Content


Chapter    Title

15.1                Introduction

15.2                Landscape and Visual Legislation, Standards and Guidelines

15.2.2             Review of Relevant Planning and Development Control Framework

15.3                Scope and Content of Study

15.3.1             Project Site Boundary

15.3.2             Major Work Components

15.3.3             Consideration of Alternative Options

15.3.4             Limits of Study Area

15.4                Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Methodology

15.4.1             General Approach

15.4.2             Landscape Impact Methodology

15.4.3             Broad Brush Tree Survey Methodology

15.4.4             Visual Impact Methodology

15.4.5             Assumptions and Limitations

15.4.6             Concurrent Projects

15.4.7             Photomontages

15.5                Baseline Conditions

15.5.1             Landscape and Visual Study Area

15.5.2             Committed and Approved Projects under Construction

15.5.3             Review of Current Land-Uses within the Assessment Area

15.5.4             Landscape Resources

15.5.5             Landscape Character Areas

15.5.6             Broad Brush Tree Survey

15.5.7             Summary of Tree Impacts

15.5.8             Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI)

15.5.9             Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)

15.6                Landscape Impact Assessment

15.6.1             Potential Sources of Impacts

15.6.2             Landscape Change Before Mitigation in Construction Phase

15.6.3             Landscape Change Before Mitigation in Operation Phase

15.6.4             Landscape & Visual Mitigation Measures

15.6.5             Prediction of Significance of Landscape Impacts

15.7                Visual Impacts Assessment

15.7.1             Potential Sources of Visual Impacts

15.7.2             Visual Change Before Mitigation in the Construction and Operation Phase

15.7.3             Proposed Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

15.7.4             Viewpoints

15.7.5             Prediction of Significance of Visual Impacts

15.7.6             Impacts during the Construction and Operation Phase before Mitigation

15.7.7             Residual Impacts during the Construction Phase after Mitigation

15.7.8             Residual Impacts during the Operation Phase after Mitigation

15.8                Cumulative Impacts

15.8.1             General

15.8.2             Cumulative Landscape Impacts

15.8.3             Cumulative Visual Impacts

15.9                Environmental Monitoring and Audit

15.9.1             Construction Phase

15.9.2             Operation Phase

15.10              Conclusion

15.10.1          Landscape Impacts

15.10.2          Visual Impacts

15.10.3          Overall Conclusion

 

Tables

Table 15.1:_ Relationship between Receptor Sensitivity and Magnitude of Change in Defining Impact Significance_ 15-8

Table 15.2:_ Landscape Resources 15-29

Table 15.3:_ Landscape Character Areas 15-33

Table 15.4:_ Key Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) 15-36

Table 15.5:_ Magnitude of Landscape Change during the Construction and Operation Phases before Mitigation_ 15-44

Table 15.6:_ Proposed Construction Phase Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures 15-55

Table 15.7:_ Proposed Operation Phase Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures 15-56

Table 15.8:_ Significance of Landscape Impacts in Construction and Operation Phases (Adverse Impacts unless otherwise stated) 15-62

Table 15.9:_ Magnitude of Visual Change during the Construction and Operation Phases before Mitigation_ 15-69

Table 15.10: Significance of Visual Impacts in the Construction and Operation Phases 15-87

 

Drawings

MCL/P132/EIA/15-001.1    Landscape Study Area

MCL/P132/EIA/15-001.2    Landscape Study Area

MCL/P132/EIA/15-002       Review of Planning Framework Chek Lap Kok & Tung Chung

MCL/P132/EIA/15-003.1    Landscape Resources – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-003.2    Landscape Resources (Blow Up Plan) – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-003.3    Landscape Resources (Blow Up Plan) – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-003.4    Landscape Resources (Blow Up Plan) – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-004       Landscape Character Areas – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-005.1    Landscape Resources Photographs – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-005.2    Landscape Resources Photographs – Chek Lap Kok (continued)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-006       Landscape Character Areas Photographs – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-007       Landscape Resources – Sha Chau Islands

MCL/P132/EIA/15-008       Landscape Character Areas – Sha Chau Islands

MCL/P132/EIA/15-009       Landscape Resources + Landscape Character Areas Photographs – Sha Chau Islands

MCL/P132/EIA/15-010       Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI) and Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-011       Committed and Concurrent Projects

MCL/P132/EIA/15-012.1    Residual Impacts on Landscape Resources with Mitigation at Year 10 – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-012.2    Residual Impacts on Landscape Resources with Mitigation at Year 10  – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-012.3    Residual Impacts on Landscape Resources with Mitigation at Year 10 – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-012.4    Residual Impacts on Landscape Resources with Mitigation at Year 10 – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-013       Residual Impacts on Landscape Character Areas with Mitigation at Year 10 – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-014       Residual Impacts on Landscape Resources with Mitigation at Year 10 – Sha Chau Islands

MCL/P132/EIA/15-015       Residual Impacts on Landscape Character Areas with Mitigation at Year 10 – Sha Chau Islands

MCL/P132/EIA/15-016       Residual Impacts on VSRs With Mitigation Year 10

MCL/P132/EIA/15-017.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 1: View from Castle Peak (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-017.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 1: View from Castle Peak (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-018.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 2: View from Miami Beach Towers (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-018.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 2: View from Miami Beach Towers (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-019.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 3: View from Marriott Hotel (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-019.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 3: View from Marriott Hotel (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-020.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 4: View from Caribbean Coast (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-020.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 4: View from Caribbean Coast (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-021.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 5: View from Ngong Ping 360 (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-021.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 5: View from Ngong Ping 360 (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-022.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 6: View from Lantau Hiking Trail (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-022.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 6: View from Lantau Hiking Trail (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-023.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 7: View from Golden Beach (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-023.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 7: View from Golden Beach (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-024.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 8: View from St. Stephans Tai O Family Buildings (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/9132/EIA/15-024.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 8: View from St. Stephans Tai O Family Buildings (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-025.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 9: View from Potential Recreational Users of Future Tung Chung East Development (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCA/P132/EIA/15-025.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 9: View from Potential Recreational Users of Future Tung Chung East Development (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-026.1    Photomontage of Viewpoint 10: View from Fu Shan in Tai O (Sheet 1 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-026.2    Photomontage of Viewpoint 10: View from Fu Shan in Tai O (Sheet 2 of 2)

MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.1    Broad Tree Group Survey – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.2    Broad Tree Group Survey – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.3    Broad Tree Group Survey – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.4    Broad Tree Group Survey Schedule

MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.5    Broad Tree Group Survey Schedule

MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.6    Broad Tree Group Survey Schedule

MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.1    Landscape and Visual Mitigation Arrangement Plan – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.2    Landscape and Visual Mitigation Arrangement (Blow Up Plan)   – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.3    Landscape and Visual Mitigation Arrangement (Blow Up Plan)  – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.4    Landscape and Visual Mitigation Arrangement (Blow Up Plan)  – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.5    Landscape and Visual Mitigation Arrangement (Blow Up Plan)  – Chek Lap Kok

MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.6    Landscape and Visual Mitigation Arrangement Plan  – Sha Chau

MCL/P132/EIA/15-029       Conceptual Section Illustrating Mitigation Measure OM1

MCL/P132/EIA/15-030.1    View from RES10 – Sham Shek Tseun

MCL/P132/EIA/15-030.2    View from RES17 – Pak Mong Village

MCL/P132/EIA/15-030.3    View from RES19 – San Shek Wan Village

MCL/P132/EIA/15-030.4    View from REC24 – Visitors to Tai Ho

 

 

15.    Landscape and Visual Impact


15.1    Introduction

15.1.1.1    This chapter of the report presents an assessment of the potential landscape and visual impacts associated with the three-runway system (3RS) in accordance with the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) and the requirements of the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-250/2012). Both construction and operation impacts are assessed. The project boundary is illustrated in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-001.1 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-001.2.

15.1.1.2    The assessment includes:

ˇ  A listing of the relevant environmental legislation and guidelines;

ˇ  A definition of the scope and contents of the study, including a description of the assessment methodology;

ˇ  A review of the relevant planning and development control framework;

ˇ  A baseline study providing a comprehensive and accurate description of the baseline landscape resources, landscape character areas, zone of visual influence and key groups of existing and planned visually sensitive receivers (VSRs).

ˇ  Identification of the source of landscape and visual impacts;

ˇ  Recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures and associated implementation programmes;

ˇ  Assessment of the potential landscape and visual impacts, by taking into account the sensitivity of receivers, prediction of the magnitude of change experienced by the receivers and resulting potential impact significance, before and after the mitigation measures; and

ˇ  Clear evaluations and explanation with supportive arguments of all relevant factors considered in arriving at the significance thresholds of the landscape and visual impacts.

15.1.1.3    Colour photographs showing baseline conditions (photographs are augmented to show all approved planned / committed projects), and photomontages and illustrative materials supporting conclusions are provided and the locations of all viewpoints are clearly mapped.  Photomontages at representative locations provide comparison between existing views (augmented to show all approved planned / committed projects); proposals on Day 1 after completion without mitigation; on Day 1 after mitigation, and in Year 10 after mitigation.

15.2    Landscape and Visual Legislation, Standards and Guidelines

15.2.1.1    The following environmental legislation, standards and guidelines are applicable to the evaluation of landscape and visual impacts associated with the construction and operation of the project:

ˇ  Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap 499) and the Technical Memorandum on EIA Process (EIAO-TM), particularly Annexes 3, 10, 11, 18, 20 and 21;

-      An Ordinance to provide for assessing the impact on the environment of certain projects and proposals, for protecting the environment and for incidental matters.

-      The Technical Memorandum sets out the principles, procedures, guidelines, requirements and criteria for the technical content of an environmental impact assessment study brief or environmental impact assessment report.

ˇ  Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines;

-      The Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG) is a Government manual of criteria for determining the scale, location and site requirements of various land uses and facilities.

ˇ  Hong Kong 2030 Planning Vision and Strategy Final Report;

-      Is a long-term planning strategy to guide future development and provision of strategic infrastructure and to help implement government policy targets in a spatial form.

ˇ  Landscape Value Mapping of Hong Kong;

-      Essential landscape baseline information to provide a systematic reference framework to facilitate landscape assessment and broad environmental assessment of major projects at territorial level.

ˇ  EIAO Guidance Note No. 8/2010;

-      The Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, (Cap 499) Guidance Note advises on the requirements in vetting Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment of designated projects under the Technical Memorandum on EIA Process for the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance.

ˇ  Town Planning Ordinance (Cap 131);

-      To promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the community by making provision for the systematic preparation and approval of plans for the lay-out of areas of Hong Kong as well as for the types of building suitable for erection therein and for the preparation and approval of plans for areas within which permission is required for development.

ˇ  Foreshore and Sea-bed (reclamations) Ordinance (Cap 127);

-      To provide for the publication of proposals in respect of reclamations over and upon any foreshore and sea-bed; to make provision in respect of objections to the proposals, the payment of compensation and connected matters; and to repeal the Public Reclamations and Works Ordinance (Cap 113, 1984 Ed.) and the Foreshores and Sea Bed Ordinance (Cap 127, 1984 Ed.).

ˇ  Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap 96) and its subsidiary legislation the Forestry Regulations;

-      To consolidate and amend the law relating to forests and plants, and to provide for the protection of the countryside.

ˇ  Country Parks Ordinance (Cap 208);

-      To provide for the designation, control and management of country parks and special areas.

ˇ  Marine Parks Ordinance (Cap 476) and associated subsidiary legislation;

-      To provide for the designation, control and management of Marine Parks and Marine Reserves.

ˇ  Protection of Endangered Species of Animals And Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586);

-      To regulate the import, introduction from the sea, export, re-export, and possession or control of certain endangered species of animals and plants and parts and derivatives of those species; and to provide for incidental and connected matters.

ˇ  Approved Chek Lap Kok Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/I-CLK/12;

ˇ  Approved Tung Chung Town Centre Area Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/I-TCTC/18;

ˇ  SILTech Publication (1991) – Tree Planting and Maintenance in Hong Kong (Standing Interdepartmental Landscape Technical Group) [11-23];

ˇ  GEO publication (1/2009) – Prescriptive Measures for Man-made Slopes and Retaining Walls;

ˇ  GEO 1/2011 – Technical Guidelines on Landscape Treatment for Slopes;

-      This publication presents guidance on good practice of landscape treatments for man-made slopes and engineering works on natural terrain in Hong Kong.

ˇ  Land Administration Office Instruction (LAOI) Section D-12 – Tree Preservation;

-      It is policy to ensure that no tree is felled unnecessarily nor, where control exists, without the prior consent of Government and that whenever possible, and appropriate, approval to the felling of any tree is made subject to a compensatory landscaping/replanting scheme.

ˇ  Land Administration Office, Lands Department Practice Note 7/2007 - Tree Preservation and Tree Removal Application for Building Development in Private Projects;

-      This practice note ensures trees are not unnecessarily felled on private lots.

ˇ  DEVB TC (W) No.2/2012 Allocation of Space for Quality Greening on Roads;

-      This circular aims to introduce improvements in greenery, to develop existing greened areas and allow opportunities for greening and landscape during the planning and development of public works projects.

ˇ  DEVB TC (W) No.3/2012 Site Coverage of Greenery for Government Building Projects;

-      This circular sets out the standards and requirements on site coverage of greenery for new government building projects and the methodology of measurement and calculation for the purpose of the required site coverage of greenery

ˇ  DEVB TC (W) No.2/2013 Greening on Footbridges and Flyovers;

-      This circular updates the policy and requirements for greening on new footbridges and flyovers in built-up areas

ˇ  ETWB TCW No. 2/2004 – Maintenance of Vegetation and Hard Landscape Features;

-      This circular sets out the departmental responsibilities for maintenance of vegetation and hard landscape features.

ˇ  ETWB TCW No. 29/2004 – Registration of Old and Valuable Trees, and Guidelines for their Preservation;

-      This circular sets out the procedures for registration of old and valuable trees on unleased Government land within built-up areas and tourist attraction spots in village areas.

ˇ  ETWB TCW No. 36/2004 The Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and Associated Structures (ACABAS);

-      This circular updates the membership of the Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and Associated Structures (ACABAS). Revised guidelines for ACABAS submissions are also included to promote better understanding of the submission requirements.

ˇ  ETWB TCW No. 5/2005 – Protection of Natural Streams/Rivers from Adverse Impacts Arising from Construction Works;

-      This circular provides an administrative framework to better protect all natural streams/rivers from the impacts of construction works. The procedures promulgated under this Circular aim to clarify and strengthen existing measures for protection of natural streams/rivers from government projects and private developments.

ˇ  ETWB TCW No. 10/2013 - Tree Preservation;

-      This circular sets out the policy on tree preservation, and the procedures for control of tree felling, transplanting and pruning in Government projects.

ˇ  WBTC No.  25/93 – Control of Visual Impact of Slopes;

-      This circular outlines the design principles recommended to be used in designing manmade slopes for Public Works projects in order to reduce their adverse visual impact.

ˇ  WBTC No. 17/2000 – Improvement to the Appearance of slopes in connection with WBTC 25/93;

-      This circular outlines the principles and procedures recommended for all departments involved in new slope formation and in upgrading and maintenance of existing slopes for improving the aesthetic and environmental impact of slope works.

ˇ  WBTC No. 7/2002 – Tree Planting in Public Works;

-      This circular affirms the advocated policy on tree planting which adopts a flexible and balanced approach in the planning and design of public works.

ˇ  Latest Proper Planting Practices and other relevant guidelines issued by Development Bureau (Greening, Landscape and Tree Management Section).

ˇ  Latest Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) Approved Plant Species List. 

15.2.2  Review of Relevant Planning and Development Control Framework

15.2.2.1    A review will be undertaken of the relevant planning and development control framework for the landscape study area (500 m beyond the limit of the works). The relevant OZPs for the project works are the Chek Lap Kok Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-CLK/12 and Tung Chung Town Centre Area Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-TCTC/18. Extracts of which are shown in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-002 and described in Section 15.5.3.

15.3    Scope and Content of Study

15.3.1  Project Site Boundary

15.3.1.1    Land is required to be formed to the north of the existing HKIA by land formation to provide a platform for the development of the third runway and all associated airport infrastructure and facilities.  The tentative project site boundary comprises the proposed land formation footprint, boundary of existing airport island, and potential daylighting point for the submarine fuel pipelines on Sheung Sha Chau Island, and is shown in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-001 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-010.

15.3.2  Major Work Components

15.3.2.1    Construction of proposed land formation area: The project covers mainly an area of land formation of approximately 650 ha to the north of the existing HKIA and other relevant modifications on the existing airport island due to this future development. The land formation activities comprise mainly ground treatment, seawall construction and filling.

15.3.2.2    Construction of airport related infrastructure and superstructures: Upon completion of the land formation, various construction activities relating to infrastructure and superstructures will commence. The layouts and designs for individual components are subject to the ongoing infrastructure scheme design for the project.

15.3.2.3    Diversion of submarine fuel pipelines: The preferred method for diversion of the submarine fuel pipelines involves horizontal directional drilling (HDD), which is a trenchless installation technique commonly used in drilling oil and gas wells.  The HDD method will be deployed to install the pipelines directly from the existing HKIA to Sheung Sha Chau Island by underground drilling. The pipelines will land on Sheung Sha Chau Island where the existing aviation fuel receiving facility (AFRF) is located. A temporary floating work platform may be required.

15.3.2.4    Diversion of 11 kV submarine cable: The preferred method for diversion of the 11 kV submarine cable involves diversion via water jetting method with field joint (to connect the new cable to the existing cable) to the south of the Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau (SCLKC) Marine Park. The cable will be buried about 5 m below seabed. At the field joint area, a small area of excavation will be needed to expose the existing cable, which will then be lifted up to a barge for forming the field joint. Upon completion of the field joint, the remaining cable will be buried below seabed level. During construction, marine vessels carrying out the cable diversion and field joint connection works will produce landscape and visual impacts. The minor impacts produced from these works are included in the LVIA, however, they are not the focus of the assessment.

15.3.2.5    Please refer to Chapter 4 for a detailed list of the project components.

15.3.3     Consideration of Alternative Options

15.3.3.1    The alternative options and opportunities available for provision of a third runway in Hong Kong, in terms of its alignment, the associated airport layout and construction methods have been considered and elaborated in Chapter 3 of the EIA. Consideration of the landscape and visual implications of the alternative options is included as one of the key differentiators in the comparison of the different options leading to the selection of the preferred option. Further details can be referred to Section 3.4.4. This Chapter 15 details the landscape and visual impacts of the preferred option.

15.3.4  Limits of Study Area

15.3.4.1    The limit of the landscape impact study is 500 m beyond the boundary of the works (as stated in the EIA study brief), which is shown in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-001.1). The limit of the visual impact study is the Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI) of the works during the construction and operation phases (as stated in the EIA study brief, which is illustrated in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-010).

15.3.4.2    As the cable and fuel line have different construction methods they will have different landscape and visual outcomes. The diversion of the 11 kV submarine cable would result in some increased vessel activity, resulting in a potential impact upon the Landscape Character Area (LCA) (and VSRs), and therefore the alignment is included in the landscape study area. Diversion of the 11 kV submarine cable will produce minor landscape and visual impacts. The minor impacts produced from these works are included in the LVIA, however, they are not the focus of the assessment. On the other hand, the submarine fuel pipelines would be constructed by HDD, which is a trenchless installation technique that involves the installation of pipes, conduits, and cables in a shallow arc using a surface-launched drilling rig. Consequently the 500 m landscape study area and ZVI include the surface-launched drilling rig on airport island and daylighting point on Sheung Sha Chau Island.  There will be no landscape or visual impact on the sea area above the undersea alignment of the fuel pipelines and consequently the sea area above the undersea alignment is not included in the landscape study area. The daylighting point on Sheung Sha Chau Island will produce minor landscape and visual impacts. The minor impacts produced from these works are included in the LVIA, however, they are not the focus of the assessment.

15.4    Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Methodology

15.4.1  General Approach

15.4.1.1    Landscape and visual impacts shall be assessed separately for the construction and operation phases. The assessment of landscape impacts shall involve the following procedures.

15.4.2  Landscape Impact Methodology

15.4.2.1    Identification of the baseline Landscape Resources (LRs) and Landscape Character Areas (LCAs) found within the study area.  This is achieved by site visits and desk-top studies of topographical maps, information databases, approved EIAs of the committed projects and photographs.  Reference is also made to the ‘Landscape Value Mapping of Hong Kong’ study.

15.4.2.2    Assessment of the degree of sensitivity to change of the LRs and LCAs.  This is influenced by a number of factors including whether the resource/character is common or rare, whether it is considered to be of local, regional, national or global importance, whether there are any statutory or regulatory limitations / requirements relating to the resource, the quality of the resource / character, the maturity of the resource, and the ability of the resource/character to accommodate change. The sensitivity of each landscape feature and character area is classified as follows:

High:

Important landscape or landscape resource of particularly distinctive character or high importance, sensitive to relatively small changes

Medium:

Landscape or landscape resource of moderately valued landscape characteristics reasonably tolerant to change

Low:

Landscape or landscape resource, the nature of which is largely tolerant to change

15.4.2.3    Identification of potential sources of landscape change. These are the various elements of the construction works and operational procedures that would generate landscape change.

15.4.2.4    Identification of the magnitude of landscape change. The magnitude of the change depends on a number of factors including the physical extent of the change, the landscape and visual context of the change – i.e. a set circumstance/facts surrounding the change, the compatibility of the project with the surrounding landscape; and the time-scale of the change - i.e. whether it is temporary (short, medium or long term), permanent but potentially reversible, or permanent and irreversible.  Landscape changes have been quantified wherever possible. The magnitude of landscape change is classified as follows:

Large:

The landscape or landscape resource would suffer a major change

Intermediate:

The landscape or landscape resource would suffer a moderate change

Small:

The landscape or landscape resource would suffer slight or barely perceptible changes

Negligible:

The landscape or landscape resource would suffer no discernible change

None:

The landscape or landscape resource would suffer absolutely no impact

15.4.2.5    Identification of potential landscape mitigation measures. These may take the form of adopting alternative designs or revisions to the basic engineering and architectural design to prevent and/or minimise adverse impacts; remedial measures such as colour and textural treatment of building features; and compensatory measures such as the implementation of landscape design measures (e.g. tree planting, creation of new open space etc.) to compensate for unavoidable adverse impacts and to attempt to generate potentially beneficial long term impacts. A programme for the mitigation measures is provided.  The agencies responsible for the funding, implementation, management and maintenance of the mitigation measures are identified and their approvals-in-principle are being sought.

15.4.2.6    Prediction of the significance of landscape impacts before and after the implementation of the mitigation measures. By synthesising the magnitude of the various changes and the sensitivity of the various landscape resources it is possible to categorise impacts in a logical, well-reasoned and consistent fashion.  Table 15.1 shows the rationale for dividing the degree of significance into four thresholds, namely insubstantial, slight, moderate, and substantial, depending on the combination of a negligible-small-intermediate-large magnitude of change and a low-medium-high degree of sensitivity of the LRs / LCAs.  The significance thresholds are defined as follows:

Substantial:

Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause significant deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality

Moderate:

Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause a noticeable deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality

Slight:

Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause a barely perceptible deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality

Insubstantial:

No discernible change in the existing landscape quality

None

Absolutely no change in the existing landscape quality

Table 15.1:    Relationship between Receptor Sensitivity and Magnitude of Change in Defining Impact Significance

Magnitude of Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Large

LIVA Significance table (2014-05-15)

 

 

Intermediate

 

 

Small

 

Negligible

 

 

 

None

 

 

 

Low

Medium

High

 

 

 

 

Receptor Sensitivity

(of Landscape Resource, Landscape Character Area or VSR)

 

Note:

The colours in the above table categorise the total spectrum of impacts rising from the lowest value at the bottom left corner to the highest value at the top right corner. It may be seen that for some combination of classification levels of Magnitude of Change and Receptor Sensitivity, there are 2 possible impact significance thresholds. When the Magnitude of Change and Receptor Sensitivity are assessed to be towards to higher ends of each classification level the resultant impact significance would be deemed to be the higher of the two impact significance thresholds.

15.4.2.7    Prediction of Acceptability of Impacts.  An overall assessment of the acceptability, or otherwise, of the impacts according to the five levels of significance set out in Annex 10 of the EIAO-TM is stated in the conclusion in Section 15.10.3.1. According to Annex 10, the evaluation of landscape and visual impacts may be classified into five levels of significance based on type and extent of the effects concluded in the EIA study:

ˇ  The impact is beneficial if the project will complement the landscape and visual character of its setting, will follow the relevant planning objectives and will improve overall and visual quality;

ˇ  The impact is acceptable if the assessment indicates that there will be no significant effects on the landscape, no significant visual effects caused by the appearance of the project, or no interference with key views;

ˇ  The impact is acceptable with mitigation measures if there will be some adverse effects, but these can be eliminated, reduced or offset to a large extent by specific measures;

ˇ  The impact is unacceptable if the adverse effects are considered too excessive and are unable to mitigate practically;

ˇ  The impact is undetermined if significant adverse effects are likely, but the extent to which they may occur or may be mitigated cannot be determined from the study. Further detailed study will be required for the specific effects in question.

15.4.3  Broad Brush Tree Survey Methodology

15.4.3.1    A broad brush tree survey in accordance with the EIA Study Brief is described in Section 15.5.6 and illustrated in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.1, MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.2, MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.3, MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.4, MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.5 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.6. The survey provides baseline information on the existing trees within the project site boundary and identifies dominant tree species, maturity, rarity and any plant species of conservation interest.

15.4.3.2    Existing trees within the project boundary were surveyed in groups according to the location, in which the following information was identified for each tree group:

ˇ  Tree group number;

ˇ  Botanical name and Chinese name of the main species found in the group;

ˇ  Approximate number of trees in the group;

ˇ  An assessment of average tree form (good / fair / poor) for each species found in each group;

ˇ  An assessment of average tree health (good / fair / poor) for each species found in each group;

ˇ  An assessment of average amenity value (high / medium / low) for each species found in each group; and

ˇ  Additional remarks are provided on the estimated approximate age range of the trees.

15.4.3.3    No rare or protected trees species were identified in the broad brush tree survey, however the absence of such species cannot be absolutely confirmed in a broad brush survey.

15.4.4  Visual Impact Methodology

15.4.4.1    Landscape and visual impacts are assessed separately for the construction and operation phases.  The assessment of visual impacts has involved the following procedures.

15.4.4.2    Identification of the Visual Envelope and Zones of Visual Influence (ZVI) during the construction and operation phases of the 3RS. The visual envelope is the area from which any part of the proposed project can be seen and may contain areas, which are fully visible, partly visible and non-visible from the project. The ZVI is the portion of the visual envelope that is within 10 km from the proposed project. Identification of the visual envelope and ZVI is achieved by site visits and desk-top studies of topographic maps and photographs to determine the visibility of the 3RS from various locations. Given the effects of distance and the panoramic qualities of many views, VSRs beyond 10 km from the project will scarcely notice (and will find it very difficult to distinguish) the 3RS in their wider views.  At these distances, the proposed 3RS will not form a feature of any significance in the VSRs frame of view and consequently will not influence the visual experience of the VSR.  Hence 10 km is considered the limit of the Zone of Visual Influence. 

15.4.4.3    Identification of the Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) within the ZVI at construction and operation phases.  These are the people who would reside within, work within, play within, or travel through, the ZVI. VSRs at both existing and committed developments will be considered in this assessment.

15.4.4.4    Assessment of the degree of sensitivity to change of the VSRs.  Factors considered include:

ˇ  The type of VSRs, classified according to whether the person is at home, at work, at play, or travelling.  Those who view the impact from their homes are considered to be highly sensitive as the attractiveness or otherwise of the outlook from their home will have a substantial effect on their perception of the quality and acceptability of their home environment and their general quality of life. Those who view the impact from their workplace are considered to be only moderately sensitive as the attractiveness or otherwise of the outlook will have a less important, although still material, effect on their perception of their quality of life.  The degree to which this applies depends on whether the workplace is industrial, retail or commercial.  Those who view the impact while taking part in an outdoor leisure activity may display varying sensitivity depending on the type of leisure activity. Those who view the impact while travelling on a public thoroughfare will also display varying sensitivity depending on the speed of travel.

ˇ  Other factors which are considered (as required by EIAO GN 8/2010) include the value and quality of existing views and views from planned developments, the availability and amenity of alternative views, the duration or frequency of view, and the degree of visibility.

15.4.4.5    The sensitivity of VSRs is classified as follows:

High:

The VSR is highly sensitive to any change in their viewing experience

Medium:

The VSR is moderately sensitive to any change in their viewing experience

Low:

The VSR is only slightly sensitive to any change in their viewing experience

15.4.4.6    Identification of the relative numbers of VSRs.  This is expressed in terms of whether there are very few, few, many or very many VSRs in any one category of VSR.

15.4.4.7    Identification of potential sources of visual impacts. These are the various elements of the construction works and operational procedures that would generate visual impacts.

15.4.4.8    Assessment of the potential magnitude of visual change.  Factors considered include:

Duration and Frequency of the impact:

Temporary / Permanent: This refers to the long term presence of the visual change – whether it is experienced by the VSR for the whole duration of the construction phase or operation phase, or only part thereof.

Intermittent / Continuous: This refers to short term frequency of the visual change - is it always visible (continuous) or only at certain times (intermittent).  For example, travelling VSRs may only see the source intermittently as they travel along their journey, whereas residential VSRs may have continuous views from their living room.

Reversibility of the impact:

Reversible / Irreversible

Compatibility of the project with the Visual Backdrop:

High / Medium / Low

Distance of the source of impact from the viewer:

Shortest distance measured in metres (m) between the VSR and the source.

Degree of visibility of Source(s) of Visual Impact:

Full: virtually full uninterrupted view of the source of impact

Partial: partial view of the source of impact which is slightly hidden by intervening elements such as buildings, vegetation etc.

Obscured:  partial view of the source of impact which is largely hidden by intervening elements such as buildings, vegetation etc.

Scale of the development

Small / Medium / Large

Potential Blockage of Existing Views

Full / Partial / Slight / Negligible:  The degree to which the source of the impact blocks existing open views currently experienced by the VSR.

15.4.4.9    The magnitude of visual change is classified as follows:

Large:

The VSRs would suffer a major change in their viewing experience;

Intermediate:

The VSRs would suffer a moderate change in their viewing experience;

Small:

The VSRs would suffer a small change in their viewing experience;

Negligible:

The VSRs would suffer no discernible change in their viewing experience;

None

The VSRs would suffer absolutely no change in their viewing experience.

15.4.4.10 Identification of potential visual mitigation measures. These may take the form of adopting alternative designs or revisions to the basic engineering and architectural design to prevent and/or minimise adverse impacts; remedial measures such as colour and finishing treatment of building features; and compensatory measures such as the implementation of landscape design measures (e.g. tree planting, creation of new open space etc.) to compensate for unavoidable adverse impacts and to attempt to generate potentially beneficial long term impacts. A programme for the mitigation measures shall be provided.  The agencies responsible for the funding, implementation, management and maintenance of the mitigation measures shall be identified and their approval-in-principle shall be sought.

15.4.4.11 Prediction of the significance of visual impacts before and after the implementation of the mitigation measures. By synthesising the magnitude of the various visual changes and the sensitivity of the VSR, and the number of individuals in the VSR that are affected, it is possible to categorise the degree of significance of the impacts in a logical, well-reasoned and consistent fashion. Table 15.1 shows the rationale for dividing the degree of significance into four thresholds, namely, insubstantial, slight, moderate and substantial, depending on the combination of a negligible / small / intermediate / large magnitude of change and a low / medium / high degree of sensitivity of VSRs.  Consideration is also given to the relative numbers of individuals in the VSRs in predicting the final impact significance - exceptionally low or high numbers of individuals in a VSR may change the result that might otherwise be concluded from Table 15.1. The significance of the visual impacts is categorised as follows:

Substantial:

Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause significant deterioration or improvement in existing visual quality perceived by the general population;

Moderate:

Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause a noticeable deterioration or improvement in existing visual quality perceived by the general population;

Slight:

Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause a barely perceptible deterioration or improvement in existing visual quality perceived by the general population;

Insubstantial:

No discernible change in the existing visual quality perceived by the general population;

None

Absolutely no change in the existing visual quality perceived by the general population.

15.4.4.12 Prediction of Acceptability of Residual Impacts.  An overall assessment of the acceptability or otherwise of the residual impacts 10 to 15 years after implementation of visual mitigation measures, according to the five criteria set out in Annex 10 of the EIAO-TM.

15.4.5  Assumptions and Limitations

15.4.5.1    In accordance with EIAO Guidance Note 8/2010 (paragraph 3.7(a)) approved projects should form part of the baseline conditions.  Therefore, the landscape and visual outcomes (including proposed landscape and visual mitigation measures) of approved projects currently under construction, including the Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facility (HKBCF), associated Hong Kong Link Road (HKLR), the Southern Connection of Tuen Mun – Chek Lap Kok Link (TM-CLKL), Residential / Commercial Development at Tung Chung (Area 55a), Residential Development at Tung Chung (Area 55b)  and the Public Rental Housing Development at Tung Chung (Area 56) will be included as part of the baseline conditions for the 3RS.  The predicted completion date for the aforementioned projects is 2015 / 16 which is before commencement of the 3RS.

15.4.5.2    The aforementioned projects are discussed below and are indicated on Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-011.

ˇ  HKBCF and HKLR - HKBCF will serve as a transportation hub and provide clearance facilities for goods and passengers using the Hong Kong – Zhuhai – Macao Bridge (HZMB). The proposed HKBCF will be located on an artificial island of about 130 ha reclaimed from the open waters off the northeast of HKIA. It is next to HKIA and Tung Chung New Town Extension Study which are at convenient locations with good transportation connectivity. With a variety of transport modes available in the proximity, HKBCF will become a multi-modal transportation hub with HKIA, SkyPier, Airport Express Line and Tung Chung Line in the area. HKLR will comprise sea viaducts in the western waters of Hong Kong, tunnels through Scenic Hill and underneath the Airport Road and Airport Express Line, and at-grade roads on reclamation along the east coast of airport island. The project consists of a dual three-lane carriageway in the form of viaduct from the HK SAR boundary to Scenic Hill of approximately 9.4 km in length. The projects are due for completion in 2016.

ˇ  Southern Connection of TM-CLKL - TM-CLKL will be a dual two-lane carriageway connecting the Tuen Mun Western Bypass (TMWB) at Tuen Mun Area 40 in the north with the proposed HZMB HKBCF, the airport and North Lantau in the south. The northern connection between Tuen Mun and HKBCF will be a sub-sea tunnel while the southern connection between HKBCF and North Lantau will be on viaducts. The Southern Connection of TM-CLKL is due for completion in 2016.

ˇ  Residential Development at Tung Chung (Area 56) - Tung Chung Area 56 covers a site area of about 32,500 m2 and is located to the east of Ying Hei Road. According to the Tung Chung Town Centre Area Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-TCTC/18, the site is zoned “Residential (A)” and has a plot ratio of five. The residential development is in line with the planning intention. The development will consist of four domestic blocks of 41 storeys high. Completion of the proposed development at Tung Chung (Area 56) is expected in 2016.

ˇ  Residential / Commercial Development at Tung Chung (Area 55a) – Tung Chung Area 55a covers an area of about 25,400 m2 and is located north of Ying Hei Road. According to the Tung Chung Town Centre Area Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-TCTC/18, the site is zoned “Residential (A)” and has a plot ratio of five. Completion of the residential / commercial development at Tung Chung (Area 55a) is expected in 2016.

ˇ  Residential Development at Tung Chung (Area 55b) - Tung Chung Area 55b covers as area of about 26,400 m2 and is located north of Ying Hei Road. According to the Tung Chung Town Centre Area Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-TCTC/18, the site is zoned “Residential (A)” and has a plot ratio of five. Completion of the residential development at Tung Chung (Area 55b) is expected in 2015.

15.4.5.3    In addition, the following assumptions are made in the assessment:

ˇ  It is assumed that funding, implementation, management and maintenance of the landscape and visual mitigation proposals can be satisfactorily resolved according to the principles in ETWB TCW No. 2/2004.  All mitigation proposals in the EIA report shall be practical and achievable within the known parameters of funding, implementation, management and maintenance. The suggested agents for the funding and implementation (and subsequent management and maintenance, if applicable) are indicated in the EIA report.  Approvals-in-principle to the implementation, management and maintenance of the proposed mitigation measures are being sought from the appropriate authorities.

15.4.6  Concurrent Projects

15.4.6.1    The concurrent projects that fall within the ZVI, therefore relating to the visual impact assessment, have been identified below and are indicated on Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-011. The visual impacts of these concurrent projects are taken into account in the cumulative assessment.

ˇ  Northern Connection of TM-CLKL - The proposed TM-CLKL, together with the proposed TMWB, is a proposed strategic road link between North West New Territories (NWNT), North Lantau, the proposed HZMB HKBCF and HKIA. The Northern Connection of TM-CLKL is located just east of the Tuen Mun River Trade Terminal and is due for completion in 2018.

ˇ  Tung Chung New Town Extension Study – According to the Stage 2 Public Engagement exercise in May 2013, the Tung Chung East Extension will comprise of a 120 ha landscape formation, primarily for residential and recreational use. It is estimated to accommodate a population of 110,000. The Tung Chung West Extension will comprise of a 14 ha land formation, primarily for residential and recreational use, the proposed Tung Chung West Station, high density developments close to the existing Tung Chung Road, medium density developments in areas adjacent to Yat Tung Estate and village clusters near the Tung Chung River Estuary to provide a stepped building height profile towards Tung Chung Bay. The Tung Chung West Extension is estimated to accommodate a population of 43,000. The Tung Chung New Town Extension Study would generate primarily residential and recreational VSRs in large numbers. According to communications with the project proponent in December 2013, this project is currently undergoing engineering and environmental assessment, and no detailed construction programme is confirmed at this stage, though construction is currently targeted to commence in 2018 and it is anticipated that the first population intake would occur in 2023/24.

ˇ  Proposed Public Housing Development at Tung Chung West (Area 39) – The Public Rental Housing (PRH) development at Tung Chung Area 39 is located on the south west of Yat Tung Estate. To the east are villages including Ha Ling Pei, Wong Ka Wai and Lung Tseng Tau; to the west is agricultural land; and to the south are YMC of Hong Kong Christian College and Caritas Charles Vath College. The site area of the proposed development is approximately 3.23 ha. The proposed development will consist of four domestic blocks ranging from 94 - 130 m high providing around 3,800 PRH flats. Construction of the PRH development at Tung Chung West (Area 39) will commence in 2014 with completion in 2018.

ˇ  Proposed Residential Development at Tung Chung (Area 54) - Tung Chung Area 54 covers an area of about 32,400 m2 and is located north of Ying Hei Road. According to the Tung Chung Town Centre Area Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-TCTC/18, the site is zoned “Residential (A)” and has a plot ratio of five. Completion of the proposed development at Tung Chung (Area 54) is anticipated to be in 2019/20.

ˇ  Lantau Logistics Park (LLP) - The LLP will be developed on the 72 ha out of a total reclamation area of 112 ha off the north shore of Lantau Island immediately to the north of, and encompassing, the existing Siu Ho Wan railway depot with proposals for possible Logistics Park extension or other compatible uses for the remaining 40 ha of reclamation area. The new reclamation will be an extension of the existing reclamation carried out for the North Lantau Highway and the Siu Ho Wan depot. The exact layout of the proposed LLP reclamation is subject to further study and will be confirmed after detailed investigation. Construction work will involve reclamation, construction of surcharge, handling and stockpiling of excavated materials for roadworks, drainage, waterworks, concreting works and construction traffic movements on unpaved roads. According to communications with the project proponent in September 2013, the development programme for the LLP is yet to be confirmed, and the land uses for the proposed reclamation are subject to the outcomes of Agreement No. CE 9/2011(CE).

ˇ  Leisure and Entertainment Node at Sunny Bay - The Sunny Bay Reclamation, at the gateway to the north east Lantau tourism hub and near the Sunny Bay MTR Station, was recommended as a tourism node in the ‘Northshore Lantau Development Feasibility Study’. It is suitable for a leisure and entertainment node, particularly for youths, which may comprise such components as entertainment, dining, fashionable stores, performance venues, theme attractions and indoor leisure and sports facilities like indoor man made beach. The proposal could create synergy with Hong Kong Disneyland and other tourism proposals on Lantau. Based on discussions with Planning Department in August 2013, it was identified that this proposal does not yet have an implementation programme, and the land uses for this proposed reclamation is also subject to the outcomes of Agreement No. CE 9/2011(CE) – Increasing Land Supply by Reclamation and Rock Cavern Development cum Public Engagement – Feasibility Study.

ˇ  New Contaminated Mud Marine Disposal Facility at Airport East/East Sha Chau - The project involves the sequential disposal of contaminated mud into a series of dredged pits. The new CMP to the south of The Brothers will operate between 2013 and 2016. Disposal of contaminated sediment will begin at CMP Pit Vb at East Sha Chau upon completion of disposal at the CMP south of The Brothers and this is expected to be ongoing throughout 2016 and 2017. Thereafter, disposal will begin at CMP Pit Vc at East Sha Chau, followed by Pit Vd at East Sha Chau.

ˇ  Intermodal Transfer Terminus (ITT) – A planned development on HKIA to meet the additional demand from an increase of transfer passengers at HKIA following the opening of the aforementioned HZMB project. The works will include the expansion and modification of the existing SkyPier facilities (located at the north-eastern extent of HKIA) to provide an ITT, a bonded road linking ITT to HKBCF (the portion within HKIA), other associated road works and an underground APM maintenance facility. Construction is tentatively scheduled to commence in 2014 for completion in 2017.

ˇ  North Commercial District (NCD) – A planned development of a new commercial centre with basement car parking in the location of the existing SkyCity Nine Eagles Golf Course. NCD will accommodate various commercial facilities include offices, hotels, and retail. Construction is tentatively scheduled to commence in 2015 for completion in 2019

ˇ  Organic Waste Treatment Facilities at Siu Ho Wan -  A planned development at Siu Ho Wan which aims to recycle source-separated organic waste generated from the C&I sectors (mostly food waste) to useful products, thereby minimising requirement for landfill disposal.. The facilities will adopt anaerobic digestion and composting technologies to recycle organic waste into biogas and compost products. According to communications with the project proponent in August 2013, it is estimated that the DBO contract will be awarded in early 2014 and the plant will be commissioned in mid-2016.

ˇ  Potential Sites for Columbarium Developments – Group B – Feasibility Study - Two sites in the Tsuen Wan District located at the eastern and western end of Sham Shui Kok Drive in Siu Ho Wan, North Lantau are shortlisted potential sites for columbarium development. Based on communication with the works agent in January 2014, the study is still in the feasibility stage and there is no implementation programme available yet, though it is initially proposed that this development may be operational by 2020. Given that insufficient information is available at this stage, this project cannot be considered as a concurrent project for cumulative impact assessment, however, it will be considered as a potential future sensitive receiver in relevant technical assessments.

ˇ  Planning and Engineering Study for Tuen Mun Areas 40 and 46 and the Adjoining Areas – This is a planning and engineering study on the future land use options for Tuen Mun Areas 40 and 46 and the adjoining areas. Area 40 is currently zoned as “Industrial” use while parts of Area 46 is zoned as “Other Specified Uses” annotated “Crematorium, Columbarium, Funeral Services Centre and Open Space”. The study aims to investigate the potential for re-planning these areas for alternative uses such as commercial, office and hotel uses, logistics uses, high technology industry uses, residential use, etc. According to the latest information from the project website, the feasibility study commenced in May 2013 and is anticipated for completion in 2015, however the future development proposal is yet to be determined. Given that insufficient information is available at this stage, this project cannot be considered as a concurrent project and cumulative impacts will not be assessed.

ˇ  Cycle Track between Tsuen Wan and Tuen Mun - This project aims to provide a cycle track between Tsuen Wan and Tuen Mun together with associated supporting and recreational facilities. According to latest information published by the project proponent on this project, the project is currently undergoing detailed design, which is estimated to be completed in phases from mid-2014 to 2015, and the programme of construction works could only be finalised upon completion of the detailed design work. Given that the construction programme is unconfirmed, this project cannot be assessed for cumulative construction phase impacts.

15.4.6.2    The concurrent projects which fall within the 500 m landscape study area, therefore relating to the landscape impact assessment, have been identified below. These projects, identified below, are discussed in detail in Section 15.4.6.1 above, and are indicated on Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-011. The landscape impacts of these concurrent projects are taken into account in the cumulative assessment.

ˇ  Tung Chung New Town Extension Study (partial);

ˇ  New Contaminated Mud Marine Disposal Facility at East Sha Chau (partial);

ˇ  Intermodal Transfer Terminus;

ˇ  The North Commercial District.

15.4.7  Photomontages

15.4.7.1    Representative views from various locations have been selected to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed impact mitigation proposal and residual impacts of the development in both short and long terms. Photomontages illustrating the proposed works and the recommended mitigation measures as well as the confirmed projects and mitigation measures are listed in Section 15.7.4. The locations of the selected viewpoints are indicated in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-010 with the viewpoints illustrated in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-017.1 to MCL/P132/EIA/15-026.2. The photomontages illustrate the proposed development under the following scenarios:

ˇ  Existing Baseline Conditions in June 2013;

ˇ  Planned Baseline Conditions in 2016 before commencement of the 3RS (with committed and approved projects: HKBCF, HKLR,  Southern Connection of the TM-CLKL, Residential/Commercial Development at Tung Chung (Area 55a), Residential Development at Tung Chung (Area 55b) and Public Rental Housing (PRH) Development at Tung Chung (Area 56));

ˇ  Day 1 of completed works without mitigation measures;

ˇ  Day 1 of the completed works with mitigation measures; and

ˇ  The completed works with mitigation after 10 years.

15.5    Baseline Conditions

15.5.1  Landscape and Visual Study Area

15.5.1.1    Chek Lap Kok was an island in the western waters of Hong Kong. Together with the smaller Lam Chau, it was levelled and merged via land formation into the 12.48 km2 platform for the current HKIA, which opened for commercial operations in 1998. The island is located north of Lantau Island off Ma Wan Chung and Tung Chung. The southern end of the Chek Lap Kok forms a small peninsula, which has been left largely undeveloped. This area is facing Tung Chung and is now named "Scenic Hill". It is the site of the Ancient Kiln Park and the Chek Lap Kok Angle Station of the Ngong Ping 360 cable car.

15.5.1.2    Chek Lap Kok is located north of Tung Chung, which is an area situated on the north-western coast of Lantau Island. Tung Chung was formerly a rural village around Tung Chung Wan, and along the delta and lower courses of Tung Chung River and Ma Wan Chung in the north-western coast of Lantau Island developed as part of the Airport Core Programme.

15.5.1.3    Located south of Chek Lap Kok is Lantau Island which encompasses a land mass of 147 km˛, it is the largest island in Hong Kong, almost twice the size of Hong Kong Island. Lantau Island primarily consists of mountainous terrain. Lantau Peak (934 m) is the highest point of the island. It is the second highest in Hong Kong, after Tai Mo Shan, and is almost twice the height of Victoria Peak. Other mountains include Sunset Peak (869 m), Lin Fa Shan (766 m), Nei Lak Shan (751 m) and Yi Tung Shan (747 m). The largest country park of Hong Kong, Lantau South Country Park is located on the island, which hosts two other parks, namely Lantau North Country Park and its extension. These parks cover slightly more than half of the area of Lantau Island.

15.5.1.4    Located across Urmston Road is Castle Peak, Tai Lam Country Park and the town of Tuen Mun. Castle Peak is a 583 m high peak in the western New Territories of Hong Kong. The area to the west of the hill was also named Castle Peak. It is an industrial area with several power plants owned by CLP. Tai Lam Country Park, is a country park located in the Tai Lam, at the south of Yuen Long and east of Tuen Mun, in the western New Territories of Hong Kong. This country park has an area of 54 km˛. Tuen Mun is a town near the mouth of Tuen Mun River and Castle Peak Bay in the New Territories. It was one of the earliest settlements in Hong Kong which can be dated back to the Neolithic period. Tuen Mun is now a modern mainly residential area in north-west New Territories.

15.5.2  Committed and Approved Projects under Construction

15.5.2.1    In accordance with EIAO Guidance Note 8/2010 (paragraph 3.7(a)) approved projects to be completed before commencement of the 3RS, should form part of the baseline conditions.  Therefore, the landscape and visual outcomes of approved projects currently under construction, including HKBCF, HKLR Southern Connection of TM-CLKL, Residential / Commercial Development at Tung Chung (Area 55a), Residential Development at Tung Chung (Area 55b) and Public Rental Housing (PRH) Development at Tung Chung (Area 56) are included as part of the baseline conditions for the 3RS as the aforementioned projects would be completed before commencement of construction for the 3RS in 2016.

15.5.2.2    For ease of understanding, the baseline study describes what will be in existence once the current approved and committed projects already under construction are completed.  It is upon that baseline that the impacts of future construction and operation of the 3RS will be felt, and it is the 3RS’s impact on that baseline that are assessed, quantitatively and qualitatively, in this LVIA.

15.5.2.3    A review of the current land-uses within the study area is outlined below in Section 15.5.3.  The existing LRs and LCAs within the study area have been identified and described in Sections 15.5.4 and 15.5.5. The sensitivities of the LRs and LCAs have been summarised in Table 15.2 and Table 15.3.

15.5.3  Review of Current Land-Uses within the Assessment Area

15.5.3.1    A review has been undertaken of the current land-use and marine park designations within the landscape study area. The relevant OZPs for the project works are the Chek Lap Kok Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-CLK/12 and Tung Chung Town Centre Area Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-TCTC/18 extracts of which is shown in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-002.

Chek Lap Kok Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-CLK/12

15.5.3.2    The object of the plan is to specify the broad land use zonings and major transport network for Chek Lap Kok and the HZMB and HKBCF so any development will be under statutory planning control.

15.5.3.3    The following describes the land use zonings on land falling within the boundaries of the plan which are always permitted and which may be permitted by the Town Planning Board, with or without conditions on application.

ˇ  Other Specified Uses (“OU”): This zoning covers land for a number of specified uses. These fall under the following specific areas as outlined below;

-      Airport; intended for the development of airport operational facilities;

-      Airport Service Area; indented for the development of airport support facilities to facilitate the operation of the airport;

-      Boundary Crossing Facilities; intended for the development of boundary crossing facilities and related activities for the HZMB;

-      Business Park; intended for the business activities relating to the airport;

-      Highways Maintenance Area; intended to designate areas for the provisions of backup area for operations and maintenance of HKLR;

-      Pier; intended to designate land for piers to facilitate marine access to Chek Lap Kok;

-      Satellite Control Building; intended to reserve land for the development of a satellite control building;

-      Sea Rescue Station; intended primarily to reserve land for the reprovisioning of the existing Fire Services Department East Sea Rescue Facilities. The existing facilities will be affected by the proposed automated people mover associated with HKBCF;

-      Ventilation Building; to reserve land for the development of a ventilation building associated with the TM-CLKL;

-      Amenity Area; designated land for major roadside amenity areas and landscape buffers. This includes the areas between the Dragonair Tower and China National Aviation Corporation (CNAC) Tower and the proposed carriageway from HKBCF and HKLR.

ˇ  Commercial (“C”): Intended for airport related activities as well as other commercial developments and business activities. This area is primarily focused in the north eastern portion of Chek Lap Kok where the aim is to provide an aesthetically pleasant environment for airport related enterprises and other business activities. Other supporting facilities in this zone include hotels, offices, retail, exhibition centre, and recreational. A large portion of this area is taken up by transport infrastructure including public car parks, terminal buildings and the Airport Express Line Station. This zoning currently occupies 118.8 ha within the current OZP.

ˇ  Government, Institutional or Community (“G/IC”): Intended for the provision of Government, institution, or community facilities to support any airport operations and serve the needs of other developments on Chek Lap Kok. Existing facilities within this zone include the Government flying services centre, fire station, police complex and airmail centre. This zone currently occupies 12.30 ha within the current OZP.

ˇ  Green Belt (“GB”): The planning intention for this zone is to preserve the existing natural landscape at the knoll at the south eastern point of the Chek Lap Kok to provide a visual and environmental buffer for the adjacent new town development of Tung Chung. The zone also holds the purpose of providing a passive recreational outlet.

ˇ  Cultural Heritage Site: A cultural heritage site (Ha Law Wan Site of Archaeological Interest) is located north of Scenic Hill with ancient kilns dated back to Yuan Dynasty. It is noted that the site has been deemed worthy of preservation.

Tung Chung Town Centre Area Outline Zoning Plan No. S/I-TCTC/18

15.5.3.4    The object of the plan is to specify the broad land use zonings and major transport networks so that development within the area can be put under statutory planning control.

15.5.3.5    The following describes the land use zonings on land falling within the boundaries of the plan which are always permitted and which may be permitted by the Town Planning Board, with or without conditions on application.

ˇ  Open space (“O”): Intended primarily for the provision of open-air public space for active and/or passive recreational uses serving the need of local residents as well as the general public. In addition to other areas, the zone also covers the waterfront open spaces in Areas 52 and 59 including a prestigious waterfront promenade which will be extended to the east to Tai Ho and to the west, Tung Chung West in the future. It also covers the open space links and other open spaces at Areas 7, 16, and 18 which serve as environmental buffers for the North Lantau Highway (NLH) and other major roads. This zone currently occupies 55.70 ha within the current OZP.

ˇ  Comprehensive Development Area (“CDA”): Intended for comprehensive development / redevelopment of the area for residential and commercial uses with the provision of open space and other supporting facilities which may include offices, shop and services, places of entertainment, eating places and hotels, functioning as the economic centre in the town centre. This zoning currently occupies 2.14 ha within the current OZP.

ˇ  Government, Institutional or Community (“G/IC”): Intended for the provision of Government, institution, or community facilities to support the needs of the local residents and/or wider district region or the territory. It is also intended to provide land for uses directly related to Government, organisation providing social services to meet community needs and other institutional establishments.  This zone currently occupies 22.32 ha within the current OZP.

ˇ  Other Specified Uses (“OU”): This zoning denotes land allocated or reserved for specified uses including railway ventilation and other associated plants to the north east of the Tung Chung MTR Station, sewage pumping station in Area 12, proposed ferry pier in Area 50, two proposed petrol filling stations in Area 58, a traction substation in Area 58, and a cable car portal and its related commercial development in Area 2. This zone currently occupies 2.86 ha within the current OZP.

ˇ  Commercial (“C”): Intended for commercial oriented developments which may include land uses such as offices, shop and services, places of entertainment, eating places and hotels, functioning as the economic centre in the town centre. This zoning currently occupies 2.14 ha within the current OZP.

ˇ  Green Belt (“GB”): The planning intention for this zone is to primarily define the limits of the urban and suburban development areas by natural features and to preserve existing topography  and natural vegetation  at the fringe of the new town as well as to provide passive recreational outlets. This zone does not feature within the proposed 500 m landscape study area of this project.

Designated Marine Parks and Marine Reserves

15.5.3.6    The Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park is situated in the open water on the western side of Hong Kong. This marine park was designated on 22 November 1996. It covers a total sea area of about 1,200 ha. The boundary is demarcated by yellow light buoys deployed at the corners of the marine park. The landward boundary largely follows the high water mark along the coastline of the islands.

ˇ  Section 21, Clause (1) of the Marine Parks Ordinance (Cap 476) states: the Authority may approve in writing the carrying out of any work for the purposes of inspecting or repairing any existing structure or facility within any marine park or marine reserve and may, after seeking the advice of the Board, approve the carrying out of any new development within any marine park or marine reserve, where he considers it to be in the public interest to do so, and may impose any conditions on granting the approval.

ˇ  Section 21, Clause (2) states: Sections 10 and 11 shall, with necessary modifications, apply in respect of an application for approval to carry out any work or new development referred to in subsection (1) within a marine park or marine reserve.

Hong Kong 2030 Planning Vision and Strategy Final Report

15.5.3.7    The necessity for the 3RS is described in the Hong Kong 2030 Planning Vision and Strategy Final Report which concludes that it recognises the importance of the continual development of HKIA as key in sustaining Hong Kong’s economic growth and priority needs to be given in strengthening this sector of development.

Other Relevant Studies, Guidelines and Manuals

-      Urban Design Guidelines and Standards Manual for New Airport at Chek Lap Kok;

-      SkyCity Masterplan Urban Design Guidelines;

-      SkyCity landscape Masterplan;

-      Tung Chung New Town Development Study;

-      Revised Concept Plan for Lantau;

-      Tuen Mun – Chek Lap Kok Link (TM-CLKL);

-      Hong Kong – Zhuhai – Macao Bridge, Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities – Investigation;

-      Tung Chung New Town Development Extension Study;

-      Planning and Engineering Study on the Remaining Development in Tung Chung - Feasibility Study; and

-      Dredging, Management and Capping of Contaminated Sediment Disposal Facility to the South of The Brothers

Conclusion

15.5.3.8    It is concluded that there is no conflict between the proposed 3RS and the current relevant planning and development control framework for existing land, as the proposed development is consistent with the current designated land uses on existing land. There is also no conflict with existing land zoned Green Belt and Open Space as the predicted extent of area of works does not encroach into the aforementioned land zonings. However, Town Planning Ordinance approvals and Foreshore and Sea-bed (reclamations) Ordinance approvals will be required for the proposed land formation within the major works components of the 3RS. Furthermore, under section 10 of the Marine Parks Ordinance, approval has to be sought for any development within a marine park. Section 10 of the Marine Parks Ordinance States An application for approval by the Authority under Section 9 to carry out new development shall be made to the Authority in writing which application shall include details of the proposal for the new development.”.

15.5.4  Landscape Resources

15.5.4.1    The baseline LRs that will be affected during the construction phase and operation phase, together with their sensitivity to change, are described below. The locations of the LRs are mapped in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-003.1, MCL/P132/EIA/15-003.2, MCL/P132/EIA/15-003.3, MCL/P132/EIA/15-003.4 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-007. Photo-views illustrating the LRs of the study area are illustrated in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-005.1, MCL/P132/EIA/15-005.2 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-009.  For ease of reference and co-ordination between text, tables and drawings, each LR is given an identity number. The below listed LRs represent the baseline condition after completion of the approved committed projects. This includes new landscape elements such as compensatory planting which is planned to be implemented as part of the approved committed projects and will in fact exist during commencement of the 3RS so will therefore form part of the baseline condition for the 3RS, except for minor advanced works that are targeted to commence in 2015.

CLK/LR1 - Coastal Waters of North Lantau

15.5.4.2    The seawater body forms part of the coastal waters of North Lantau and is a valuable resource contributing to the unique waterfront setting of Tung Chung. These Coastal Waters surrounding Chek Lap Kok are an important recreational resource as they are frequented by commercial and pleasure craft marine traffic.  Given the regional importance and physical characteristics of this landscape the sensitivity given is High.

15.5.4.3    After implementation of the approved committed projects, a loss of approximately 60 ha of coastal waters will occur resulting in an area of approximately 12,000 ha for this resource.

CLK/LR2 – Grass / Turf Areas around Runways and Verges

15.5.4.4    These are the large, flat, low-lying grass areas which have been established around the primary airport infrastructure, runway network and roadside areas on Chek Lap Kok.  A continuous band of grass approximately 100 m wide abuts the northern land formation edge and continues around a portion of both the eastern and western extents of the North Runway. Given the nature of the LR its subsequent high tolerance to change, the sensitivity given is Low.

15.5.4.5    This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR3 – Landscaped Areas Around Existing Airport Buildings

15.5.4.6    These areas include the water features and soft landscape areas around the existing buildings on airport island. These areas are primarily situated along vehicle / pedestrian access ways, along private roads and around the perimeter of the buildings. Landscaped areas consist of amenity water features, ground covers, low shrub planting, small size semi mature trees and broad leaf vegetation. Species assessed include Alpinia zerumbet 'Variegata', Ixora stricta, Callistemon viminalis, Cassia surattensis, Bauhinia spp., Roystonea regia, Casuarina equisetifolia, Calliandra haematocephala, Lagerstroemia indica, Lantana montevidensis, Agave americana, and Hibiscus spp. Much of the planting is relatively young and can be relatively easily replaced to a similar state; however semi-mature tree species do exist throughout the area. Given the quality of the LR, relative maturity of particular species and ability to accommodate some change, the sensitivity is considered Low.

15.5.4.7    This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR4a - Roadside Vegetation – Amenity Planting

15.5.4.8    A planting theme has been implemented for amenity planting throughout the commercial areas and associated airport facilities alongside major roads and access routes of Chek Lap Kok. Amenity areas consist of low hedges defining planting areas with large grassed areas, groundcovers, small shrubs, ornamental palms and small semi mature trees. Species identified include Ixora stricta, Albizia lebbeck, Casuarina equisetifolia, Acacia confusa, Acacia mangium, Cassia siamea, Dalbergia odorifera, Grevillea robusta, Leucaena leucocephala, Delonix regia, Lagerstroemia speciosa, Litsea glutinosa, Macaranga tanarius, Melia azedarach, Phoenix roebelenii, Plumeria rubra, Roystonea regia, Calliandra haematocephala, Duranta repens 'Golden Leaves', Bougainvillea spp., Cycas revoluta, Chrysalidocarpus lutescens, Ravenala madagascariensis, Archontophoenix alexandrae, Acacia auriculiformis, Hibiscus tiliaceus, Ficus microcarpa 'Golden Yellow', Ficus benjamina, Bauhinia spp., Cocos nucifera, and Nerium spp.  Planting arrangements are featured on roundabouts, traffic islands, median strips and along pedestrian footways. Much of the planting is relatively young and can be relatively easily replaced to a similar state; however semi-mature tree species do exist throughout the area. Given the quality of the LR, relative maturity of particular species and ability to accommodate some change, the sensitivity is considered Medium.

15.5.4.9    It is anticipated that the construction of infrastructure associated with HKBCF, located adjacent to Airport Road, would result in loss of approximately 2 ha of existing roadside vegetation. The existing landscape resource is approximately 57 ha. Similarly construction of HKLR along the Chek Lap Kok South Road would result in loss of approximately 2 ha of existing roadside vegetation. After the implementation of the approved committed projects, the area of this landscape resource would be reduced to approximately 53 ha for this resource. However, landscape and visual mitigation measures, including amenity roadside planting and screen planting will be implemented under those projects.

CLK/LR4b - Roadside Vegetation on Modified Slopes

15.5.4.10 Vegetation is predominantly located on slopes at the Airport North Interchange. Both self-seeded and planted native and exotic woodland species such as Hibiscus tiliaceus, Pinus elliottii, Leucaena leucocephala, Thevetia peruviana, Bauhinia spp., Acacia confusa, Acacia mangium, Nerium spp., and Agave americana occupy the engineered slopes around the highway infrastructure. The sensitivity of this vegetation is considered Low as it is predominantly incidental, of common species and of low quality.

15.5.4.11 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR5 - Natural Coastline

15.5.4.12 The natural coastline features at a variety of locations on both the south eastern point of Chek Lap Kok and Lantau Island accommodating a varying degree of human disturbance.  An almost continuous band of natural coastline exists to the west of Tung Chung Bay to Sha Lo Wan interrupted briefly by piers and jetties. The Southern coastline of Scenic Hill adjoins the designated Green Belt under the current OZP (No. S/I-CLK/12). Natural coastline also features along the eastern edge of Tung Chung Bay and the north eastern tip of Chek Lap Kok. Due to the quality and natural status, its regional importance, and low tolerance to change, the sensitivity given is High.

15.5.4.13 The existing landscape resource is approximately 9,950 linear metres. After the implementation of the approved committed projects, a loss of approximately 1,650 linear metres of coastal waters will occur resulting in 8,300 linear metres for this resource.

CLK/LR6 – Amenity / Compensatory Planting on HKBCF/HKLR

15.5.4.14 Following the completion of HKLR and HKBCF programmed for 2016 (ref. Government Contract Nos. HY/2011/03 and HY/2011/09) this resource will comprise of amenity roadside planting and landscaped areas / environmental buffers including hydroseeding and peripheral planting. Given the recent instalment of the landscape treatment and relative ease of replacement there is a high ability for this landscape resource to accommodate change. Sensitivity: Low.

15.5.4.15 After the implementation of the committed and approved projects the entire existing resource grassland / scrub on coastal edge, encompassing 6 ha, would be lost.

CLK/LR7 - Streams

15.5.4.16 A number of small streams have been identified within and around the villages of Tin Sam, Kau Liu and San Tau. The streams originate and fall within the vegetated hillsides of Lantau North Country Park. The streams are seasonal or of very low base flow. Given the natural landscape status and local importance the sensitivity given is Medium.

15.5.4.17 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR8 - Agricultural Land

15.5.4.18 Agricultural land within the villages of San Tau is comprised of various areas of active and inactive agricultural land with farms and fish ponds. Though this LR accommodates a degree of human disturbance, semi-mature tree species do exist throughout the area, the sensitivity is considered Medium.

15.5.4.19 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR9 - Natural Rocky and Sandy Shore with Mangrove/Mudflat

15.5.4.20 This is a stretch of natural shoreline containing natural rocks, mudflats, mangroves and dense coastal vegetation. The LR includes the San Tau Beach which holds Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) status largely due to the ecological value with rare seagrass species. Mangrove species include Aegiceras corniculatum, and Avicennia marina. Given the natural landscape status, rarity, regional importance and quality of the LR, the sensitivity to change is considered High.

15.5.4.21 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR10a - Coastal Woodland and Scrubland on North Lantau

15.5.4.22 This is woodland and scrubland that covers the coastal hillsides on Lantau Island facing towards Chek Lap Kok. This LR falls within the designated Lantau North Country Park. Dominant species comprise Mallotus paniculatus, Thevetia peruviana, Acacia confusa, Macaranga tanarius, Bauhinia spp., Celtis sinensis, Acacia mangium, Calliandra haematocephala, Dicranopteris linearis, Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, and Pinus elliottii. Given the relatively natural landscape status, regional importance, and low tolerance to change, the sensitivity is considered High.

15.5.4.23 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR10b - Coastal Woodland and Scrubland on Scenic Hill

15.5.4.24 This is the various forms of vegetation that cover the slopes of Scenic Hill. This area is designated Green Belt under the current OZP (No. S/I-CLK/12).   Dominant species comprise Mallotus paniculatus, Thevetia peruviana, Acacia confusa, Macaranga tanarius, Bauhinia spp., Celtis sinensis, Acacia mangium, Calliandra haematocephala, Dicranopteris linearis, Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, and Pinus elliottii. Given the relatively natural landscape status, regional importance and low tolerance to change, the sensitivity is considered High.

15.5.4.25 The existing landscape resource is approximately 21 ha. After the implementation of the approved committed projects, a loss of approximately 2 ha of coastal woodland and scrubland of Scenic hill will occur resulting in an area of 19 ha for this resource. 

CLK/LR11 - Amenity Planting in Urban Park

15.5.4.26 Amenity planting within the public parks of Tung Chung features a selection of species such as Hibiscus tiliaceus, Livistona chinensis, Bauhinia spp., Calliandra haematocephala, Melaleuca cajuputi subsp. Cumingiana, Lagerstroemia speciosa, Pongamia pinnata, Acacia auriculiformis, Ixora spp., Schefflera arboricola, Asparagus densiflorus 'Sprengeri', Ficus microcarpa 'Golden Yellow', and Rhododendron spp. Much of the planting is relatively young and can be relatively easily replaced to a similar state; however semi-mature tree species do exist throughout the area. Given the quality of the LR, relative maturity of particular species and ability to accommodate some change, the sensitivity is considered Medium.

15.5.4.27 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR12 – Grassland / Scrub on Vacant Land

15.5.4.28 Vacant lots are currently in existence on Chek Lap Kok and in Tung Chung. These areas are generally devoid of LRs and accommodate temporary land use including open storage and car parking.  These spaces are generally covered in self-seeded vegetation comprising of low growing opportunistic scrub and grass species, with occasional residual ornamental plants from previous uses. Species include Lantana camara, Leucaena leucocephala, Roystonea regia, Chrysalidocarpus lutescens, Wedelia trilobata, Chloris spp., Melinis spp., and Cerbera manghas. The sensitivity of this vegetation is considered Low as it is predominantly of common species and low quality.

15.5.4.29 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LR13 – Artificial / Man–made Coastline

15.5.4.30 An artificial coastline of approximately 17,000 m surrounds the majority of Chek Lap Kok and Tung Chung. This engineered coastline consists of loose quarried armour rock which forms the edge of the land formation where it meets the North Lantau coastal waters. Given this resource has no natural landscape status or regional importance and accommodates a high tolerance to change, the sensitivity is Low.

15.5.4.31 The existing landscape resource is approximately 17,000 linear metres. After the implementation of the approved committed projects, artificial / man–made coastline will increase to 24,000 linear metres for this resource.

SC/LR1 - Natural Rocky Coastline of Sha Chau Islands

15.5.4.32 The remote Sha Chau islands both present natural rocky coastlines of approximately 1,250 m. Sheung Sha Chau Island (north of Sha Chau Island) features a continuous rocky coastline around the circumference of the island, totalling approximately 900 m, which is briefly interrupted by the existing Sha Chau jetty to the east. The rocky coastline of Sheung Sha Chau Island is peppered with large boulders with occasional rocky outcrops appearing just off the coastal edge. Sha Chau Island is located approximately 250 m south of Sheung Sha Chau Island. The landscape study area captures the northern most portion of the island where rocky coastlines are present around the small knolls and rocky outcrops. The sensitivity given is High.

15.5.4.33 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

SC/LR2 - Natural Vegetation on Sha Chau Islands

15.5.4.34 Both islands are heavily covered with naturally established and opportunistic vegetation. Sheung Sha Chau Island topography stems from a singular landform consisting of two distinguished hills rising steadily from the coastline to approximately +50 mPD. The entire island is heavily covered with vegetation. The northern portion of Sha Chau Island features two vegetated knolls less than +20 mPD separated by a low elevated area vegetated to the shoreline. The northern portion of the island is separated from the main landform by a large sandbar which becomes submerged at high tide. Vegetation on the Sha Chau islands includes  Hibiscus tiliaceus, Phoenix hanceana, Scaevola taccada, Pandanus tectorius, Ficus superba var. japonica, Wedelia chinensis, Gordonia axillaris, Schefflera heptaphylla, Dicranopteris linearis, Litsea glutinosa, Lantana camara, Casuarina equisetifolia, Bridelia tomentosa, Terminalia catappa, Cerbera manghas, Rhaphiolepis indica, Cassytha filiformis, and Alpinia zerumbet. The sensitivity given is High.

15.5.4.35 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

SC/LR3 - Coastal Waters of Sha Chau Islands

15.5.4.36 This resource comprises the coastal waters surrounding Sha Chau islands. These waters were designated as the SCLKC Marine Park in 1996 by the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD). The Marine Park covers a total sea area of about 1,200 ha. The boundary is demarcated by yellow light buoys deployed at the corners of the Marine Park. The sensitivity given is High.

15.5.4.37 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

SC/LR4 – Natural Sandy Coastline of Sha Chau Island

15.5.4.38 Approximately 600 m of sandy coastline feature around the northern portion of Sha Chau Island. These areas are particularly present on the east and western shorelines between the two knolls featuring on this area of the island. In addition, a large sandbar (approximately 140 linear metres) also connects the northern portion to the main landform of the island which becomes submerged for a short period of time at high tide. Any changes to this LR would likely be irreversible therefore the sensitivity given is High.

15.5.4.39 This resource is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

15.5.4.40 The sensitivities for the LRs identified for Chek Lap Kok and Sha Chau islands are summarised in Table 15.2 below.

Table 15.2:    Landscape Resources

Ref.

ID.

Description

Sensitivity to Change (Low, Medium, High)

CLK/LR1

Coastal waters of North Lantau

Baseline: approx. 12,000 ha

High

CLK/LR2

Grass / turf areas around runways and verges

Baseline: 260 ha

Low

CLK/LR3

Landscaped areas around existing airport buildings

Baseline: 4.5 ha

Low

CLK/LR4a

Roadside vegetation – Amenity Planting

Baseline: 53 ha

Medium

CLK/LR4b

Roadside vegetation on modified slopes

Baseline : 5 ha

Low

CLK/LR5

Natural coastline

Baseline: 8,300 lm

High

CLK/LR6

Amenity / compensatory planting on HKBCF / HKLR

Baseline: 40 ha

Low

CLK/LR7

Stream

Baseline: 1,100 lm

Medium

CLK/LR8

Agricultural land

Baseline: 1 ha

Medium

CLK/LR9

Natural rocky and sandy shore with mangrove / mudflat

Baseline: 3 ha

High

CLK/LR10a

Coastal woodland and scrubland on North Lantau

Baseline: 50 ha

High

CLK/LR10b

Coastal woodland and scrubland on Scenic Hill

Baseline: 19 ha

High

CLK/LR11

Amenity planting in urban park

Baseline: 4 ha

Medium

CLK/LR12

Grassland / scrub on vacant land

Baseline: 114 ha

Low

CLK/LR13

Artificial / man-made coastline

Baseline: 17,000 m

Low

SC/LR1

Natural rocky coastline of  Sha Chau islands

Baseline: 1,250 lm

High

SC/LR2

Natural vegetation on Sha Chau islands

Baseline: 10 ha

High

SC/LR3

Coastal waters of Sha Chau islands

Baseline: 165 ha

High

SC/LR4

Natural sandy coastline of Sha Chau Island

Baseline: 600 m

High

15.5.5     Landscape Character Areas

15.5.5.1    Several LCAs have been identified within the study area based on the ‘Landscape Value Map of Hong Kong’ study.  These areas, and their sensitivity to change, are described below. The locations of the LCAs are indicated on Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-004 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-008. Photo-views illustrating the LCAs within the study area are illustrated in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-006 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-009. For ease of reference and co-ordination between text, tables and drawings each LCA is given an identity number. The below listed LCA’s represent the baseline condition after completion of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LCA1 - Airport Landscape

15.5.5.2    This extensive LCA consists of a flat, open and an expansive reclaimed landscape comprising airport runways, taxiways, grass verges, and the terminal complex. The landscape also contains a significant number of associated low and medium-rise out-buildings, offices and related facilities surrounding the airport and its complex, all connected by roads and highways. Other than grass, vegetation is limited to ornamental tree and shrub planting along access roads and areas around buildings. The result is a landscape characterised by its visual openness and expansive large scale, airport activity and artificial character. Sensitivity: Low.

15.5.5.3    After the implementation of the approved committed projects, a loss of approximately 3 ha of airport landscape will occur resulting in an area of 1,100 ha for this character area.

CLK/LCA2- Inshore Water Landscape

15.5.5.4    These are areas of coastal water to the north, east and west of Chek Lap Kok. The character area is partially enclosed by surrounding landmasses including Lantau Island and the south west coast of the New Territories, as well as Lung Kwu Chau and the Sha Chau islands which create a limited sense of enclosure or containment. While the landscape is characterised predominantly by the horizontality and muted hues of the coastal waters, the landscape also includes ferry traffic as well as other waterborne recreational and commercial activity. The result is a largely open and natural landscape which is interspersed human features and activities. Sensitivity: High.

15.5.5.5    After the implementation of the approved committed projects, a loss of approximately 60 ha of inshore water landscape will occur resulting in an area of approximately 12,000 ha for this character area.

CLK/LCA3 - Strait Landscape

15.5.5.6    This area of inshore coastal waters is framed by artificial seawall of Chek Lap Kok to the north and the natural coastline of Sha Lo Wan and Tung Chung to the south. The landscape is characterised predominantly by the surrounding landforms and the neutral tones of the sheltered coastal waters. These features produce a natural marine landscape with a distinct sense of enclosure, characterised by the coastal edge and features of marine activities. The natural rocky and sandy shore with mangrove / mudflat of San Tau (CLK/LR9) holds SSSI status largely due to the ecological value with rare seagrass species. As a consequence of the artificial northern edge of the landscape, the planned presence of the HKLR within the LCA and narrow linear shape, the character area has some ability to accommodate change without compromising its existing nature. Sensitivity: Medium.

15.5.5.7    After the implementation of the approved committed projects, a loss of approximately 3 ha of strait landscape will occur resulting in an area of 170 ha for this character area.

CLK/LCA4a - Coastal Upland and Hillside Landscape – Sha Lo Wan

15.5.5.8    This landscape area is located on the northern slopes of Sha Lo Wan, east of Tung Chung. The upland landscape of Sha Lo Wan consists of hillsides, knolls, ridges and spurs and is covered in scrub and grassy vegetation with occasional rocky outcrops. Woodland is found on the lower slopes where seasonal rocky streams travel down the hillsides. This portion of the LR falls within the Lantau North Country Park boundary and abuts the SSSI of San Tau beach.  Due to the location, the landscape contains few human features other than footpaths and power lines, and possesses a remote character. The hillside landscape offers significant views from Lantau Island. At the base, the hillsides accommodate rocky coasts, sandy bays or cliffs. Given the regional importance, the quality of the LCA and low tolerance to accommodate change the sensitivity given is High.

15.5.5.9    After the implementation of the approved committed projects, a loss of approximately 1 ha of coastal upland and hillside landscape – Sha Lo Wan will occur resulting in an area of 35 ha for this character area.

CLK/LCA4b - Coastal Upland and Hillside Landscape – Scenic Hill

15.5.5.10 This landscape area encompasses the last remaining area of natural hillside of the original Chek Lap Kok. The upland landscape of Scenic Hill consists of hillsides, knolls, ridges and spurs and is covered in scrub and grassy vegetation with occasional rocky outcrops. Scrubland is found on the lower slopes to the south where natural rocky coastline can be found whereas to the north coastal woodland exists. At the peak of Scenic Hill a viewing pavilion allows for distant sightlines and panoramic views of Chek Lap Kok and Tung Chung.  This area is designated Green Belt under the current OZP (No. S/I-CLK/12). Sensitivity: High.

15.5.5.11 After the implementation of the approved committed projects, a loss of approximately 2 ha of coastal upland and hillside landscape – Scenic Hill will occur resulting in an area of 24 ha for this character area.

CLK/LCA5 - Mixed Modern Comprehensive Development Landscape

15.5.5.12 The built area of Tung Chung supports an urban landscape developed systematically in recent years. Located primarily on reclaimed land, the landscape is defined by its combination of land uses including open spaces, an assembly of commercial, retail and residential towers linked by roads and highway infrastructure also serving Chek Lap Kok. The landscape is characterised by the predominance of man-made resources and by its varied character of man-made and natural features of often differing forms, scales and colours. The result is a somewhat incoherent landscape in various stages of development and establishment. Sensitivity: Low.

15.5.5.13 This LCA is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LCA6 - Rural Coastal Plain Landscape

15.5.5.14 This flat lowland vegetated landscape sits between the predominant hillsides of Lantau Island and the inshore waters around Tung Chung Bay. Descending towards the bay, the landscape shows signs of land formation from the sea over time as a result of various degrees of human occupation. The natural rocky and sandy shore with mangrove / mudflat of San Tau (CLK/LR9) holds SSSI status largely due to the ecological value with rare seagrass species.  Small villages are scattered within the fabric of the landscape set back from the coastal edge, connected by winding lanes sided by thickets of vegetation. A handful of rock bedded streams flow from the higher ground within shallow valleys, before entering the sea primarily via fabricated outlets. Sensitivity: High.

15.5.5.15 This LCA is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

CLK/LCA7 - Transportation Corridor Landscape

15.5.5.16 The landscape extends along the transportation corridor on the eastern edge of Chek Lap Kok and includes the infrastructure associated with HKBCF which extends along the south coast of Chek Lap Kok. The primary features are the railway, highway and local roads. This linear landscape includes flyovers, roundabouts, signage gantries, traffic islands, and footbridges as well as miscellaneous roadside land uses. Between the roads and railway are landscaped embankments with semi-mature vegetation including trees and shrubs. Sensitivity: Low.

15.5.5.17 After the implementation of the approved committed projects, an increase of approximately 60 ha of transportation corridor landscape will occur resulting in an area of 225 ha for this character area.

CLK/LCA8 - On-going Major Development Landscape

15.5.5.18 Located to the east of Terminal 2 (T2), on the site of the temporary golf course planned to be decommissioned due to the future NCD development, this LCA is surrounded by various airport facilities and infrastructure. At the time of the 3RS construction, this will be a transitional landscape awaiting or undergoing construction and redevelopment. The land will be characterised by flat, low-lying topography, stripped of significant vegetation or significant built structures and will include major construction activity such as cranes or other construction machinery involved in the construction of the NCD development . As this landscape has an indeterminate status with on-going disturbance, the landscape will have a desolate and transient character and a Low sensitivity to change.

15.5.5.19 This LCA is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

SC/LCA1 - Island Landscape

15.5.5.20 Lying offshore from the main landmass of Hong Kong, the Sha Chau islands are located in the north Lantau waters within the SCLKC Marine Park, and forms part of the Lung Kwu Chau, Tree Island and Sha Chau SSSI. The islands are rocky and steep in nature and are entirely covered in shrub and grass vegetation. Sheung Sha Chau Island contains no human features or access apart from the connection to the Sha Chau jetty. Sha Chau Island, located 250 m south of Sheung Sha Chau Island, contains a handful of human features. These include a Tin Hau Temple, an Approach Surveillance Radar and a Secondary Surveillance Radar for air traffic control. Isolated and exposed, the island landscape is particularly notable for its remote character. Sensitivity: High.

15.5.5.21 This LCA is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

SC/LCA2 - Sha Chau Islands Inshore Water Landscape

15.5.5.22 These are areas of coastal waters surrounding the Sha Chau islands. The Sha Chau jetty (on Sheung Sha Chau Island) may be visited by fuel tankers servicing the airport. The character area of the landscape is sheltered by the adjacent islands and rocky outcrops. The landscape is characterized by its isolated location and muted hues of the coastal waters. Due to its Marine Park status, the limited number of marine vessels visiting the area (due to restrictions on marine traffic) heightens the impression of an isolated setting with few human interruptions. Sensitivity: High.

15.5.5.23 This LCA is not anticipated to be impacted by the implementation of the approved committed projects.

15.5.5.24 The sensitivities for the LCAs identified for Chek Lap Kok and Sha Chau islands are summarised in Table 15.3 below.

Table 15.3:    Landscape Character Areas

Ref.

ID.

Description

Sensitivity to Change (Low, Medium, High)

CLK/LCA1

Airport landscape

Baseline: 1,100 ha

Low

CLK/LCA2

Inshore water landscape

Baseline: Coastal waters of North Lantau (Approx. 12,000 ha)

High

CLK/LCA3

Strait landscape

Baseline: 170 ha

Medium

CLK/LCA4A

Coastal upland and hillside landscape – Sha Lo Wan

Baseline: 35 ha

High

CLK/LCA4B

Coastal upland and hillside landscape – Scenic Hill

Baseline: 24 ha

High

CLK/LCA5

Mixed modern comprehensive development landscape

Baseline: 30 ha

Low

CLK/LCA6

Rural coastal plain landscape

Baseline: 15 ha

High

CLK/LCA7

Transportation corridor landscape

Baseline: 225 ha

Low

CLK/LCA8

On-going major development landscape

Baseline: 13 ha

Low

SC/LCA1

Island landscape

Baseline: 10 ha

High

SC/LCA2

Sha Chau islands inshore water landscape

Baseline: 160 ha

High

15.5.6     Broad Brush Tree Survey

15.5.6.1    A broad tree survey was undertaken within the project site boundary of the 3RS. The survey includes tree group survey data and tree group plans recording approximate numbers of trees (with estimated stem diameter over 95 mm diameter at 1.3 m above ground) and is illustrated on Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.1, MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.2, MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.3, MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.4, MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.5 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-027.6.  As certain details of the project are yet to be confirmed, a broad assessment has been made on the potential impacts on the trees.

15.5.6.2    The tree group survey was primarily focused to the southern and eastern regions of Chek Lap Kok due to the absence of trees within the airside zones of HKIA. No rare or endangered species and no “Old and Valuable Trees” (OVTs) as defined under ETWB TC(W) 29/2004 or listed in the LCSD OVT Register were identified within the survey area, although the absence of such species cannot be absolutely confirmed in a broad brush survey. Due to the broad nature of this survey potential OVTs or “Important Trees” as defined by ETWB TC(W) 10/2013 have not been identified. The dominant species surveyed were Acacia auriculiformis, Acacia confusa, Albizia lebbeck, Bauhinia purpurea, Casuarina equisetifolia, Cerbera manghas, Erythrina variegata, and Hibiscus tiliaceus. It is noted that some areas of trees may be affected due to the evolving site conditions associated with HKLR and HKBCF and may not exist at the commencement of the construction phase of the 3RS. 

15.5.6.3    There are no trees occupying Sheung Sha Chau Island which is the only island in the Sha Chau islands that would be affected by the works associated with the 3RS, namely the submarine fuel pipeline daylighting point.  None of the existing trees on the other island in the Sha Chau islands are anticipated to be affected by the works associated with the 3RS.

15.5.7  Summary of Tree Impacts

15.5.7.1    The tree groups anticipated to be affected by the 3RS are TG002, TG003, TG004, TG005  TG006, TG006A, TG006C, TG006D, TG007, TG010A, TG011, TG016, TG017, TG018, TG019, TG019A, TG020 TG022, TG023, TG024, TG025, TG030 and TG033.

15.5.7.2    The design of the 3RS has been considered to minimise the number of trees affected. It is estimated that approximately 2,000 trees would be affected by the 3RS. This is a preliminary estimate. The accurate number of trees affected by the works (number of trees felled or transplanted) and the number of compensatory trees required will be determined by a detailed tree survey at detail design stage. Tree preservation and compensatory tree planting will be carried out in accordance with ETWB TC(W) No. 10/2013 Tree Preservation.

15.5.8  Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI)

15.5.8.1    The visual envelope is the area from which any part of the proposed project can be seen and may contain areas, which are fully visible, partly visible and non-visible from the project. The ZVI is the portion of the visual envelope that is within 10 km from the proposed project, since any potential VSRs beyond this would suffer negligible impacts due to their distant location. Given the effects of distance and the panoramic qualities of many views, VSRs beyond 10 km from the project will scarcely notice (and will find it very difficult to distinguish) the 3RS in their wider views.  At these distances, the proposed 3RS will not form a feature of any significance in the VSRs frame of view and consequently will not influence the visual experience of the VSR.  Hence 10 km is considered the limit of the Zone of Visual Influence. 

15.5.8.2    Given the predominant waterfront location and the medium to low rise of the proposed development, the ZVI has been mapped based on the exposure of the proposed development on surrounding environment and is shown in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-010. In accordance with GN 8/2010 the ZVI may contain areas which are fully visible, partly visible, and non-visible from the project.  Areas of visual shadow may occur within the ZVI due to intervening topography, dense vegetation and man-made structures.

15.5.8.3    The extensive scale of the development in an open location allows for a wide visual envelope and ZVI within the region generally bound by the mountainous topography of Lantau and the New Territories. The visual envelope extends south across Tung Chung and through areas of North and South Lantau Country Parks where it is defined by the predominant ridgelines of Lantau Island to the south and east. To the southwest the visual envelope includes the coastal settlement of Tai O and extends west as far as the maritime boundary of HKSAR. To the east the visual envelope extends along Urmston Road sea channel past the north-east tip of Lantau Island as far as Tsuen Wan (which is more than 10 km from the project boundary). To the north the visual envelope is defined by the ridgelines of Tai Lam Country Park, the coastal areas of Tuen Mun, Castle Peak and Lung Kwu Tau.

15.5.8.4    The ZVI includes almost all of the areas described above, but does not include the eastern portion of Urmston Road sea channel that is beyond 10 km from the project site, as illustrated in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-010. 

15.5.9  Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)

15.5.9.1    Within the ZVI for the 3RS, a number of key VSRs have been identified.  These VSRs are mapped in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-010 and listed in Table 15.4.

15.5.9.2    For ease of reference, each VSR is given an identity number, which is used in the text tables and drawings.

 


Table 15.4:    Key Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)

VSR ID.

Key VSR

Value and Quality of Existing View (Poor, Fair , Good)

Availability of Alternative Views (Yes, No)

Number of Individuals (Very Few, Few, Many,
Very Many)

Sensitivity to Change (Low, Medium, High)

 

 

 

 

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

Residential VSRs

RES-1

Residents of Villages of Tai O

Good

Yes

Many

Many

High

High

RES-2

Residents of Villages of Sha Lo Wan

Fair

No

Few

Few

High

High

RES-3

Residents of Tung Chung including, Tung Chung Crescent,  Seaview Crescent,  Caribbean Coast, Area 53 to Area 56.

Good

Yes

Very Many

Very Many

High

High

RES-4

Residents along south coast of Tuen Mun

Good

Yes

Very Many

Very Many

High

High

RES-5

Residents of Hong Kong Gold Coast

Good

Yes

Many

Many

High

High

RES-6

Residents of Siu Lam

Good

Yes

Many

Many

High

High

RES-7

Proposed residents of Tung Chung East

Good

Yes

N/A

Very Many

N/A

High

RES-8

Residents of Lung Kwu Tan

Good

Yes

Many

Many

High

High

RES-9

Residents of  planned Tung Chung West future development including Area 39

Good

Yes

N/A

Very Many

N/A

High

RES-10

Residents of Sham Shek Tsuen

Good

No

Few

Few

High

High

RES-11

Residents of Sai Tso Wan Village

Good

No

Very Few

Very Few

High

High

RES-12

Residents of San Tau, Kau Liu and Tin Sam Villages

Fair

No

Few

Few

High

High

RES-13

Residents of  Shek Lau Po and Mok Ka Village

Good

No

Few

Few

High

High

RES-14

Residents of Tung Hing Village

Good

No

Very Few

Very Few

High

High

RES-15

Residents of Sheung Ling Pei Village

Fair

No

Many

Many

High

High

RES-16

Residents of Ma Wan New Village

Fair

No

Many

Many

High

High

RES-17

Residents of Pak Mong Village

Good

No

Few

Few

High

High

RES-18

Residents of Ngau Kwu Long Village

Good

No

Few

Few

High

High

RES-19

Residents of San Shek Wan Village

Good

No

Few

Few

High

High

RES-20

Residents of Yat Tung Estate

Good

Yes

Very Many

Very Many

High

High

RES-21

Residents of Tai Ho San Tsuen

Good

No

Few

Few

High

High

Recreational VSRs

REC-1

Visitors to AsiaWorld-Expo

Poor

No

Many

Many

Medium

Medium

REC-2

Visitors to Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

Fair

No

Many

Many

High

High

REC-3

Visitors to Hong Kong Airport Passenger Terminal

Fair

No

Many

Many

High

High

REC-4

Visitors to Regal Hotel

Fair

No

Many

Many

High

High

REC-5

Passengers of Cable Cars of Ngong Ping 360

Good

Yes

Many

Many

High

High

REC-6

Hikers of Nei Lak Shan

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-7

Hikers of Fung Wong Shan (Lantau Peak)

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-8

Hikers of Tai Tung Shan (Sunset Peak)

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-9

Hikers of Lantau North Country Park

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-10

Hikers of Lantau South Country Park

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-11

Recreational users of future Tung Chung East Development

Fair

Yes

N/A

Many

N/A

High

REC-12

Hikers of Scenic Hill

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-13

Passengers / Drivers of recreational marine craft in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-14

Passengers / Drivers of recreational marine craft in Castle Peak Bay

Good

Yes

Many

Many

High

High

REC-15

Recreational users of Butterfly Beach

Good

Yes

Many

Many

High

High

REC-16

Hikers of Castle Peak

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-17

Recreational users of Tung Chung Outdoor Recreation Camp

Fair

No

Many

Many

High

High

REC-18

Recreational users of Man Tung Road Park

Fair

No

Many

Many

High

High

REC-19

Hikers of Tai Lam Country Park

Good

Yes

Few

Few

High

High

REC-20

Recreational users of Planned Entertainment Node

Good

Yes

N/A

Many

N/A

High

REC-21

Recreational users of Sha Chau

Good

Yes

Very Few

Very Few

High

High

REC-22

Recreational users of Golden Beach

Good

Yes

Many

Many

High

High

REC-23

Hikers from Tung Chung to Tai O

Good

No

Few

Few

High

High

REC-24

Visitors to Tai Ho

Good

No

Few

Few

High

High

REC-25

Visitors to proposed NCD hotels and commercial facilities

Fair

Yes

 N/A

 Many

N/A

High

REC-26

Recreational users of future Tung Chung West Development

Fair

Yes

N/A

Many

N/A

High

REC-27

Users of Proposed Columbarium Developments for Tsuen Wan

Good

Yes

Very Few

Very Few

Low

Low

Travelling VSRs

T-1

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles and MTR along North Lantau Highway

Good

No

Very Many

Very Many

Medium

Medium

T-2

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles and MTR along Cheong Wing Road

Good

Yes

Very Many

Very Many

Medium

Medium

T-3

Passengers of commercial aircraft

Good

Yes

Very Many

Very Many

Medium

Medium

T-4

Passengers / Drivers of the proposed Tuen Mun-Chek Lap Kok Link (TMCLKL)

Good

Yes

Very Many

Very Many

Medium

Medium

T-5

Passengers / Drivers of the proposed Hong Kong Link Road HKLR

Good

Yes

Very Many

Very Many

Medium

Medium

T-6

Passengers of Ferry’s in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road

Good

Yes

Many

Many

Medium

Medium

T-7

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles along castle peak road and Tuen Mun Road

Good

Yes

Very Many

Very Many

Medium

Medium

T-8

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles along Lung Mun Road

Good

Yes

Many

Many

Medium

Medium

T-9

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles at planned Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities

Good

No

Very Many

Very Many

Medium

Medium

T-10

Passengers / Drivers of vehicles along Tung Chung road

Good

Yes

Many

Many

Medium

Medium

T-11

Ferry Passengers from Tung Chung to Tai O

Good

Yes

Few

Few

Medium

Medium

T-12

Ferry Passengers at Public Pier in Tung Chung

Fair

No

Many

Many

Medium

Medium

T-13

Ferry Passengers at Public Pier in Tuen Mun

Good

Yes

Many

Many

Medium

Medium

Occupational VSRs

O-1

Workers / Staff of Asia World Expo

Poor

No

Many

Many

Low

Low

O-2

Workers of Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

Fair

No

Many

Many

Low

Low

O-3

Workers / Staff of Chek Lap Kok Facilities

Fair

Yes

Many

Many

Low

Low

O-4

Workers / Staff of Hong Kong Aircraft Engineering LTD.

Fair

Yes

Few

Few

Low

Low

O-5

Workers / Staff of Hong Kong Passenger Terminal

Fair

No

Very Many

Very Many

Low

Low

O-6

Workers of Regal Hotel

Fair

No

Many

Many

Low

Low

O-7

Workers / Staff of Pillar Point

Fair

Yes

Few

Few

Low

Low

O-8

Workers of EcoPark

Good

Yes

Few

Few

Low

Low

O-9

Workers on commercial aircraft on and around Chek Lap Kok

Fair

Yes

Many

Many

Low

Low

O-10

Workers of planned Lantau Logistic Park (LLP) at the possible LLP extension

Good

Yes

N/A

Many

N/A

Low

O-11

Workers of Cathay Pacific City

Good

No

Many

Many

Low

Low

O-12

Workers of Castle Peak Power Station

Fair

Yes

Few

Few

Low

Low

O-13

Workers of Siu Ho Wan

Good

Yes

Few

Few

Low

Low

O-14

Workers at HKBCF

Fair

Yes

Many

Many

Low

Low

O-15

Workers of proposed NCD hotels and commercial facilities

Fair

Yes

N/A

Many

N/A

Low

O-16

Workers of Siu Ho Wan MTR Depot

Good

No

Few

Few

Low

Low

O-17

Future workers of potential commercial development in Tung Chung East

Fair

Yes

N/A

Very Many

Low

Low

O-18

Future workers of potential commercial development in Tung Chung West

Fair

Yes

N/A

Very Many

Low

Low

Note: ‘Duration and Frequency of Views’ and ‘Degree of Visibility’ have been taken into account in assessing the magnitude of change in view experience by the VSRs and cannot be double counted in determining the sensitivity of the VSR.


15.6       Landscape Impact Assessment

15.6.1  Potential Sources of Impacts

15.6.1.1    The nature and scope of the works has been described in Section 15.3 and indicated in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-001.1 and MCL/P132/EIA/15-001.2.

15.6.1.2    The 3RS would create varying levels of landscape and visual impacts on the surrounding areas during the construction phase.  Potential impacts would result from the following sources:

ˇ  Construction of proposed land formation and exposed fill and sediment;

ˇ  Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation;

ˇ  Construction of temporary site access;

ˇ  Haulage off-site of excavated materials;

ˇ  Storage of existing topsoil for reinstatement works;

ˇ  Materials stockpiling;

ˇ  Dust and construction debris;

ˇ  Laying of 11 kV submarine cable;

ˇ  Daylighting point of submarine fuel pipeline;

ˇ  Construction of on-site offices and working areas;

ˇ  Construction of T2 expansion;

ˇ  Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads, airside tunnels and APM / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings);

ˇ  Construction of associated airport buildings;

ˇ  Construction of new passenger concourse;

ˇ  Construction of temporary parking areas;

ˇ  Expansion of the Midfield freighter apron on the existing airport island;

ˇ  Loss of vegetation;

ˇ  Temporary road works and traffic management;

ˇ  Construction night lighting;

ˇ  Presence of temporary construction plants, platforms, structures, construction machinery, marine vessels and construction vehicle traffic;

ˇ  Presence of other related construction activities; and

ˇ  Installation of airport utilities.

15.6.1.3    The 3RS would create varying levels of landscape and visual impacts on the surrounding areas during the operation phase.  Potential impacts would result from the following sources:

ˇ  Presence of land formation;

ˇ  Presence of new associated airport buildings and facilities;

ˇ  Presence of new passenger concourse;

ˇ  Presence of T2 expansion building;

ˇ  Presence of new associated airport infrastructure;

ˇ  Presence of additional air traffic;

ˇ  Presence of submarine fuel pipeline daylighting point on Sheung Sha Chau Island, assumed to be location at the north side of the AFRF bridge;

ˇ  Additional operational vehicular and air traffic;

ˇ  Additional operational night lighting; and

ˇ  Maintenance of third runway and associated structures.

15.6.2  Landscape Change Before Mitigation in Construction Phase

15.6.2.1    The magnitude of change, before implementation of mitigation measures, on the landscape resources and landscape character areas that would occur in the construction phase are summarised below and tabulated in Table15.5.  All impacts are adverse unless otherwise stated.

Landscape Resources

15.6.2.2    The construction of the land formation and presence of associated marine traffic before mitigation would result in a permanent and irreversible loss of approximately 650 ha of coastal waters (CLK/LR1).  This magnitude of change is considered to be Large.

15.6.2.3    Due to the construction of T2 expansion building and the associated infrastructural works around T2 and existing cargo buildings, roadside vegetation – amenity planting (CLK/LR4a) would likely suffer a predicted loss of approximately 15 ha, resulting in an Intermediate magnitude of change.

15.6.2.4    Construction activities associated with new airport infrastructure and airport facilities including the T2 expansion building would result in a reversible loss of approximately 50 ha of grass / turf areas around runways and verges (CLK/LR2) resulting in an Intermediate magnitude of change.

15.6.2.5    Site clearance and temporary site access to the land formation would result in a reversible loss of roadside vegetation on modified slopes (CLK/LR4b) of approximately 0.2 ha resulting in a magnitude of change considered Small.

15.6.2.6    Grassland / scrub on vacant land (CLK/LR12), would suffer a permanent loss of approximately 6 ha of its resource due to expansion of T2 and construction of the associated infrastructure resulting in a magnitude of change considered to be Small.

15.6.2.7    Artificial / Man-made Coastline (CLK/LR13), would suffer a permanent loss of approximately 6,000 linear meters of its resource due to the construction of the proposed land formation for the proposed third runway resulting in a magnitude of change considered to be Small.

15.6.2.8    The construction activities associated with the submarine fuel pipelines would impact both natural rocky coastline of Sha Chau islands (SC/LR1) and natural vegetation on Sha Chau islands (SC/LR2). The daylighting point of the submarine fuel pipelines would result in a permanent and irreversible loss of approximately 30 m of natural rocky coastline and a reversible loss of approximately 0.05 ha of natural vegetation resulting in a magnitude of change considered to be Small.

15.6.2.9    Site clearance and temporary site access to the land formation would result in a reversible loss of landscape areas around buildings (CLK/LR3) of approximately 0.1 ha resulting in a magnitude of change considered Negligible.

15.6.2.10 It is anticipated that the LRs that have not been described above will experience a magnitude of change considered as None as they will not be affected by the 3RS and the associated sources of impact and thus will experience no change.

Landscape Character Areas

15.6.2.11 The construction of the land formation and presence of associated marine traffic before mitigation would result in a permanent and irreversible loss of approximately 650 ha of inshore water landscape (CLK/LCA2), with wide visibility of associated marine construction vessels. The magnitude of change is considered to be Large.

15.6.2.12 The On-going Major Development Landscape (CLK/LCA8) would experience a magnitude of change of Small due to the expansion of T2 and construction of the associated airport infrastructure.

15.6.2.13 Construction activities associated with the new airport infrastructure and airport facilities including the T2 expansion building would impact the existing airport landscape (CLK/LCA1) with a magnitude of change considered to be Small.

15.6.2.14 The construction activities associated with the submarine fuel pipelines would impact both island landscape (SC/LCA1) and Sha Chau islands inshore water landscape (SC/LCA2). The daylighting point of the submarine fuel pipelines in the area of the Sha Chau islands would result in an irreversible loss of approximately 30 m of natural rocky coastline affecting the island landscape. An increase in marine traffic within the Sha Chau islands inshore water landscape during construction would also impact the inshore water landscape (SC/LCA2). Both LCA’s would suffer a magnitude of change considered Small.

15.6.2.15 It is anticipated that the LCA’s that have not been described above will experience a magnitude of change considered None as they will not be affected by the 3RS and associated sources of impact and thus experience no discernible magnitude of change.

15.6.3  Landscape Change Before Mitigation in Operation Phase

15.6.3.1    The magnitude of change, before implementation of mitigation measures, on the landscape resources and landscape character areas that would occur in the operation phase are described below and tabulated in Table15.5.  All impacts are adverse unless otherwise stated.

Landscape Resources

15.6.3.2    The magnitude of change before mitigation, on the landscape resources in the operation phase are the same as described for the construction phase.

Landscape Character Areas

15.6.3.3    The presence of the land formation would result in a permanent and irreversible loss of approximately 650 ha of inshore water landscape (CLK/LCA2). The magnitude of change is considered to be Large.

15.6.3.4    The presence of the land formation, new airport infrastructure and airport facilities including the T2 expansion building and passenger concourse would likely impact the existing airport landscape (CLK/LCA1) with a magnitude of change considered to be Small. Although the LCA will experience an increase in airport related traffic and an overall increased landscape character extent, the presence of the new airport facilities and airport infrastructure is highly compatible with the existing landscape character.

15.6.3.5    The presence of the submarine fuel pipeline daylighting point would impact island landscape (SC/LCA1). The daylighting point of the submarine fuel pipeline in the area of the Sha Chau islands would result in an irreversible loss of approximately 30 m of natural rocky coastline affecting the island landscape. Therefore it is considered SC/LCA1 would suffer a magnitude of change considered to be Small.

15.6.3.6    The presence of associated airport infrastructure would likely impact the On-going Major Development landscape (CLK/LCA8) with a magnitude of change considered to be Negligible.

15.6.3.7    It is anticipated that the  LCA’s, that have not been described above, will experience a magnitude of change considered None as they will not be affected by the 3RS and associated sources of impact and thus experience no magnitude of change before the implementation of mitigation measures.


Table 15.5:    Magnitude of Landscape Change during the Construction and Operation Phases before Mitigation

ID No.

Landscape Resources/ Landscape Character Areas

Source of Impact

Description of Impacts

Magnitude of Change before Mitigation

CLK/LR1

Coastal waters of North Lantau

 

Construction

-          Construction of proposed land formation and exposed fill and sediment

-          Presence of temporary construction plants, platforms, structures, construction machinery, marine vessels and construction vehicle traffic

-          Laying of 11 kV submarine cable

-          Daylighting point of submarine fuel pipeline

-          Dust and construction debris

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 650 ha of coastal waters

-          Baseline area is entire north Lantau waters

-          Increased marine traffic

Large

Operation

-          Presence of land formation

Operation

-          Same as described for construction phase

Large

CLK/LR2

Grass/turf areas around runways and verges

 

Construction

-          Construction of proposed land formation and exposed fill and sediment

-          Storage of existing topsoil for reinstatement works

-          Materials stockpiling

-          Daylighting point of submarine fuel pipeline

-          Presence of temporary construction plants, platforms,  structures, construction machinery, marine vessels and construction vehicle traffic

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Construction of on-site offices and working areas

-          Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads and airside tunnels)

-          Construction of associated airport buildings

-          Construction of temporary parking areas

-          Expansion of the Midfield freighter apron on the existing airport island;

-          Temporary road works and traffic management

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 50 ha of Grass / turf areas around runways and verges

-          Baseline vegetation coverage is 260 ha

Intermediate

Operation

-          Presence of new associated airport buildings and facilities

-          Presence of T2 expansion building

-          Presence of new passenger concourse

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

-          Additional operational vehicular traffic

Operation

-          Same as described for construction phase

Intermediate

CLK/LR3

Landscaped areas  around existing airport buildings

 

Construction

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads, airside tunnels, and  APM  / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings)

-          Storage of existing topsoil for reinstatement works

-          Construction of associated airport buildings

-          Temporary road works and traffic management

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 0.1 ha* of vegetation around existing buildings

-          Baseline vegetation coverage is 4.5 ha

-          This area may contain young to semi mature species including Callistemon viminalis, Casuarina equisetifolia, Calliandra haematocephala, Hibiscus spp., as well as opportunistic and invasive vegetation of common species including Leucaena leucocephala.

-          No OVTs are located within the affected area

Negligible

Operation

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

-          Additional operational vehicular traffic

Operation

-          Same as described for construction phase

Negligible

CLK/LR4a

Roadside Vegetation – Amenity Planting

 

Construction

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Construction of on-site office and working areas

-          Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads, airside tunnels, and  APM  / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings)

-          Construction of associated airport buildings

-          Construction of temporary parking areas

-          Storage of existing topsoil for reinstatement works

-          Temporary road works and traffic management

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 15 ha* of roadside vegetation

-          Baseline vegetation coverage is 53 ha

-          Species anticipated to be affected include semi mature to mature  Acacia auriculiformis  Albizia lebbeck, Casuarina equisetifolia

-          Young to mature: Acacia confusa, Acacia mangium, and Hibiscus tiliaceus

-          Young to semi mature: Bauhinia purpurea, Cassia siamea, Dalbergia odorifera, Ficus benjamina, Ficus microcarpa, Grevillea robusta,and the invasive species  Leucaena leucocephala

-          Young: Delonix regia, Lagerstroemia speciosa, and Litsea glutinosa

-          Semi mature: Macaranga tanarius, Melia azedarach, Phoenix roebelenii, Plumeria rubra, and Roystonea regia

-          No OVTs are located within the affected area

Intermediate

Operation

-          Presence of new associated airport buildings and facilities

-          Presence of T2 expansion building

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

-          Additional operational vehicular traffic

Operation

-          Same as described for construction phase

Intermediate

CLK/LR4b

Roadside vegetation on modified slopes

 

Construction

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads, airside tunnels, and  APM  / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings)

-          Construction of associated airport buildings

-          Storage of existing topsoil for reinstatement works

-          Temporary road works and traffic management

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 0.2 ha* of roadside vegetation on modified slopes

-          Baseline vegetation coverage is 5 ha

-          Vegetation anticipated to be affected predominantly includes a stand of semi mature Pinus elliottii trees and Leucaena leucocephala which occurs extensively along this edge and is an invasive introduced species.

-          No OVTs are located within the affected area

Small

Operation

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

-          Additional operational vehicular traffic

Operation

-          Same as described for construction phase

Small

CLK/LR5

Natural coastline

None

None

None

CLK/LR6

Amenity / Compensatory planting on HKBCF / HKLR

None

None

None

CLK/LR7

Streams

None

None

None

CLK/LR8

Agricultural land

None

None

None

CLK/LR9

Natural rocky and sandy shore with mangrove / mudflat

None

None

None

CLK/LR10a

Coastal woodland and scrubland on North Lantau

None

None

None

CLK/LR10b

Coastal woodland and scrubland on Scenic Hill

None

None

None

CLK/LR11

Amenity planting in urban park

None

None

None

CLK/LR12

Grassland / scrub on vacant land

 

Construction

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads, airside tunnels, and  APM  / BHS and associated  tunnel ventilation buildings)

-          Temporary road works and traffic management

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 6 ha* of grassland / scrub on vacant land

-          Baseline vegetation coverage is 130 ha

-          Anticipated species of various stages of maturity to be impacted include Lantana camara, Leucaena leucocephala, Roystonea regia, Chrysalidocarpus lutescens, Wedelia trilobata, Chloris spp., Melinis spp., and Cerbera manghas.

-          These are areas supporting opportunistic and self-seeded  vegetation comprising of common or invasive species

-          No OVTs are located within the affected area

Small

Operation

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

-          Additional operational vehicular traffic

Operation

-          Same as described for construction phase

Small

CLK/LR13

Artificial / man-made coastline

Construction

-          Construction of proposed land formation and exposed fill and sediment

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Haulage off-site of excavated materials

-          Laying of 11 kV submarine cable

-          Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads, airside tunnels, and  APM  / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings)

-          Presence of temporary construction plants, structures, construction machinery, marine vessels and construction vehicle traffic

-          Presence of other related construction activities

-          Installation of airport utilities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 6,000 m of artificial / man-made coastline

-          Baseline artificial / man-made coastline is 17,000 m

Small

Operation

-          Presence of land formation

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

Operation

Same as described for construction phase

Small

SC/LR1

Natural rocky coastline of  Sha Chau islands

 

Construction

-          Daylighting point of submarine fuel pipeline

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 30 m* of natural rocky coastline

-          Baseline natural rocky coastline is 1,250 linear metres

Small

Operation

-          Presence of submarine fuel pipeline daylighting point

Operation

-          Same as described for construction phase

Small

SC/LR2

Natural vegetation on Sha Chau islands

 

Construction

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

-          Daylighting point of submarine fuel pipeline

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 0.05 ha* of natural vegetation

-          Baseline vegetation coverage is 10 ha

-          Anticipated species of various stages of maturity to be impacted include Hibiscus tiliaceus, Phoenix hanceana, Scaevola taccada, Pandanus tectorius, Ficus superba var. japonica, Wedelia chinensis, Gordonia axillaris,  Schefflera heptaphylla, Dicranopteris linearis, Litsea glutinosa, Lantana camara, Casuarina equisetifolia, Bridelia tomentosa, Terminalia catappa, Cerbera manghas, Rhaphiolepis indica, Cassytha filiformis, and Alpinia zerumbet. These are of common species found on Hong Kong’s existing island habitats

-          No OVTs are located within the affected area

Small

Operation

-          Presence of submarine fuel pipeline daylighting point;

-          Loss of vegetation

Operation

-          Same as described for construction phase

Small

SC/LR3

Coastal waters of Sha Chau islands

None

None

None

SC/LR4

Natural sandy coastline of Sha Chau Island

None

None

None

CLK/LCA1

Airport landscape

 

Construction

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Haulage off-site of excavated materials

-          Storage of existing topsoil for reinstatement works

-          Materials stockpiling

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Construction of on site office and working areas

-          Construction of T2 expansion

-          Construction of new passenger concourse

-          Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads, airside tunnels, and  APM  / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings)

-          Construction of associated airport buildings

-          Construction of temporary parking areas

-          Expansion of the Midfield freighter apron on the existing airport island;

-          Temporary road works and traffic management

-          Construction night lighting

-          Presence of temporary construction plants, structures, construction machinery, marine vessels and construction vehicle traffic

-          Presence of other related construction activities

-          Installation of airport utilities

Construction

-          Presence of construction works and associated machinery and equipment will change visual amenity

Small

Operation

-          Presence of land formation

-          Presence of new associated airport buildings and facilities

-          Presence of new passenger concourse

-          Presence of T2 expansion building

-          Additional operational night lighting

-          Maintenance of third runway and associated structures

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

Operation

-          Increase area of landscape character

-          Increase in airport related traffic

Small

CLK/LCA2

Inshore water landscape

 

Construction

-          Construction of proposed land formation and exposed fill and sediment

-          Presence of marine traffic, including but not limited to construction vessels, barges, plants

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Laying of 11 kV submarine cable

-          Construction night lighting

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 650 ha of coastal water

-          Baseline coastal waters is approximately 2,080 ha of the entire north Lantau coastal waters

-          Increased marine traffic

-          Presence of marine construction machinery

Large

Operation

-          Presence of land formation

Operation

-          Loss of 650 ha of coastal waters

-          Even without construction activity, presence of large land formation will change landscape character

Large

CLK/LCA3

Strait landscape

None

None

None

CLK/LCA4A

Coastal upland and hillside landscape – Sha Lo Wan

None

None

None

CLK/LCA4B

Coastal upland and hillside landscape – Scenic Hill

None

None

None

CLK/LCA5

Mixed modern comprehensive development landscape

None

None

None

CLK/LCA6

Rural coastal plain landscape

None

None

None

CLK/LCA7

Transportation corridor landscape

None

None

None

CLK/LCA8

On-going Major Development Landscape

Construction

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Dust and construction debris

-          Construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads, airside perimeter roads, airside tunnels, and  APM  / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings)

-          Construction of on-site office and working areas

-          Temporary road works and traffic management

-          Presence of other related construction activities

Construction

-          Presence of construction equipment and machinery

Small

Operation

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

-          Additional operational vehicular traffic

Operation

-          Presence of new associated airport infrastructure

Negligible

SC/LCA1

Island landscape

 

Construction

-          Daylighting point of submarine fuel pipeline

-          Construction of temporary site access

-          Presence of temporary construction plants, platforms, structures, construction machinery, marine vessels and construction vehicle traffic

-          Site clearance works involving the removal of existing vegetation

Construction

-          Loss of approximately 0.05 ha* of natural vegetation

-          Baseline vegetation coverage is 10 ha

-          Loss of approximately 30 m* of natural coastline

-          Baseline natural rocky coastline is 1,250 linear metres

Small

Operation

-          Presence of submarine fuel pipeline daylighting point

-          Loss of vegetation

Operation

-          Loss of vegetation and natural coastline

-          Presence of submarine fuel pipeline daylighting point

Small

SC/LCA2

Sha Chau islands inshore water landscape

 

Construction

-          Presence of marine traffic, including but not limited to construction vessels, barges.

-          Presence of temporary construction plants, platforms,  structures, construction machinery, marine vessels and construction vehicle traffic

-          Dust and construction debris

Construction

-          Presence of marine traffic, including but not limited to construction vessels, barges, plant will change landscape character

Small

Operation

-          None

Operation

None

None

* Assumptions have been made due to lack of detailed design information at this stage


15.6.4  Landscape & Visual Mitigation Measures

Review of Planning Principles and Architectural Design

15.6.4.1    The development of the 3RS reflects the need for a third runway as outlined in the Hong Kong International Airport Master Plan 2030 (MP2030). The master plan states that in terms of the alignment of the third runway, the National Air Traffic Services (NATS) has investigated a total of 15 alignment options with regard to operational safety, obstacle clearances, environmental issues, Pearl River Delta airspace issues, air traffic control procedures, runway usability and capacity. NATS concluded that the best alignment for a third runway would be parallel to and north of the existing two runways. Eighteen airport layout options were evaluated against the following five major criteria (a) airfield efficiency; (b) passenger convenience; (c) cargo operations efficiency;(d) surface access; and (e) environmental impact. The final recommended airport layout featured in the MP2030 is a northward expansion of the airport facility.

15.6.4.2    The third runway concourse (TRC) is based upon the aspects of the design and planning of the existing T1. The TRC responds to the MP2030 studies and traffic forecasts. The TRC objectives also include the enhancement of passenger experience and their expectations of a world class airport, maximisation of commercial opportunities for revenue generation and safeguards future growth potentials, has a terminal-like facility that is safe, secure, user-friendly, energy efficient, easy to maintain and cost, creates a unique sense of place and is iconic for Hong Kong and a building which is architecturally outstanding. Architecturally, the geometry of the roof is based on a sphere which creates an “undulating” effect inside the TRC concourse from the east to the west with a constant curvature visually in all directions. There are two types of façade under consideration that correspond to functional, architectural and performance needs. The first type includes the glazed façade areas which are mostly seen on arrivals, departures and mezzanine levels. Glazed areas in these levels can enhance passenger’s experience and improve daylight performance. The second type includes the solid areas which are mostly seen on apron level where functions such as ramp accommodation and plant rooms are developed.

15.6.4.3    The objectives of the T2 expansion are to respond to the MP2030 studies and traffic forecasts by providing an airport terminal that facilitates a simple, direct and efficient flow for air passengers and baggage. The architectural theme for the expanded T2 building is based on a feather concept with a design to provide not only an elegant reference point, but also provides a way of unitising the roof into east / west orientated strips that breaks down both the sale of the roof plane and provides a strong directional orientation.  The intended effect will create a series of light ‘feathers’ gently resting on a series of supports.

15.6.4.4    The architectural design measures described above are intended to enhance the visual quality of the new development. These shall be adopted during the detailed design, and will be built as part of the construction works so that they are in place at the date of commissioning of the 3RS. 

15.6.4.5    Minimisation of the land formation footprint has been adopted during the planning and design stage of the 3RS.

15.6.4.6    Although stripping and storing of topsoil during the construction phase is not listed as a mitigation measure, it is considered good site practice and should be implemented where practical.

15.6.4.7    In addition, a number of landscape and visual mitigation measures are identified below to further mitigate adverse impacts and enhance beneficial impacts.

Proposed Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

15.6.4.8    The proposed landscape and visual mitigation measures for potential impacts generated during the construction and operation phases are described below in Table 15.6 and Table 15.7 and Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.1 to MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.6, together with the associated funding, implementation, management and maintenance agencies. 

Table 15.6:    Proposed Construction Phase Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

ID No.

Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measure

Landscape measure

Visual measure

Funding Agency

Implementation Agency

CM1

The construction area and contractor’s temporary works areas should be minimised to avoid impacts on adjacent landscape. 

AAHK

Contractor

CM2

Reduction of construction period to practical minimum.

 

AAHK

Contractor

CM3

Phasing of the construction stage to reduce visual impacts during the construction phase.

 

AAHK

Contractor

CM4

Construction traffic (land and sea) including construction plants, construction vessels and barges should be kept to a practical minimum.

 

AAHK

Contractor

CM5

Erection of decorative mesh screens or construction hoardings around works areas in visually unobtrusive colours.

 

AAHK

Contractor

CM6

Avoidance of excessive height and bulk of site buildings and structures.

 

AAHK

Design Engineer

CM7

Control of night-time lighting by hooding all lights and through minimisation of night working periods.

 

AAHK

Contractor

CM8

All existing trees shall be carefully protected during construction.  Detailed Tree Protection Specification shall be provided in the Contract Specification. Under this specification, the Contractor shall be required to submit, for approval, a detailed working method statement for the protection of trees prior to undertaking any works adjacent to all retained trees, including trees in contractor’s works areas.

 

AAHK

Contractor

CM9

Trees unavoidably affected by the works shall be transplanted where practical.   A detailed Tree Transplanting Specification shall be provided in the Contract Specification, if applicable. Sufficient time for necessary tree root and crown preparation periods shall be allowed in the project programme.

 

AAHK

Contractor

CM10

Land formation works shall be followed with advanced hydroseeding around taxiways and runways as soon as practical.

AAHK

Contractor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: AAHK stands for Airport Authority Hong Kong

Table 15.7:    Proposed Operation Phase Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

ID

No.

Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measure

Landscape Measure

Visual Measure

Funding Agency

Implementation Agency

Management

Agency

Maintenance

Agency

OM1*

Sensitive landscape design of land formation edge by incorporating different angles of gradient and the use of a range of armour rock sizes placed randomly in a riprap approach for an irregular appearance. Planting of native coastal plants shall be incorporated.

 

AAHK

Design Engineer

AAHK

AAHK

OM2

All above ground structures, including, APM / BHS tunnel ventilation buildings, emergency and firemen’s’ accesses etc. shall be, either fully integrated with the planned buildings, or sensitively designed in a manner that responds to the existing and planned urban context, and minimises potential adverse landscape and visual impacts.

 

AAHK

Design Engineer

Building Operator

Building Operator

OM3

Sensitive design of buildings and structures in terms of scale, height and bulk (visual weight).

 

AAHK

Design Engineer

Building Operator

Building Operator

OM4

Use appropriate building materials and colours in built structures to create cohesive visual mass.

 

AAHK

Design Engineer

Building Operator

Building Operator

OM5

Lighting units to be directional and minimise unnecessary light spill and glare.

 

AAHK

Design Engineer

AAHK

AAHK

OM6

Greening measures, including vertical greening, green roofs, road verge planting and peripheral screen planting shall be implemented.

AAHK

Contractor

AAHK

AAHK

OM7

Compensatory tree planting for all felled trees shall be provided to the satisfaction of relevant Government departments.  Required numbers and locations of compensatory trees shall be determined and agreed separately with Government during the Tree Felling Application process under the relevant technical circulars.

AAHK

Contractor

AAHK

AAHK

OM8

Streetscape (e.g. paving, signage, street furniture, lighting etc.) shall be sensitively designed in a manner that responds to the existing and planned urban context, and minimises potential adverse landscape and visual impacts.

AAHK

Design Engineer

AAHK

AAHK

OM9

All streetscape areas and hard and soft landscape areas disturbed during construction shall be reinstated to equal or better quality (due to implementation of screen planting, road verge planting etc.), to the satisfaction of the relevant Government departments.

AAHK

Contractor

AAHK

AAHK

OM10

Aesthetic improvement planting of viaduct structure through greening of structure to mitigate visual impact of viaduct form.

 

AAHK

Design Engineer

AAHK

AAHK

OM11

Sensitive design of footbridges, noise barriers and enclosures with greening (screen planting/climbers/planters) and chromatic measures.

 

AAHK

Design Engineer

AAHK

AAHK

*A conceptual section illustrating the mitigation measure OM1 is presented in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-029

Note: AAHK stands for Airport Authority Hong Kong

Programme of Implementation of Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

15.6.4.9    The construction phase measures listed above shall be adopted from the commencement of construction and shall be in place throughout the entire construction period.  The operation phase measures listed above shall be adopted during the detailed design, and be built as part of the construction works so that they are in place at the date of commissioning of the 3RS.  However, it should be noted that the full effect of the soft landscape mitigation measures would not be appreciated for several years.

15.6.5  Prediction of Significance of Landscape Impacts

15.6.5.1    The potential significance of the landscape impacts during the construction and operation phases, before and after mitigation, are provided below in Table 15.8 and mapped in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-012.1 to MCL/P132/EIA/15-015. This assessment follows the methodology outlined in Section 15.4 above and assumes that the appropriate mitigation measures identified in Table 15.6 and Table 15.7 above will be implemented, and that the full effect of the soft landscape mitigation measures will be realised after 10 years. Photomontages of the proposed development before and after mitigation are illustrated in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-017.1 to MCL/P132/EIA/15-026.2 inclusive.

Construction Phase before Mitigation

15.6.5.2    In the construction phase, before the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, there will be some adverse landscape impacts as summarised below and identified in Table 15.8.

Landscape Resources

15.6.5.3    Coastal waters of North Lantau (CLK/LR1) would experience impacts of Substantial significance due to a loss of 650 ha of coastal waters due to construction of the new land formation.

15.6.5.4    Roadside vegetation – amenity planting (CLK/LR4a) located along the existing roadside verges and landscape buffers would experience reversible impacts of Moderate significance before the implementation of mitigation measures during the construction phase.

15.6.5.5    Grass / Turf areas around runways and verges (CLK/LR2), Roadside Vegetation on Modified Slopes (CLK/LR4b), Natural Rocky Coastline of Sha Chau islands (SC/LR1) , Artificial / man-made coastline (CLK/LR13) and Natural Vegetation on Sha Chau islands (SC/LR2) would experience impacts of Slight significance during the construction phase of the 3RS before the implementation of mitigation measures.

Landscape Character Areas

15.6.5.6    Inshore Water Landscape (CLK/LCA2) would experience an impact significance of Substantial significance due to highly visible marine construction activity and the loss of 650 ha of the character area.

15.6.5.7    Due to the construction of the daylighting point for the fuel pipelines, Island Landscape (SC/LCA1) would suffer a loss of approximately 30 m of natural coastline and 0.5 ha of natural vegetation, resulting in an impact of Slight significance. Due to the presence of marine construction traffic in the surrounding waters, Sha Chau islands Inshore Water Landscape (SC/LCA2) would suffer an impact of Slight significance.

15.6.5.8    During construction and before implementation of mitigation measures, On-going Major Development Landscape (CLK/LCA8) would experience impacts of Slight significance due to the construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads and  APM  / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings)

15.6.5.9    It is predicted that all other LRs and LCAs that are not described above will experience impacts of insubstantial significance or are not anticipated to be affected by the 3RS. 

Operation Phase before Mitigation

15.6.5.10 In the operation phase, before the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, there will be some adverse landscape impacts as summarised below and identified in Table 15.8.

Landscape Resources

15.6.5.11 The prediction of the significance of landscape impacts before mitigation on landscape resources during the operation phase are the same as described for the construction phase.

Landscape Character Areas

15.6.5.12 During operation and before implementation of mitigation measures, Inshore Water Landscape (CLK/LCA2) would continue to experience an impact significance of Substantial after the loss of 650ha of inshore water landscape.

15.6.5.13 During operation and before implementation of mitigation measures, Island Landscape (SC/LCA1) would continue to experience an impact significance of Slight after the loss of natural coastline and vegetation and the presence of the submarine fuel pipeline daylighting point.

15.6.5.14 It is predicted that all other LRs and LCAs that are not described above will experience impacts of insubstantial significance or are not anticipated to be affected by the 3RS. 

Construction Phase after Mitigation

15.6.5.15 In the construction phase, after the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, there will be adverse residual landscape impacts as summarised below and identified in Table 15.8.

15.6.5.16 Although implementation of the recommended mitigation measures should slightly reduce the magnitude of the residual landscape impacts during the construction phase, this will not be sufficient to reduce the overall significance thresholds described above for the before mitigation scenario.

Landscape Resources

15.6.5.17 Coastal waters of North Lantau (CLK/LR1) would experience impacts of Substantial significance due to a loss of 650 ha of coastal waters due to construction of the new land formation.

15.6.5.18 Roadside vegetation – amenity planting (CLK/LR4a) located along the existing roadside verges and landscape buffers would experience impacts of Moderate significance after the implementation of mitigation measures during the construction phase.

15.6.5.19 Grass / Turf areas around runways and verges (CLK/LR2), Roadside Vegetation on Modified Slopes (CLK/LR4b), Natural Rocky Coastline of Sha Chau islands (SC/LR1) and Natural Vegetation on Sha Chau islands (SC/LR2) would experience residual impacts of Slight significance during the construction phase of the 3RS.

Landscape Character Areas

15.6.5.20 Inshore Water Landscape (CLK/LCA2) would experience a residual impact significance of Substantial significance due to highly visible marine construction activity and the loss of 650 ha of the character area.

15.6.5.21 After mitigation measures have been implemented the construction of the daylighting point for the fuel pipeline, Island Landscape (SC/LCA1) would continue to suffer a loss of approximately 30 m of natural coastline and 0.5 ha of natural vegetation, resulting in an impact of Slight significance. Due to the presence of marine construction traffic in the surrounding waters, Sha Chau islands Inshore Water Landscape (SC/LCA2) would suffer an impact of Slight significance.

15.6.5.22 After mitigation measures, On-going Major Development Landscape (CLK/LCA8) would continue to experience impacts of Slight significance due to the construction of airport infrastructure (landside roads and APM / BHS and associated tunnel ventilation buildings).

15.6.5.23 It is predicted that all other LRs and LCAs that are not described above will experience residual impacts of insubstantial significance or are not anticipated to be affected by the 3RS. 

Operation Phase after Mitigation

15.6.5.24 In the operation phase, after the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, there will be some adverse residual landscape impacts as summarised below and identified in Table 15.8.

15.6.5.25 Implementation of the recommended mitigation measures will reduce the magnitude of the residual landscape impacts during the operation phase, and in some cases this will be sufficient to reduce the overall significance thresholds described above for the before mitigation scenario.

Landscape Resources

15.6.5.26 For the Coastal waters of North Lantau (CLK/LR1) the substantial residual impacts experienced during the construction phase after the implementation of mitigation measures due to the loss of 650 ha of the resource would remain Substantial at Day 1 and Year 10 of the operation phase, as loss of 650 ha of coastal waters cannot be mitigated.

15.6.5.27 The residual impacts on Natural Rocky Coastline of Sha Chau islands (SC/LR1) after mitigation are predicted to remain as Slight at Day 1 and Year 10 of the operation phase due to the irreversible change to the resource.

15.6.5.28 The residual impacts on Roadside Vegetation – Amenity Planting (CLK/LR4a) located along the existing roadside verges and landscape buffers would be reduced due to the implementation of mitigation measures such as compensatory planting. Residual impacts after mitigation at Day 1 are predicted to be Slight and would reduce further to Insubstantial at Year 10 after the establishment and maturity of the compensatory planting.

Landscape Character Areas

15.6.5.29 The Inshore Water Landscape (CLK/LCA2) would experience a residual impact of Substantial significance at Day 1 and Year 10 due to the loss of 650 ha of inshore water, which cannot be effectively mitigated.

15.6.5.30 It is predicted that all other LRs and LCAs that are not described above will experience residual impacts of insubstantial significance or are not anticipated to be affected by the 3RS. 


Table 15.8:    Significance of Landscape Impacts in Construction and Operation Phases (Adverse Impacts unless otherwise stated)

Id. No.

Landscape Resource /

Landscape Character

Sensitivity to Change during Construction and Operation Phases      (Low, Medium, High)

Magnitude of Change before Mitigation      (None, Negligible, Small, Intermediate, Large)

Impact Significance Threshold BEFORE Mitigation 

(None, Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

Recommended Mitigation Measures

Residual Impact Significance Threshold AFTER Mitigation  

(None, Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

DAY 1

YEAR 10

Landscape Resources

CLK/LR1

Coastal waters of North Lantau

High

Large

Large

Substantial

Substantial

CM1

Substantial

Substantial

Substantial

CLK/LR2

Grass / turf areas around runways and verges

Low

Intermediate

Intermediate

Slight

Slight

CM1

 

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CLK/LR3

Landscaped areas around existing airport buildings

Low

Negligible

Negligible

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1, CM8 -9, OM6-9

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CLK/LR4a

Roadside Vegetation – Amenity Planting

Medium

Intermediate

Intermediate

Moderate

Moderate

CM1, CM8 -9, OM6-9

Moderate

Slight

Insubstantial

CLK/LR4b

Roadside vegetation on modified slopes

Low

Small

Small

Slight

Slight

CM1, CM8 -9, OM6-9

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CLK/LR5

Natural coastline

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LR6

Amenity / compensatory planting on HKBCF/HKLR

Low

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LR7

Streams

Medium

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LR8

Agricultural land

Medium

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LR9

Natural rocky and sandy shore with mangrove / mudflat

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LR10a

Coastal woodland and scrubland on North Lantau

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LR10b

Coastal woodland and scrubland on Scenic Hill

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LR11

Amenity planting in urban park

Medium

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LR12

Grassland/scrub on vacant land

Low

Small

Small

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1, OM6

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CLK/LR13

Artificial / man-made coastline

Low

Small

Small

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1,OM6

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

SC/LR1

Natural rocky coastline of  Sha Chau islands

High

Small

Small

Slight

Slight

CM1

Slight

Slight

Slight

SC/LR2

Natural vegetation on Sha Chau islands

High

Small

Small

Slight

Slight

CM1, CM8-9, OM7

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

SC/LR3

Coastal waters of Sha Chau islands

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

SC/LR4

Natural sandy coastline of Sha Chau Island

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

Landscape Character Areas

CLK/LCA1

Airport landscape

Low

Small

Small

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1, OM6, OM8-9

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CLK/LCA2

Inshore water landscape

High

Large

Large

Substantial

Substantial

CM1

Substantial

Substantial

Substantial

CLK/LCA3

Strait landscape

Medium

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LCA4A

Coastal upland and hillside landscape – Sha Lo Wan

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LCA4B

Coastal upland and hillside landscape – Scenic Hill

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LCA5

Mixed modern comprehensive development landscape

Low

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LCA6

Rural coastal plain landscape

High

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LCA7

Transportation corridor landscape

Low

None

None

None

None

N/A

None

None

None

CLK/LCA8

On-Going Major Development Landscape

Low

Small

Negligible

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

SC/LCA1

Island landscape

High

Small

Small

Slight

Slight

CM1, CM8-9, OM6

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

SC/LCA2

Sha Chau islands inshore water landscape

High

Small

None

Slight

None

CM1

Slight

None

None

 


15.7       Visual Impacts Assessment

15.7.1  Potential Sources of Visual Impacts

15.7.1.1    The sources of visual impacts of the project during construction and operation phases have been described in Section 15.6.1.

15.7.2  Visual Change Before Mitigation in the Construction and Operation Phase

15.7.2.1    The magnitude of visual change resulting from the construction and operation phases of the 3RS is presented in Table 15.9.

15.7.3  Proposed Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

15.7.3.1    The proposed landscape and visual mitigation measures for impacts from the construction and operation phases are described previously in Table 15.6 and Table 15.7, together with the associated funding, implementation, management and maintenance agencies and the proposed implementation programme. Please refer to Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.1 to MCL/P132/EIA/15-028.6 for the landscape and visual mitigation arrangement plan.

15.7.4  Viewpoints

15.7.4.1    The viewpoints were selected as representative examples of the visual impacts of the project. Viewpoints have been selected to provide close, medium and long range views of the project. The locations of the viewpoint locations are indicated in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-010. The photomontages showing the proposed development at ‘Existing Baseline Conditions’ in June 2013, ‘Planned Baseline Conditions in 2016 before commencement of the 3RS’ (with committed and approved projects: HKBCF, HKLR, the Southern Connection of the TM-CLKL CLKL, Residential / Commercial Development at Tung Chung (Area 55a), Residential Development at Tung Chung (Area 55b) and the Public Rental Housing Development at Tung Chung (Area 56)), ‘Day 1 of completed works without mitigation measures’, ‘Day 1 of the completed works with mitigation measures’ and ‘Year 10 of the completed works with mitigation measures’ are illustrated in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-017.1 to MCL/P132/EIA/15-026.2.

ˇ  VP1 - Viewpoint from Castle Peak. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential recreational VSRs (Hikers along Castle Peak, REC-16) as it provides direct and panoramic views of the development site and represents a highly sensitive VSR group. The viewpoint is located at a viewing pavilion along one of the hiking trails around Castle Peak and provides an elevation of approximately +580 mPD.

ˇ  VP2 - Viewpoint from Miami Beach Towers. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential residential VSRs (Residents along south coast of Tuen Mun, RES-4) as it represents a large group of highly sensitive receivers who have direct and panoramic views of the development. The viewpoint is located at the residential development of Miami Beach Towers.

ˇ  VP3 - Viewpoint from Marriott Hotel. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential recreational VSRs (Visitors to Marriott Hotel, REC-2) as it represents a large group of highly sensitive receivers who have direct and panoramic close range views of the development. The viewpoint is located from a northeast facing vantage point within the Marriott Hotel.

ˇ  VP4 - Viewpoint from Caribbean Coast. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential residential VSRs (Residents of Tung Chung, RES-3) as it represents a large group of highly sensitive receivers who are closest to the development. The viewpoint is located at the residential development of Caribbean Coast.

ˇ  VP5 - Viewpoint from Ngong Ping 360. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential recreational VSRs (Passengers of Cable Car of Ngong Ping 360, REC-5) as it represents a large group of highly sensitive receivers who have elevated and panoramic views of the development. The viewpoint is located within one of the Ngong Ping 360 Cable Cars and provides a transient view at an elevation ranging from approximately +60 mPD to +580 mPD.

ˇ  VP6 - Viewpoint from Lantau Hiking Trail. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential recreational VSRs (Hikers of Lantau North Country Park, REC-9) as it provides direct and panoramic views of the development and represents a highly sensitive VSR group. The viewpoint is located along Wong Lung Hang Country Trails in Lantau North Country Park and provides an elevation of approximately +500 mPD.

ˇ  VP7 - Viewpoint from Golden Beach. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential recreational VSRs (Recreational Users of Golden Beach, REC-22) as it provides direct and panoramic views of the development and represents a highly sensitive VSR group. Golden Beach is the largest public beach in Tuen Mun with a total area of 78,500 m˛ and a length of 545 m. The viewpoint is located on Golden Beach.

ˇ  VP8 - Viewpoint from St. Stephens Tai O Family Buildings. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential residential VSRs (Residents of Villages of Tai O, RES-1), as it provides partial views of the development and represents a highly sensitive VSR group. Tai O is a fishing town, partly located on an island of the same name, on the western side of Lantau Island in Hong Kong. The viewpoint is located at a viewing pavilion in Kau Shan Tei within Tai O.

ˇ  VP9 - Viewpoint from potential recreational users of future Tung Chung East Development. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from future potential recreational VSRs (Recreational users of future of Tung Chung East REC-11), as it provides partial views of the development and represents a highly sensitive VSR group.

ˇ  VP10 – Viewpoint from Fu Shan in Tai O. This viewpoint was selected as representative of views from potential recreational VSRs (Hikers from Tung Chung to Tai O, REC-23) as it provides direct and panoramic views of the development and represents a highly sensitive VSR group. Fu Shan Country Trail starts from the access next to Hung Shing Temple in Shek Tsai Po Street and passes the peak of Fu Shan before reaching Kau San Tei, rising to a height of 105 mPD.

15.7.4.2    Viewpoints from VSRs (RES10 Residents of Sham Shek Tsuen, RES17 Residents of Pak Mong Village, RES19 Residents of San Shek Wan Village and REC24 Visitors to Tai Ho) located in recognised villages along Lantau’s north coast are not included in the photomontages because views of the project site from these locations are partially to completely obscured by the surrounding topography and existing vegetation, as is demonstrated in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-030.1 to MCL/P132/EIA/15-030.4.

15.7.4.3    The MTR Siu Ho Wan Depot, O-16 Workers at Siu Ho Wan MTR Depot, is not accessible to the public and the view would be obstructed by the HKBCF development, therefore it is an insignificant viewpoint and is not included as such.

15.7.4.4    The view from Sunny Bay MTR Station has not been included as a viewpoint as it entirely obstructed by intervening topography and is therefore not suitable as a viewpoint.

Table 15.9:    Magnitude of Visual Change during the Construction and Operation Phases before Mitigation

VSR ID

 

Key VSR

 

Compatibility of the Project with the Visual Backdrop

(High/Medium/Low)

 

Duration and Frequency of Impacts

(Temporary/Permanent &  Intermittent/Continuous)

Scale of Development (Large/Medium/Small) &  Reversibility of Change (Yes/No)

 

 

Degree of Visibility of Source(s) of Visual Impact  (Full, Partial, Obscured) & Distance Between VSR & Nearest Source(s) of Impact

Potential Blockage of Existing View (Full/Partial/Slight/Negligible)

Magnitude of Visual Change BEFORE Mitigation

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

Residential VSRs

RES-1

Residents of Villages of Tai O

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~6,600m

Obscured, ~6,600m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

RES-2

Residents of Villages of Sha Lo Wan

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~2,500m

Obscured, ~2,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

RES-3

Residents of Tung Chung including, Tung Chung Crescent,  Seaview Crescent,  Caribbean Coast, Area 53 to Area 56

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~900m

Full, ~900m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

RES-4

Residents along south coast of Tuen Mun

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~6,200m

Full, ~6,200m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

RES-5

Residents of Hong Kong Gold Coast

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~7,500m

Full, ~7,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

RES-6

Residents of Siu Lam

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~8,700m

Full, ~8,700m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

RES-7

Proposed residents of Tung Chung East

Low

N/A

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

N/A

Full, ~2,500m

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Small

RES-8

Residents of Lung Kwu Tan

High

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Partial, ~6,500m

Partial, ~6,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

RES-9

Residents of  planned Tung Chung West future development including Area 39

Low

N/A

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

N/A

Full, ~1,500m

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Small

RES-10

Residents of Sham Shek Tsuen

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~2,000m

Obscured, ~2,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

RES-11

Residents of Sai Tso Wan Village

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~3,500m

Obscured, ~3,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

RES-12

Residents of San Tau, Kau Liu and Tin Sam Villages

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~400m

Obscured, ~400m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

RES-13

Residents of  Shek Lau Po and Mok Ka Village

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~1,900m

Obscured, ~1,900m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

RES-14

Residents of Tung Hing Village

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~1,700m

Obscured, ~1,700m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

RES-15

Residents of Sheung Ling Pei Village

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~1,500m

Obscured, ~1,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

RES-16

Residents of Ma Wan New Village

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~1,400m

Obscured, ~1,400m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

RES-17

Residents of Pak Mong Village

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~3,200m

Obscured, ~3,200m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

RES-18

Residents of Ngau Kwu Long Village

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~4,000m

Obscured, ~4,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

RES-19

Residents of San Shek Wan Village

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~1,900m

Obscured, ~1,900m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

RES-20

Residents of Yat Tung Estate

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Partial, ~900m

Partial, ~900m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Small

RES-21

Residents of Tai Ho San Tsuen

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~5,500m

Obscured, ~5,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Recreational VSRs

REC-1

Visitors to AsiaWorld-Expo

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-2

Visitors to Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-3

Visitors to Hong Kong Airport Passenger Terminal

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial , 0m*

Partial , 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-4

Visitors to Regal Hotel

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-5

Passengers of Cable Cars of Ngong Ping 360

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~ 0-3,600m

Full, ~ 0-3,600m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-6

Hikers of Nei Lak Shan

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~3,000m

Full,~3,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-7

Hikers of Fung Wong Shan (Lantau Peak)

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~4,500m

Full, ~4,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-8

Hikers of Tai Tung Shan (Sunset Peak)

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~4,200m

Full, ~4,200m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-9

Hikers of Lantau North Country Park

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~2,800m

Full, ~2,800m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-10

Hikers of Lantau South Country Park

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~600-10,000m

Full, ~600-10,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-11

Recreational users of future Tung Chung East Development

Low

N/A

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

N/A

Partial, ~600m

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Small

REC-12

Hikers of Scenic Hill

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, 0m*

Full, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

REC-13

Passengers / Drivers of recreational marine craft in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~0-10,000m

Full, ~0-10,000m

Partial

Partial

Large

Inter-mediate

REC-14

Passengers / Drivers of recreational marine craft in Castle Peak Bay

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~6,200m

Full, ~6,200m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

REC-15

Recreational users of Butterfly Beach

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~5,500m

Full, ~5,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

REC-16

Hikers of Castle Peak

High

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~6,500m

Full, ~6,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Small

REC-17

Recreational users of Tung Chung Outdoor Recreation Camp

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~1,200m

Obscured, ~1,200m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

REC-18

Recreational users of Man Tung Road Park

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~200m

Obscured, ~200m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

REC-19

Hikers of Tai Lam Country Park

Medium

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~8,000m

Full, ~8,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Small

REC-20

Recreational users of Planned Entertainment Node

Low

Permanent,

Continuous

Permanent,

Continuous

Large, No

N/A

Partial, ~7,500m

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Negligible

REC-21

Recreational users of Sha Chau

High

Permanent,

Continuous

Permanent,

Continuous t

Large, No

Full, ~1,300m

Full, ~1,300m

Slight

Slight

Large

Intermediate

REC-22

Recreational users of Golden Beach

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~8,000m

Full, ~8,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

REC-23

Hikers from Tung Chung to Tai O

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, ~200 – 5,200m

Partial,~200 – 5,200m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

REC-24

Visitors to Tai Ho

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Obscured, ~4,200m

Obscured, ~4,200m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

REC-25

Visitors to proposed NCD hotels and commercial facilities

Low

Permanent,

Continuous

Permanent,

Continuous

Large, No

N/A

Partial, 0m*

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Negligible

REC-26

Recreational users of future Tung Chung West Development

Low

N/A

Permanent, Intermittent

Large, No

N/A

Partial, ~400m

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Negligible

REC-27

Users of Proposed Columbarium Developments for Tsuen Wan

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, ~5,500m

Partial, ~5,500m

Slight

Slight

Negligible

Negligible

Travelling VSRs

T-1

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles and MTR along North Lantau Highway

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~0-10,000m

Full, ~0-10,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

T-2

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles and MTR along Cheong Wing Road

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~10m

Full, ~10m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

T-3

Passengers of commercial aircraft

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~0-10,000m

Full, ~0-10,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

T-4

Passengers / Drivers of the proposed Tuen Mun-Chek Lap Kok Link (TMCLKL)

Medium

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, ~2,000m

Full, ~2,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

T-5

Passengers / Drivers of the proposed Hong Kong Link Road HKLR

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~0-10,000m

Full, ~0-10,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

T-6

Passengers of Ferry’s in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~0-10,000m

Full, ~0-10,000m

Slight

Slight

Intermediate

Small

T-7

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles along castle peak road and Tuen Mun Road

Medium

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Obscured, ~7,900m

Obscured, ~7,900m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

T-8

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles along Lung Mun Road

High

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Obscured, ~4,000m

Obscured, ~4,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

T-9

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles at planned Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities

Medium

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Obscured, ~700m

Obscured, ~700m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

T-10

Passengers / Drivers of vehicles along Tung Chung road

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Obscured, ~1,300m

Obscured, ~1,300m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

T-11

Ferry Passengers from Tung Chung to Tai O

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~100 – 5,200m

Full, ~100 – 5,200m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

T-12

Ferry Passengers at Public Pier in Tung Chung

Low

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Obscured, ~200m

Obscured, ~200m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

T-13

Ferry Passengers at Public Pier in Tuen Mun

Medium

Permanent, Continuous

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

Full, ~5,000m

Full, ~5,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Occupational VSRs

O-1

Workers / Staff of Asia World Expo

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

O-2

Workers of Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

O-3

Workers / Staff of Chek Lap Kok Facilities

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

O-4

Workers / Staff of Hong Kong Aircraft Engineering LTD.

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

O-5

Workers / Staff of Hong Kong Passenger Terminal

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

O-6

Workers of Regal Hotel

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Intermediate

Small

O-7

Workers / Staff of Pillar Point

High

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, ~3,500m

Partial , ~3,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

O-8

Workers of EcoPark

High

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, ~3,500m

Partial, ~3,500m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

O-9

Workers on commercial aircraft on and around Chek Lap Kok

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Full, 0 -10,000m*

Full, 0 -10,000m*

Slight

Slight

Intermediate

Small

O-10

Workers of planned Lantau Logistic Park (LLP) at the possible LLP extension

Low

N/A

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

N/A

Obscured, ~3,200m

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Negligible

O-11

Workers of Cathay Pacific City

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, 0m*

Partial, 0m*

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

O-12

Workers of Castle Peak Power Station

High

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Partial, ~4,000m

Partial, ~4,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

O-13

Workers of Siu Ho Wan

Low

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Obscured, ~5,400m

Obscured, ~5,400m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

O-14

Workers at HKBCF

Medium

Permanent,

Intermittent

Permanent,

Intermittent

Large, No

Obscured, ~300m

Obscured, ~300m

Negligible

Negligible

Small

Negligible

O-15

Workers of proposed NCD hotels and commercial facilities

Low

N/A

Permanent,

Continuous

Large, No

N/A

Obscured, 0m*

N/A

Slight

N/A

Small

O-16

Workers of Siu Ho Wan MTR Depot

Low

Permanent, Intermittent

Permanent, Intermittent

Large, No

Obscured, ~4,000m

Obscured, ~4,000m

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

Negligible

O-17

Future workers of potential commercial development in Tung Chung East

Low

N/A

Permanent,  Continuous

Large, No

N/A

Obscured, ~2,500m

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Small

O-18

Future workers of potential commercial development in Tung Chung West

Low

N/A

Permanent, Continuous

Large, No

N/A

Obscured, ~1,500m

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Small

Note: (1) 0* denotes VSR within project site boundary (refer to Section 15.3.1)

(2) The closet viewing distance has been used to rate the worst case scenario

(3) ‘Permanent’  duration measurement refers to entire construction/operation phase


15.7.5     Prediction of Significance of Visual Impacts

15.7.5.1    An assessment of the significance of the potential visual impacts during the construction and operation phases, before and after mitigation, is briefly described, and listed in detail in Table 15.10 (All impacts are adverse unless otherwise stated). This follows the methodology outlined in Section 15.4 above and assumes that the appropriate mitigation measures identified in Table 15.6 and Table 15.7 would be implemented, and that the full effect of the soft landscape mitigation measures would be realised after 10 years.

15.7.6  Impacts during the Construction and Operation Phase before Mitigation

15.7.6.1    Due to the low rise nature of the 3RS the magnitude of visual change to the majority of the VSRs is perceived to be ‘Small’ or ‘Negligible’ before mitigation measures. Many of the VSRs are a long distance away and enjoy good quality views of the sea, mountains and offshore islands and alternative views are available.  The impact upon each VSR is described in greater detail below.  The magnitude of impacts experienced by VSRs is generally greater in the construction phase than in the operation phase for most VSRs due to the presence of the construction activities and temporary disturbance to the landscape.

15.7.6.2    Photomontages illustrating the existing views (including approved committed projects) and operation phase impacts before and after (Day 1 and Year 10) the implementation of mitigation measure are provided in Drawings MCL/P132/EIA/15-017.1 to MCL/P132/EIA/15-026.2 and locations are illustrated on Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-010. Mitigation measures are described in more detail in Table 15.6 and Table 15.7.

Residential VSRs

15.7.6.3    RES3: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 900 m. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for RES3 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-020.1.

15.7.6.4    RES4, RES5, & RES6: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances ranging from 6,200 m to 8,700 m. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for RES4 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-018.1.

15.7.6.5    RES7 & RES9: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances ranging from 1,500 m to 2,500 m. In the construction phase, the VSRs will not yet exist and therefore there will be no subsequent impacts. In the operation phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to be ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for RES7 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-025.1.

15.7.6.6    RES20: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 900 m. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. 

15.7.6.7    RES1, RES2, RES10, RES11, & RES-19: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous obscured views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 1,900 m. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Small’ to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for RES1 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-024.1.

15.7.6.8    RES12, RES13, RES14, RES15, RES16, RES17, RES18, RES21: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous views towards the source of visual impact at distances between 400 m to 5,500 m. Residents would largely experience obscure degrees of visibility due to visual obstruction by topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.9    RES8: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 6,500 m. Land formation within the north Lantau waters will be more compatible against the existing visual backdrop of Tung Chung and Chek Lap Kok from this position and therefore the compatibility of the project when compared to this visual backdrop is high. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. 

 

Recreational VSRs

15.7.6.10 REC13: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m) to the extent of the north Lantau coastal waters (10,000 m). Land formation within the north Lantau waters will generally be seen against the existing visual backdrop of Tung Chung and Chek Lap Kok and therefore the compatibility of the project when compared to this visual backdrop is medium. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Large’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Substantial significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce to ‘Intermediate’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance. 

15.7.6.11 REC21: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 1,300 m. Land formation within the north Lantau waters will be more compatible against the existing visual backdrop of Tung Chung and Chek Lap Kok from this position and therefore the compatibility of the project when compared to this visual backdrop is high. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Large’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity and ‘Very Few’ numbers results in an impact considered to be of Substantial significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Large’ to ‘Intermediate’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance. 

15.7.6.12 REC12: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent full views towards the source of visual impact at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. 

15.7.6.13 REC6, REC7, REC8, REC9 & REC10: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent full views towards the source of visual impacts at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m) to the extent of the Lantau South Country Park (10,000 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  Photomontages illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for REC6, REC7, REC8 & REC10 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-021.1

15.7.6.14 REC1: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. 

15.7.6.15 REC3: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.

15.7.6.16 REC2 & REC4: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for REC2 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-019.1

15.7.6.17 REC5: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances immediately beside the source of impact (0 m to 3,600 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for REC5 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-021.1

15.7.6.18 REC11: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 600 m. In the construction phase, the VSRs will not yet exist and therefore there will be no subsequent impacts. In the operation phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to be ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. 

15.7.6.19 REC16 & REC19: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent full views towards the source of visual impact at distances ranging from 6,500 m to 8,000 m. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for REC16 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-017.2.

15.7.6.20 REC25: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the VSRs will not yet exist and therefore there will be no subsequent impacts. In the operation phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to be ‘Negligible’ and this with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. 

15.7.6.21 REC23: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances between 200 m to 5,200 m. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity and ‘Few’ numbers results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Small’ to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for REC23 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-026.1.

15.7.6.22 REC17 & REC18: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous obscured views towards the source of visual impact.  In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to be ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.23 REC20: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 7,500 m. In the construction phase, the VSRs will not yet exist and therefore there will be no subsequent impacts. In the operation phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to be ‘Negligible’ and this with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. 

15.7.6.24 REC14, REC15 & REC22: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances ranging from 5,500 m to 8,000 m. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. A photomontage illustrating the impacts during the operation phase before mitigation for REC22 is provided in Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-023.1.

15.7.6.25 REC24: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent obscure views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 4,200 m. VSRs would experience obscure degrees of visibility due to visual obstruction by topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.26 REC27: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 5,500 m. VSRs would experience slight degrees of visibility due to visual obstruction by topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.27 REC26: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 400 m. In the construction phase, the VSRs will not yet exist and therefore there will be no subsequent impacts. In the operation phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to be ‘Negligible’ and this with their ‘High’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. 

Travelling VSRs

15.7.6.28 T2: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent full views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 10 m. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.

15.7.6.29 T3, T5 & T6: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous / intermittent views towards the source of visual impact at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m) to the extent of the north Lantau coastal waters (10,000 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.

15.7.6.30 T9: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent obscured views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 700 m. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Small’ to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.31 T11: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 100 m. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Small’ to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.32 T1 & T4: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent full views towards the source of visual impact at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m) to the extent of the ZVI (10,000 m). In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.33 T7, T8 & T10: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 1,300 m. VSRs would experience obscure degrees of visibility due to visual obstruction by topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.34 T12: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 200 m. VSRs would experience obscure degrees of visibility due to visual obstruction by topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in a reduced impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.35 T13: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 5,000 m. Land formation within the north Lantau waters will be seen against the existing visual backdrop of Tung Chung and Chek Lap Kok and therefore the compatibility of the project when compared to this visual backdrop is medium. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘Medium’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

Occupational VSRs

15.7.6.36 O1, O2, O3, O4, O5 & O6: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.37 O9: This VSR will have permanent and intermittent full views towards the source of visual impact at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Intermediate’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Intermediate’ to ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.38 O15: This VSR will have permanent and continuous obscured views towards the source of visual impact at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the VSRs will not yet exist and therefore there will be no subsequent impacts. In the operation phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9,  the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. 

15.7.6.39 O11: This VSR will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0 m). In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Small’ to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.40 O14: This VSR will have permanent and intermittent obscured views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 300 m. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Small’ to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.41 O10: This VSR will have permanent and intermittent obscured views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 3,200 m. In the construction phase, the VSRs will not yet exist and therefore there will be no subsequent impacts. During operation, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance. 

15.7.6.42 O13: This VSR will have permanent and intermittent obscured views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 5,400 m. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.43 O12: This VSR will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 4,000 m. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Small’ to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.44 O7 & O8: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent partial views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 3,500 m. In the construction phase, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to reduce from ‘Small’ to ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.45 O16: These VSRs will have permanent and intermittent obscured views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 3,800 m. In the construction phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the resultant magnitude of visual change is ‘Negligible’, and this combined with their ‘Low’ sensitivity results in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.  In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to remain as ‘Negligible’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Insubstantial significance.

15.7.6.46 O17 & O18: These VSRs will have permanent and continuous obscured views towards the source of visual impact at distances of at least 1,500 m. In the construction phase, the VSRs will not yet exist and therefore there will be no subsequent impacts.  In the operation phase, due to visual obstruction by intervening topographical and vegetation features and/or existing buildings / structures and other such factors as stated in Table 15.9, the predicted magnitude of visual change is ‘Small’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Slight significance.

15.7.7     Residual Impacts during the Construction Phase after Mitigation

15.7.7.1    Although implementation of the recommended mitigation measures should slightly reduce the magnitude of the residual visual impacts during the construction phase, this will not be sufficient to reduce the overall significance thresholds described above for the before mitigation scenario.

15.7.8  Residual Impacts during the Operation Phase after Mitigation

15.7.8.1    Although implementation of the recommended mitigation measures should slightly reduce the residual impacts in the operation phase between Day 1 and Year 10, this will not be sufficient to reduce the overall significance thresholds.

15.7.8.2    The most predominant visual impact of the 3RS is from new land formation accommodating the third runway. Expansion of T2 and new associated infrastructure is unlikely to significantly alter the existing views towards the site due to its isolated locations and high compatibility to surrounding airport activities and structures. The proposed architectural theme for the expanded T2 building is based on a feather concept with a design to provide not only an elegant reference point, but also provides a way of unitizing the roof into east / west orientated strips that breaks down both the sale of the roof plain and provides a strong directional orientation.  The intended effect will create a series of light ‘feathers’ gently resting on a series of supports. VSRs located within Tung Chung and Lantau Island would generally experience residual visual impacts of Slight or Insubstantial significance during the operation phase after mitigation. VSRs located north of the project will view the site at large distances against an existing visual backdrop featuring Tung Chung and existing airport facilities, therefore it is anticipated that these VSRs would also generally experience residual visual impacts of Slight or Insubstantial significance after the implementation of mitigation measures during the operation phase.

15.7.8.3    The greatest visual impact in the operation phase will be experienced by REC13, Passengers / Drivers of recreational marine craft in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road and REC21, Recreational users of Sha Chau. REC13 will have permanent and intermittent full views towards the source of visual impact at distances from immediately beside the source of impact (0m) to the extent of the Lantau Country Parks (10,000 m). In the operation phase, the predicted magnitude of visual change is predicted to be ‘Intermediate’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance. REC21 will have permanent and continuous full views towards the source of impact at distances of at least 1,300 m. In the operation phase, the predicated magnitude of visual change is anticipated to be ‘Intermediate’ resulting in an impact considered to be of Moderate significance.


Table 15.10: Significance of Visual Impacts in the Construction and Operation Phases

VSR Type

& ID

Key Visually Sensitive Receiver (VSR)

Magnitude of Visual  Change before Mitigation

(None, Negligible, Small, Intermediate, Large)

Receptor Sensitivity & Number

(Low, Medium, High)   (Very Few, Few, Many, Very Many)

Impact Significance Threshold BEFORE Mitigation

(None, Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

Recommended Mitigation Measures

Residual Impact Significance Threshold AFTER Mitigation

(None, Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

DAY 1

YEAR 10

Residential VSRs

RES-1

Residents of Villages of Tai O

Small

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-2

Residents of Villages of Sha Lo Wan

Small

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-3

Residents of Tung Chung including, Tung Chung Crescent,  Seaview Crescent,  Caribbean Coast, Area 53 to Area 56

Intermediate

Small

High, Very Many

High, Very Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

RES-4

Residents along south coast of Tuen Mun

Intermediate

Small

High, Very Many

High, Very Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

RES-5

Residents of Hong Kong Gold Coast

Intermediate

Small

High, Many

High, Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

RES-6

Residents of Siu Lam

Intermediate

Small

High, Many

High, Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

RES-7

Proposed residents of Tung Chung East

N/A

Small

N/A

High, Very Many

N/A

Slight

OM1-11

N/A

Slight

Slight

RES-8

Residents of Lung Kwu Tan

Negligible

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-9

Residents of  planned Tung Chung West future development including Area 39

N/A

Small

N/A

High, Very Many

N/A

Slight

OM1-11

N/A

Slight

Slight

RES-10

Residents of Sham Shek Tsuen

Small

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-11

Residents of Sai Tso Wan Village

Small

Negligible

High, Very Few

High, Very Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-12

Residents of San Tau, Kau Liu and Tin Sam Villages

Negligible

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-13

Residents of  Shek Lau Po and Mok Ka Village

Negligible

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-14

Residents of Tung Hing Village

Negligible

Negligible

High, Very Few

High, Very Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-15

Residents of Sheung Ling Pei Village

Negligible

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-16

Residents of Ma Wan New Village

Negligible

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-17

Residents of Pak Mong Village

Negligible

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-18

Residents of Ngau Kwu Long Village

Negligible

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-19

Residents of San Shek Wan Village

Small

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

RES-20

Residents of Yat Tung Estate

Small

Small

High, Very Many

High, Very Many

Slight

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Slight

Slight

RES-21

Residents in Tai Ho San Tsuen

Negligible

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Recreational VSRs

REC-1

Visitors to AsiaWorld-Expo

Intermediate

Small

Medium, Many

Medium, Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-2

Visitors to Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

Intermediate

Small

High, Many

High, Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-3

Visitors to Hong Kong Airport Passenger Terminal

Intermediate

Small

High, Many

High, Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-4

Visitors to Regal Hotel

Intermediate

Small

High, Many

High, Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-5

Passengers of Cable Cars of Ngong Ping 360

Intermediate

Small

High, Many

High, Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-6

Hikers of Nei Lak Shan

Intermediate

Small

High, Few

High, Few

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-7

Hikers of Fung Wong Shan (Lantau Peak)

Intermediate

Small

High, Few

High, Few

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-8

Hikers of Tai Tung Shan (Sunset Peak)

Intermediate

Small

High, Few

High, Few

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-9

Hikers of Lantau North Country Park

Intermediate

Small

High, Few

High, Few

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-10

Hikers of Lantau South Country Park

Intermediate

Small

High, Few

High, Few

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-11

Recreational users of future Tung Chung East Development

N/A

Small

N/A

High, Many

N/A

Slight

OM1-11

N/A

Slight

Slight

REC-12

Hikers of Scenic Hill

Intermediate

Small

High, Few

High, Few

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

REC-13

Passengers/Drivers of recreational marine craft in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road

Large

Inter-mediate

High, Few

High, Few

Substantial

Moderate

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Substantial

Moderate

Moderate

REC-14

Passengers/Drivers of recreational marine craft in Castle Peak Bay

Negligible

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-15

Recreational users of Butterfly Beach

Negligible

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-16

Hikers of Castle Peak

Small

Small

High, Few

High, Few

Slight

Slight

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Slight

Slight

REC-17

Recreational users of Tung Chung Outdoor Recreation Camp

Negligible

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-18

Recreational users of Man Tung Road Park

Negligible

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-19

Hikers of Tai Lam Country Park

Small

Small

High, Few

High, Few

Slight

Slight

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Slight

Slight

REC-20

Recreational users of Planned Entertainment Node

N/A

Negligible

N/A

High, Many

N/A

Insubstantial

CM10 OM1-11

N/A

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-21

Recreational users of Sha Chau islands

Large

Intermediate

High, Very Few

High, Very Few

Substantial

Moderate

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Substantial

Moderate

Moderate

REC-22

Recreational users of Golden Beach

Negligible

Negligible

High, Many

High, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-23

Hikers from Tung Chung to Tai O

Small

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-24

Visitors to Tai Ho

Negligible

Negligible

High, Few

High, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-25

Visitors to proposed NCD hotels and commercial facilities

N/A

Negligible

N/A

High, Many

N/A

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

N/A

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-26

Recreational users of future Tung Chung West Development

N/A

Negligible

N/A

High, Many

N/A

Insubstantial

OM1-11

N/A

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

REC-27

Users of Proposed Columbarium Developments for Tsuen Wan

Negligible

Negligible

Low, Very Few

Low, Very Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Travelling VSRs

T-1

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles and MTR along North Lantau Highway

Small

Negligible

Medium, Very Many

Medium, Very Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

T-2

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles and MTR along Cheong Wing Road

Intermediate

Small

Medium, Very Many

Medium, Very Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

T-3

Passengers of commercial aircraft

Intermediate

Small

Medium, Very Many

Medium, Very Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

T-4

Passengers / Drivers of the proposed Tuen Mun-Chek Lap Kok Link (TMCLKL)

Small

Negligible

Medium, Very Many

Medium, Very Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

T-5

Passengers / Drivers of the proposed Hong Kong Link Road (HKLR)

Intermediate

Small

Medium, Very Many

Medium, Very Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

T-6

Passengers of Ferry’s in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road

Intermediate

Small

Medium, Many

Medium, Many

Moderate

Slight

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Moderate

Slight

Slight

T-7

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles along castle peak road and Tuen Mun Road

Negligible

Negligible

Medium, Very Many

Medium, Very Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

T-8

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles along Lung Mun Road

Negligible

Negligible

Medium, Many

Medium, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

T-9

Passengers / Drivers of Vehicles at planned HKBCF

Small

Negligible

Medium, Very Many

Medium, Very Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

T-10

Passengers / Drivers of vehicles along Tung Chung road

Negligible

Negligible

Medium, Many

Medium, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

T-11

Ferry Passengers from Tung Chung to Tai O

Small

Negligible

Medium, Few

Medium, Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

T-12

Ferry Passengers at Public Pier in Tung Chung

Negligible

Negligible

Medium, Many

Medium, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

T-13

Ferry Passengers at Public Pier in Tuen Mun

Negligible

Negligible

Medium, Many

Medium, Many

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Occupational VSRs

O-1

Workers / Staff of Asia World Expo

Intermediate

Small

Low, Many

Low, Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-2

Workers / Staff of Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

Intermediate

Small

Low, Many

Low, Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-3

Workers / Staff of Chek Lap Kok Facilities

Intermediate

Small

Low, Many

Low, Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-4

Workers / Staff of Hong Kong Aircraft Engineering LTD.

Intermediate

Small

Low, Few

Low, Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-5

Workers / Staff of Hong Kong Passenger Terminal

Intermediate

Small

Low, Very Many

Low, Very Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-6

Workers of Regal Hotel

Intermediate

Small

Low, Many

Low, Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-7

Workers / Staff of Pillar Point

Small

Negligible

Low, Few

Low, Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-8

Workers of EcoPark

Small

Negligible

Low, Few

Low, Few

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-9

Workers on commercial aircraft on and around Chek Lap Kok

Intermediate

Small

Low, Many

Low, Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-10

Workers of planned Lantau Logistic Park (LLP) at the possible LLP extension

N/A

Negligible

N/A

Low, Many

N/A

Insubstantial

CM10 OM1-11

N/A

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-11

Workers of Cathay Pacific City

Small

Negligible

Low, Many

Low, Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-12

Workers of Castle Peak Power Station

Small

Negligible

Low, Few

Low, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-13

Workers of Siu Ho Wan

Negligible

Negligible

Low, Few

Low, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10 OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-14

Workers at HKBCF

Small

Negligible

Low, Many

Low, Many

Slight

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-15

Workers of proposed NCD hotels and commercial facilities

N/A

Small

N/A

Low, Many

N/A

Insubstantial

OM1-11

N/A

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-16

Workers of Siu Ho Wan MTR Depot

Negligible

Negligible

Low, Few

Low, Few

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

CM1-7, CM10, OM1-11

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

O-17

Future workers of potential commercial development in Tung Chung East

N/A

Small

N/A

Low, Very Many

N/A

Slight

OM1-11

N/A

Slight

Slight

O-18

Future workers of potential commercial development in Tung Chung West

N/A

Small

N/A

Low, Very Many

N/A

Slight

OM1-11

N/A

Slight

Slight


15.8       Cumulative Impacts

15.8.1  General

15.8.1.1    The landscape and visual impacts generated by the 3RS are also assessed in the context of the impacts associated with the concurrent projects as described in Section 15.4.6 and illustrated on Drawing MCL/P132/EIA/15-011. (Note that cumulative impacts of already committed projects that will be completed by 2016 form part of the landscape and visual baseline are not included in the cumulative assessment, namely HKLR, HKBCF, Southern Connection of the TM-CLKL and public rental housing development at Tung Chung (Area 56))

15.8.1.2    The major projects which are concurrent with the 3RS include Northern Connection of TM-CLKL, Tung Chung New Town Extension Study, Lantau Logistics Park (LLP), Leisure and Entertainment Node at Sunny Bay, Intermodal Transfer Terminus (ITT) (on HKIA), North Commercial District (NCD) (on HKIA), the New Contaminated Mud Marine Disposal Facility at East Sha Chau and Airport East, the proposed public housing development at Tung Chung West (Area 39), Organic Waste Treatment Facilities at Siu Ho Wan, and the proposed residential development at Tung Chung (Area 54).

15.8.2  Cumulative Landscape Impacts

15.8.2.1    The only concurrent projects that fall within the landscape study area of the 3RS are NCD and ITT. NCD would occupy the vacant site of the decommissioned SkyCity Nine Eagles Golf Course (CLK/LCA8 On-Going Major Development Landscape), and thus there would be no additional adverse impacts from the NCD. ITT would occupy the current site of the SkyPier which has no landscape resources, so there would be no additional impact on landscape resources or landscape character resulting from ITT.

15.8.3  Cumulative Visual Impacts

15.8.3.1    Within the ZVI of the 3RS, the listed concurrent projects would create additional visual impacts on the VSRs identified in this LVIA.

15.8.3.2    The projects involving land formation along the coastline would cause visual impacts to adjacent VSRs including those VSRs identified in this LVIA. The degree of visual impact will vary greatly between VSRs, based primarily on the relative proximity of the VSR to the source of the impact, however it may be concluded in general terms that the cumulative visual impacts resulting from the concurrent reclamation projects would be greater than the impacts resulting from the 3RS alone. This is because the reclamation projects will generally be closer to the VSRs than the 3RS, and thus the visual impacts from those reclamation projects will tend to be greater than those resulting from the 3RS. The overall effect of the reclamations will be to change the landscape and visual character of the north Lantau coastline from one of rural fringe and transportation corridor to a more urbanized character.

15.8.3.3    Within the airport island, NCD and ITT will create some visual change. ITT will modify existing SkyPier facilities with little visual change in character. NCD would have a maximum building height of approx. 53 mPD and would be designed to sit comfortably within the airport landscape.  There would be no significant adverse visual impact caused by NCD greater than what has already been identified for the construction of the 3RS. In fact, the presence of a well-designed and landscaped NCD may provide a net positive visual impact to the Landscape Character (CLK/LCA8, Ongoing Major Development Landscape).

15.8.3.4    The New Contaminated Mud Marine Disposal Facility at East Sha Chau and Airport East would have no long term impact on the visual context of the area as the facility would result in no physical presence other than sea traffic during the disposal period.

15.9    Environmental Monitoring and Audit

15.9.1  Construction Phase

Monitoring of Design, Construction and Establishment Works

15.9.1.1    The design, implementation and maintenance of landscape and visual mitigation measures (refer to Table 15.6 and Table 15.7) shall be checked to ensure that they are fully realised and that any potential conflicts between the proposed landscape measures and any other project works and operational requirements are resolved at the earliest possible date and without compromise to the intention of the mitigation measures.  

Design of Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

15.9.1.2    The detailed design of the landscape and visual mitigation measures shall be undertaken so as to ensure compliance with the measures described in Section 15.6.4.

Site Supervision of Landscape Works

15.9.1.3    The implementation of the landscape works during the construction phase and establishment works shall be inspected through the site audit program.

15.9.2  Operation Phase

Monitoring of Landscape Establishment

15.9.2.1    All landscape and visual mitigation measures shall be monitored during the landscape establishment period to check that intended mitigation effects are realised. 

15.10 Conclusion

15.10.1         Landscape Impacts

15.10.1.1 The principle landscape impacts will be on the Coastal waters of North Lantau. The physical impact upon the Coastal waters of North Lantau is ‘Substantial’ in relation to the entire resource as a whole; however the impact upon the Coastal waters of North Lantau would remain Substantial during the operation phase as the loss of 650 ha of coastal waters cannot be mitigated.

15.10.1.2 It is anticipated all other LRs and LCAs that have not been described above after the construction phase would largely be restored to their pre-construction state. Mitigation measures including compensatory tree, shrub and groundcover planting would minimise the residual impacts on the airport landscape. The reduction of construction period to a practical minimum and the immediate grassing and treatment of disturbed areas would help restore the landscape to its pre-construction quality. With the implementation of mitigation measures, the residual impact has been assessed as Slight and Insubstantial.

15.10.1.3 It is anticipated that the majority of trees affected by the 3RS will be young to semi-mature trees of common species and will either be felled or transplanted if suitable. No OVTs are located within the project site boundary. To mitigate the loss of the existing trees and to restore the landscape to its existing condition, compensatory tree planting is proposed according to the relevant Technical Circulars.

15.10.2         Visual Impacts

15.10.2.1 The primary visual impacts of the 3RS would result from the construction of a 650 ha land formation north of HKIA. The 3RS would likely have minimal residual visual impacts as the major geomorphic features of the North Lantau and Tuen Mun Region, such as the ridge lines of Castle Peak, Lantau Island and Tai Lam Country Park would remain intact thus preserving the overall landscape character of area. The implementation of operation phase mitigation measures such as the sensitive design of the airport buildings and facilities in terms of scale, height, visual weight, lighting, materials and colours as well as greening measures such as screening, green walls and green roofs will help reduce the residual impacts of the new T2 expansion and associated facilities.

15.10.2.2 The presence of the 3RS would have Slight and Insubstantial residual visual impacts on the surrounding VSRs as the form and character will be consistent with that of the existing HKIA. The greatest visual impacts will be experienced by REC13 (Passengers / Drivers of recreational marine craft users in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road) who are transient in nature, and REC21 (Recreational users of Sha Chau islands) who are very few in number, and are predicted to experience a Moderate impact significance.

15.10.3         Overall Conclusion

15.10.3.1 It is unavoidable that a development of this scale will have impacts on the environment, which are identified and addressed in this EIA with the aim of avoiding (where practicable) and at the very least, minimising such impacts to within acceptable levels. Nevertheless, there are opportunities, at the project’s design, construction and operation stages, for incorporating positive environmental aspects into the project. Among others, these include providing flexibility for avoiding night time use of the southern runway and enabling further environmental efficiencies to be incorporated into the new airport buildings and facilities.

15.10.3.2 As described above, there is one landscape impact caused by the 3RS that is considered to be of substantial significance, namely that experienced by CLK/LR1 Coastal Waters of North Lantau, and two visual impacts, considered to be of moderate significance, namely that experienced by REC13 Passengers / Drivers of recreational marine craft users in north Lantau waters and Urmston Road and REC21 Recreational users of Sha Chau islands.

15.10.3.3 Furthermore, although CLK/LR1 Coastal Waters of North Lantau is considered to suffer substantial impact, the loss is the absolute minimum necessary for the creation of the 3RS and there will remain, even after the impact, a significant large area (much larger than the impacted area) of CLK/LR1 Coastal Waters of North Lantau that will be unaffected by 3RS and that will be available in the operation phase as an ongoing landscape resource.

15.10.3.4 Taking this into account and since despite the very large scale of the development, only one sensitive receiver suffers substantial impact and only two suffer moderate impacts and all other sensitive receivers identified in this chapter suffer slight, insubstantial or no impacts, it is therefore considered that in accordance to the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing impacts as stated in Annex 10 and 18 of the EIAO-TM, the overall residual landscape and visual impacts of the proposed 3RS are marginally acceptable with mitigation during the construction and operation phases.