TABLE OF CONTENTS
Environmental
Monitoring Works
Key
Information in the Reporting Month
Key
Construction Work in the reporting month & the next reporting month
Construction
Activities undertaken during the Reporting Month
Status of Environmental
Licences, Notification and Permits
Monitoring
Parameters and Frequency
Monitoring Methodology and
QA/QC Procedure
Monitoring Parameters and
Frequency
Sampling Management and
Supervision
Post-Translocation Coral
Monitoring
Alert, Alarm and Action Levels
Mitigation Measures for
Cultural Heritage
8. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT
REQUIREMENTS
Monitoring Parameters and
Frequency
Implementation Status of
Environmental Mitigation Measures
12. ENVIRONMENTAL
NON-CONFORMANCE
Summary of Environmental
Non-Compliance
Summary of Environmental
Complaint
Summary of Environmental Summon
and Successful Prosecution
Key Issues for the Coming Month
14. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
lIST OF TABLES
Table I Non-compliance
(exceedance) Recorded for the Project in the Reporting Month
Table II Key Information in the Reporting Month
Table III Summary Table for Complaint Details in the Reporting Month
Table IV Summary Table for Key Construction Work in the Reporting
Month
Table V Summary
Table for Site Activities in the next Reporting Period
Table 2.1 Key Project Contacts
Table 2.2 Summary Table for Major Site Activities in the Reporting
Month
Table 2.4 Summary of the Status of Environmental Licences,
Notification and Permits
Table 3.1 Locations for Air Quality Monitoring
Table 3.2 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3.3 Impact Dust Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Table 3.4 Major Dust Source during Air Quality Monitoring
Table 4.1 Noise Monitoring Stations
Table 4.2 Noise Monitoring Equipment
Table 4.3 Noise Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Table 4.4 Major Noise Source during Noise Monitoring
Table 4.5 Baseline Noise Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring
Stations
Table 4.7 Baseline Noise Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring
Stations (Night-time)
Table 5.1 Not Used
Table 5.2 Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations
Table 5.3 Water Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 5.4 Water Quality Monitoring Parameters and Frequency
Table 5.5 Methods for Laboratory Analysis for Water Samples
Table 5.6 Not Used
Table 7.1 Cultural Heritage Monitoring Equipment
Table 7.2 AAA Levels for Monitoring for Cultural Heritage
Table 9.1 Landfill Gas Monitoring Equipment
Table 13.1 Summary Table for Site Activities in the next Reporting Period
lIST
OF FIGUREs
Figure 1a Site Portions under Works Contract No. NE/2015/01 (Lam Tin
Side)
Figure 1b Site Portions under Works Contract No. NE/2015/01 (Tseung Kwan O Side)
Figure 1c Site Portions under Works Contract No. NE/2015/02
Figure 1d Site Portions under Works Contract No. NE/2015/03
Figure 1e Site Portions under Works Contract No. NE/2017/01
Figure 1f Site Portions under Works Contract No. NE/2017/01
Figure 1g Site Portions under Works Contract No. NE/2017/02
Figure 1h Site Portions under Works Contract No. NE/2017/02
Figure 2 Locations of Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Figure 3 Locations of Construction Noise Monitoring Stations
Figure 4 Not Used
Figure 5 Locations of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations
Figure 6 Locations of Landfill Gas Monitoring
Figure 7 Location of Post-translocation Coral Monitoring
Figure 8 Location of
Monitoring for Cultural Heritage
Figure 9 Not Used
lIST
OF APPENDIces
Appendix A
Action and Limit Levels
Appendix B
Copies of Calibration Certificates
Appendix C
Weather Information
Appendix
D
Environmental Monitoring Schedules
Appendix
E
1-hour TSP Monitoring Results and
Graphical Presentations
Appendix
F
24-hour TSP Monitoring Results and
Graphical Presentations
Appendix
G
Noise Monitoring Results and
Graphical Presentations
Appendix H
Not Used
Appendix I
Marine Water Quality Monitoring
Results and Graphical Presentations
Appendix J
Not Used
Appendix K
Summary of Exceedance
Appendix L
Site Audit Summary
Appendix
M
Event and
Action Plans
Appendix N
Implementation Schedule And
Recommended Mitigation Measures
Appendix O Summaries of Environmental Complaint,
Warning, Summon and Notification of Successful Prosecution
Appendix P
Waste Generation in the Reporting
Month
Appendix Q Tentative Construction Programme
Appendix R
Record of Landfill Gas Monitoring by
Contractor
Appendix S
Not Used
Appendix T
Cultural
Heritage Monitoring Results
Appendix U
Not Used
Appendix
V
Surface Runoff Management Plan
1.
This is the 48th Environmental Monitoring and Audit
(EM&A) Report prepared by Cinotech Consultants
Limited for the “Agreement No. CE 59/2015 (EP) Environmental Team for Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Design and Construction”
(hereinafter called “the Project”). This
report documents the findings of EM&A Works conducted in October 2020.
2.
During the reporting month, the following works contracts were
undertaken:
·
Contract No. NE/2015/01 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin
Tunnel – Main Tunnel and Associated Works;
·
Contract No. NE/2015/02 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam
Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works;
· Contract No. NE/2015/03 – Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge;
· Contract No. NE/2017/01 – Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel –Tseung Kwan O Interchange
and Associated Works
· Contract No. NE/2017/02 – Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2/D4 and Associated Works.
· Contract No. NE/2017/06
– Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control
and Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works
· Contract No. NE/2017/07
– Cross Bay Link, Tseung Kwan O – Main Bridge and
Associated Works.
3. Environmental monitoring for the Project was performed in accordance with the EM&A Manual and the monitoring results were checked and reviewed. Site Inspections/Audits were conducted once per week. The implementation of the environmental mitigation measures, Event Action Plans and environmental complaint handling procedures were also checked.
4.
Summary of the non-compliance (exceedance) in the reporting month for
the Project is tabulated in Table I.
Table I Non-compliance (exceedance) Record for the Project in the Reporting Month
Environmental Monitoring |
No. of
Non-compliance (Exceedance) |
No. of Non-compliance
(Exceedance) due to Construction
Activities of this Project |
Action Taken |
||
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
||
Air Quality |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Noise |
9 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
Refer to Appendix K & O |
Marine Water Quality |
37 |
122 |
0 |
0 |
Refer to Appendix K |
Groundwater Level Monitoring (Piezometer Monitoring) |
0 |
N/A1 |
0 |
N/A1 |
N/A |
Ecological |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Cultural Heritage |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Landfill Gas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Note:(1) No Limit Level for Groundwater Level Monitoring
(Piezometer Monitoring).
Air Quality Monitoring
5. No Action/Limit Level exceedance for
1-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.
6. No Action/Limit Level exceedance for
24-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.
Construction Noise
Monitoring
7.
Nine
(9) Action Level
exceedances were recorded due to the documented complaints received in this
reporting month. The Summary of Documented Complaints in Reporting Month is
tabulated in Table III.
8. No Limit Level exceedance for day
time and no limit level exceedance for night time construction noise monitoring
were recorded in the reporting month.
Water Quality Monitoring
9. Groundwater quality monitoring had been suspended since October 2019 upon the agreement by EPD. Further details should be founded at Section 5.1.
10. All marine water quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting month. There were thirty-seven (37) Action Level and one hundred and twenty-two (122) Limit Level exceedances in Monitoring Stations (M) during marine water quality monitoring. During this reporting month, no sand plume was observed during the water quality monitoring and site audits, therefore there is no direct evidence that the recent exceedances were due to the construction works of the Project. Details of this investigation are presented in Section 5. Daily silt curtain inspection and weekly diving inspection have been carried out by contractor, the record, as reviewed by the site auditors, indicated that silt curtains were found in good conditions.
11. Construction phase daily
piezometer monitoring by the Contractor commenced in June 2018. It has switched
to monthly basis since 3 October 2018 as the construction activity was 120m away from the
piezometer gate. No monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.
Ecological Monitoring
12. Post-translation coral
monitoring survey shall be conducted once every 3 months for a period of 12
months after completion of coral translocation. The post-translocation coral monitoring
surveys were completed in November 2017.
Monitoring on Cultural
Heritage
13. Monitoring of impacts on
Cultural Heritage at Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple commenced in May 2017. No Alert, Alarm and Action
(AAA) Level exceedance was recorded in the reporting month.
Landscape and Visual
Monitoring and Audit
14. The implementation of
landscape and visual mitigation measures was checked during the environmental
site inspections. Recommended follow-up actions have been discharged by the
Contractor. Details of the audit
findings and implementation status are presented in Section 10.
Landfill Gas Monitoring
15. Monitoring of landfill
gases commenced in December 2016 and were carried out by the Contractor at excavation location, Portion III. No Limit
Level exceedance was recorded.
Environmental Site Inspection
16. Joint weekly site
inspections were conducted by representatives of the Contractor, Engineer and
Environmental Team. The representative of the IEC joined the site inspection for
NE/2015/01, NE/2015/02, NE/2017/01 and NE/2017/02 on 28, 15, 15 and 15 September 2020 respectively. Details of the audit findings and implementation status
are presented in Section 10.
Waste Management
17. Wastes generated from this Project include inert
construction and demolition (C&D) materials, non-inert C&D materials
and marine sediment. Details of waste management data is presented in Section 11 and Appendix P.
18. Summary of key
information in the reporting month is tabulated in Table II
Table II Key Information in the Reporting Month
Monthly Complaints |
Event Details |
Action Taken |
Status |
|
Number |
Nature |
|||
October 2020 |
11 |
Air / Noise |
Details refer to App O |
Draft CIRs submitted/
On-going |
September 2020 |
9 |
Noise /
Operation hours / Water |
Details refer to App O |
Draft CIRs submitted/ On-going |
August 2020 |
6 |
Noise /
Operation hours / Water |
Details refer to App O |
Draft CIRs submitted/ On-going |
July 2020 |
5 |
Air / Noise |
Details refer to App O |
Draft CIRs submitted |
June 2020 |
52 |
Air
/ Noise / Water/ Odour |
Details refer to App O |
Draft CIRs submitted |
May 2020 |
52 |
Air
/ Noise |
Details refer to App O |
Draft CIRs submitted/ Closed |
April 2020 |
41 |
Air /
Noise / Light / Odour |
Details refer to App O |
Draft CIRs submitted/ Closed |
Notifications of any summons & prosecutions received |
0 |
--- |
N/A |
N/A |
1. One of the complaint in April 2020 was missed out and discovered at
mid-May 2020. 2. One complaint was moved from June 2020 to May 2020 after
investigation. |
19. Summary of complaints
received in the reporting month is tabulated in Table III.
Table III Summary of Complaints Details in Reporting
Month
Complaint No. |
Complaint |
Investigation Findings |
Follow-up Action /
Mitigation Measure |
Tseung Kwan O Side |
|||
471 |
Noise nuisance
at morning (Oct 2020) |
The complainant had repeatedly complaint about
the continuous noise nuisace from September to October
2020. The CIR will be prepared in one-go. Meanwhile, no action level of
construction noise was recorded during noise monitoring; no non-compliance
was identified during site inspection. |
|
472 |
Noise Nuisance
from Excavation Works |
Preliminary
results show the noise source was from the backhoe at Portion IV. The details
shall be referred to CIR-N118 |
The Contractor
had applied mitigation measures such as adding lubricant to mounting parts to
alleviate the problem. |
474 |
Low-frequency
noise at night (Oct-Nov 2020) |
Preliminary results show the noise source was
originated from the dewatering pumps. Both ER and the Contractor confirms
that there was no malfuctioning pumps during the
time of incident. Details shall be referred to CIR-N119. |
NIL |
482 |
Dust emission
from construction works |
Despite the contractor had sprinkle water
regularly, the haul road was found dry during site audit session.
The Contractor is reminded to sprinkle water more frequently and cover
stockpiles of dusty material to reduce dust emission. The details shall be
referred to CIR-A19. |
NIL |
Lam Tin Side |
|||
468, 470, 476 |
Noise Nuisance
near Lam Tin Interchange (Late September to Early November) |
Investigation
on-going |
|
469, 473, 475, 477 |
Air &
Noise Nuisance near Lam Tin Interchange (October) |
20. Summary of key
construction work in the reporting month is tabulated in Table IV.
Table IV Summary Table for Key
Construction Work in the Reporting Month
Contract No. |
Project Title |
Site Activities (October 2020) |
|
NE/2015/01 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and
Associated Works |
Lam
Tin Interchange |
1)
EHC2 U-Trough 2)
Site Formation – Area
1G1, Area 1G2, Area 2 & Area 5 3)
Site Formation – Slope
stabilization & Retaining Wall 4)
Administration Building
& Bridge Construction 5)
Stormwater Tank Construction 6)
S01_2, EHC1&4
Construction 7)
CKLR Underground
Utilities |
Main
Tunnel |
8)
S02_2 Excavation 9)
Main Tunnel Lining Works |
||
TKO
Interchange |
10) Bridge Construction 11)
East Ventilation Building |
||
NE/2015/02 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works |
1)
Site formation works, road and drainage for Road P2 CH500-CH650 and
SR1 2)
Sloping seawall construction 3)
Excavation at CH821 – CH105 Cofferdam 4)
Excavation at CH105 – CH318 Cofferdam 5)
Installation of ELS at CH105 – CH821 Cofferdam 6)
Construction of U-trough at CH821 – CH105 7)
Installation of dewatering system at CH821 – CH105 Cofferdam 8)
Construction of U-trough at CH821 – CH105 9)
Construction of Underpass at CH105 – CH318 10)
Re-construction of watermains
DN150/DN200 at Tong Yin Street 11)
Structure works for underpass CH105 – CH318 12)
Reinstatement of Tong Yin Street 13)
Reinstatement of Chiu Shin Street 14)
Water works PE315 and DN300 15)
Removal of temporary cofferdam 16)
Installation of socketed H-pile at CT01 CH117 –
CH336 17)
Construction of abutment 18)
Road & drainage works at SR1 footpath / cycle
track 19)
Excavation of 3rd layer of ELS at
CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 20)
Construction of storm water drain system for SHH
9101 – 9103 21)
Drainage works at U-trough CH318 – CH363.50 22)
H-Pile Remedial Works at CH105 – CH318 Cofferdam 23)
Construction of Site Hull Road adjacent to SR2
CH110 – CH170 |
|
NE/2015/03 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge |
The construction works under the contract had been
completed in December 2019. The EM&A works were terminated in late April
2020. |
|
NE/2017/01 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Tseung
Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works |
1)
Construction of Pier 2)
Construction of Pier Head Works 3)
Construction of Pier Head 4)
Bored Piling Works 5)
Segment Erection Works 6)
Installation of Precast
Pile Cap Shell |
|
NE/2017/02 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2/D4 and
Associated Works |
1)
Inspection pit excavation
and utility diversion works 2)
Construction of drainage
and watermain 3)
Pile cap 4)
Asphalt Paving 5)
Pier, Staircase and Lift
Shalt Construction 6)
Road Works 7)
Pre-bored Socket-H Pile |
|
NE/2017/06 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and
Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works |
1)
Site clearance 2)
Site Office set-up 3)
Project signboard set up |
21. The future key
environmental issues in the coming month include:
Table V Summary Table for Site
Activities in the next Reporting Period
Contract No. and Project Title |
Site Activities (November 2020) |
Key Environmental Issues
* |
|
NE/2015/01 - Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and Associated Works |
Lam Tin Interchange |
1)
EHC2 U-Trough 2)
Site Formation – Area
1G1, Area 1G2, Area 2 & Area 5 3)
Site Formation – Slope
stabilization & Retaining Wall 4)
Administration Building
& Bridge Construction 5)
Stormwater Tank Construction 6)
S01_2, EHC1&4
Construction 7)
CKLR Underground
Utilities |
(A) / (B) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (G) |
Main Tunnel |
8)
S02_2 Excavation 9)
Main Tunnel Lining Works |
(B) |
|
TKO Interchange |
10)
Bridge Construction 11)
East Ventilation Building |
(A) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (F) / (I) |
|
NE/2015/02 - Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works |
1)
Construction of pillar box and ducting system at
Portion IV adjacent to Ocean Shores EVA 2)
Site formation at Road P2 CH500-CH650 and SR1 3)
Road and drainage works at Road P2 CH500 – 650,
slip road SR1 footpath and cycle track, slip road SR2 CH250 – CH350 4)
ELS at underpass P2 CH105 – CH318 5)
4th of excavation at CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 6)
Excavation/ELS at CH821 – CH105 Cofferdam 7)
Installation of socketed H-pile at CT01 CH117 –
CH336 8)
Reinstatement of Tong Yin Street 9)
Installation of de-watering system at CH821 –
CH105 10)
Excavation & ELS installation works at CH821
– CH105 11)
Construction of U-tough at CH821 – CH105 12)
Drainage works at U-trough CH318 – CH363.50 13)
Pre-bore/ELS works for U-trough CH363.50 –
CH411/U-trough SR2 CH110-CH170 14)
Construction of profile barrier at U-trough CH318
– CH363.50 15)
Construction of sloping seawall 16)
Removal of temporary cofferdam 17)
Construction of seawall coping 18)
Drainage works at SR1 footpath / cycle truck 19)
Installation of ELS at cofferdam CH105 – CH318 20)
Backfilling works for reinstatement of Tong Yin
Street 21)
Construction of U-trough at CH821 – CH 105
Cofferdam 22)
Excavation and re-compaction at S100 CH280 – S200
CH755 and S300 CH405 – CH326 23)
Construction of U-tough A 24) Waterworks
– DN300/PE315 |
(A) / (B) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (G) / (I) |
|
NE/2015/03 - Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge |
The construction
works under the contract had been completed in December 2019. Materials are
being removed from works area. |
N/A |
|
NE/2017/01 – Tseung
Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works |
1)
Dismantling of Temporary Working Platforms 2)
Bored Piling Works 3)
Installation of Precast Pile Cap Shell 4)
Construction of Pile Cap 5)
Construction of Pier 6)
Construction of Pier Head works 7)
Segment erection works 8)
Construction of Bridge
Decks |
(A) / (B) / (E) / (F) / (G) |
|
NE/2017/02 –Tseung Kwan
O - Lam Tin Tunnel - Road P2/D4 and Associated Works |
1)
Inspection pit excavation
and utility diversion works 2)
Construction of drainage
and watermain 3)
Pile cap 4)
Pre-bored Socket-H Pile 5)
Asphalt Paving 6)
Pier, Staircase and Lift
Shalt Construction 7)
Road Works |
(A) / (B) / (E) / (F) / (G) |
|
NE/2017/06 – Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and Surveillance System(TCSS) and
Associated Works |
1)
Site clearance 2)
Site Office set-up 3)
Project signboard set up 4)
Goods arrived &
storage on-site |
N/A |
Note:
(A)
Watering for
dust generation from haul road, stockpiles of dusty materials, exposed site
area, excavation works and rock breaking activities;
(B)
Noisy
construction activity such as rock-breaking activities and piling works;
(C)
Runoff from
exposed slope or site area;
(D)
Wastewater and
runoff discharge from site;
(E)
Accumulation of
silt, mud and sand along U-channels and sedimentation tanks;
(F)
Set up and
implementation of temporary drainage system for the surface runoff;
(G)
Storage of chemicals/fuel
and chemical waste/waste oil on site;
(H)
Accumulation and
storage of general and construction waste on site; and
(I)
Marine water quality impact and indirect
impact to coral communities due to marine construction for TKO-LTT reclamation
1.1
Cinotech Consultants Limited (Cinotech)
was commissioned by Civil Engineering and
Development Department (CEDD) as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake
environmental monitoring and auditing services for the Works Contracts involved
in the implementation of Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel
(TKO-LTT) project to ensure that the environmental performance
of the Works Contracts comply with the requirements specified in the
Environmental Permit (EP), Environmental Monitoring & Audit (EM&A)
Manual, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report of the TKO-LTT project and
other relevant statutory requirements.
This is the 48th Monthly EM&A report summarizing the
EM&A works for the Project in October 2020.
1.2
This is the 48th Monthly EM&A Report which summarises the
impact monitoring results and audit findings for the EM&A programme during
the reporting period in October 2020.
1.3
The structure of the report is as follows:
Section 1: Introduction – purpose and structure of
the report.
Section 2: Contract
Information – summarises background and scope of the Contract, site
description, project organization and contact details, construction programme,
the construction works undertaken and the status of Environmental Permits/Licenses
during the reporting month.
Section 3: Air
Quality Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring
programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations,
Action and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event / Action Plans.
Section 4: Noise
Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes,
monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations, Action
and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event / Action Plans.
Section 5: Water
Quality Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring
programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring
locations, Action and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event / Action
Plans.
Section 6: Ecological
Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes,
monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations and Action
and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event / Action Plans.
Section 7: Cultural
Heritage –summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes,
monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations and
monitoring results.
Section 8: Landscape
and Visual Monitoring Requirements – summarises the requirements of
landscape and visual monitoring
Section 9: Landfill
Gas Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring
programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring
locations, monitoring results and Limit Levels and Action Plan
Section 10: Environmental
Site Inspection – summarises the audit findings of the weekly site
inspections undertaken within the reporting month.
Section 11: Waste
Management – summarises the waste management data in the reporting month.
Section 12: Environmental
Non-conformance – summarises any monitoring exceedance, environmental
complaints, environmental summons and successful prosecutions within the
reporting month.
Section 13: Future
Key Issues – summarises the impact forecast and monitoring schedule for the
next three months.
Section 14: Conclusions
and Recommendation
2.1
In 2002, Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD)
commissioned an integrated planning and engineering study under Agreement No.
CE 87/2001 (CE) “Further Development of Tseung Kwan O
– Feasibility Study” (the “TKO Study”) to formulate a comprehensive plan for
further development of TKO New Town. It
recommended to further develop TKO to house a total population of 450,000
besides the district’s continuous commercial and industrial developments.
2.2
At present, the Tseung Kwan O Tunnel is the
main connection between Tseung Kwan O (TKO) and other
areas in the territory. To cope with the
anticipated transport need, the TKO Study recommended the provision of Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel (TKO-LTT) (hereinafter
referred to as “the Project”) and Cross Bay Link (CBL) to meet the long-term
traffic demand between TKO and the external areas. The site layout plan for the
Project is shown in Figure 1. CBL
was also entrusted with part of the marine viaducts near Tseung
Kwan O Interchange since the commencement of the CBL project the December 2018.
2.3
The Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) Report for the TKO-LTT project was approved under the
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) in July 2013. The
corresponding Environmental Permit (EP) was issued in August 2013 (EP no.:
EP-458/2013). Variations to the EP was applied and the latest EP (EP no.:
EP-458/2013/C) was issued by the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) in
January 2017.
2.4
The
commencement dates of construction of this Project are:
Contract No. NE/2015/01 and Contract No.
NE/2015/02: 7 November 2016.
Contract No. NE/2015/03: 29 May 2017.
Contract No. NE/2017/02: 15 March 2018.
Contract No. NE/2017/01: 23 May 2018.
Contract No. NE/2017/06: 09 November 2018.
2.5
Different
parties with different levels of involvement in the project organization
include:
·
Project Proponent – Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD)
·
The Engineer and the Engineer’s Representative (ER) – AECOM
·
Environmental Team (ET) – Cinotech Consultants
Limited (Cinotech)
·
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) – AnewR
Consulting Limited (AnewR)
2.6
The key
contacts of the Project are shown in Table
2.1.
Table 2.1 Key Project Contacts
Role |
Contact Person |
Phone No. |
Fax No. |
|
CEDD |
Project
Proponent |
Mr. LO Sai Pak, Sunny |
2301 1384 |
2739 0076 |
AECOM |
Engineer’s Representative |
Mr. KY Chan |
3922 9000 |
2759 1698 |
Cinotech |
Environmental
Team |
Dr. HF Chan |
2151 2088 |
3107 1388 |
Mr. KS Lee |
2151 2091 |
|||
AnewR |
Independent
Environmental Checker |
Mr. Adi Lee |
2618 2836 |
3007 8648 |
2.7
The major site activities undertaken in the reporting month included:
Table 2.2 Summary Table for Major Site Activities in
the Reporting Month
Contract No. |
Project Title |
Site Activities (October 2020) |
|
NE/2015/01 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and
Associated Works |
Lam
Tin Interchange |
1)
NE/2015/01 |
Main
Tunnel |
2)
S02_2 Excavation 3)
Main Tunnel Lining Works |
||
TKO
Interchange |
4)
Bridge Construction 5)
East Ventilation Building |
||
NE/2015/02 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works |
1)
Site formation works, road and drainage for Road P2 CH500-CH650 and
SR1 2)
Sloping seawall construction 3)
Excavation at CH821 – CH105 Cofferdam 4)
Excavation at CH105 – CH318 Cofferdam 5)
Installation of ELS at CH105 – CH821 Cofferdam 6)
Construction of U-trough at CH821 – CH105 7)
Installation of dewatering system at CH821 – CH105 Cofferdam 8)
Construction of U-trough at CH821 – CH105 9)
Construction of Underpass at CH105 – CH318 10)
Re-construction of watermains
DN150/DN200 at Tong Yin Street 11)
Structure works for underpass CH105 – CH318 12)
Reinstatement of Tong Yin Street 13)
Reinstatement of Chiu Shin Street 14)
Water works PE315 and DN300 15)
Removal of temporary cofferdam 16)
Installation of socketed H-pile at CT01 CH117 –
CH336 17)
Construction of abutment 18)
Road & drainage works at SR1 footpath / cycle
track 19)
Excavation of 3rd layer of ELS at
CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 20)
Construction of storm water drain system for SHH
9101 – 9103 21)
Drainage works at U-trough CH318 – CH363.50 22)
H-Pile Remedial Works at CH105 – CH318 Cofferdam 23)
Construction of Site Hull Road adjacent to SR2
CH110 – CH170 |
|
NE/2015/03 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge |
The
construction works under the contract had been completed in December 2019.
The EM&A works were terminated in late April 2020. |
|
NE/2017/01 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Tseung
Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works |
1)
Construction of Pier 2)
Construction of Pier Head Works 3)
Construction of Pier Head 4)
Bored Piling Works 5)
Segment Erection Works 6)
Installation of Precast Pile Cap Shell |
|
NE/2017/02 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2/D4 and
Associated Works |
1)
Inspection pit excavation and utility diversion
works 2)
Construction of drainage and watermain
3)
Pile cap 4)
Asphalt Paving 5)
Pier, Staircase and Lift Shalt Construction 6)
Road Works 7)
Pre-bored Socket-H Pile |
|
NE/2017/06 |
Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and
Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works |
1)
Site clearance 2)
Site Office set-up 3)
Project signboard set up |
2.8
The
construction programme showing the inter-relationship with environmental
protection/mitigation measures are presented in Table 2.3.
Table 2.3 Construction Programme Showing the
Inter-Relationship with Environmental Protection/Mitigation Measures
Construction
Works |
Major
Environmental Impact |
Control
Measures |
As mentioned in Table 2.2 |
Noise, dust impact, water quality and waste
generation |
Sufficient watering of the works site with active
dust emitting activities Properly cover the stockpiles On-site waste sorting and implementation of trip
ticket system Appropriate desilting/sedimentation devices
provided on site for treatment before discharge Use of quiet plant and well-maintained construction
plant Provide movable noise barrier |
2.9
A summary
of the relevant permits, licences, and/or notifications on environmental
protection for this Project is presented in Table 2.4.
Table
2.4 Summary of the
Status of Environmental Licences, Notification and Permits
Contract No. |
Permit /
License No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
|
From |
To |
|||
Environmental Permit (EP) |
||||
N/A |
EP-458/2013/C |
20/1/2017 |
N/A |
Valid |
Notification pursuant
to Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
||||
NE/2015/01 |
EPD Ref no.: 405305 |
21/07/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
EPD Ref no.:
405582 |
28/07/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
|
NE/2015/02 |
EPD Ref no.: 406100 |
12/08/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2015/03 |
EPD Ref no.: 416072 |
26/04/2017 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2017/02 |
EPD Ref no.: 429867 |
19/01/2018 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2017/01 |
EPD Ref no.: 430070 |
25/01/2018 |
N/A |
Valid |
Billing
Account for Construction Waste Disposal |
||||
NE/2015/01 |
Account No. 7025431 |
11/07/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2015/02 |
Account No. 7025654 |
16/08/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2015/03 |
Account No. 7026805 |
30/12/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2017/02 |
Account No. 7029651 |
22/12/2017 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2017/01 |
Account No. 7029994 |
01/02/2018 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2017/06 |
Account No. 7032520 |
22/11/2018 |
N/A |
Valid |
Registration
of Chemical Waste Producer |
||||
NE/2015/01 |
Waste Producer No. 5218-290-L2881-02 |
22/08/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
Waste
Producer No. 5213-833-L2532-03 |
22/08/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
|
NE/2015/02 |
Waste Producer No. 5213-838-C4094-01 |
23/08/2016 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2015/03 |
Waste Producer No. 5213-265-W3435-04 |
19/07/2017 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2017/02 |
Waste Producer No. 5213-833-Z4004-04 |
01/02/2018 |
N/A |
Valid |
NE/2017/01 |
Waste Producer No. 5213-833-C4262-01 |
12/02/2018 |
N/A |
Valid |
Effluent Discharge License under Water
Pollution Control Ordinance |
||||
NE/2015/01 |
WT00025806-2016 |
18/07/2018 |
30/11/2021 |
Valid |
WT00026212-2016 |
16/05/2017 |
30/11/2021 |
Valid |
|
WT00027354-2017 |
22/03/2017 |
31/03/2022 |
Valid |
|
WT00027405-2017 |
22/03/2017 |
31/03/2022 |
Valid |
|
WT00028495-2017 |
11/08/2017 |
31/08/2022 |
Valid |
|
NE/2015/02 |
WT00026386-2016 |
15/12/2016 |
31/12/2021 |
Valid |
WT00027226-2017 |
23/02/2017 |
28/02/2022 |
Valid |
|
WT00030654-2018 |
16/04/2018 |
30/04/2023 |
Valid |
|
NE/2015/03 |
WT00027295-2017 |
20/03/2017 |
31/03/2022 |
Valid |
NE/2017/01 |
WT00030711-2018 |
11/04/2018 |
30/04/2023 |
Valid |
WT00030716-2018 |
23/05/2018 |
31/05/2023 |
Valid |
|
NE/2017/02 |
WT00030654-2018 |
16/04/2018 |
30/04/2023 |
Valid |
Construction Noise Permit (CNP) |
||||
NE/2015/01 |
GW-RE0323-20 |
15/05/2020 |
29/11/2020 |
Valid |
GW-RE0362-20 |
21/05/2020 |
12/11/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0366-20 |
21/05/2020 |
20/11/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0486-20 |
23/06/2020 |
21/12/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0580-20 |
08/07/2020 |
07/10/2020 |
Valid until 7
Oct 2020 |
|
GW-RE0662-20 |
21/08/2020 |
20/11/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0693-20 |
07/09/2020 |
06/11/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0697-20 |
04/09/2020 |
03/03/2021 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0738-20 |
17/09/2020 |
16/12/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0767-20 |
23/09/2020 |
21/03/2021 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0812-20 |
01/10/2020 |
04/10/2020 |
Valid until 4
Oct 2020 |
|
GW-RE0909-20 |
06/11/2020 |
05/01/2021 |
Valid |
|
NE/2015/02 |
GW-RE0291-20 |
06/05/2020 |
15/10/2020 |
Valid until
15 Oct 2020 |
GW-RE0302-20 |
07/05/2020 |
10/10/2020 |
Valid until
10 Oct 2020 |
|
GW-RE0433-20 |
01/06/2020 |
25/11/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0503-20 |
12/06/2020 |
04/12/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0584-20 |
08/07/2020 |
07/10/2020 |
Valid until 7
Oct 2020 |
|
NE/2017/01 |
GW-RE0290-20 |
04/05/2020 |
03/11/2020 |
Valid |
GW-RE0331-20 |
07/05/2020 |
03/11/2020 |
Valid |
|
GW-RE0549-20 |
30/06/2020 |
28/12/2020 |
Valid |
|
NE/2017/02 |
GW-RE0896-20 |
03/11/2020 |
02/05/2021 |
Valid |
Marine
Dumping Permit |
||||
NE/2017/01 |
EP/MD/21-011 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
NE/2015/01 |
CEDD01062 |
N/A |
10/11/2020 |
Valid |
Specified
Process (SP) License |
||||
NE/2015/01 |
L-11-053 |
09/03/2018 |
08/03/2021 |
Valid |
2.10
The
EM&A programme requires construction noise monitoring, air quality monitoring,
water quality monitoring, environmental site audit, etc. The EM&A
requirements for each parameter are described in the following sections,
including:
·
All monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit levels for all environmental parameters;
·
Event Action Plans;
·
Environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the Project EIA
Report.
2.12
This report
presents the monitoring results, observations, locations, equipment, period,
methodology and QA/QC procedures of the monitoring parameters of the required
environmental monitoring works and audit works for the Project in October 2020.
3.1
According to EM&A Manual of the Project, 1-hour and 24-hour TSP
monitoring are required to monitor the air quality. For regular impact
monitoring, a sampling frequency of at least once in every six days shall be
undertaken at all of the monitoring stations for 24-hour TSP monitoring. For
1-hour TSP monitoring, the sampling frequency of at least three times in every
six days shall be undertaken when the highest dust impact occurs. Appendix A shows the established
Action/Limit Levels for the environmental monitoring works.
3.2
Six designated monitoring stations were selected for air quality
monitoring programme. Table 3.1
describes the air quality monitoring locations, which are also depicted in Figure 2.
Table 3.1 Locations for Air Quality Monitoring
Monitoring
Stations |
Location |
Location
of Measurement |
AM1 |
Tin Hau Temple |
Ground Level |
AM2 |
Sai Tso Wan Recreation Ground |
Ground Level |
AM3 |
Yau Lai Estate Bik Lai House |
Rooftop (41/F) |
AM4(1) |
Sitting-out Area at Cha Kwo
Ling Village |
Ground Level |
AM4(A)(2) (*) |
Cha Kwo Ling
Public Cargo Working Area Administrative Office |
Rooftop (3/F) |
AM5(A)(*) |
Tseung Kwan O DSD Desilting Compound |
Ground Level |
AM6(A) (*) |
Park Central, L1/F Open Space Area |
1/F |
Remarks: (1) For 1-hour TSP monitoring; (2) For 24-hour TSP
monitoring
(*) Air
quality monitoring at designated station AM4(24-hr
TSP), AM5 and AM6 was rejected by the premise owners. Therefore, baseline and
impact air quality monitoring
works were carried out at alternative air quality monitoring stations AM4(A) (24-hr TSP only), AM5(A) and AM6(A) respectively.
3.3
High Volume Samplers (HVS) were used to carry out 24-hour TSP
monitoring. Direct reading dust meter were also used to measure 1-hour average
TSP levels. The 1-hour sampling was determined periodically by HVS to check the
validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.
3.4
Wind data monitoring equipment was set at rooftop (about 41/F) of Yau
Lai Estate Bik Lai House for logging wind speed and wind direction such that
the wind sensors are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by building.
The wind data monitoring equipment is re-calibrated at least once every six
months and the wind directions are divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees
each. The location is shown in Figure 2.
3.5
Table 3.2 summarizes the
equipment to be used in the air quality monitoring. Copies of calibration certificates are
attached in Appendix B.
Table 3.2 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model and Make |
Quantity |
Calibrator |
TISCH Model:
TE-5025A |
1 |
1-hour TSP
Dust Meter |
Sibata Model No.: LD-3B / LD-5R |
5 |
Met One
Instruments Model No.: AEROCET-831 |
0 |
|
Handheld Particle
Counter Hal-HPC300 / Hal-HPC301 |
0 |
|
HVS Sampler |
TISCH Model:
TE-5170 |
1 |
GMW Model:
GS2310 |
5 |
|
Wind Anemometer |
Davis Weather Monitor II, Model no. 7440 |
1 |
Davis Weather Stations, Vantage Pro 2, Model No. 6152CUK |
0 |
3.6
Table 3.3 summarizes the monitoring parameters, monitoring
period and frequencies of air quality monitoring.
Table 3.3 Frequency and Parameters of Air Quality
Monitoring
Monitoring Stations |
Parameter |
Frequency |
AM1, AM2, AM3,
AM4, AM5(A) and AM6(A) |
1-hour TSP |
3 times per 6
days |
AM1, AM2,
AM3, AM4(A), AM5(A) and AM6(A) |
24-hour TSP |
Once per 6
days |
1-hour TSP Monitoring
Measuring Procedures
3.7
The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with
the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:
(Model LD3 / LD3B / LD5R)
The 1-hour dust meter is
placed at least 1.3 meters above ground.
Set POWER to “ON” and
make sure that the battery level was not flash or in low level.
Allow the instrument to
stand for about 3 minutes and then the cap of the air sampling inlet has been
released.
Push the knob at MEASURE
position.
Set time/mode setting to
[BG] by pushing the time setting switch.
Then, start the background measurement by pushing the start/stop switch
once. It will take 6 sec. to complete
the background measurement.
Push the time setting
switch to change the time setting display to [MANUAL] at the bottom left of the
liquid crystal display. Finally, push
the start/stop switch to stop the measuring after 1 hour sampling.
Information such as
sampling date, time, count value and site condition
were recorded during the monitoring period.
(AEROCET-531)
The 1-hour dust meter is
placed at least 1.3 meters above ground.
Remove the red rubber
cap from the AEROCET-531 inlet nozzle.
Turn on the power switch
that is located on the right side of the AEROCET-531.
On power up the product
intro screen is displayed for 3 seconds. The intro screen displays the product
name and firmware version.
Then the main counter
screen will be displayed.
Press the START button.
Internal vacuum pump start running. After 1 minute the pump will stop and the
0.5µm and 5µm channels will show the cumulative counts of particles larger than
0.5µm and 5µm per cubic foot.
The AEROCET-531 is now
checked out and ready for use.
To switch off the
AEROCET-531 power to stop the measuring after 1 hour sampling.
Information such as
sampling date, time, and display value and site condition were recorded during
the monitoring period.
(Equipment: Hal Technology; Model no. Hal-HPC300 /
Hal-HPC301)
The 1-hour dust meter is
placed at least 1.3 meters above ground.
Set POWER to “ON” and
make sure that the battery level was not flash or in low level.
Allow the instrument to
stand for about 3 minutes and then the cap of the air sampling inlet has been
released.
Push the knob at MEASURE
position.
Set time/mode setting to
[BG] by pushing the time setting switch.
Then, start the background measurement by pushing the start/stop switch once. It will take 6 sec. to complete the
background measurement.
Push the time setting
switch to change the time setting display to [MANUAL] at the bottom left of the
liquid crystal display. Finally, push
the start/stop switch to stop the measuring after 1 hour sampling.
Information such as
sampling date, time, count value and site condition
were recorded during the monitoring period.
Maintenance/Calibration
3.8
The following maintenance/calibration is required for the direct dust
meters:
Check and calibrate the
meter by HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by
direct reading method at 2-month intervals throughout all stages of the air
quality monitoring.
24-hour TSP Monitoring
Instrumentation
3.9
High volume samplers (HVS) (TISCH Model: TE-5170 and GMW Model: GS2310)
completed with appropriate sampling inlets were employed for 24-hour TSP
monitoring. The sampler is composed of a
motor, a filter holder, a flow controller and a sampling inlet and its
performance specification complied with that required by USEPA Standard Title
40, Code of Federation Regulations Chapter 1 (Part 50).
3.10
The positioning of the HVS samplers are as follows:
· a horizontal platform
with appropriate support to secure the samplers against gusty wind shall be
provided;
· no two samplers shall be
placed less than 2 meter apart
· the distance between the
sampler and an obstacle, such as buildings, must be at least twice the height
that the obstacle protrudes above the sampler;
· a minimum of 2 metres of
separation from walls, parapets and penthouses is required for rooftop
samplers;
· a minimum of 2 metres of
separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally is required;
· no furnace or
incinerator flue is nearby;
· airflow around the
sampler is unrestricted;
· the sampler is more than
20 metres from the dripline;
· any wire fence and gate,
to protect the sampler, shall not cause any obstruction during monitoring;
· permission must be
obtained to set up the samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring
stations; and
· a secured supply of electricity is needed to operate
the samplers.
Operating/analytical procedures for the operation of
HVS
3.11
Prior to the commencement of the dust sampling, the flow rate of the
high volume sampler was properly set (between 1.1 m3/min. and 1.4 m3/min.)
in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction to within the range
recommended in USEPA Standard Title 40, CFR Part 50.
3.12
For TSP sampling, fiberglass filters with a collection efficiency of
> 99% for particles of 0.3μm diameter were used.
3.13
The power supply was checked to ensure the sampler worked properly. On sampling, the sampler was operated for 5
minutes to establish thermal equilibrium before placing any filter media at the
designated air monitoring station.
3.14
The filter holding frame was then removed by loosening the four nuts and
a weighted and conditioned filter was carefully centred with the stamped number
upwards, on a supporting screen.
3.15
The filter was aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an
airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.
Then the filter holding frame was tightened to the filter holder with
swing bolts. The applied pressure should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at
the edges.
3.16
The shelter lid was closed and secured with the aluminium strip.
3.17
The timer was then programmed.
Information was recorded on the record sheet, which included the
starting time, the weather condition and the filter number (the initial weight
of the filter paper can be found out by using the filter number).
3.18
After sampling, the filter was removed and sent to the HOKLAS laboratory
(Wellab Ltd.) for weighing. The elapsed time will be also recorded.
3.19
Before weighing, all filters was equilibrated in a conditioning
environment for 24 hours. The conditioning environment temperature should be
between 25°C and 30°C and not vary by more than ±3°C; the relative humidity
(RH) should be < 50% and not vary by more than ±5%. A convenient working RH
is 40%.
Maintenance/Calibration
3.20
The following maintenance/calibration is required for the HVS:
The high volume motors
and their accessories will be properly maintained. Appropriate maintenance such
as routine motor brushes replacement and electrical wiring checking will be
made to ensure that the equipment and necessary power supply are in good
working condition.
High volume samplers
will be calibrated at bi-monthly intervals using TE-5025A Calibration Kit
throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.
3.21
No Action/Limit Level exceedance was recorded for both 1-hour TSP and
24-hour TSP monitoring respectively.
3.22
The air temperature, precipitation and the relative humidity data was
obtained from Hong Kong Observatory where the wind speed and wind direction
were recorded by the installed Wind Anemometer at rooftop of Yau Lai Estate Bik Lai House (41/F). The
location is shown in Figure 2. This
weather information for the reporting month is summarized in Appendix C.
3.23
The monitoring data and graphical presentations of 1-hour and 24-hour
TSP monitoring results are shown in
Appendix E and Appendix F
respectively.
3.24
According to our field observations, the major dust source identified at
the designated air quality monitoring stations are as follows:
Table 3.4 Major Dust Source during Air Quality Monitoring
Station |
Major Dust Source |
AM1 – Tin Hau Temple |
Road Traffic
at Cha Kwo Ling Road |
AM2 – Sai Tso
Wan Recreation Ground |
N/A |
AM3 – Yau Lai
Estate Bik Lai House |
Road Traffic near
Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza |
AM4 -
Sitting-out Area at Cha Kwo Ling Village |
Road Traffic
at Cha Kwo Ling Road |
AM4(A) - Cha Kwo Ling Public Cargo Working Area Administrative Office |
Road Traffic
at Cha Kwo Ling Road |
AM5(A) - Tseung Kwan O DSD Desilting Compound |
Vehicle
Movement within the Desilting Compound |
AM6(A) - Park
Central, L1/F Open Space Area |
Road Traffic
at Po Yap Road |
4.1
According to EM&A Manual of the Project, construction noise
monitoring was conducted to monitor the construction noise arising from the
construction activities. The regular monitoring frequency for each monitoring
station shall be on a weekly basis and conduct one set of measurements between
0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays. Appendix
A shows the established Action and Limit Levels for the environmental
monitoring works.
4.2
Noise monitoring was conducted at 9 designated monitoring stations (CM1,
CM2, CM3, CM4, CM5, CM6(A), CM7(A), CM8(A), CM9(A)) in
the reporting period. Table 4.1 and Figure 3 show the locations of these
stations.
Table 4.1 Noise Monitoring Stations
Monitoring Stations |
Locations |
Location of Measurement |
CM1 |
Nga Lai House, Yau Lai Estate Phase 1, Yau Tong |
Rooftop (41/F) |
CM2 |
Bik Lai House, Yau Lai Estate Phase 1, Yau Tong |
Rooftop (41/F) |
CM3 |
Block S, Yau Lai Estate Phase 5, Yau Tong |
Rooftop (40/F) |
CM4 |
Tin Hau Temple, Cha Kwo Ling |
Ground Level |
CM5 |
CCC Kei Faat Primary
School, Yau Tong |
Rooftop (6/F) |
CM6(A)* |
Site Boundary
of Contract No. NE/2015/02 near Tower 1, Ocean Shores |
Ground Level |
CM7(A)* |
Site Boundary
of Contract No. NE/2015/02 near Tower 7, Ocean Shores |
Ground Level |
CM8(A)* |
Park Central,
L1/F Open Space Area |
1/F |
CM9(A)1 |
Rooftop of
Capri Tower 10 |
Rooftop
(12/F) |
* Noise
monitoring at designated station CM6, CM7 & CM8 was rejected by the premise
owners. Therefore, baseline and impact noise monitoring works were carried out
at alternative noise monitoring stations CM6(A),
CM7(A) and CM8(A) respectively.
1 Ad-hoc
noise monitoring at station CM9(A) was commenced in
September 2019.
4.3 Since the population intake of Capri had commenced during the construction of the TKOLTT, the noise monitoring work in daytime period was conducted at CM9(A) – Rooftop of Capri Tower 10 on normal weekdays. The background Noise Level was recorded during the Lunch Hour of Construction Site (i.e. 12:00-13:00) and to be used as the referencing value for compliance checking for Noise Action and Limit Level.
Monitoring
Equipment
4.4
Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for impact noise monitoring. The
meters are Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of
the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq) and percentile sound pressure level (Lx)
that also complied with International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications.
Table 4.2 summarizes the noise
monitoring equipment being used. Copies of calibration certificates are
attached in Appendix B.
Table 4.2 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model and Make |
Quantity |
Integrating
Sound Level Meter |
SVAN 957/ 959 / 979 |
4 |
BSWA308 SLM |
3 |
|
Calibrator |
SV30A |
1 |
Brüel & Kjær 4231 |
1 |
|
ST-120 |
3 |
4.5
Table 4.3 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and
total duration of monitoring. The noise monitoring schedule is shown in Appendix D. Additional weekly impact
monitoring are carried out for evening time (1900 – 2300 hours) for monitoring
stations CM1, CM2, CM3 & CM6(A) and night-time (2300 – 0700 hours) for
monitoring stations CM1, CM2 & CM3.
Table 4.3 Frequency and Parameters of Noise Monitoring
Monitoring Stations |
Parameter |
Period |
Frequency |
Measurement |
CM1 |
L10(30
min) dB(A) L90(30
min) dB(A) Leq(30 min)
dB(A) |
0700-1900 hrs
on normal weekdays |
Once per week |
Façade |
CM2 |
Façade |
|||
CM3 |
Façade |
|||
CM4 |
Façade |
|||
CM5 |
Façade |
|||
CM6(A) |
Free Field |
|||
CM7(A) |
Free Field |
|||
CM8(A) |
Façade |
|||
CM9(A) |
Façade |
|||
CM1 |
L10(5
min) dB(A) L90(5
min) dB(A) Leq(5 min) dB(A) |
1900 – 0700
hrs on normal weekdays |
Façade |
|
CM2 |
Façade |
|||
CM3 |
Façade |
|||
CM6(A) |
1900 – 2300
hrs on normal weekdays |
Free Field |
Monitoring Methodology and QA/QC Procedure
4.6
The monitoring procedures are as follows:
· The monitoring station
was normally be at a point 1m from the exterior of the sensitive receivers
building façade and be at a position 1.2m above the ground.
· For free field
measurement, the meter was positioned away from any nearby reflective surfaces.
All records for free field noise levels was adjusted with a correction of +3 dB(A).
· The battery condition
was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.
· Parameters such as
frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time was set as
follows:
- frequency
weighting : A
- time
weighting : Fast
- measurement
time : 30 minutes
· Prior to and after each
noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94.0 dB at
1000 Hz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after
measurement will be more than 1.0 dB, the measurement would be considered
invalid and repeat of noise measurement would be required after re-calibration
or repair of the equipment.
· At the end of the
monitoring period, the Leq, L90
and L10 was recorded. In
addition, noise sources was recorded on a standard record sheet.
· Noise monitoring will be
cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, and wind with a steady speed exceeding
5 m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s. Supplementary monitoring was
provided to ensure sufficient data would be obtained.
Maintenance and
Calibration
4.7
The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator was cleaned
with a soft cloth at quarterly intervals.
4.8
The sound level meter and calibrator was checked and calibrated at
yearly intervals.
4.9
Immediately prior to and following each noise measurement the accuracy
of the sound level meter was checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a
known sound pressure level at a known frequency. Measurements may be accepted
as valid only if the calibration levels from before and after the noise
measurement agree to within 1.0 dB.
4.10
Nine (9) Action Level exceedances were
recorded due to the documented complaints received in this reporting month. No
Limit level exceedances for night-time construction noise monitoring were
recorded and no Limit Level exceedance for day time was recorded in the reporting
month.
4.11
Noise monitoring results and graphical presentations are shown in Appendix G.
4.12
The major noise source identified at the noise monitoring stations are
shown in Table 4.4.
Table 4.4 Major Noise Source during Noise Monitoring
Monitoring Stations |
Locations |
Major Noise Source |
CM1 |
Nga Lai
House, Yau Lai Estate Phase 1, Yau Tong |
Road Traffic
near Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza |
CM2 |
Bik Lai
House, Yau Lai Estate Phase 1, Yau Tong |
Road Traffic
near Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza |
CM3 |
Block S, Yau
Lai Estate Phase 5, Yau Tong |
Road Traffic
near Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza |
CM4 |
Tin Hau Temple, Cha Kwo Ling |
Road Traffic at
Cha Kwo Ling Road |
CM5 |
CCC Kei Faat Primary School, Yau Tong |
Road Traffic at
Yau Tong Road |
CM6(A) |
Site Boundary
of Contract No. NE/2015/02 near Tower 1, Ocean Shores |
Road Traffic at
O King Road near Ocean Shores |
CM7(A) |
Site Boundary
of Contract No. NE/2015/02 near Tower 7, Ocean Shores |
Road Traffic at
Tong Yin Street |
CM8(A) |
Park Central,
L1/F Open Space Area |
Road Traffic at
Po Yap Road |
CM9(A) |
Rooftop of
Capri Tower 10 |
Construction
Noise from Portion V/Area A of NE/2015/02 site area |
4.13
All the Construction Noise Levels (CNLs) reported in this report were
adjusted with the corresponding baseline level (i.e. Measured Leq – Baseline Leq
= CNL), in order to facilitate the interpretation of the noise exceedance. The
baseline noise level and the Noise Limit Level at each designated noise
monitoring station are presented in Table
4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.
Table 4.5 Baseline Noise Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring
Stations
Station |
Baseline Noise Level, dB (A) |
Noise Limit Level, dB (A) (at 0700 – 1900 hrs on normal weekdays) |
CM1 |
65.5 |
75 |
CM2 |
63.6 |
|
CM3 |
65.6 |
|
CM4 |
62.0 |
|
CM5 |
68.2 |
70* |
CM6(A) |
61.9 |
75 |
CM7(A) |
58.3 |
|
CM8(A) |
69.1 |
|
CM9(A) |
N/A(1) |
|
(*) Noise Limit Level is
65 dB(A) during school examination periods. (1) )
The background Noise Level was recorded during the Lunch Hour of Construction
Site (i.e. 12:00-13:00) and to be used as the referencing value for
compliance checking for Noise Action and Limit Level. |
Table 4.6 Baseline Noise Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring
Stations (Evening-time & Daytime (Holiday))
Station |
Baseline Noise Level, dB (A) (Evening time on all days
(1900-2300 hrs) and Holidays (including Sundays) during daytime (0700-1900
hrs)) |
Noise Limit Level, dB (A) (Evening time on all days
(1900-2300 hrs) and Holidays (including Sundays) during daytime (0700-1900
hrs)) |
CM1 |
64.4 |
70 |
CM2 |
62.2 |
|
CM3 |
64.7 |
|
CM6(A) |
60.2 |
651 |
1. ASR B was adopted
according to the EIA as traffic in the surrounding area has not been changed.
|
Table 4.7 Baseline
Noise Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring Stations (Night-time)
Station |
Baseline Noise Level, dB (A) (Night-time (2300 – 0700
hrs) |
Noise Limit Level, dB (A) (Night-time (2300 – 0700
hrs) |
CM1 |
14-day baseline monitoring results for the time period
of impact measurement at each station would be adopted |
55 |
CM2 |
||
CM3 |
Current Tunnel Blasting
Arrangement
4.14
The drill and blast method was evaluated as the most appropriate method and
the general practice of this method was introduced during the EIA report
assessment. The paragraphs 2.9.9 and 2.9.33 of the EIA Report mention that
there might be one blast or multiple blasts and the maximum number of blast
location per day would be determined by the Contractor to suite his method of
working.
4.15
Notwithstanding the information provided by the Engineer at paragraphs
4.6.4 and 6.6.12 of the EIA Report, to minimize blast nuisance to the public
and to respond to the community concerns, the tunnel blast should be arranged,
where possible, avoiding the blast to be carried out during night time and
shortening the blast duration by arranging various work fronts to be blasted at
different time slots. Hence, it has become more desirable to split one tunnel
blasting operation, which may consist of several blasting work fronts along the
tunnels, into a total of two to three tunnel blasts per day. The tunnel blasts,
which locate outside the MTR Protection Zone (RPZ) possessing insignificant
risk to the MTR's structures would be carried out during day time and before
22:00. For the tunnel blasts within and in close vicinity to RPZ, Contractor's
blasting assessment report revealed that those blasts have to be carried out
after train service and, generally, at around 01:40.
Groundwater Quality
5.1
The existing groundwater quality monitoring programme has been suspended
as the monitoring results had been deemed non-representative of the impact from
the project justified by two major factors: (1) influence on the monitoring
results from non-project related factors, such as anthropogenic activities and
natural phenomenon; and (2) large separation between the monitoring stations
and works area. In addition, as no alternative locations for the groundwater
quality monitoring were available, the groundwater quality monitoring has been
suspended since October 2019 upon the agreement by EPD.
Marine Water Quality
5.2
Marine water quality monitoring was conducted three times per week at
the designated monitoring stations. Monitoring took place two times per
monitoring day during mid ebb and mid flood tides at three depths (1 meter from
surface, mid depth and 1 meter from the bottom). For Tseung
Kwan O Salt Water Intake (i.e. Station M6), water sampling and in-situ
measurements was taken at the vertical level where the water abstraction point
of the intake is located (i.e. approximately mid-depth level). If the water
depth is less than 6m, the mid-depth measurement may be omitted. If the depth
is less than 3m, only the mid-depth measurements need to be taken.
5.3
Duplicate in-situ measurements (Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, DO
saturation, turbidity, pH, temperature and salinity) and water samples
(suspended solids (SS)) at each depth were monitored in accordance with the
requirements in the EM&A Manual. For selection of tides for in-situ
measurement and water sampling, tidal range of individual flood and ebb tides
were not less than 0.5m.
5.4 According to the Environmental Review Report (ERR) for Variations of Environmental Permit (Ref: C45-03), water quality monitoring and audit programme was implemented for monitoring of oxygen depletion (e.g. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) level) in this embayed waters during the period when the fully enclosed barrier is installed. A “Proposal for Water Quality Monitoring in Temporary Marine Embayment” has been submitted to EPD in July 2017 to propose the monitoring frequency, parameter, location, etc. EPD has no further comment on the Proposal. Since January 2020, the cofferdam has been partially removed and the seawater is no longer enclosed. Therefore, no embayment water quality monitoring is required.
Groundwater Level Monitoring (Piezometer Monitoring)
5.5
Daily piezometer monitoring at any time of
the day shall be carried throughout the whole period when any tunnel
construction activities are carried out within +/- 50m of the piezometer gate
in plan. The monitoring commenced in June 2018. It has switched to monthly
basis since 3 October 2018 as the
construction activity was 120m away from the piezometer gate. No monitoring was
conducted in the reporting month.
Marine Water Quality
5.6
A total of twelve monitoring stations are designated for the water
quality monitoring program according to EM&A Manual. One additional
monitoring station (W1) is designated for monitoring of oxygen depletion in the
embayed waters during the period when the fully enclosed barrier is installed.
The locations are also summarized in Table
5.2 and shown on Figure 5.
Table 5.2 Marine Quality Monitoring Stations
Descriptions |
Coordinates |
||
Easting |
Northing |
||
M1 |
Junk Bay
Coral Site – Junk Bay near Chiu Keng Wan |
844255 |
817565 |
M2 |
Junk Bay
Coral Site – Junk Bay |
844076 |
817087 |
M3 |
Junk Bay
Coral Site – Junk Island |
844491 |
817890 |
M4 |
Junk Bay
Coral Site –Chiu Keng Wan |
843209 |
816416 |
M5 |
Junk Bay
Coral Site – Fat Tong Chau |
845463 |
815769 |
M6 |
Tseung Kwan O Salt Water Intake |
845512 |
817442 |
C1 |
Control
Station – Southeast |
844696 |
814773 |
C2 |
Control
Station – Northwest |
842873 |
816014 |
G1 |
Gradient
Station |
844418 |
817560 |
G2 |
Gradient
Station |
844290 |
817384 |
G3 |
Gradient
Station |
844488 |
817735 |
G4 |
Gradient
Station |
844967 |
817551 |
5.7
For in-situ monitoring, a multi-parameter
meter (Aquaread AP-2000-D) was used to measure Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, DO saturation (DO
%), pH, temperature and turbidity. A sampler was used to collect water samples
for laboratory analysis of SS, BOD5, TOC, Total Nitrogen, Ammonia-N
and Total Phosphate.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Temperature Measuring Equipment
5.8
The instrument for measuring dissolved oxygen
and temperature was portable and weatherproof complete with cable, sensor,
comprehensive operation manuals and use DC power source. It was capable of
measuring:
a dissolved oxygen level in the range of 0-20
mg/L and 0-200% saturation; and
a temperature of 0-45 degree
Celsius.
5.9
It has a membrane electrode with automatic
temperature compensation complete with a cable.
5.10
Sufficient stocks of spare electrodes and
cables were available for replacement where necessary.
5.11
Salinity compensation was built-in in the DO
equipment.
Turbidity
5.12
Turbidity was measured in-situ by the nephelometric method. The instrument was portable and
weatherproof using a DC power source complete with cable, sensor and
comprehensive operation manuals. The equipment was capable of measuring
turbidity between 0-1000 NTU. The probe cable was not be less than 25m in
length.
pH
5.13
The instrument was consisting of a
potentiometer, a glass electrode, a reference electrode and a
temperature-compensating device. It was readable to 0.1pH in a range of 0 to
14. Standard buffer solutions of at least pH 7 and pH 10 were used for
calibration of the instrument before and after use.
Water Depth Detector
5.14
A portable, battery-operated echo sounder was
used for the determination of water depth at each designated monitoring station.
Water Sampler
5.15
Water samples collected for laboratory
analysis were stored in high density polythene bottles sample containers, with
appropriate preservatives added. All sampling bottles were labelled
(waterproof) with the sampling date and time, sample lot number and sampling
location reference number to avoid mishandling.
Sample Container and Storage
5.16
Following collection, water samples for
laboratory analysis were stored in high density polythene bottles, with
preservative appropriately added where necessary. They will be packed in ice
(cooled to 4°C without being frozen),
delivered to the laboratory and analysed as soon as possible.
Calibration of In-Situ Instruments
5.17
All in-situ monitoring instruments were
checked, calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or
other international accreditation scheme before use, and subsequently
re-calibrated at 3 monthly intervals throughout all stages of the water quality
monitoring.
5.18
For the on-site calibration of field
equipment, the BS 1427:1993, "Guide to Field and on-site test methods for
the analysis of waters" was observed.
5.19
Before each round of monitoring, a zero check
in distilled water was performed with the turbidity probe of Aquaread AP-2000-D. The probe was then be calibrated with a
solution of known NTU.
5.20
Sufficient stocks of spare parts were
maintained for replacements when necessary. Backup monitoring equipment was
also made available so that monitoring can proceed uninterrupted even when some
equipment is under maintenance, calibration, etc.
5.21
Table 5.3 summarizes the equipment
used in the water quality monitoring program. Copies of the calibration
certificates of the equipment are shown in Appendix
B.
Table 5.3 Water Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model and
Make |
Qty. |
Water Sampler |
Kahlsico Water-Bottle
Model 135DW 150 |
1 |
Multi-parameter Water Quality System |
YSI 6820-C-M |
0 |
Aquaread AP-2000-D |
0 |
|
YSI EXO1 Multiparameter
Sondes |
1 |
|
Monitoring Position Equipment |
“Magellan” Handheld GPS Model GPS-320 |
1 |
Water Depth Detector |
Fishfinder 140 |
1 |
5.22
Table 5.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters, monitoring
period and frequencies of the water quality monitoring in the reporting period.
Table 5.4 Water Quality Monitoring Parameters and
Frequency
Monitoring Stations |
Parameters, unit |
Depth |
Frequency |
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 C1 C2 G1 G2 G3 G4 |
In-situ: Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, DO
saturation, turbidity, pH, temperature and salinity Laboratory Testing: Suspended Solids (SS) |
M1-M5, C1-C2,
G1-G4 · 3 water depths: 1m below water surface, mid-depth
and 1m above sea bed. · If the water depth is less than 3m, mid-depth
sampling only. · If the water depth is less than 6m, omit
mid-depth sampling. M6 · at the vertical level where the water abstraction
point of the intake is located(i.e. approximately mid-depth level) |
3 days per
week / 2 per
monitoring day (1 for
mid-ebb and 1 for mid-flood) |
Marine Water Quality
5.23
The monitoring stations were accessed using survey boat by the guide of
a hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS). The depth of the monitoring
location was measured using depth meter in order to determine the sampling
depths. Afterwards, the probes of the in-situ measurement equipment was lowered
to the predetermined depths (1 m below water surface, mid-depth and 1 m above
seabed) and the measurements was carried out accordingly. The in-situ
measurements at predetermined depths was carried out in duplicate. In case the
difference in the duplicate in-situ measurement results was larger than 25%,
the third set of in-situ measurement would be carried out for result
confirmation purpose.
5.24
Water sampler was lowered into the water to the required depths of
sampling. Upon reaching the pre-determined depth, a messenger to activate the
sampler was then released to travel down the wire. The water sample was sealed
within the sampler before retrieving. At each station, water samples for SS at
three depths (1 m below water surface, mid-depth and 1 m above seabed) were
collected accordingly. Water samples were stored in a cool box and kept at less
than 4°C but without frozen and sent to the laboratory as
soon as possible.
5.25
The testing of all parameters were conducted by Wellab
Ltd. (HOKLAS Registration No.083) and comprehensive quality assurance and
control procedures in place in order to ensure quality and consistency in results.
The testing method and limit of reporting are provided in Table 5.5.
Table 5.5 Methods for Laboratory Analysis for Water
Samples
Parameters
(Unit) |
Proposed
Method |
Reporting
Limit |
Detection
Limit |
SS (mg/L) |
APHA 2540 D |
0.5 mg/L (1) |
0.5 mg/L |
BOD5 (mg O2/L) |
APHA 19ed 5210B |
2 mg O2/L |
-- |
TOC (mg-TOC/L) |
In-house method SOP020 (Wet Oxidation) |
1 mg-TOC/L |
-- |
Total Nitrogen |
In-house method SOP063 (FIA) |
0.6 mg/L |
-- |
Ammonia-N |
In-house method SOP057 (FIA) |
0.05 mg NH3-N/L |
-- |
Total Phosphorus |
In-house method SOP055 (FIA) |
0.05 mg-P/L |
-- |
Note:
1) Limit of Reporting is reported as
Detection Limit for non-HOKLAS report.
2)
Parameter Total Phosphorus represents the laboratory testing for total
phosphate content in water which is the sum of all three forms of phosphates in
water.
5.26
Water sampling equipment used during the course of the monitoring
programme was decontaminated by manual washing and rinsed clean seawater/distilled
water after each sampling event. All disposal equipment was discarded after
sampling.
Sampling Management and
Supervision
5.27
Water samples were dispatched to the testing
laboratory for analysis as soon as possible after the sampling. All samples
were stored in a cool box and kept at less than 4°C but without frozen. All
water samples were handled under chain of custody protocols and relinquished to
the laboratory representatives at locations specified by the laboratory.
5.28
QA/QC procedures as attached in Appendix J are available for the
parameters analysed in the HOKLAS-accredited laboratory, WELLAB Ltd.
Groundwater Quality
Monitoring
5.29
Monitoring of groundwater quality had been suspended since October 2019.
(Details refer to Section 5.1)
Marine Water Quality
Monitoring
5.30
Marine water monitoring results and graphical presentations are shown in
Appendix I. Other relevant data was also
recorded, such as monitoring location / position, time, sampling depth, weather
conditions and any special phenomena or work underway nearby.
5.31 Calculated Action and Limit Levels for Marine Water Quality is presented in Appendix I. Thirty-seven (37) Action Level and one hundred and twenty-two (122) Limit Level exceedances on Monitoring Stations (M) were recorded in marine water quality monitoring.
5.32
Exceedances
of turbidity and suspended solid were recorded on from various monitoring
stations non-specifically among all stations including the control stations. Investigations over October 2020
showed that the range of SS levels recorded in October 2020 remained consistent
with the records in recent months. All Contractor is reminded to strictly
follow the approved drainage plan and clear drainage regularly. In particular,
all drainage shall be checked and cleared after heavy rainstorm as sediments
may accumulate along pipes and culverts. Further details of the exceedance
investigation reports can be found in Appendix
K.
5.33
Silt curtain inspections are
carried out before the commencement of the construction works every day and
diving surveys are also conducted once a week to inspect the silt curtain below
the water level. The inspection report are verified by both the RE and the
diving specialist and the records are reviewed weekly during the site audits.
Groundwater Level Monitoring (Piezometer Monitoring)
5.34
Daily piezometer monitoring at
any time of the day shall be carried throughout the whole period when any
tunnel construction activities are carried out within +/- 50m of the piezometer
gate in plan.
5.35 Tunnel construction activities are within +/- 50m of the piezometer gate in plan. Construction phase daily piezometer monitoring by the Contractor commenced in June 2018. It has switched to monthly basis since 3 October 2018 as the construction activity was 120m away from the piezometer gate. No monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.
5.36 During dry season, the Contractors have maintained the mitigation measures adopted on Site, in order to prevent surface run-off and muddy water from discharging to the public areas. The mitigation measures adopted by each Contract are summarised below:
NE2015/01
5.37 At Lam Tin Side, the Site drainage systems are divided into two parts, namely the site formation and tunnel site drainage which includes:
1. Site formation drainage system collects surface run-off from open excavation areas including slope works and flows naturally to the lowest point in the Site, where they are pumped to the wetseps and sedimentation tank for treatment near LTI site entrance before they are discharged to the designated discharge point.
2. Tunnel drainage system collects surface run-off from the tunnel which are then pumped to the sedimentation tanks near tunnel adit, where three sets of wetseps and sedimentation tanks were set up. The treated water will be discharged to designated discharge point near the Eastern Harbour Crossing (EHC) area.
5.38 At Eastern Harbour Crossing (EHC), two sets of wetseps and sedimentation tanks are set up on site. The wastewater will flow to the lowest catchpit by gravity, which are then pumped to wetseps for wastewater treatment. The sandbags/bunds are also set up at the vehicle entrance to surface run-off from the Site.
5.39 At Tseung Kwan O (TKO), the surface run-off from the slope are directed to the lowest point at cavern via the permanent drainage, which are then pumped to the sedimentation tanks for wastewater treatment via temporary pipes. The treated water will be discharged at designated discharge points. The wetseps and sedimentation tanks are provided under the BMCPC bridge and at the two sides of marine working platform. Water from natural stream will also be diverted to existing drainage to avoid overloading the capacity of the wastewater treatment system. The reservoir on the right side of marine working platform will be enlarged to cater for higher water storage demands. During heavy rainfall, the water stored at the exit of the tunnel shall be pumped into the sedimentation tanks on the right.
NE2015/02
5.40 The exposed sloped area at Portion 9 has been covered with geotextile or tarpaulin to avoid surface run-off. Temporary peripheral open U-channel are also provided along the surcharge area within the rock mount to collect stormwater and surface run-off.
5.41 Soak away pit with a 600mm in diameter were bored into the ground, down to -14mPD, near the piling works area to cater for the surface runoff at Portion IX (Figure 1C). The stormwater and the water generated from the piling works are stored temporary at the pit around the soak away pit, which shall be pumped automatically into the soak away pit where they are soaked into the soil naturally.
5.42 The stormwater received in Portion 9 shall be directed and pumped via the flex tube and sump towards the water treatment system and the approved discharge points. Water generated from Portion VI and V and some water in Portion IX are treated via storage tanks and sedimentation tanks and discharged into approved discharge points (manholes of DN2100 Drain and Area Z).
5.43 The peripheral open U-channel are also provided along the site boundary, which shall be directed to the storage tank and WetSep for treatment in Area A.
5.44 Regular cleaning depending on site conditions are provided for the WetSep at Area A and Z; and the storage tanks and sedimentation tanks at Area A. The water treated by the sedimentation tank and the wetsep shall be discharged towards the designated discharge point. Quality of the effluent are also monitored regularly.
NE2017/02
5.45 Existing manholes are covered with sandbags and geotextiles to avoid surface run-off from entering the channels.
5.46 Stockpiles are covered with tarpaulin to avoid surface run-off.
5.47 Concrete blocks and sandbags are placed along the periphery of the site boundary to avoid surface run-off.
5.48 Stormwater within the site enters the excavated area and flow naturally into the sump due height difference. The stormwater collected in the sump shall be pumped into the sedimentation tank where the run-off are treated before discharging into the designated discharge point.
NE2015/03
5.49 The existing manhole cover are covered with geotextile to prevent muddy water from entering the existing U-channels along the side of Po Shun Road. Manhole inspection are carried out by taking silt measurement regularly in case if silt enters the channel, and silt shall be removed from the manhole if silt were found.
5.50 Sandbags were placed at the periphery of the site along the hoarding to prevent surface runoff from escaping the site.
5.51 Exposed slopes are covered with tarpaulin to prevent surface run-off.
5.52 The surface run-off shall be pumped into the sedimentation tank where they are treated before entering the designated discharge points
NE2017/01
5.53 Temporary peripheral open U-channels and sumps are provided for collecting the stormwater, which are pumped and directed towards the sedimentation tank for treatment. The treated water shall be directed to the designated discharge point.
6.2
Under Contract No. NE/2015/01 and NE/2015/02, a total of 14 and 29 coral
colonies were tagged and translocated respectively from the Donor Site to the
Recipient Site in November 2016. Ten (10) corals at the Recipient Site were
also tagged by each Contract as reference for post-translocation monitoring.
6.3
The post-translocation coral monitoring shall be conducted once every 3
months after completion for a period of 12 months. Location of
post-translocation coral monitoring is shown in Figure 7. The fourth post-translocation coral monitoring was
carried out on 07 November 2017. No further monitoring is required.
7.1
According to the EP Conditions and EM&A Manual, monitoring of vibration
impacts was conducted when the construction works are less than 100m from the
Built Heritage in close proximity of the worksite, namely the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau temple. Tilting
and settlement monitoring should be applied on the Cha Kwo
Ling Tin Hau Temple. Construction works less than
100m from the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau
temple commenced on 8 May 2017.
7.2
As stated in the “Built Heritage Mitigation Plan” for this Project,
during the period of the construction works conducted within 100m from the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple,
monitoring on settlement and tilting will be conducted once a day for the Cha Kwo Ling. Monitoring of vibration will be conducted during
blasting at Cha Kwo Ling area once a day. When there is no blasting to be conducted at
the area, vibration monitoring at the Cha Kwo Ling
Tin Hau Temple will be conducted once per day when
there are piling works or rock breaking works within the 100m from the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple.
7.3
One vibration monitoring point and three building settlement monitoring
points were proposed for monitoring of the cultural heritage. The building settlement markers were placed
on the wall on three sides of the Temple, except the front, of the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple and the
vibration monitoring point is located within the Cha Kwo
Ling Tin Hau Temple. Monitoring Location is shown in Figure
8.
7.4
Building settlement is measured via a settlement
marker attached to the wall of Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple by adhesive tape.
7.5
Vibration monitoring was conducted by using vibrographs:
Minimate Plus manufactured by Instantel. These vibrographs
will be calibrated annually and its performance follows the requirements given
in the “Guidance Note on Vibration Monitoring” (GN-VM) issued by the
Civil Engineering and Development Department, which is based on the Performance
Specification for Blasting Seismographs by International Society of Explosive Engineers
(ISEE (2000)).
7.6
Table 7.1 summarizes the equipment employed by the Contractor
for cultural heritage monitoring. Copies of calibration certificates are
attached in Appendix B.
Table 7.1 Cultural Heritage
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Manufacturer and Model |
Quantity |
Digital Level
for tilting |
Leica LS15 Serial No.:
701141 |
1 |
Digital Caliper for tilting |
Mitutoyo CD-6” ASX Serial No.:
A17047921 |
1 |
iCivil-1011
Inclinometer for building
settlement |
iCivil-1011
Inclinometer Serial No.:
HK110118 / HK110120 |
2 |
Vibrographs for
vibration monitoring |
MiniMate Plus / MicroMate manufactured
by Instantel Model No.:
716A0403 / 721A2501 |
33 |
7.7
Vibrograph (velocity seismograph) was deployed at each
monitoring station to measure and record the PPV and amplitude of ground motion
in three mutually perpendicular directions. Vibration monitoring equipment
fulfils the requirements stated in the Government guidelines and is calibrated
to HOKLAS standards. Each monitoring would not be more than 10 minutes.
Settlement monitoring should be conducted by surveyors manually.
Alert,
Alarm and Action Levels
7.8
The Alert, Alarm and Action (AAA) Levels are given in Table 7.2.
Table 7.2 AAA Levels for
Monitoring for Cultural Heritage
Parameter |
Alert Level |
Alarm Level |
Action Level |
Vibration |
ppv: 4.5 mm/s |
ppv: 4.8 mm/s |
ppv: 5mm/s
Maximum Allowable Vibration Amplitude: 0.1mm |
Building
Settlement Markers |
6mm |
8mm |
10mm |
Building
Tilting(1) |
1:2000 |
1:1500 |
1:1000 |
(1) Building tilting measurement was replaced by building settlement
point measurement. The tilting can be calculated by the ratio of the maximum
settlement difference between 2 points and the distance between the 2 points.
7.9
In the reporting month, cultural heritage
monitoring was carried out by the Contractor at the aforesaid location on 26
occasions. No AAA Level exceedance was recorded in the reporting month. The
monitoring results are presented in
Appendix T.
Mitigation Measures for
Cultural Heritage
7.10
According to Condition 3.6 of the EP (EP No.: EP-458/2013/C), to prevent damage to Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple and its
Fung Shui rocks (Child-given rocks) during the
construction phase, a temporarily fenced-off
buffer zone (Rocks buffer zone is 5 m from the edge of Rocks and 15m from the
edge of Rocks alter) with allowance for public access (minimum 1 m) around the
temple and the Fung Shui rocks shall be provided. The open yard in front of
the temple should be kept as usual for annual Tin Hau
festival.
7.11
As there is a large buffer distance from the current works to Cha Kwo
Ling Tin Hau Temple and the Fung Shui rocks
(Child-given rocks), the temporarily fenced-off rocks buffer zone and from the edge of Rocks
alter is not required. The fenced-off rocks buffer zone
would be implemented when there is construction activities in vicinity of the
cultural heritage.
8.1
Landscape and visual mitigation measures during the construction phase
shall be checked to ensure that they are fully realized and implemented on
site.
8.2
Site audits were carried out on a weekly
basis to monitor and audit the timely implementation of landscape and visual
mitigation measures listed in “Implementation Schedule and Recommended Mitigation
Measures” (shown in Appendix N). The summaries of
observations and recommendations related to landscape and visual impacts, if
any, are shown in Appendix L.
8.3
No non-compliance of the landscape and visual
impact was recorded in the reporting month.
9.1
In accordance with the EM&A Manual, monitoring of landfill gas is
required for construction works within the Sai Tso Wan Landfill Consultation Zone
during the construction phase. This section presents the results of landfill
gas measurements performed by the Contractor.
Appendix A shows the Limit
Levels for the monitoring works.
9.2
The “Landfill Gas Monitoring Proposal”, including the monitoring programme
and detailed actions, is submitted to the EPD for approval. Details of
monitoring in this Proposal is in line with the monitoring requirements stipulated
in the EM&A Manual.
Monitoring Parameters and
Frequency
9.3
Monitoring parameters for Landfill gas monitoring include Methane,
Carbon dioxide and Oxygen.
9.4
According to the implementation schedule and recommended mitigation
measures of the EM&A Manual, measurements of the following frequencies
should be carried out:
Excavations deeper than 1m
at the ground surface before excavation
commences;
immediately before any worker enters the
excavation;
at the beginning of each working day for the
entire period the excavation remains open; and
periodically throughout the working day
whilst workers are in the excavation.
Excavations between 300mm and 1m deep
directly after the excavation has been
completed; and
periodically whilst the excavation
remains open.
For excavations less than 300mm deep
monitoring may be omitted, at the discretion
of the Safety Officer or other appropriately qualified person
9.5
Monitoring of oxygen, methane and carbon dioxide was performed for
excavations at 1m depth or more within the Consultation Zone. In this reporting month, the area required to
be monitored for landfill gas are shown below and Figure 6 shows the landfill gas monitoring locations.
Ø Excavation Locations : Portion III
Ø Manholes and Chambers : N/A
Ø Relocation of monitoring
wells : N/A
Ø
Any other Confined Spaces :
N/A
Monitoring Equipment noise mitigation
9.6
Table 9.1 summarizes the equipment employed by the Contractor
for the landfill gas monitoring.
Table 9.1 Landfill Gas Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model and Make |
Quantity |
Portable gas
detector |
ALTAIR 5X Multigas Detector (Serial No.
137333) |
1 |
9.7
In the reporting month, landfill gas monitoring was carried out by the
Contractor at the aforesaid locations on 130 occasions. No Limit Level exceedance
for landfill gas monitoring was recorded in the reporting month. The monitoring
results are provided in Appendix R.
Copies of calibration certificates are attached in Appendix B.
10.1
Site audits were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the timely
implementation of proper environmental management practices and mitigation
measures in the Project site. The
summaries of site audits are attached in Appendix
L.
10.2
Joint weekly site audits by the representatives of the Engineer,
Contractor and the ET were conducted in the reporting month as shown in below:
Contract No. NE/2015/01: 07, 14, 21 & 28 October 2020
Contract No. NE/2015/02: 08, 15, 22 & 29 October 2020
Contract No. NE/2017/01: 08, 15, 22 & 29 October 2020
Contract No. NE/2017/02: 08, 15, 22 & 29 October 2020
10.3
Monthly joint site
inspection with the representative of IEC was conducted for NE/2015/01,
NE/2015/02, NE/2017/01 and NE/2017/02 on 28, 15, 15 and 15 October 2020 respectively.
10.4
The EM&A programme of Contract No. NE/2015/03 had been terminated on
21 April 2020 under the approval of EPD.
10.5
According to the EIA Study Report, Environmental Permit and the EM&A
Manual of the Project, the mitigation measures detailed in the documents are
recommended to be implemented during the construction phase. An updated summary
of the Implementation Schedule and Recommended Mitigation Measures is provided
in Appendix N.
10.6
During site inspections in the reporting month, no
non-compliance was recorded on reporting month. The observations and recommendations
made during the audit sessions are summarized in Appendix L.
11.1
Waste
generated from this Project includes inert construction and demolition
(C&D) materials, non-inert C&D materials and marine sediments. Inert
C&D waste includes soil, broken rock, broken concrete and building debris,
while non-inert C&D materials are made up of C&D waste which cannot be
reused or recycled and has to be disposed of at the designated landfill sites. Marine sediment shall be expected from
excavation and dredging works of this Project.
11.2
With
reference to relevant handling records of this Project, the quantities of
different types of waste generated in the reporting month are summarised and
presented in Appendix P.
11.3
The Contractors are advised to minimize the wastes generated through the
recycling or reusing. All mitigation measures stipulated in the approved
EM&A Manual and waste management plans shall be fully implemented. The
status of implementation of waste management and reduction measures are
summited in Appendix N.
12.1
Nine
(9) Action Level exceedances of noise were recorded due
to the documented complaints received in the reporting month. No Limit Level
exceedances of construction noise monitoring were recorded for day-time in the
reporting month.
12.2
Thirty-seven (37) Action Level and one hundred
and twenty-two (122) Limit Level exceedances were recorded in monitoring stations (M) during marine water
quality monitoring.
12.3
Actions carried out in accordance with the Event and Action Plans in Appendix M are presented in Appendix K – Summary of Exceedance.
12.4
No non-compliance was recorded on this reporting month.
12.5
Eleven (11) environmental complaints were received in the reporting month. The
Cumulative Complaint Log is presented in Appendix O. The investigation status and result is also reported in Appendix O.
12.6
No notification of summon or successful environmental prosecution was
received in this reporting period. The Cumulative Log for environmental summon
and successful prosecution since the commencement of the Project is presented
in Appendix O.
13.1
Tentative construction programmes for the next three months are provided
in Appendix Q.
13.2
Major site activities to be undertaken for the next reporting period are
summarized in Table 13.1.
Table 13.1 Summary
Table for Site Activities in the next Reporting Period
Site Activities (November 2020) |
Key Environmental Issues * |
||
NE/2015/01 - Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and
Associated Works |
Lam Tin Interchange |
1)
EHC2 U-Trough 2)
Site Formation – Area 1G1, Area 1G2, Area 2 &
Area 5 3)
Site Formation – Slope stabilization &
Retaining Wall 4)
Administration Building & Bridge Construction 5)
Stormwater Tank Construction 6)
S01_2, EHC1&4 Construction 7) CKLR
Underground Utilities |
NE/2015/01 - Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and Associated Works |
Main Tunnel |
8)
S02_2 Excavation 9) Main Tunnel
Lining Works |
(B) |
|
TKO Interchange |
10)
Bridge Construction 11) East Ventilation
Building |
(A) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (F) / (I) |
|
NE/2015/02 - Tseung
Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works |
1)
Construction of pillar box and ducting system at
Portion IV adjacent to Ocean Shores EVA 2)
Site formation at Road P2 CH500-CH650 and SR1 3)
Road and drainage works at Road P2 CH500 – 650,
slip road SR1 footpath and cycle track, slip road SR2 CH250 – CH350 4)
ELS at underpass P2 CH105 – CH318 5)
4th of excavation at CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 6)
Excavation/ELS at CH821 – CH105 Cofferdam 7)
Installation of socketed H-pile at CT01 CH117 –
CH336 8)
Reinstatement of Tong Yin Street 9)
Installation of de-watering system at CH821 –
CH105 10)
Excavation & ELS installation works at CH821
– CH105 11)
Construction of U-tough at CH821 – CH105 12)
Drainage works at U-trough CH318 – CH363.50 13)
Pre-bore/ELS works for U-trough CH363.50 –
CH411/U-trough SR2 CH110-CH170 14)
Construction of profile barrier at U-trough CH318
– CH363.50 15)
Construction of sloping seawall 16)
Removal of temporary cofferdam 17)
Construction of seawall coping 18)
Drainage works at SR1 footpath / cycle truck 19)
Installation of ELS at cofferdam CH105 – CH318 20)
Backfilling works for reinstatement of Tong Yin
Street 21)
Construction of U-trough at CH821 – CH 105
Cofferdam 22)
Excavation and re-compaction at S100 CH280 – S200
CH755 and S300 CH405 – CH326 23)
Construction of U-tough A 24)
Waterworks – DN300/PE315 |
(A) / (B) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (G) / (I) |
|
NE/2015/03 - Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge |
The construction
works under the contract had been completed in December 2019. Materials are
being removed from works area. |
N/A |
|
NE/2017/01 – Tseung Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works |
1)
Dismantling of Temporary Working Platforms 2)
Bored Piling Works 3)
Installation of Precast Pile Cap Shell 4)
Construction of Pile Cap 5)
Construction of Pier 6)
Construction of Pier Head works 7)
Segment erection works 8)
Construction of Bridge Decks |
(A) / (B) / (E) / (F) / (G) |
|
NE/2017/02 –Tseung Kwan O - Lam Tin Tunnel - Road P2/D4 and
Associated Works |
1) Inspection pit excavation and utility diversion works 2) Construction of drainage and watermain 3) Pile cap 4) Pre-bored Socket-H Pile 5) Asphalt Paving 6) Pier, Staircase and Lift Shalt Construction 7)
Road Works |
(A) / (B) / (E) / (F) / (G) |
|
NE/2017/06 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and
Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works |
1) Site clearance 2) Site Office set-up 3) Project signboard set up 4) Goods arrived & storage on-site |
(G) |
(A)
Watering for dust generation from haul
road, stockpiles of dusty materials, exposed site area, excavation works and
rock breaking activities;
(B)
Noisy construction activity such as
rock-breaking activities and piling works;
(C)
Runoff from exposed slope or site area;
(D)
Wastewater and runoff discharge from site;
(E)
Accumulation of silt, mud and sand along
U-channels and sedimentation tanks;
(F)
Set up and implementation of temporary
drainage system for the surface runoff;
(G)
Storage of chemicals/fuel and chemical
waste/waste oil on site;
(H)
Accumulation and storage of general and
construction waste on site; and
(I)
Marine water quality impact and indirect impact to coral
communities due to marine construction for TKO-LTT reclamation.
13.3
Key environmental issues in the coming month include:
·
Watering for dust generation from haul road, stockpiles of dusty
materials, exposed site area, excavation works and rock breaking activities;
·
Noisy construction activity such as rock-breaking activities and piling
works;
·
Runoff from exposed slope or site area;
·
Wastewater and runoff discharge from site;
·
Accumulation of silt, mud and sand along U-channels and sedimentation
tanks;
·
Set up and implementation of temporary drainage system for the surface
runoff;
·
Precaution measures in case of heavy rainfall brought along by typhoon;
·
Storage of chemicals/fuel and chemical waste/waste oil on site;
·
Accumulation and storage of general and construction waste on site; and
·
Marine water quality impact and indirect impact to coral
communities due to marine construction for TKO-LTT reclamation.
14.1
This is the 47th Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A)
Report which presents the EM&A works undertaken during the period in
October 2020 in accordance with EM&A Manual and the requirement under EP.
Air Quality Monitoring
14.2
No
Action/Limit Level exceedance for 1-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.
14.3
No
Action/Limit Level exceedance for 24-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.
Construction Noise Monitoring
14.4
Nine
(9) Action Level exceedances were recorded due
to the documented complaints received in this reporting month.
14.5
No
Limit Level exceedances was recorded for daytime
construction noise in the reporting month. No limit level exceedances were
recorded for night-time.
Water Quality Monitoring
14.6
Groundwater quality monitoring had been suspended since October 2019.
Details shall be referred to Section 5.1.
14.7
Thirty-seven (37) Action Level and one hundred
and twenty-two (122) Limit Level exceedances
were recorded in Monitoring Stations (M) during marine water quality monitoring.
14.8
Tunnel construction activities are within +/- 50m of the piezometer gate
in plan. Construction phase daily piezometer monitoring by the Contractor
commenced in June 2018. It has switched to monthly basis since 3 October 2018 as the construction activity was 120m away from the
piezometer gate. No monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.
Ecological Monitoring
14.9
The post-translocation coral monitoring surveys were completed in
November 2017.
Monitoring on Cultural
Heritage
14.10
No Alert Alarm and Action (AAA) Level exceedance of cultural heritage monitoring on
cultural heritage was recorded in the reporting month.
Landscape and Visual Monitoring and
Audit
14.11
No non-compliance of the landscape and visual impact was recorded in the
reporting month.
Landfill Gas Monitoring
14.12
Monitoring of landfill gases in the reporting month was carried out by the Contractor at excavation location, Portion III. No Limit Level
exceedance was recorded.
Environmental Site Inspection
14.13
Joint weekly site inspections were conducted by representatives of the
Contractor, Engineer and Environmental Team. During site inspections in the reporting
month, no non-compliance was identified. The
environmental deficiency observed during the reporting month are shown in
Appendix K.
Complaint, Prosecution and
Notification of Summons
14.14
Eleven (11) environmental
complaints, no successful prosecution and
notification of summon were received during the reporting period.
14.15
The following recommendations were made to the Contractor for the
reporting month:
Air Quality Impact
·
To regularly apply watering on dry surface should be applied to minimize
erosion.
·
To aim the water spray at the rock breaking point for effective dust
suppression.
·
To water materials before loading/unloading.
·
To turn off idle equipment.
Construction Noise
·
To provide sufficient noise barriers for
noisy PMEs as practically at LTI according to CNMP.
·
To repair the gaps between the noise barriers.
·
To place compatible noise barrier close to
the breaking point for effective noise screening.
·
To erect sound proof canvases on derrick
lighter barge
Water Quality Impact
·
To clear the oil
slick and check for any damage of the silt curtain.
·
To repair damaged or missing silt curtain
·
To check whether the curtain has been set to
the seabed.
·
To ensure that the pumping rate of bored pile
is sufficient to avoid discharging waste water into the sea.
·
To clear floating refuse between the cofferdam and silt curtain.
·
To clear oil slick within and outside
cofferdam.
·
To control the amount of loading materials in the barge to avoiding
spillage.
·
To cover stockpile near seafront.
·
To remove wastewater and oil in drip tray.
·
To remove pond/still water.
Waste/Chemical Management
·
To bund or lock the chemical storage area.
·
To clear dripping oil from bored piling
machine.
·
To clear oil slick on seawater.
·
To clear oil on the floor.
Landscape and Visual
·
To avoid placing any construction materials in the tree protection zone.