheme Stage
I, Baseline Monitoring and Verification. EM&A
Manual EPD.
(9)EVS
(1996) 1996 Strategic Sediment Sampling Programme
(SSSP): Interpretive Report (Final). Prepared
for CED.
(10)The
factor 'period' has been nested within 'station'
because differences between months at a predefined
station are of interest but comparisons between
months at different stations are not.
(11)The
detection of significant differences requires
less power when using a fixed factor model than
a random factor model as the analyses utilises
degrees of freedom associated with the residual
term (the highest degrees of freedom) as the enominator
is in the test. The denominator in a random factor
model will be one of the other specified factors
in the test and consequently will have lower degrees
of freedom.
(12)Underwood
AJ (1997) Experiments in Ecology: their logical
design and interpretation using analysis of variance.
(13)CES
Asia (1995) Tributyltin Contamination in Coastal
Sediments in Hong Kong. Report for EPD.
(14)EVS
(1997) Op cit.
(15)Aspinwall
(1998) A Study of Tributyltin Contamination of
the Marine Environment in Hong Kong. Final Report
for EPD.
|