| 6.1.18 |
Modified
Watercourse |
| |
|
|
The
majority of the surveyed sites were mapped with
100% accuracy with only a few sites mis-identified
and should be re-classified as Natural Watercourse
(Table 6.1o).
| Table
6.1o Mis-identified Survey Sites of Modified
Watercourse |
| Site
No. |
Site
Name |
Sub-site |
Percentage
of Area
Mis-identified (%)
|
Habitat
Types of the
Mis-identified Area
|
| 151 |
San
Tin |
a |
100 |
Natural
Watercourse |
| c |
100 |
Natural
Watercourse |
| d |
100 |
Natural
Watercourse |
| f |
100 |
Natural
Watercourse |
|
| |
|
| 6.1.19 |
Artificial
Rocky/Hard Shoreline |
| |
|
|
The
habitat was mapped with a high degree of accuracy
and the sites surveyed were found to be correctly
identified. No re-categorisation was required.
|
| |
|
| 6.1.20 |
Golf
Course/Urban Park |
| |
|
|
The
habitats selected for field surveys were mapped
correctly apart from small areas which were discovered
to be residential areas or buildings which were
consequently re-classified as Other (Table 6.1p).
| Table
6.1p Mis-identified Survey Sites of Golf Course/Urban
Park
|
| Site
No. |
Site
Name |
Sub-site |
Percentage
of Area
Mis-identified (%)
|
Habitat
Types of the
Mis-identified Area
|
| 157 |
Ocean
Park |
a |
5 |
Other |
| 158 |
Chung
Hom Kok |
a |
5 |
Other |
|
| |
|
|