4.               Noise

4.1             Introduction

4.1.1         This section presents the assessment on the potential airborne noise impacts that are likely to be generated during the construction and operation phases of the both the upgrading of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS and the sewers works of the Project.  Appropriate mitigation measures were identified to mitigate the potential noise impacts as far as practicable.

4.1.2         This assessment has based on the criteria and guidelines for evaluation and assessment of air quality impacts as stated in Annexes 5 and 13 of the EIAO-TM and has covered the scope outlined in Section 3.4.3 of the EIA Study Brief. 

4.2             Relevant Legislations, Standards and Guidelines

4.2.1         Noise impacts have been assessed in accordance with the criteria and methodology given in the Technical Memoranda issued under the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO) and Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO).

4.2.2         The NCO provides the statutory framework for noise control.  This defines statutory limits applicable to equipment used during the construction and operation phases of the proposed works in the study area.  The NCO invokes four Technical Memoranda, which define the technical means for noise assessment:

Ÿ    Technical Memorandum on Noise from Places other than Domestic Premises, Public Places or Construction Sites (IND-TM):

Ÿ    Technical Memorandum on Noise from Construction Work in Designated Areas (DA-TM);

Ÿ    Technical Memorandum on Noise from Construction Work other than Percussive Piling (GW-TM); and

Ÿ    Technical Memorandum on Noise from Percussive Piling (PP-TM).

4.2.3         The NCO and the accompanying Technical Memoranda provide a mechanism for assessing noise levels and the statutory power to control noise.

Construction Noise

4.2.4         Noise impact arising from general construction activities other than percussive pilling during the daytime period (0700-1900 hours of any day not being a Sunday or public holiday) shall be assessed against the noise standards given in Annex 5 of EIAO-TM, which is tabulated in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 : Noise Standards for Daytime Construction Activities

Noise Sensitive Uses

0700 to 1900 hours on any day not being a
Sunday or general holiday, Leq (30 min), dB(A)

Domestic premises, hotels and hostel

75

Educational institutions (normal teaching periods)

70

Educational institutions (examination periods)

65

Notes:

1)   The above noise standards apply to uses, which rely on opened windows for ventilation.

2)   The above standards shall be viewed as the maximum permissible noise levels assessed at 1m from the external facade.

3)   The above standards shall be met as far as possible.  All practicable mitigation measures shall be exhausted and the residual impacts are minimized.

Operational Noise

4.2.5         Fixed noise sources associated with STW and SPS are controlled by Section 13 of the NCO.  For the assessment of fixed noise sources, the area sensitivity rating (ASR) of the noise sensitive receivers (NSRs) will be determined in accordance with the IND-TM.  Based on the ASR, the appropriate Acceptable Noise Levels (ANLs) can be determined.

4.2.6         The Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) is a function of the type of area within which the NSR is located, and the degree of the effect on the NSR of influencing factors such as major roads and industrial areas.  According to the IND-TM, the ANLs for different Area Sensitivity Rating (ASR) of noise sensitive receivers (NSRs) are given in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 : Acceptable Noise Levels

Time Period

ASR A

ASR B

ASR C

All days during the evening (1900 to 2300 hours), and general holidays (including Sundays) during the day-time and evening (0700 to 2300 hours)

60

65

70

All days during the night-time (2300 to 0700 hours)

50

55

65

 

4.2.7         More stringent criteria for fixed plant noise impacts recommended in Table 1A of the EIAO-TM for planning purposes are as follow:

Ÿ    5 dB(A) below the appropriate ANL set out in the IND-TM (the ANL–5 dB(A) criterion), or

Ÿ    The prevailing background noise level where the prevailing background noise level is 5 dB(A) below the appropriate ANL (although during the operation the NCO will be the controlling legislation).

4.2.8         The above-mentioned second criterion would generally apply to areas with low ambient noise levels such as rural and suburban areas.  In view of no major nearby noise sources such as road and rail traffic, noise sensitive receivers near Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS would be subject to low ambient noise levels which could be lower than the ANL-5dB(A) criterion.  The type of area containing the STW and SPS is considered to be “Rural Area” that is not affected by any influencing factors (IF).  This represents ASR ”A” with an ANL-5dB(A) criterion of 45 dB(A) for the nighttime (23:00 to 07:00 hours) and 55 dB(A) in the daytime and evening (07:00 to 19:00 hours, and 19:00 to 23:00 hours, respectively).

4.2.9         In order to determine the appropriate criteria for noise assessment, background noise measurements at representative sensitive receivers in the vicinity of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS were conducted in October 2011.  For those sensitive receivers which were found to experience to prevailing noise levels lower than the ANL-5dB(A) criterion, fixed plant noise impact were assessed against the prevailing background noise levels.

4.2.10      In any event, the Area Sensitivity Rating assumed in this EIA Report is for indicative assessment only.  Therefore, the Noise Control Authority shall determine noise impact from concerned fixed noise sources on the basis of prevailing legislation and practices being in force, and taking account of contemporary conditions/situations of adjoining land uses.  Nothing in the EIA study shall bind the Noise Control Authority in the context of law enforcement against any of the fixed noise sources being assessed.

4.3             Description of the Existing Noise Environment

4.3.1         Cheung Chau is situated at southeast of Lantau Island.  It is a densely populated outlying island.  Cheung Chau contains mostly developed areas including commercial uses, residential villages and community facilities. 

4.3.2         Cheung Chau is generally car-free except the common used transportation within the island by village vehicles called “VV vehicle” and the emergency vehicles.  These are considered to be the dominant noise sources within the study area.  There are also human noises arising from commercial activities centred near the ferry pier and Tung Wan Beach.  The ambient noise level increases slightly with more tourist activities during weekends and festivals.

Background Noise Measurements

4.3.3         Background noise measurements were conducted for the determination of noise criteria as discussed in Section 4.2.8.

4.3.4         Continuous free-field noise measurements were conducted in October 2011 to investigate the prevailing noise levels in the study areas.  The noise measurement locations are shown in Figure 4.1.  The noise measurements were conducted according to the operation period of the facilities, and therefore the noise results are considered to be representative to the background noise at the noise sensitive receivers.

4.3.5         The noise measurements were conducted using B&K Type 2238 Sound Level Meter (Type 1) and were calibrated using B&K Sound Level Calibrator Type 4231 with a calibration signal of 94.0 dB(A) at 1kHz.  The measurements were conducted with reference to the calibration and measurement procedures as stated in the IND-TM.  A summary of background noise measurement results is given in Table 4.3.

Table 4.3 : Background Noise Measurement Results

Measurement Location

Measured Noise Level(1), Leq(30 min) (daytime / nighttime), dB(A)

Area Sensitivity Rating
(ASR)

ANL-5 dB(A) (daytime / nighttime), dB(A)

Recommended Operational Noise Assessment Criteria (daytime / nighttime), dB(A)

Near Cheung Chau STW -
at Cheung Shun House

53 / 54

A

55 / 45

53 / 45

Near Pak She SPS -
at Cheung Chau Fire Station

56 / 53

A

55 / 45

55 / 45

Note:

(1) A façade correction of +3 dB(A) has been included.

4.4             Construction Noise Impact Assessment

Noise Sources Identification

4.4.1         Key noise generating activities during the construction phase are summarized in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4 : Summary of related Works Type

Works Type

Description of
Works Type

Works Type 1

Construction of Sewer (Open Cut Method)

Works Type 2

Construction of Sewer (Trenchless Method)

Works Type 3

Upgrading of Existing Sewer

Works Type 4

Upgrading of Pak She Sewage Pumping Station

Works Type 5

Upgrading of Cheung Chau Sewage Treatment Works

Works Type 6

Rehabilitation of Existing Sewer

Works Type 7

Temporary Concrete Mixing (within Cheung Chau STW)

 

4.4.2         The works type and the various works stages involved are given in Table 4.5 together with the estimated duration.  No restricted hours works are expected to be required for the construction of the Project.

4.4.3         In collaboration with the design engineer and the Project Proponent and based on the findings from the Review Phase, an inventory of project specific powered mechanical equipment required has been developed for each works type which is considered to be appropriate and practical for completing works within the proposed works programme, and are detailed in Appendix 4.1.  The associated worst-case sound power levels (SWLs) of the different works stages are also provided
in
Table 4.5.

4.4.4         Whilst it is possible that the future appointed contractor may propose a different plant inventory, this assessment has been undertaken on the anticipated plant to allow early identification of any potential noise problem and to ensure there are practicable and sufficient noise mitigation measures that can be implemented to alleviate adverse noise impacts.  The contractor will be required to provide and implement sufficient direct noise mitigation measures based on the recommendation in this EIA to achieve acceptable noise levels on the nearby NSRs.

Table 4.5 : Construction Activities Schedule

Works Stage

Construction Activities

Calculated Worst-case SWL, dB(A)

Works Type 1 - Construction of Sewer (Open Cut Method)

Stage 1

Breaking up of road surface

103

Stage 2

Excavation of soil material

95

Stage 3

Steel fixing & concreting of manholes

110

Stage 4

Laying of bedding material

113

Stage 5

Backfilling and soil compaction

102

Stage 6

Reinstatement of road surface

113

Works Type 2 - Construction of Sewer (Trenchless Method) (Intervals between 2 manholes)

Stage 1

Excavation of Pits

122

Stage 2

Jacking of pipes

118

Stage 3

Steel fixing and concreting of manholes

110

Stage 4

Reinstatement of road surface with bricks

No PME involved

Works Type 3 - Upgrading of Existing Sewer

Stage 1

Breaking up of road surface

103

Stage 2

Excavation of soil material

95

Stage 3

Removal of existing sewers and laying of new sewers

94

Stage 4

Steel fixing & concreting of manholes

110

Stage 5

Laying of bedding materials

113

Stage 6

Backfilling and soil compaction

102

Stage 7

Reinstatement of road surface

110

Works Type 4 - Upgrading of Pak She Sewage Pumping Station

Stage 1

Partial removal of existing structure

122

Stage 2

Partial reconstruction of structures

119

Stage 3

Replacement of E&M equipments

112

Works Type 5 - Upgrading of Cheung Chau Sewage Treatment Works

Stage 1

Demolish the abandoned filter beds

123

Stage 2

Modification and diversion of pipework

123

Stage 3

Construction and upgrading of treatment facilities

123

Stage 4

Construction of the new pump house

123

Stage 5

Demolish of primary sedimentation tanks & sludge digestor

122

Stage 6

Construction of the new storm tanks and workshop

123

Works Type 6 - Rehabilitation of Existing Sewers (for 20 meters)

Stage 1

Rehabilitation of existing sewer

104

Works Type 7 - Temporary Concrete Mixing

Stage 1

Operation of concrete mixer

96

Notes:

1)   The various stages involved for each work type will not be undertaken concurrently.

2)   Note that works programme is subject to variables such as weather, conflicts with utilities, etc. and is variable upon these conditions.

3)   “SWL” is the calculated worst-case total sound power level due to the operation of the plant inventory for that works stage based on the unmitigated scenario.

Noise Sensitive Receivers

4.4.5         Representative noise sensitive receivers (NSRs), both existing and planned ones, within 300 m of the Project boundary were identified, according to the criteria set out in Annex 13 of EIAO-TM, observations from site visits and review of latest approved Cheung Chau Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/I-CC/5 and information available in the Statutory Planning Portal of the Town Planning Board (TPB). 

4.4.6         NSRs located closest to the noise sources, i.e., the first layer of NSR, have been considered as the most critical locations.  Figure 4.2 to Figure 4.15 show the locations of the NSRs.  Table 4.6 presents a summary of representative NSRs selected for the noise assessments and photographs of these NRSs are provided in Appendix 4.2.

Table 4.6 : Representative Noise Sensitive Receivers (Construction Phase)

NSR

Description of NSR

Nature of Use

No. of Floor

Figure No.

Construction Phase Works Type that will Affect the NSR

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

TKST2

No.4 Tai Kwai San Tsuen

Residential

2

4.2

--

--

--

--

--

--

CSH1*

Chung Shak Hei Home for the Aged

Homes for the Aged

2

4.3

--

--

--

--

--

--

CKH*

Cheung King House

Residential

4

4.4

--

--

--

--

--

CSH2*

Cheung Shun House

Residential

4

4.4

--

--

--

--

--

PSSL*

No. 1A Pak She Second Lane

Residential

3

4.5

--

--

--

--

--

--

CCEP

No.7 Cheung Chau Electric Path

Residential

3

4.6

--

--

--

--

--

--

ST

Block D Seaview Terrence

Residential

3

4.8

--

--

--

--

--

--

SW1

3A Golden Lake Garden

Residential

3

4.7

--

--

--

--

--

THT

No.24 Tai Hing Tai Road

Residential

3

4.7

--

--

--

--

--

SYT1

No.2A Sin Yan Tseng

Residential

2

4.8

--

--

--

--

--

--

SYT2

No.37 Sin Yan Tseng

Residential

2

4.8

--

--

--

--

--

--

P1

No. 34 Praya Street

Residential

3

4.9

--

--

--

--

--

TW1

Cheung Chau Fisheries Joint Association Public School

Educational

2

4.9

--

--

--

--

TSB1

No. 123 Tai San Back Street

Residential

3

4.10

--

--

--

--

--

--

LTT1

Cheung Chau Alliance Church

Church

2

4.11

--

--

--

--

--

--

LTT2

No.35 Lung Tsai Tsuen Road

Residential

3

4.11

--

--

--

--

--

--

P2

No.41A Peak Road

Residential

3

4.11

--

--

--

--

--

--

KYW1

No.31 Kwun Yam Wan Road

Residential

2

4.12

--

--

--

--

--

--

CCS2

Block G-H Fu Yuen

Residential

3

4.12

--

--

--

--

--

--

PR1

No.25 Peak Road

Residential

2

4.13

--

--

--

--

--

--

PR2

No.72 Peak Road

Residential

2

4.13

--

--

--

--

--

--

KYW2

No.46 Kwun Yam Wan Road

Residential

3

4.14

--

--

--

--

--

--

MF1

Caritas Ka Fai House

Residential

2

4.14

--

--

--

--

--

--

FP1

No.18 Fa Peng Road

Residential

3

4.15

--

--

--

--

--

--

FP2

Bethany Cottage and House

Residential

3

4.15

--

--

--

--

--

--

Notes:

NSR ID marked with * is located within the 300 m radius of the boundary of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS

All representative NSRs identified are existing NSRs.

Works Type 1 - Construction of sewer (Open Cut Method).

Works Type 2 - Construction of sewer (Trenchless Method).

Works Type 3 - Upgrading of existing sewers.

Works Type 4 - Upgrading of Pak She Sewage Pumping Station.

Works Type 5 - Upgrading of Cheung Chau Sewage Treatment Works.

Works Type 6 - Rehabilitation of existing sewers.

Works Type 7 - Temporary Concrete Mixing.

Local ground mPD levels at the NSRs are shown on the respective Figure 4.2 to Figure 4.15.

Construction Noise Impact Evaluation

4.4.7         Construction noise impact will be assessed based on the following methodology:

Ÿ    Locate the NSRs which would most likely be affected by noise from construction work;

Ÿ    Determine the items of Powered Mechanical Equipment (PME) for each discrete construction activity, based on available information or agreed plant inventories;

Ÿ    Assumptions for on-time percentage of certain PME have been made. The Project Proponent’s design engineer confirmed that the assumption of on-time percentage and number of PME are considered to be practical in completing the works within the schedule;

Ÿ    Calculate the distance attenuation and screening effects to NSRs from notional noise source.  Under the Technical Memorandum on Noise from Construction work other than Percussive Piling (GW-TM), the distance attenuation will be determined by the following formula;

Ÿ    Distance Attenuation in dB(A) = 20 Log D + 8 [where D is distance in metres];

Ÿ    A +3 dB (A) façade correction is added to the predicted noise levels to account for the façade effect at each NSR;

Ÿ    Calculate the unmitigated Predicted Noise Level (“PNL”) and correct it for façade reflection to obtain the Corrected Noise Level (“CNL”) at any NSRs;

Ÿ    If necessary, re-select typical project-specific silenced equipment and other types of mitigation measure to address noise exceedance, e.g. noise barrier and calculate the mitigated noise impact; and

Ÿ    Compare the mitigated CNL with the noise standards to determine acceptability and the need for further mitigation/ EM&A.

4.4.8         For a conservative approach to assessing the worst-case construction noise impacts, it was assumed that all the proposed PMEs for each construction work stage are operating concurrently.  The predicted cumulative worst-case construction noise levels at the NSRs due to the construction activities of the upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS are summarized in Table 4.7, while the impacts due to the construction activities of sewers works are presented in Table 4.8.  Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix 4.3.

Table 4.7 : Predicted Worst-case Cumulative Construction Noise Levels at
Representative NSRs Affected by Upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS - Unmitigated Scenario

NSR

Description of NSR

Predicted Worst-case Construction Noise Level
of  Works Type for Upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS, dB(A)

Works Type 4

Works Type 5

Works Type 7

Total

CKH

Cheung King House

--

77

48

77

CSH2

Cheung Shun House

--

76

47

76

PSSL

No. 1A Pak She Second Lane

86

--

--

86

Notes:

Underlined bold figure (e.g. 77) indicates an exceedance of the 75 dB(A) noise criteria.

Works Type 4 - Upgrading of Pak She Sewage Pumping Station.

Works Type 5 - Upgrading of Cheung Chau Sewage Treatment Works.

Works Type 7 - Temporary Concrete Mixing.

 

Table 4.8 : Predicted Worst-case Cumulative Construction Noise Levels at
Representative NSRs Affected by sewers works- Unmitigated Scenario

NSR

Description of NSR

Predicted Worst-case Construction Noise Level
of  Works Type for sewers works, dB(A)

Works Type 1

Works Type 2

Works Type 3

Works Type 6

Total

TKST2

No. 4 Tai Kwai San Tsuen

108

--

--

--

108

CSH1*

Chung Shak Hei Home for the Aged

108

--

--

--

108

CCEP

No.7 Cheung Chau Electric Path

108

--

--

--

108

ST

Block D Seaview Terrence

94

--

--

--

94

SW1

3A Golden Lake Garden

94

--

86

--

95

THT

No.24 Tai Hing Tai Road

94

--

82

--

94

SYT1

No.2A Sin Yan Tseng

102

--

--

--

102

SYT2

No.37 Sin Yan Tseng

108

--

--

--

108

P1

No. 34 Praya Street

--

98

--

73

98

TW1

Cheung Chau Fisheries Joint Association Public School

102

102

99

--

106

TSB1

No. 123 Tai San Back Street

108

--

--

--

108

LTT1

Cheung Chau Alliance Church

108

--

--

--

108

LTT2

No.35 Lung Tsai Tsuen Road

108

--

--

--

108

P2

No.41A Peak Road

108

--

--

--

108

KYW1

No.31 Kwun Yam Wan Road

91

--

--

--

91

CCS2

Block G-H Fu Yuen

108

--

--

--

108

PR1

No.25 Peak Road

102

--

--

--

102

PR2

No.72 Peak Road

96

--

--

--

96

KYW2

No.46 Kwun Yam Wan Road

102

--

--

--

102

MF1

Caritas Ka Fai House

102

--

--

--

102

FP1

No.18 Fa Peng Road

102

--

--

--

102

FP2

Bethany Cottage and House

102

--

--

--

102

Notes:

NSR ID marked with * is located within the 300 m radius of the boundary of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS  but no line of sight to the site.

Underlined bold figure (e.g. 77) indicates an exceedance of the 75 dB(A) noise criteria.

Noise criteria for TW1 (school) is 70 dB(A) during normal hours (65 dB(A) during examination periods).

Noise criteria for LTT1 is 70 dB(A) is a place of worship where unaided voice communication is required.

Works Type 1 - Construction of sewer (Open Cut Method).

Works Type 2 - Construction of sewer (Trenchless Method).

Works Type 3 - Upgrading of existing sewers

Works Type 6 - Rehabilitation of existing sewers

 

4.4.9         From Table 4.7, the predicted unmitigated worst-case construction noise levels at NSRs that will be affected by the upgrading of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS will range from 76 dB(A) to 86 dB(A), which would exceed the EIAO-TM noise standards by up to 11 dB(A).

4.4.10      From Table 4.8, the predicted unmitigated worst-case construction noise levels at NSRs that will be affected by the sewers works will be up to 108 dB(A) which exceeds the EIAO-TM noise standards.

Noise Mitigation Measures for Upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS

4.4.11      The construction noise assessment indicated that, in the absence of any mitigation measures, there would be exceedance of the construction noise criteria at some of the NSRs.  Various mitigation options have thus been considered in accordance with the guidelines laid down in the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, Guidance Note No. 9/2010 “Preparation of Construction Noise Impact Assessment under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance” (GN 9/2010).  It should be noted that the assumptions used in formulating mitigation measures and their practicality were based on the best available information from the preliminary design stage of the Project.  Alternative mitigation proposals which could achieve the same noise reduction effect may be formulated in detailed design stage. Mitigation measures considered are discussed below:

Good Site Practice

4.4.12      Good site practice and noise management can significantly reduce the impact of construction site activities on nearby NSRs.  The following mitigation measures should be followed during the construction:

Ÿ    only well-maintained plant should be operated on-site and plant should be serviced regularly during the construction works;

Ÿ    machines and plant that may be in intermittent use should be shut down between work periods or should be throttled down to a minimum;

Ÿ    plant known to emit noise strongly in one direction should, where possible, be orientated to direct noise away from the NSRs;

Ÿ    mobile plant should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible; and

Ÿ    material stockpiles and other structures should be effectively utilized, where practicable, to screen noise from on-site construction activities.

Adoption of Quiet PMEs and Site Hoardings Screening

4.4.13      To reduce construction noise impact on the affected NSRs during the construction phase, quieter equipment shall be adopted as far as possible.  Table 4.9 shows the possible alternative quieter PME which are taken from BS:5228: Part 1:2009.  These quieter PMEs are available in the market and have been successfully applied to other projects and have achieved noticeable noise reductions.  The SWLs of quieter PMEs that are to be used for the works shall meet, or lower than, the values in Table 4.9.

Table 4.9 : Quiet PME and Associated Sound Power Level

Description of PME

Equivalent Quiet PME

SWL, dB(A)

Generator

BS 5228 Table C4/77

88

Poker, vibratory, hand-held

BS 5228 Table C4/34

97

Breaker, excavator mounted (hydraulic)

BS 5228 Table C9/12

113

Excavator

BS 5228 Table C4/65

99

Tracked Mobile Crane

BS 5228 Table C4/50

99

Vibratory Compactor

QPME EPD-00055

102

Dumper

BS 5228 Table C4/3

104

Air Compressor

BS 5228 Table D7/24

95

Concrete Pump

BS 5228 Table C3/25

106

Piling Rig

BS 5228 Table C3/14

111

4.4.14      Temporary site hoardings of 2.4 m high are recommended for the works at the Pak She SPS.  The hoardings will be erected along the works boundary facing the NSRs.  The PME involved in the works would be screened by the erected site hoardings.  Without direct line of sight from the affected NSRs, a noise reduction of 10 dB(A) could be achieved provided that the hoardings have no openings or gaps and have a surface mass of at least 7 kg/m2.  Nonetheless, a -5 dB(A) screening correction for site hoardings has been applied as a more conservative approach.

4.4.15      It should be noted that the noise screening effect due to the temporary site hoardings noise barriers and the noise mitigation measures including phasing of the works adopter in this EIA Report are specific to this Project with considerations of specific works types, low-rise houses, specific design of temporary noise barriers in the form of site hoardings and screening without direct line sight between the NSRs and the PMEs.  The measures and the noise screening effect should not be lightly applied to other project without careful considerations of the specific construction works, design of barriers and NSR’s situations.

4.4.16      The predicted cumulative mitigated construction noise levels at the NSRs due to the construction activities for the upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS will comply with the EIAO-TM noise standard.  The predicted noise levels are summarized in Table 4.10.  Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix 4.5.

Table 4.10 : Predicted Maximum Construction Noise Levels at
Representative NSRs Affected by upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS- Mitigated Scenario (Quiet Plant and Site Hoardings)

NSR

Description of NSR

Predicted Maximum Construction Noise Level
of  Works Type for upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS, dB(A)

Works Type 4

Works Type 5

Works Type 7

Total

CKH

Cheung King House

--

72

48

72

CSH2

Cheung Shun House

--

71

47

71

PSSL

No. 1A Pak She Second Lane

72

--

--

72

Notes:

Noise criteria = 75 dB(A).

Works Type 4 - Upgrading of Pak She Sewage Pumping Station.

Works Type 5 - Upgrading of Cheung Chau Sewage Treatment Works.

Works Type 7 - Temporary Concrete Mixing.

 

Noise Mitigation Measures for Sewers Works

4.4.17      In view of the high noise exceedances at some NSRs due to the sewers works, mitigation measures are considered to be implemented at three levels, which involves adoption of quiet PME and temporary noise barriers; good scheduling of works avoiding concurrent construction activities; and alternative construction method for excavation of soil.  In addition, good site practice as described above for the upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS should also be applied to reduce the impact of construction site activities on nearby NSRs.

Level 1 Noise Mitigation Measures - Quiet PMEs and Temporary Noise Barrier

4.4.18      Similar to the mitigation measures recommended for the upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS, quiet PME and temporary noise barriers can be adopted as far as possible to reduce the noise impacts.  Quiet PMEs and SWLs as provided in Table 4.9 can be adopted for the sewers works.

4.4.19      For the construction of sewers, use of temporary noise barrier has been recommended for PMEs to alleviate the construction noise impacts.  In general, temporary noise barrier located close to the noise generating part of the PME would reduce noise level of 5 to 10 dB(A) depending on the actual design with reference to GN 9/2010.  The noise screening benefit for each plant considered in this assessment has been adopted as follow:

Ÿ    Temporary noise barrier for stationary plant - assuming 10 dB(A) reduction on stationary plants;

Ÿ    Temporary noise barrier for mobile plant - assuming 5 dB(A) reduction on mobile plants.

4.4.20      In general, temporary noise barrier material’s surface mass in excess of 7 kg/m2 is recommended.  The contractor shall be responsible for design of the temporary noise barrier with due consideration given to the size of the PME and the requirement of intercepting the line of sight between the NSRs and PME.  Although the sewers works areas within village area are limited, contractors are recommended to adopt temporary noise barrier as far as practicable to minimize noise impact at lower floors of NSRs.  Table 4.11 summarizes the assumed noise reduction achieved by the temporary noise barrier for certain PMEs.  Detailed mitigated plant inventory is presented in Appendix 4.4.

Table 4.11 : Noise Mitigation Measures for Certain PME

Description of PME

Proposed Mitigation Measures

Assumed Noise Reduction, dB(A)

Backhoe (mini)

Noise Barrier (Mobile)

5

Breaker, hand-held, mass>10kg and <20kg

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Generator

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Poker, vibratory hand-held

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Bar bender and cutter (electric)

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Vibratory compactor

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Breaker, excavator mounted (hydraulic)

Noise Barrier (Mobile)

5

Piling, earth auger, auger

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Hoist (electric)

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Excavator

Noise Barrier (Mobile)

5

Dumper

Noise Barrier (Mobile)

5

Submersible Pump

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Rock Drill, hand-held (pneumatic)

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Air Compressor

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Ventilation Fan

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Grout Mixer

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Grout Pump

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Winch (electric)

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

Grinder, hand held (electric)

Noise Barrier (Stationary)

10

 

4.4.21      The predicted mitigated construction noise levels at the representative NSRs are summarized in Table 4.12 and detailed in Appendix 4.5.

Table 4.12 : Predicted Maximum Construction Noise Levels at
Representative NSRs Affected by sewers works - with Level 1 Mitigation Measures

NSR

Description of NSR

Predicted Worst-case Construction Noise Level
of  Works Type for sewers works, dB(A)

Works Type 1

Works Type 2

Works Type 3

Works Type 6

Total

TKST2

No. 4 Tai Kwai San Tsuen

88

--

--

--

88

CSH1*

Chung Shak Hei Home for the Aged

88

--

--

--

88

CCEP

No.7 Cheung Chau Electric Path

88

--

--

--

88

ST

Block D Seaview Terrence

74

--

--

--

74

SW1

3A Golden Lake Garden

74

--

66

--

75

THT

No.24 Tai Hing Tai Road

74

--

62

--

74

SYT1

No.2A Sin Yan Tseng

82

--

--

--

82

SYT2

No.37 Sin Yan Tseng

88

--

--

--

88

P1

No. 34 Praya Street

--

84

--

60

84

TW1

Cheung Chau Fisheries Joint Association Public School

82

88

79

--

89

TSB1

No. 123 Tai San Back Street

88

--

--

--

88

LTT1

Cheung Chau Alliance Church

88

--

--

--

88

LTT2

No.35 Lung Tsai Tsuen Road

88

--

--

--

88

P2

No.41A Peak Road

88

--

--

--

88

KYW1

No.31 Kwun Yam Wan Road

71

--

--

--

71

CCS2

Block G-H Fu Yuen

88

--

--

--

88

PR1

No.25 Peak Road

82

--

--

--

82

PR2

No.72 Peak Road

76

--

--

--

76

KYW2

No.46 Kwun Yam Wan Road

82

--

--

--

82

MF1

Caritas Ka Fai House

82

--

--

--

82

FP1

No.18 Fa Peng Road

82

--

--

--

82

FP2

Bethany Cottage and House

82

--

--

--

82

Notes:

NSR ID marked with * is located within the 300 m radius of the boundary of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS but no line of sight to the site.

Underlined bold figure (e.g. 77) indicates an exceedance of the 75 dB(A) noise criteria.

Noise criteria for TW1 (school) is 70 dB(A) during normal hours (65 dB(A) during examination periods).

Noise criteria for LTT1 is 70 dB(A) is a place of worship where unaided voice communication is required.

Works Type 1 - Construction of sewer (Open Cut Method).

Works Type 2 - Construction of sewer (Trenchless Method).

Works Type 3 - Upgrading of existing sewers.

Works Type 6 - Rehabilitation of existing sewers.

 

4.4.22      With the adoption of quiet PMEs and temporary barrier, noise exceedances were still predicted at most sensitive receivers during construction of the sewers works.

Level 2 Noise Mitigation Measures - Good Scheduling of Works

4.4.23      For NSRs which would be affected by more than one Works Type of the sewers works, good scheduling of works is recommended to further mitigate the potential construction noise impacts. 

4.4.24      NSR P1 and NSR TW1 will be affected by more than one Works Type of the sewers works.  Level 2 noise mitigation measures by considering good scheduling of works were proposed.  It is recommended to avoid carrying out concurrent Works Type near these NSRs.

4.4.25      During construction phase of sewers works, the contractor should liaise with the NSR TW1 (Cheung Chau Fisheries Joint Association Public School) to obtain the examination schedule and avoid noisy construction activities during the school examination period.

4.4.26      By avoiding concurrent Works Type, noise exceedances were still predicted at NSRs P1 and TW1 due to individual Works Type.  Further mitigation measures were considered.

Level 3 Noise Mitigation Measures - Hand Digging for Excavation

4.4.27      Further mitigation measures were considered for the soil excavation works of constructing sewer (open cut method) and upgrading of the existing sewer.  Provided the site condition is allowed, the contractor should avoid the use of PME as far as possible and adopt hand digging method.  If hand digging method is adopted, the maximum sound power level associated with the excavation works can be reduced from 89 dB(A) to 80 dB(A) (sum of sound power level of water pump and generator).  Since digging will occupy most of the time during the excavation works, avoid the use of PME would reduce the noise impacts on the NSRs.  However, the use of hand digging method for excavation should be considered with all relevant factors taken into account, such as site condition, work duration, extent of excavation, liaison with residents etc.  Although the employment of hand digging method would further reduce the mitigated sound levels, it would otherwise prolong the construction period and thereby nuisance to the public.  Therefore, the overall merits or demerits of this mitigation measure must be carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis under the prevailing situation on site.

Cumulative Impact

4.4.28      The following discusses the potential cumulative interface issues between concurrent projects as indicated in Section 2.10. 

Improvement of Fresh Water Supply to Cheung Chau - Design and Construction

4.4.29      The construction activities of the fresh water supply project are located at Cheung Chau Tai Kwai Wan which potentially interface with the proposed sewers works in the same area for 15 months overlapping period.  It is recommended that the construction of sewers at Tai Kwai Wan San Tsuen should be launched after the completion of the Project.  The contractor should liaise with the correspondent party to ensure concurrent works are avoided as far as possible.  By avoiding concurrent works, adverse cumulative noise impact is not expected to occur.

Replacement and Rehabilitation of Water Mains Stage 3 and Stage 4, Mains on Hong Kong and Islands – Investigation, Design and Construction

4.4.30      Based on the information provided by WSD, Stage 3 of this project will be completed before the construction phase of this Project. Construction of Stage 4 commenced in October 2012 and is anticipated for completion in 2015. Close liaison will be undertaken with the project proponent of the interfacing project to avoid concurrent works as far as possible.  By avoiding concurrent works, the potential interface issues with this project are not expected to occur.

Improvement to Existing Roads and Drains in Cheung Chau Old Town, Remaining Engineering Works, Stage 3, Cheung Chau

4.4.31      There are potential concurrent construction activities within Cheung Chau Area. Based on the best available information, this project involves the construction of village sewer at Cheung Chau Town Centre, Hill Side Road, Kwun Yam Wan Road, Tai Shek Hau, Lung Tsai Tsuen, Ko Shan Tsuen and Pak She San Tsuen.  Close liaison between the two project teams will be undertaken to ensure concurrent works are avoided as far as possible.  By avoiding concurrent works and given the small scale works involved, adverse cumulative noise impact is not expected during construction.

Residual Noise Impact

Upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS

4.4.32      The predicted mitigated construction noise levels at NSRs due to the construction activities for upgrading of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS were found to be within the EIAO-TM noise criteria.  With appropriate implementation of the noise mitigation measures, residual noise impacts due to the construction activities for upgrading of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS are expected to be insignificant. 

Sewers Works

4.4.33      Practical noise abatement measures, such as the use of quieter PME, scheduling of works avoiding the concurrent of noise activities and the use of temporary noise barriers, have been considered for the construction of sewers works where practicable.  However, exceedances of the daytime construction noise criterion are still predicted at some NSRs which are located very close to the construction and upgrading work of village sewers.

4.4.34      All reasonably practicable mitigation measures are, therefore, considered to have been proposed but some residual noise impacts will still remain.  Residual impacts related to the sewers works are further discussed in below.

4.4.35      The construction noise assessment results were based on the worst case scenario where the notional sources were assumed.  The actual residual exceedances would be limited on to the time period when the construction work is being carried out adjacent to these NSRs.  In practice, the PME will progress along the working area of each section.  Once the PMEs move on along the working area within each section and further from the NSRs, the noise impacts will be less and only last for a short period.

4.4.36      The construction of sewer is unavoidable.  Under normal practice, the sewers would be constructed in section of about 20m to 30m at any one time and each work front would be separated by a clearance distance.  The anticipated noise impact would be localized.  With such a typical arrangement, construction works for each section could normally be completed in about 30 days, with each noisy construction activity lasts for about 1.5 days to 9 days.  The duration of the residual noise impacts is hence short-term only.  Having said that, longer sections of sewer construction may be adopted in less sensitive locations to suit site condition, construction method and/or works sequence/programme.

4.4.37      The extent and duration of the predicted residual impacts of Works Type 1 construction of sewer (open cut method) during different construction stages are summarized in Table 4.13.  Details of the construction noise calculation for each works stage for the construction of sewer (open cut method) are provided in Appendix 4.6.

Table 4.13 : Predicted Residual Impact of Works Type 1 Construction of Sewer (Open Cut Method)
 at the Representative NSRs

NSR

Description of NSR

Predicted Residual Noise Impacts due to
different Construction Stages, dB(A)

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

Stage 4

Stage 5

Stage 6

Duration

1.5 days

9 days

6 days

2.5 days

8 days

3 days

TKST2

No. 4 Tai Kwai San Tsuen

88

84

80

83

84

80

CSH1

Chung Shak Hei Home for the Aged

88

84

80

83

84

80

CCEP

No.7 Cheung Chau Electric Path

88

84

80

83

84

80

SYT1

No.2A Sin Yan Tseng

82

78

74

77

78

74

SYT2

No.37 Sin Yan Tseng

88

84

80

83

84

80

TW1

Cheung Chau Fisheries Joint Association Public School

82

78

74

77

78

74

TSB1

No. 123 Tai San Back Street

88

84

80

83

84

80

LTT1

Cheung Chau Alliance Church

88

84

80

83

84

80

LTT2

No.35 Lung Tsai Tsuen Road

88

84

80

83

84

80

P2

No.41A Peak Road

88

84

80

83

84

80

CCS2

Block G-H Fu Yuen

88

84

80

83

84

80

PR1

No.25 Peak Road

82

78

74

77

78

74

PR2

No.72 Peak Road

76

72

68

71

72

68

KYW2

No.46 Kwun Yam Wan Road

82

78

74

77

78

74

MF1

Caritas Ka Fai House

82

78

74

77

78

74

FP1

No.18 Fa Peng Road

82

78

74

77

78

74

FP2

Bethany Cottage and House

82

78

74

77

78

74

Notes:

Underlined bold figure (e.g. 77) indicates an exceedance of the 75 dB(A) noise criteria.

Noise criteria for TW1 (school) is 70 dB(A) during normal hours (65 dB(A) during examination periods).

Noise criteria for LTT1 is 70 dB(A) is a place of worship where unaided voice communication is required.

Works Stage 1 - Breaking up of road surface (SWL: 93 dB(A)).

Works Stage 2 - Excavation of soil material (SWL: 89 dB(A)).

Works Stage 3 - Steel fixing and concreting of manholes (SWL: 85 dB(A)).

Works Stage 4 - Laying of bedding material (SWL: 88 dB(A)).

Works Stage 5 - Backfilling and soil compaction (SWL: 89 dB(A)).

Works Stage 6 - Reinstatement of road surface (SWL: 85 dB(A)).

4.4.38      For NSRs TW1 and P1, maximum construction noise impacts were predicted due to Works Type 2 construction of sewer (trenchless method).  The extent and duration of the predicted residual impacts of Works Type 2 construction of sewer (trenchless method) during different construction stages at these two NSRs are summarized in Table 4.14.  For pit excavation (Stage 1), the worst case residual noise impacts will be associated with the use of hydraulic breaker for breaking up the concrete surface at grade.  This work would be of short duration only.  The rest of the excavation works below grade will require hydraulic breaker only if rock is encountered which is on occasional case only.  However, the excavation works will be below ground, the construction noise level associated with the pit excavation by hydraulic breaker below grade will be less.  For the pipe jacking activities (Stage 2) of Works Type 2, trenchless method, the predicted residual noise impacts would occur at the working pit only.  The contractor can plan theirs works to locate the working pits further away from the NSRs.  Details of the construction noise calculation for each works stage for the construction of sewer (trenchless method) are provided in Appendix 4.6.

Table 4.14 : Predicted Residual Impact of Works Type 2 Construction of Sewer (Trenchless Method) at NSRs TW1 and P1

NSR

Description of NSR

Predicted Residual Noise Impacts due to different Construction Stages, dB(A)

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

Duration

5 days

7 days

30 days

TW1

Cheung Chau Fisheries Joint Association Public School

88

88

65

P1

No. 34 Praya Street

84

84

61

Notes:

Underlined bold figure (e.g. 77) indicates an exceedance of the 75 dB(A) noise criteria.

Noise criteria for TW1 (school) is 70 dB(A) during normal hours (65 dB(A) during examination periods).

Works Stage 1 - Excavation of pits by breaker (SWL: 108 dB(A)).  This relates to the breaking up of concrete surface at grade at the pit by hydraulic breaker.  Excavation below grade will require hydraulic breaker only if rock is encountered which is on occasional case only.

Works Stage 2 - Jacking of pipes (SWL: 108 dB(A)).  The pits close to the two NSRs are receiving pits where the PME will be deployed after the break-through at that point.  This is the worst case if rock drill is used.  Predicted noise level would be less if no rock is encountered.

Works Stage 3 - Steel fixing and concreting of manholes (SWL: 85 dB(A)).

Reinstatement of road surface is by using bricks.  No PME will be involved.

 

4.4.39      NSR TW1 will be affected by Works Type 3 upgrading of existing sewer.  The extent and duration of the predicted residual impacts of Works Type 3 upgrading of existing sewer during different construction stages at NSR TW1 are summarized in Table 4.15.  In view of the predicted residual noise impacts, the contractor should liaise closely with the school to plan their works to avoid examination periods and to avoid teaching periods as far as practicable, e.g. during school break.  In doing so, this residual noise impacts at NSR TW1 due to Works Type 3 will be eliminated.  Details of the construction noise calculation for each works stage for Works Type 3 are provided in Appendix 4.6.

Table 4.15 : Predicted Residual Impact of Works Type 3 Upgrading of Existing Sewer
 at NSR TW1

NSR

Description of NSR

Predicted Residual Noise Impacts due to different Construction Stages, dB(A)

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

Stage 4

Stage 5

Stage 6

Stage 7

Duration

1.5 days

9 days

5 days

6 days

2.5 days

8 days

3 days

TW1

Cheung Chau Fisheries Joint Association Public School

79

75

75

71

74

75

71

Notes:

Underlined bold figure (e.g. 77) indicates an exceedance of the 70 dB(A) noise criteria during normal teaching hours. 

Noise criteria for TW1 (school) is 65 dB(A) during examination periods.

Works Stage 1 - Breaking up of road surface (SWL: 93 dB(A)).

Works Stage 2 - Excavation of soil material (SWL: 89 dB(A)).

Works Stage 3 - Removal of existing sewers and laying of new sewers (SWL: 89 dB(A)).

Works Stage 4 - Steel fixing and concreting of manholes (SWL: 85 dB(A)).

Works Stage 5 - Laying of bedding material (SWL: 88 dB(A)).

Works Stage 6 - Backfilling and soil compaction (SWL: 89 dB(A)).

Works Stage 7 - Reinstatement of road surface (SWL: 85 dB(A)).

 

4.4.40      Based on the above, the predicted residual impacts are considered to be temporary and reversible.  The geographic extent of the impacts are confined to small works areas and considered to be localised, not of international and regional importance.  Furthermore, the mitigation measures proposed will reduce the levels of impacts.  As such, the residual impacts associated with the construction phase exceedances for the sewers works would be short-term and considered acceptable provided appropriate mitigation measures are implemented.

4.5             Operational Noise Impact Assessment

Noise Sources Identification

4.5.1         Potential operational fixed plant noise impact will be associated with the upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS.  Both Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS are existing operative facilities and installed with noise generating equipment.   After the upgrading works the equipment inventory will be similar to the existing ones, which would be sewage pumps, ventilation fans, deodourizing fans, mechanically raked fine screen and blower.  The noisy equipment inventory at both Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS, based on the design at the time of preparation of this EIA, are provided in Table 4.16.  The typical Sound Power Levels (SWL) associated with these equipments are also provided.  Figure 4.16 shows the general location of noisy equipment for Cheung Chau STW.

Table 4.16 : Major Noise Generating Equipment (Operational Phase)

Location

Equipment

No. of Units

Typical Sound Power Level, dB(A)

Sub-total Sound Power Level, dB(A)

Pak She Sewage Pumping Station

Plant Room

Submersible pump (Ref. 1)

2

85

88

Exhaust fan (Ref. 2)

2

79

82

Mechanically raked fine screen (Ref. 3)

2

89

92

Deodourizing Units

Deodourizing fan (Ref. 4)

1

85

89

Cheung Chau Sewage Treatment Works

Preliminary Treatment Units

Submersible pump (Ref. 1)

10

85

95

Mechanically raked fine screen (Ref. 3)

3

89

96

Deodourizing fan (Ref. 4)

4

85

95

Exhaust fan (Ref. 2)

14

79

90

MBR Equipment Unit (Part 1)

Mechanically pump (Ref. 5)

9

92

108

Deodourizing fan (Ref. 4)

2

85

92

Exhaust fan (Ref. 2)

8

79

88

MBR Equipment Unit (Part 2)

Mechanically pump (Ref. 5)

9

92

108

Deodourizing fan (Ref. 4)

2

85

92

Exhaust fan (Ref. 2)

4

79

85

Sludge Treatment Unit

 

Submersible pump (Ref. 1)

2

85

88

Deodourizing fan (Ref. 4)

2

85

92

Exhaust fan (Ref. 2)

6

79

87

Air Blower Room

Blower (Ref. 6)

7

85

93

Exhaust fan (Ref. 2)

4

79

85

Existing Outfall Pumping Station and Header Tank

Mechanical pump (Ref. 5)

12

92

109

Deodourizing fan (Ref. 4)

4

85

91

Exhaust fan (Ref. 2)

14

79

90

Notes:

Only noisy equipments are included in the table.  Other equipments which do not have significant noise emissions are not included.

 (Ref. 1) SWL referenced to CNP283.

(Ref. 2) SWL referenced to approved EIA of Harbour Area Treatment Scheme (HATS) Stage 2A (EIA-148/2008) and Good Practices on Ventilation System Noise Control based on the flow rate of 1,300m3/hr.

(Ref. 3) SWL referenced to the approved EIA Report on Tai Po Sewage Treatment Works Stage V (EIA-097/2004).

(Ref 4) SWL of plant refers to Good Practices on Ventilation System Noise Control based on the flow rate of 17,000 m3/hr and 125 Pa.

(Ref 5) SWL of plant refer to Good Practices on Pumping System Noise Control based on the horsepower of pumpset 20 hp at 1800 rpm.

(Ref 6) SWL of plant refers to the tender specification for Shatin STW Stage 3 Upgrading and approved EIA of Harbour Area Treatment Scheme (HATS) Stage 2A (EIA-148/2008).

 

4.5.2         Standby equipment would only be used in case of failure or maintenance of duty units.  Therefore, concurrent operation of both duty and standby equipment will not occur under the normal operation.  It is anticipated that the maximum sound power levels during operation would be under the full operation of all duty equipment which are given in Table 4.16.

Noise Sensitive Receivers

4.5.3         Representative first tier NSRs closest to the Pak She SPS and Cheung Chau STW were selected for predicting the noise impacts during the operational phase.  These would represent the worst case scenario in predicting noise impacts.  Other NSRs further away from these NSRs are expected to be less affected by comparison.  Table 4.17 shows the selected representative NSRs for the operational phase fixed plant noise assessment for the operation of Pak She SPS and Cheung Chau STW.  All selected NSRs for the operational noise impact assessment are existing NSRs.  Based on the information available at the time of the preparation of this EIA, there are no planned NSRs that are in a location closer to the Pak She SPS and Cheung Chau STW than those identified existing NSRs.

Table 4.17 : Representative Noise Sensitive Receivers (Operational Phase)

NSR

Description of NSR

Nature of Use

No. of Floor

Figure No.

Approximate Nearest Horizontal Separation (m)

Cheung Chau STW

Pak She SPS

PSSL

No. 1A Pak She Second Lane

Residential

3

4.5

No direct line of sight

58

CKH

Cheung King House

Residential

4

4.4

65

No direct line of sight

CSH2

Cheung Shun House

Residential

4

4.4

81

No direct line of sight

Operational Noise Impact Evaluation

4.5.4         All identified noisy equipment of Pak She SPS and Cheung Chau STW would be confined within the existing site boundary and housed inside the SPS and STW building structure.  For the assessment of the worst-case unmitigated operational noise, it was assumed that all duty equipments would be operated at the same time and located outdoor without cover.  The predicted noise levels during operation phase at the identified NSRs are shown in Table 4.18 and detailed in Appendix 4.7.

Table 4.18 : Predicted Worst-case Maximum Operational Noise Levels at
Representative NSRs - Without Mitigation Measures

NSR

NSR Description

Predicted Unmitigated Noise Level, dB(A)

Night-time Noise Criterion, dB(A)

Day-time Noise Criterion, dB(A)

CKH

Cheung King House

69

45

53

CSH2

Cheung Shun House

68

45

53

PSSL

No. 1A Pak She Second Lane

55

45

55

 

4.5.5         From Table 4.18, the predicted worst-case unmitigated noise levels due to the operation of Cheung Chau STW would exceed the noise criteria at all time, and it would exceed the night-time noise criterion due to the operation of the Pak She SPS.

Possible Noise Mitigation Measures and Mitigated Impacts

4.5.6         The assessment assumed that all the noisy equipments for the SPS and STW are located outdoor without covering.  In real terms, the equipments are designed to be installed inside the respective building structures.  A reduction of 20 dB(A) can be achieved if the building enclosure are built using suitable material such as concrete with surface density of 25 kg/m2.

4.5.7         The use of acoustic louver on ventilation fans can provide significant reduction in noise level.  It is recommended to provide acoustic louver with a minimum noise reduction of 10 dB(A) for ventilation fans at the discharge point.

4.5.8         The recommended mitigation measures for the equipment used for the operation of Pak She SPS and Cheung Chau STW and the proposed noise reduction are summarized in Table 4.19.

Table 4.19 : Proposed Noise Mitigation Measures for Equipments during Operation

Location

Equipment

Mitigation Measures

Noise Reduction

Pak She Sewage Pumping Station

Submersible pump

enclosed inside SPS building structure

-20 dB(A)

Mechanically raked fine screen

enclosed inside SPS building structure

-20 dB(A)

Deodourizing fan

enclosed inside SPS building structure

-20 dB(A)

Exhaust fan

Provide acoustic louver at discharge point

-10 dB(A)

Cheung Chau Sewage Treatment Works

Submersible pump

enclosed inside treatment unit building structure

-20 dB(A)

Mechanically raked fine screen

enclosed inside STW building structure

-20 dB(A)

Deodourizing fan

enclosed inside STW building structure

-20 dB(A)

Exhaust fan

Provide acoustic louver at discharge point

-10 dB(A)

Blower

enclosed inside STW building structure

-20 dB(A)

Mechanical pump

enclosed inside STW building structure

-20 dB(A)

 

4.5.9         By incorporating the recommended noise mitigation measures, the predicted worst-case mitigated noise levels at identified NSRs due to the operation of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS would comply with the noise criteria at all time.  The predicted noise levels at representative NSRs are summarized in Table 4.20 and detailed in Appendix 4.8.

Table 4.20 : Predicted Maximum Operational Noise Levels at
Representative NSRs - With Mitigation Measures

NSR

NSR Description

Predicted Mitigated Noise Level, dB(A)

Night-time Noise Criterion, dB(A)

Day-time Noise Criterion, dB(A)

CKH

Cheung King House

45

45

53

CSH2

Cheung Shun House

44

45

53

PSSL

No. 1A Pak She Second Lane

42

45

55

 

4.5.10      The maximum sound power level of equipment would be specified in the tender specification to ensure the operational noise impact complying with relevant noise criteria.  The supplier of equipment should guarantee the specified SWLs including the characteristics of tonality, impulsiveness and intermittency, if any.  If necessary, the suppliers should apply attenuation measures (e.g. use of silencers) to achieve the recommended noise levels during the detailed design stage.


Residual Impact

4.5.11      Provided that the maximum SWL of equipment is met through appropriate design and the recommended noise mitigation measures are adopted, the residual noise impacts due to the operation of the upgraded Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS are expected to be insignificant.

4.6             Environmental Monitoring and Audit Requirements

Construction Phase

4.6.1         With the adoption of appropriate noise mitigation measures, construction noise levels caused by upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS at all representative NSRs would comply with the EIAO-TM daytime noise criteria of 75 dB(A).  It was envisaged that the residual impact at the NSRs will be significantly reduced with appropriate mitigation measures being incorporated.  Nonetheless, it is recommended that environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A) for construction noise be carried out throughout the construction period for upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS to ensure proper implementation of construction phase mitigation measures with consideration of practicability in local levels.  Details of the specific EM&A requirements are detailed in the EM&A Manual.

4.6.2         Localised and short period residual impacts during construction of the sewers works were predicted.  As such, it is recommended that construction phase EM&A is undertaken as part of the contract requirements.  Details of the EM&A programme will be included as Particular Specifications of the works contract documents.

Operational Phase

4.6.3         Operational noise impacts from fixed plant of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS can be effectively mitigated by implementing noise control treatment at source.   Results of assessment indicate that the predicted impacts are within the EIAO-TM requirements.  EM&A during operational phase is not required.  In order to ensure compliance of the operational airborne noise impacts with the relevant noise standards, the requirement for carrying out a noise commissioning test for all major fixed noise sources should be included in the tender document. 

4.7             Conclusion

4.7.1         Construction noise assessment has been conducted for the upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS, and the sewers works.  Assessment results indicate that with proper implementation of recommended mitigation measures, the predicted noise levels at the NSRs due to the construction activities for upgrading of Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS  will comply with the EIAO-TM noise standard.

4.7.2         There would be noise exceedances at some NSRs due to the construction activities for the sewers works.  Mitigation measures have been recommended to reduce the associated construction noise impacts.  Residual impacts of construction phase have been evaluated and considered the impacts are temporary and reversible.  Construction phase EM&A is recommended to be undertaken for the sewers works to minimize the impacts as far as practicable.

4.7.3         Operational noise impacts from fixed plant of the Cheung Chau STW and Pak She SPS can be effectively mitigated by implementing noise control treatment at source.   Results of assessment indicate that the predicted impacts are within the EIAO-TM requirements.