TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
9.......... Fisheries Impact. 9-2
9.1....... Introduction. 9-2
9.2....... Environmental
Legislation, Standards and Criteria. 9-2
9.3....... Assessment
Methodology. 9-2
9.4....... Description of
Baseline Condition. 9-3
9.5....... Identification,
Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts. 9-7
9.6....... Mitigation of
Adverse Environmental Impacts. 9-14
9.7....... Evaluation of
Residual Impacts. 9-15
9.8....... Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) 9-15
9.9....... Environmental
Benefits. 9-16
9.10..... Conclusion. 9-16
9.11..... References. 9-17
LIST
OF TABLES
Table 9.1 Baseline Information of Fisheries Resources in the
Assessment Area. 9-1
Table 9.2 Recent Figures of Hong Kong Capture Fisheries Industry. 9-1
Table 9.3 Summary of Capture Fisheries Data in the Assessment Area. 9-1
Table 9.4 Fisheries Production (kg/ha) of the Top Ten Families in
the Assessment Area. 9-1
Table 9.5 Recent Figures of Hong Kong Culture Fisheries Industry. 9-1
Table 9.6 Summary of Potential Fisheries Impact during
Construction Phase. 9-1
Table 9.7 Summary of Potential Fisheries Impact during Operation
Phase. 9-1
LIST OF FIGURES
60334056/EIA/9.01 Key Fisheries Resources Within
Assessment Area
9.1.1.1
This section presents the potential fisheries impacts generated from
the construction and operation of the Project, and the demolition of existing
STSTW of the Project. Baseline
conditions for fisheries resources in the assessment area were identified from
the latest relevant literature.
Potential direct, indirect, cumulative and residual impacts on fisheries
resources during the construction and operation phases of the Project were
identified and evaluated. Mitigation
measures have been recommended where necessary.
9.2.1.1
This fisheries impact assessment was conducted according to criteria
and guidelines set out in the Annex 9 and Annex 17 of the EIAO-TM in order to
provide complete and objective identification, prediction and evaluation of
potential fisheries impacts arising from the Project. EIAO-TM Annex 17 sets out the methodology for
assessment of fisheries impacts and Annex 9 provides the evaluation criteria.
9.2.1.2
Other local legislations that are relevant to this fisheries impact
assessment include:
·
Fisheries Protection Ordinance
(Cap. 171) – promotes the conservation of fish and other forms of aquatic life
within Hong Kong waters by regulating fishing practices to prevent detrimental
activities to the fisheries industry.
The authority may also make rules for the management and control of
fishing in any fisheries protection area, including but not limited to the
specification of any zone within any fisheries protection area and the
prohibition of any fishing in the specified zone.
·
Marine Fish Culture Ordinance
(Cap. 353) – regulates and protects marine fish cultured by designating areas
of fish culture zone, granting licenses, prohibiting unauthorised vessels and
any deposition of chemicals or other substances which are likely to cause
injury to fish in a fish culture zone.
·
WPCO (Cap. 358) – aims to control water
pollution in waters of Hong Kong. WCZs
are designated with individual water quality objectives to promote the
conservation and best use of those waters in the public interest. The most updated water quality objectives for
the Junk Bay WCZ, Eastern Buffer WCZ and Victoria Harbour WCZ were revised in
June 1997.
·
Annex 17 of the EIAO-TM – sets
out the methodology for assessment of fisheries impacts, in order to provide
objective identification, prediction and evaluation of potential fisheries
impacts arising from the Project. Annex
9 provides evaluation criteria.
9.3.1.1
The assessment area for fisheries impact assessment was the same as
the assessment area for water quality impact assessment and included any other
areas likely to be impacted by the Project.
Special attention was given to the fishing
activities and spawning and nursery grounds of commercial fisheries resources
within the assessment area and any nearby fish culture zones.
9.3.2.1
Collation and desktop review of available relevant fisheries baseline
data (e.g. AFCD) Port Survey 2006, EIAs and other available relevant studies)
within or in vicinity to the assessment area were conducted. Potential direct/indirect, short term/long
term, on-site/off-site and cumulative fisheries impacts arising from the
Project were identified and evaluated where possible. Special attention was given to loss or
disturbance of fishing ground, fisheries habitat and spawning and nursery
ground; water quality deterioration at ensitive receivers such as fish culture
zones; permanent loss or temporary occupation of fish ponds; deterioration of
water quality in fish ponds and any surrounding watercourses; and disruption or
disturbance of pond culture related activities, where appropriate. Mitigation measures and monitoring and audit
programme were recommended, where necessary.
9.3.2.2
The criteria and guidelines as stated in Annexes 9 and 17 of the EIAO-TM were followed for
evaluating and assessing fisheries impact arising from the construction and
operation of the Project, and decommissioning of the existing STSTW of the
Project.
9.4.1.1
Following the collation and review of existing fisheries baseline
information, relevant literatures on capture and culture fisheries within and
in vicinity of the assessment area are listed in Table 9.1 below.
Table 9.1 Baseline
Information of Fisheries Resources in the Assessment Area
Relevant Literatures
|
AFCD Port Survey 2006
(AFCD, 2015b)
|
Aquaculture and Capture
Fisheries data available
from AFCD website (AFCD, 2015a and
2015b)
|
AFCD Annual Report 2007
– 2014
|
Fisheries Resources and
Fishing Operations in Hong Kong Waters (ERM, 1998)
|
Relocation of Sha Tin
Sewage Treatment Works to Caverns – Feasibility Study –Preliminary
Environmental Review (DSD, 2014)
|
9.4.1.2
The relevant desktop information reviewed is considered sufficient
for evaluating the importance of the potentially impacted fisheries resources
and fishing operations within the assessment area. Therefore, no information gap on fisheries
baseline conditions within the assessment area was identified and fisheries
surveys are not needed for the current EIA study.
9.4.2.1
There are four mariculture areas identified
in the assessment area, Lo Fu Wat Fish Culture Zone (FCZ), Yung Shue Au FCZ, Yim Tin Tsai
FCZ and Yim Tin Tsai (East) FCZ, which are located approximately 9 km, 8 km,
4.5 km and 4.5 km away from the existing STSTW respectively. A potential subzone of Yim Tin Tsai FCZ is
located approximately 3.2 km away from the existing STSTW. In addition, Three Fathoms Cove was
identified as important nursery area for commercial fisheries resources with
high fish fry production within the assessment area (located approximately 6.5
km away from the existing STSTW). The
locations of the key fisheries resources within the assessment area are shown
in Figure No. 60334056/EIA/9.01. Based on the findings of the literature
review, no important nursery or spawning area was identified in immediate
vicinity of the existing STSTW in Tolo Harbour (ERM, 1998).
9.4.3.1
In 2014, the capture fisheries industry produced an estimated 160,789
tonnes of fisheries valued at about $2,530 million (AFCD, 2015b). This industry is operated by approximately
9,400 local fishermen with 4,500 fishing vessels. Fishing activities are mainly conducted in
the waters of the adjacent continental shelf in the South China Sea. Main fishing methods include trawling,
long-lining, gill-netting and purse-seining with the majority of the total
catch obtained through trawling.
Trawling landed the majority of the catch in Hong Kong waters prior to
31 December 2012, after which a ban on trawling was implemented with the
intensions of protecting marine resources and ecosystem so that damaged seabed
and depleted marine resources can rehabilitate.
Some recent data on local capture fisheries industry are summarised in Table 9.2 below.
Table 9.2 Recent
Figures of Hong Kong Capture Fisheries Industry
Parameter
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
Fishing fleet
size
(No. of
vessels)
|
4,500
|
4,000
|
4,000
|
4,000
|
3,900
|
3,700
|
3,800
|
4,000
|
3,940
|
4,150
|
Local Fishermen
engaged in capture fisheries
|
9,400
|
8,800
|
8,800
|
8,500
|
8,200
|
7,600
|
8,000
|
8,500
|
8500
|
9,170
|
Production
(tonnes)
|
160,789
|
170,729
|
155,230
|
170,720
|
168,000
|
159,000
|
158,000
|
154,000
|
155,000
|
162,000
|
Values of
produce (HK$ million)
|
2,530
|
2,338
|
2,317
|
2,358
|
2,100
|
2,000
|
1,780
|
1,530
|
1,600
|
1,600
|
9.4.3.2
The latest AFCD Port Survey 2006 (AFCD 2015b) provides the most
updated information on capture fisheries in Hong Kong waters,
including both fishing operation and fisheries production (adult fish and
fry). In
general, the highest fish yields in Hong Kong were obtained in the eastern
waters (e.g. Tolo Channel, Crooked Haven,
Port Shelter, and Po Toi) and the southwestern
waters (e.g. Lamma Island,
Cheung Chau and Soko Islands).
9.4.3.3
The fishing operation within the assessment area was mainly supported
by vessels of less than 15 m in length.
Sampans were the dominant fishing vessels but other vessels such as stem
trawler, pair trawler, shrimp trawler, gill netters, long liners and purse
seiner were also operated within the assessment area. The capture fisheries data within the
assessment area are summarised in Table 9.3. The existing STSTW
is located next to Sha Tin Hoi.
Table 9.3 Summary
of Capture Fisheries Data in the Assessment Area
Parameter
|
Sha
Tin Hoi
|
Tolo
Harbour
|
Plover
Cove
|
Three
Fathoms Cove
|
Tolo
Channel
|
No. of vessels
|
10 - 50
|
10 - 400
|
10 - 400
|
10 - 400
|
100 - 400
|
Adult fish production in terms of weight (kg/ha)
|
>0 - ≤50
|
>0 - 200
|
>0 - 100
|
>0 - 400
|
100 - 400
|
Fish fry production in terms of density (tails/ha)
|
None reported
|
0 - ≤50
|
0 - ≤50
|
100 - 500
|
>0 - 100
|
Annual fisheries production (adult and fry) in terms
of value (HK$/ha)
|
>0 - ≤500
|
>0 - 5000
|
500 - 5000
|
2000 - 10000
|
2000 - 10000
|
9.4.3.4
The number of fishing vessels operating within the assessment area
was generally between 10 and 400 vessels, while that near the existing STSTW was low (10 - 50 vessels).
9.4.3.5
In terms of weight, >0 - 400 kg/ha adult fish was produced
within the assessment area. The weight of adult fish production near the existing STSTW was low (>0 - ≤50
kg/ha). Fish production increased
towards the Tolo Channel. Fish
production was the highest in the western portion of Tolo Channel, ranged from
200 to 400
kg/ha (AFCD, 2015b). However, this area is
located at distance (approximately 4 km) from the existing
STSTW.
9.4.3.6
Fry collection in Hong Kong has reduced in scale in recent
years. The latest interview studies reported that fry collection
only occurs in a few areas (AFCD, 2015b). The highest fry collection
was mainly found in the northeast inshore waters at Three Fathoms Cove, Crooked
Harbour, Double Haven, and Long Harbour. Three Fathoms Cove is
located within the assessment area, with 100 - 500 tails/ha fry production. It is approximately 6.5 km away from the existing STSTW.
9.4.3.7
Tolo Harbour is not considered as important spawning or nursery areas
for commercial fish species. Although
reproductive individuals of Ponyfish have been collected in Tolo Harbour, this
species does not appear to have a specific spawning ground as reproductive
individuals were collected in a wide range area from Tolo Harbour and
northeastern waters, to Junk Bay and as far as southwest Lantau (ERM,
1998). A low level of fish fry production
(>0
– ≤50 tails/ha) was reported in Tolo
Harbour (AFCD, 2015b).
9.4.3.8
Tolo Channel has been identified as a potential fish nursery ground
of Seabream species (Chrysophrys major, Rhabdosargus sarba and Sparus
spp.), Shrimp (Metapenaeopsis palmensis) and Lutjanus fry (ERM,
1998). Fish fry production ranging from
0 – 500 tails/ha was reported in Tolo Channel (AFCD, 2015b). Three Fathoms Cove was identified as important
nursery area for commercial fisheries resources with high fish fry production
(100 – 500 tails/ha).
9.4.3.9
Overall, in terms of capture fishery production value, the assessment
area showed a range of production value from >HK$0 to 10,000 per hectare annually. Moderate to high production (HK$5,000 -
10,000 per hectare) occurred in Tolo Channel
and Three Fathoms Cove, whilst a low production value (>HK$0 - ≤500 per hectare) was recorded near the existing STSTW.
9.4.3.10
Capture fisheries production of the top ten fish families within the
assessment area is summarised in Table 9.4.
Table 9.4 Fisheries
Production (kg/ha) of the Top Ten Families in the Assessment Area
Top
Ten Fish Families
|
Sha
Tin Hoi
|
Tolo
Harbour
|
Plover
Cove
|
Three
Fathoms Cove
|
Tolo
Channel
|
Scad (Caragidae)
|
≤5
|
5 -10
|
≤5
|
10 - 20
|
10 - 40
|
Shrimp
|
None reported
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
Rabbitfish (Siganidae)
|
≤5
|
≤5 - 20
|
5 - 20
|
≤5 - 40
|
10 - 60
|
Squid
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
≤5 - 20
|
≤5 - 20
|
Croaker (Sciaenidae)
|
None reported
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
0 -20
|
5 - 20
|
Crab
|
≤5
|
≤5 - 20
|
≤5 - 10
|
10 - 60
|
5 - 40
|
Mullet (Mugilidae)
|
≤5
|
≤5 - 10
|
≤5 - 10
|
0 - 40
|
≤5 - 40
|
Sardine (Clupeidae)
|
None reported
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
0 - 20
|
5 - 20
|
Seabream (Sparidae)
|
≤5
|
≤5 - 10
|
≤5 - 10
|
≤5 - 40
|
10 - 40
|
Anchovy (Engraulidae)
|
None reported
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
≤5
|
9.4.3.11
Production of Crab and Rabbitfish was high in Three Fathoms Cove and
Tolo Channel respectively. Fish
production was generally low near the existing STSTW (i.e.
Sha Tin Hoi, Tolo Harbour and Plover Cove).
Only low production of Scad, Rabbitfish, Squid, Crab, Mullet and
Seabream were reported in vicinity of the existing
STSTW.
9.4.4.1
Marine culture fisheries included marine fish culture and oyster
culture. Mariculture areas for marine fish included 26 FCZs located in
various sheltered coastal areas in Hong Kong marine waters and occupied
about 209 ha of marine areas with about 968 licensed operators in
2014 (AFCD, 2015a). Majority of the licensed farms are small,
family-based and consisting of one to two rafts with average total area of
around 290 m2. Oyster culture
has been practiced on the Deep Bay mudflats for at least 200
years. Production from oyster culture in 2014 was about 121 tonnes
(meat only) valued at $10 million (AFCD, 2015a).
9.4.4.2
There are four FCZs but no oyster culture present in the assessment
area. Lo Fu Wat FCZ, Yung Shue Au FCZ, Yim Tin Tsai FCZ and Yim Tin
Tsai (East) FCZ are located approximately 9 km, 8 km, 4.5 km and 4.5 km away
from the existing STSTW respectively. The locations of the FCZs are shown in Figure No. 60334056/EIA/9.01.
9.4.4.3
Although no figures are available for the individual production of
FCZs, it was estimated that culture fisheries of marine fish production in 2014
weighted 1,255 tonnes and was valued at $115 million which catered for
approximately 6% of local demand for live marine fish (AFCD, 2015a). Recent figures on marine fish culture are
present in Table 9.5.
Table 9.5 Recent Figures of Hong Kong Culture Fisheries Industry
Parameter
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
Licensed operator
|
968
|
987
|
1,008
|
1,015
|
1,035
|
1,050
|
1,060
|
1,070
|
1,080
|
1,100
|
Production (tonnes)
|
1,255
|
1,005
|
1,299
|
1,185
|
1,512
|
1,437
|
1,370
|
1,532
|
1,488
|
1,539
|
Value
(HK$ million)
|
115
|
94
|
117
|
94
|
118
|
92
|
82
|
99
|
89
|
76
|
9.4.4.5
In addition, certain areas in Hong Kong waters are important fish
spawning and nursery grounds and are proposed to designate as Fisheries
Protection Areas (FPAs) to protect fish fry, juvenile and spawning fish, help
restore fisheries resources in Hong Kong waters, and promote the sustainable
development of fisheries in the long run.
There are two proposed FPAs in the eastern waters including the “Tolo
Channel and Long Harbour” and the “Port Shelter”. The closest one at the “Tolo Channel and Long
Harbour” is located approximately over 8 km from the existing STSTW.
9.4.4.6
Pond fish culture industry is centred in the north-west New
Territories. Fish ponds are either
freshwater or brackish. In 2014, the
local inland ponds, covering an area of approximately 1,140 ha, produced 2,001
tonnes of freshwater fish amounting to $44 million (AFCD, 2015a). There are no fish ponds within the assessment
area. Therefore there would be no
impacts on pond culture fisheries.
Direct
Impacts
Loss of Fishing Grounds
Indirect
Impacts
THEES Connection Works
9.5.1.3
On the other hand, under the existing practice, regular inspection
and repair of the THEES would be carried out when necessary to maintain proper
functioning and integrity of the THEES. During each THEES maintenance event,
secondarily treated and disinfected effluent from TPSTW and STSTW would be
temporarily discharged to the Tolo Harbour to provide a dry zone within the
THEES tunnel for a maximum duration of 4 weeks in non-algal bloom season with
frequency less than once per year. To
minimize water quality impact to Tolo Harbour, the necessary THEES connection works
required for this Project will be split into a number of steps for sequential
and synchronized implementation with THEES maintenance, thereby avoiding the
need for additional temporary suspension of the THEES.
Changes in Water Quality by Land-based
Construction Works
9.5.1.4
Discharge from land-based construction works (general cleaning and
polishing, wheel washing, dust suppression, utility installation, etc.) and
construction site runoff (e.g. runoff and erosion of exposed bare soil and
earth, drainage channel, earth working area and stockpiles, etc.) during the
cavern development and demolition of the existing STSTW may cause a temporary
increase in SS level. With the
implementation of appropriate measures to control run-off and drainage from the
construction site, as well as the adoption of guidelines and good site
practices for handling and disposal of construction discharges (refer to Section 5.7.2),
unacceptable impacts on water quality and fisheries due to water quality
deterioration by land-based construction works are not expected.
9.5.1.5
The overall evaluation of construction
phase fisheries impacts are summarised in Table 9.6.
Table 9.6 Summary
of Potential Fisheries Impact during Construction Phase
Criteria
|
Construction
Phase Impact
|
Nature of Impact
|
Direct Impact
The Project will only
involve land-based construction works.
There will be no disturbance to marine or riverbed sediments. Trenchless method underneath Shing Mun
River was proposed for the construction of connection pipes to existing
emergency outfall of STSTW. The
construction method would not cause disturbance to the marine sediment. The demolition of the existing STSTW would
be land-based only with no disturbance to marine or riverbed sediments. No loss of fishing ground is anticipated.
Indirect Impact
THEES connection works
required for this Project will be split into smaller sections and each
section will be arranged to be undertaken to synchronized with THEES
maintenance for a duration not longer than 4 weeks each outside the algae
blooming season and the frequency will be no more than once per year. No additional water quality impact and no
additional fisheries impact from changes of water quality will be induced by
the proposed THEES connection works.
With the implementation
of appropriate measures to control run-off and drainage from the construction
site, as well as the adoption of guidelines and good site practices,
unacceptable impacts on water quality and fisheries due to water quality
deterioration by land-based construction works are not expected.
|
Size of Affected Area
|
Direct Impact
There will be no
disturbance to marine or riverbed sediments.
No loss of fishing
ground is anticipated.
Indirect Impact
Inner Tolo Harbour and
Tolo Channel
No additional water
quality impact and no additional fisheries impact from changes of water
quality will be induced by the proposed THEES connection works.
With the implementation
of mitigation measures and the adoption of guidelines and good site
practices, unacceptable impacts on water quality, and hence, fisheries
impacts due to water quality deterioration by land-based construction works
are not expected.
|
Loss of Fisheries Resources / Production
|
There will be no
disturbance to marine or riverbed sediments.
No loss of fisheries
resources / production is anticipated.
No additional water
quality impact and no additional fisheries impact from changes of water
quality will be induced by the proposed THEES connection works.
With the implementation
of mitigation measures and the adoption of guidelines and good site
practices, unacceptable impacts on water quality, and hence, fisheries
impacts due to water quality deterioration by land-based construction works
are not expected.
|
Destruction and Disturbance of Nursery and Spawning
Grounds
|
There will be no direct
loss of important nursery and spawning grounds for commercial fisheries
species.
No additional water
quality impact and no additional fisheries impact from changes of water
quality will be induced by the proposed THEES connection works.
With the implementation
of mitigation measures and the adoption of guidelines and good site
practices, unacceptable impacts on water quality, and hence, fisheries
impacts due to water quality deterioration by land-based construction works
are not expected.
|
Impact on Fishing Activity
|
There will be no
disturbance to marine or riverbed sediments.
No impact on fishing
activity is anticipated.
|
Impact on Aquaculture Activity
|
Minor.
No additional water
quality impact and no additional fisheries impact from changes of water
quality will be induced by the proposed THEES connection works.
With the implementation
of mitigation measures and the adoption of guidelines and good site
practices, unacceptable impacts on water quality, and hence, fisheries
impacts due to water quality deterioration by land-based construction works
are not expected.
|
Overall Fisheries Impact
|
Minor
|
Indirect
Impacts
Changes in Water Quality during Normal Plant
Operation
Elevation
of Suspended Solids (SS)
9.5.2.1
The increase in SS level may potentially cause lethal or sublethal
effects on fish by clogging the delicate structures of gills in fish and
therefore prohibiting the exchange of dissolved oxygen. Fish eggs and fish fry are more susceptible
to smothering of respiratory surface due to high sediment levels. Adult fish are more likely to move away when
they detect increase in SS level and therefore less sensitive to the effects
from SS elevation.
9.5.2.2
SS occur naturally in the marine environment due to vertical flux and
wave action of water current, particularly in estuaries. Consequently fish have evolved adaptations to
tolerate the increased SS, including clearing their gills by flushing water
through and simply moving away from turbid waters.
9.5.2.3
If SS levels exceed tolerance thresholds and the fish are unable to
move away from the area, they may become stressed or even die. The
rate, timing and duration of SS elevations will influence the type and extent
of impacts on fish and crustaceans (CPPC, 2006). Lethal response had
not been observed in adult fish at SS level less than 125 mg/L, and sublethal
effects were only reported at levels exceeded 90 mg/L. However,
guideline values were identified for fisheries and selected marine ecological
sensitive receivers in Consultancy Study on Fisheries and Marine Ecological
Criteria for Impact Assessment based on international marine water quality
objective guidelines for the ecosystem protection. The
recommended value was 50 mg/L (AFCD, 2001). Besides, the WQO for SS
(i.e. elevation of less than 30% of ambient baseline level) is also generally
applicable to fisheries sensitive receivers inside the relevant WCZs.
9.5.2.4
According to the water quality impact assessment, operation of this
Project (Scenario 5 – “with Project” scenario) would slightly reduce the mean SS
level in Sha Tin Hoi waters when compare with the baseline condition (Scenario
4 – “without Project” scenario). The SS
level is predicted to be either lower than (at Yim Tin Tsai FCZ, Yim Tin Tsai
(East) FCZ and potential subzone of Yim Tin Tsai FCZ) or the same as (at Yung
Shue Au FCZ, Lo Fu Wat FCZ and the important nursery area for commercial
fisheries resources) the baseline condition (refer to Appendix 5.05).
Decrease of
Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
9.5.2.5
Increase in SS in water column combined with a number of other
physical or biotic factors would reduce DO in water column. Elevated
SS reduces light penetration, lowers the photosynthetic rate of phytoplankton
and so lowers the rate of oxygen production in the water
column. Also the release of inorganic substances from the temporary
bypass events may cause eutrophication and algal bloom. Oxidation of
dead algae may use up some of the oxygen in the water. If oxygen
levels are depleted to low levels, fish, especially those in early life stages
may be unable to tolerate such conditions and suffer hypoxia-induced mortality
and / or stress including reduced feeding and growth rate. Normal operation of this Project would
significantly improve the mean depth-averaged (DA) DO level and the minimum
bottom DO level in the Harbour Subzone of the Tolo Harbour as compared with the
baseline condition. Full compliance of
DO was predicted at the four FCZs, the potential subzone of Yim Tin Tsai FCZ
and the important nursery area for commercial fisheries
resources
under Scenarios 4 and 5 (refer to Appendix 5.05) and
would be within the ranges for FCZs (DO: 4 – 8 mg/L) stated in the Environmental
Management of Mariculture (AFCD, 2009).
Release of
Nutrients
9.5.2.6
High nutrient levels in marine water may trigger rapid increase in
phytoplankton, resulting in algal bloom.
When a large number of algae die, degradation of dead algae would cause
sudden drop in DO which leads to suffocation of fish and other organisms. The
phytoplankton may also produce biotoxins which could be lethal to fish. According to the water quality impact
assessment, the TIN levels are similar at all the fisheries resources under the
Scenario 4 and Scenario 5.
Chlorophyll-a
9.5.2.7
Chlorophyll-a is a green photosynthetic pigment in plant. The level of chlorophyll-a can provide an
indication of algae or phytoplankton concentration in marine water. It should be highlighted that the presence of
algae / chlorophyll-a in water is generally not harmful. Only their uncontrolled growth as algal bloom
or red tide would adversely affect the environment.
9.5.2.10
Tolo Harbour is a shallow landlocked water body with low water
exchange rate and poor flushing capacity, which is susceptible to algal
formation and accumulation of algae.
Thus, the maximum chlorophyll-a levels at all fisheries resources are
considered high under the “without Project” condition (Scenario 4) (refer to Appendix 5.05). Operation of this Project (Scenario 5) would
reduce the chlorophyll-a concentration in the Harbour and Buffer
Subzones of the Tolo Harbour and Channel WCZ.
The chlorophyll-a levels predicted at the four FCZs, the potential
subzone of Yim Tin Tsai FCZ and the important nursery area for commercial
fisheries resources are already considered high under the “without Project” condition
(Scenario 4). Implementation
of this Project (Scenario 5) would minimise the chlorophyll-a level at
the fisheries resources. In comparison
with the baseline levels of 18 – 36 µg/L (under Scenario 4), the maximum 5-day
moving mean chlorophyll-a predicted during operation of this Project
(Scenario 5) would be reduced to 12 – 25 µg/L at the fisheries resources, and
thus potentially minimising the risk of red tide in Tolo Harbour.
9.5.2.11
The Project operation will improve the water quality in Tolo Harbour
(including the fisheries resources) as compared to the baseline condition. This Project will not cause any unacceptable
water quality impact to the Tolo Harbour.
This Project will in fact have a positive water quality effect in Tolo
Harbour, minimising the pollution level and also the risk of algal bloom in the
Tolo Harbour (due to the predicted decrease in the chlorophyll-a and nutrient
level) in the long term. No unacceptable water quality impact would be
resulted from this Project during the operation phase. Therefore, unacceptable fisheries impacts due
to changes in water quality are not expected.
Changes in Water Quality during THEES
Maintenance Discharge
9.5.2.12
A continuous THEES maintenance discharge for a period of 4 weeks was
simulated under Scenarios 6a and 6b.
During the THEES maintenance period, secondarily treated and disinfected
effluent would be discharged from both STSTW and TPSTW. Under the water quality model, Scenario 6a
represents a possible worst case following existing practice where the THEES
maintenance events could be scheduled in March (within the algal blooming
season identified in this EIA). Scenario
6b however represents an optimised case recommended under this Project to avoid
THEES maintenance in algal blooming season.
The water quality modelling results for Scenarios 6a and 6b (with THEES
maintenance discharge) are compared with the model results for Scenario 5
(normal Project operation without THEES maintenance) to identify the water
quality changes due to the THEES maintenance.
9.5.2.13
The predicted SS level during the maintenance period of THEE tunnel
under Scenarios 6a and 6b at Yim Tin Tsai FCZ (2.9 and 2.8 mg/L), Yim Tin Tsai
(East) FCZ (1.9 and 1.8 mg/L), potential subzone of Yim Tin Tsai FCZ (2.2 and
2.1 mg/L), Yung Shue Au FCZ and the important nursery area for commercial
fisheries resources at Three Fathoms Cove (1.5 mg/L) and Lo Fu Wat FCZ (0.9
mg/L) would be below 50 mg/L (refer to Appendix 5.05). The
THEE maintenance would increase the maximum SS level at Yim Tin Tsai FCZ by
around 0.1 mg/L (or about 4%) under Scenario 6a as compared to the normal
operation of the Project (Scenario 5).
No SS elevation is predicted at other fisheries resources under both
Scenarios 6a and 6b. Therefore, adverse
fisheries impacts due to SS elevation are not expected.
9.5.2.14
According to the modeling results from water quality impact
assessment, no exceedance of DO was predicted at Yim Tin Tsai FCZ, Yim Tin Tsai
(East) FCZ, potential subzone of Yim Tin Tsai FCZ, Yung Shue Au FCZ and the
important nursery area for commercial fisheries resources at Three Fathoms
Cove, and Lo Fu Wat FCZ under Scenarios 5, 6a and 6b and would be
within the ranges for FCZs (DO: 4 – 8 mg/L) stated in the Environmental
Management of Mariculture (AFCD, 2009) (refer to Appendix 5.05). Meanwhile, the TIN levels are similar at the
fisheries resources under the Scenarios 5, 6a and 6b. Therefore, adverse fisheries impacts due to
oxygen depletion and release of nutrients are not expected.
9.5.2.15
Tolo Harbour is a shallow landlocked water body with low water
exchange rate and poor flushing capacity, which is susceptible to algal
formation and accumulation of algae.
Hence, the maximum chlorophyll-a levels at all fisheries resources under
normal operation of the THEES in Ultimate Design Scenario (UDS) (Scenario 5:
“without Project”) is already considered high (refer to Appendix 5.05).
The chlorophyll-a predicted at the fisheries resources would range from 22
–
79 µg/L under the existing practice of THEES maintenance (Scenario 6a) as
compared to the normal situation (Scenario 5) of 12 – 25 µg/L. This Project would optimise the THEES
maintenance operation and minimise the chlorophyll-a impacts at the fisheries
resources to a range of 12 – 49 µg/L under Scenario 6b. It should be noted that the chlorophyll-a
levels mentioned above represent the maximum 5-day running means over the
entire 1-year simulation period. The
actual chlorophyll-a levels at these fisheries resources would be varying and
these highest chlorophyll-a levels would only occur for a short period
of times as indicated in the time series plots in Figures 01 – 09 of Appendices 5.04b and 5.04c. The time series plots in Appendices 5.04b and 5.04c also
showed that the chlorophyll-a elevations caused by the THEES maintenance
discharge would be reversible. The model
predicted that the chlorophyll-a levels can return to the condition similar to
the baseline levels within about 1.5 months after termination of the effluent
bypass under Scenario 6a, whilst Scenario 6b is predicted to have a shorter
recovery time of about 2 weeks after the end of the maintenance discharge.
9.5.2.16
This Project would optimise the THEES maintenance discharge and
reduce the chlorophyll-a levels at all important fisheries resources
identified in Tolo Harbour as compared to the chlorophyll-a increases
induced by the existing THEES maintenance practices. This Project would potentially minimise the
risk of red tides during the THEES maintenance.
9.5.2.17
It should however be highlighted that red tides are
natural phenomena which
occur seasonally in both polluted and unpolluted waters and would depend
on a combination of different factors including flow condition, light
penetration, salinity distribution, nutrient concentrations, nutrient ratios
and species competition, etc. (refer to Section 9.5.2.9). Past research studies on long-term water
quality data in Hong Kong suggested that, under favourable environmental
conditions (e.g. in stagnant water, under calm wind condition and with
sufficient light energy), red tide can be trigged at a very low nutrient
level. Thus, the THEES maintenance
discharge may not be a critical or major factor for
triggering red tide in Tolo Harbour.
9.5.2.18
Any potential impacts from red tide or HABs that may arise in the
Tolo Harbour is currently managed and responded under the routine red tide
monitoring and management protocol and response plan adopted by the Hong Kong
government. AFCD is acting as the coordinator of the Red Tide Reporting
Network, to receive reports of red tide, conduct investigation and provide
warning of the risk associated and appropriate mitigation measures. The objectives of this red tide monitoring programme
are to provide coordination of monitoring and response to red tides/HABs and
fish kills and to compile and synthesise data necessary to effectively manage
fisheries resources, protect human health and the marine ecosystems. In
addition, specific water quality monitoring programme and mitigation measures
are also recommended under this Project to minimise the potential water quality
impacts during the THEES maintenance discharge as presented in Section 5.10.3. With implementation of the recommended
mitigation measures and monitoring programme, the potential impacts from the
maintenance discharge events would be minimised.
Changes in Water Quality during Emergency
Discharge from STSTW
9.5.2.19
During the operation phase, it is assumed that an emergency discharge
of primarily treated sewage from the STSTW would occur for a period of 6 hours
in case of power or plant failure.
According to the water quality modeling results, the short-term discharge
under Scenario 7 would not cause significant impact upon the predicted mean SS,
DO, TIN and chlorophyll-a levels at the fisheries resources as compared to the
normal plant operation under Scenario 5 (refer to Appendix 5.05). Therefore, unacceptable fisheries impacts are
not expected.
Treated Effluent Reuse
9.5.2.20
Reuse of treated effluent from the Project by general public is not
proposed for irrigation or flushing since it is not an effective option as
assessed under this Assignment. Treated
effluent from the Project would be limited to non-potable uses inside the plant
for polymer preparation and the effluent would subsequently be treated again
for discharge and would not contribute to additional pollution load. Thus, no additional impact on the water
environment, and hence, no additional fisheries impact will be induced by the
proposed treated effluent reuse.
9.5.2.21
The overall evaluation of operation phase fisheries
impacts are summarised in Table 9.7.
Table 9.7 Summary
of Potential Fisheries Impact during Operation Phase
Criteria
|
Operation
Phase Impact
|
Nature of Impact
|
Indirect Impact
Normal operation of this
Project will not cause any unacceptable water quality impact upon the Tolo
Harbour. This Project will in fact
have a positive water quality effect in Tolo Harbour (e.g. SS, DO,
chlorophyll-a), minimising the pollution level and also the risk of algal
bloom in the Tolo Harbour.
Changes in water quality
(e.g. SS, DO, TIN, chlorophyll-a) are expected during the THEES maintenance
discharge from STSTW and TPSTW to Tolo Harbour. No significant changes in water quality
parameters are predicted. Although the
impact chlorophyll-a levels is high under the existing practice of THEES
maintenance (Scenario 6a), the baseline chlorophyll-a levels is already
considered high (Scenario 5: “without Project”) as Tolo Harbour is a shallow
landlocked water body with low water exchange rate and poor flushing
capacity, which is susceptible to algal formation and accumulation of
algae.
This Project would
optimise the THEES maintenance operation and minimise the chlorophyll-a
impacts at the fisheries resources (Scenario 6b). In addition, the chlorophyll-a levels can
return to the condition similar to the baseline levels within about 1.5
months after termination of the effluent bypass under Scenario 6a, whilst
Scenario 6b is predicted to have a shorter recovery time of about 2 weeks
after the end of the maintenance discharge. It should be highlighted that the
maintenance discharge may not be a critical factor for triggering red tide in
Tolo Harbour.
The short-term emergency
discharge would not cause significant impact upon the predicted mean SS, DO,
TIN and chlorophyll-a levels at the fisheries resources as compared to the
normal plant operation.
With the implementation
of specific water quality monitoring programme and mitigation measures, no
unacceptable water quality impacts are expected.
|
Size of Affected Area
|
Indirect Impact
Inner Tolo Harbour and
Tolo Channel
|
Loss of Fisheries Resources /
Production
|
There will be no
disturbance to marine or riverbed sediments.
No loss of fisheries
resources / production is anticipated.
|
Destruction and Disturbance of Nursery
and Spawning Grounds
|
There will be no direct
loss of important nursery and spawning grounds for commercial fisheries
species.
With the implementation
of specific water quality monitoring programme and mitigation measures, no
unacceptable impacts on nursery and spawning grounds in Tolo Harbour and Tolo
Channel due to changes in water quality are expected.
|
Impact on
Fishing Activity
|
There
will be no disturbance to marine or riverbed sediments.
No
impact on fishing activity is anticipated.
|
Impact on Aquaculture Activity
|
Minor.
Normal operation of this
Project will not cause any unacceptable water quality impact upon the Tolo
Harbour. This Project will in fact
have a positive water quality effect in Tolo Harbour (e.g. SS, DO,
chlorophyll-a), minimising the pollution level and also the risk of algal
bloom in the Tolo Harbour.
Changes in water quality
(e.g. SS, DO, TIN, chlorophyll-a) are expected during the THEES maintenance
discharge from STSTW and TPSTW to Tolo Harbour. No significant changes in water quality
parameters are predicted. Although the
impact chlorophyll-a levels is high under the existing practice of THEES
maintenance (Scenario 6a), the baseline chlorophyll-a levels is already
considered high (Scenario 5) as Tolo Harbour is a shallow landlocked water
body with low water exchange rate and poor flushing capacity, which is
susceptible to algal formation and accumulation of algae.
This Project would
optimise the THEES maintenance operation and minimise the chlorophyll-a
impacts at the fisheries resources (Scenario 6b). In addition, the chlorophyll-a levels can
return to the condition similar to the baseline levels within about 1.5
months after termination of the effluent bypass under Scenario 6a, whilst
Scenario 6b is predicted to have a shorter recovery time of about 2 weeks
after the end of the maintenance discharge.
It should be highlighted that the maintenance discharge may not be a
critical factor for triggering red tide in Tolo Harbour.
The short-term emergency
discharge would not cause significant impact upon the predicted mean SS, DO,
TIN and chlorophyll-a levels at the fisheries resources as compared to the
normal plant operation.
With the implementation
of specific water quality monitoring programme and mitigation measures, no
unacceptable water quality impacts are expected.
|
Overall Fisheries Impact
|
Minor
|
9.5.2.22
In summary, there will be no loss of fishing ground. Based on the water quality modeling, no
unacceptable water quality impacts are expected during the construction and
operation phase. Any indirect water
quality impacts would be temporary and reversible. The overall fisheries impact is expected to
be minor during the construction and operation phase.
9.6.1.1
According to the guidelines in Annex 17 of EIAO-TM, the general
policy for alleviating fisheries impacts in order of priority are avoidance,
minimisation and compensation.
Avoidance
9.6.1.2
Potential impacts on fisheries resources and fishing operations
arising from the Project have been avoided and minimised by selecting Option 1B
(construction of the connection pipes to existing to emergency outfall of STSTW
by trenchless method underneath Shing Mun River) of emergency outfall with the
least water quality impact. In addition,
the temporary effluent bypass event would be arranged within the regular THEES
maintenance windows. Therefore,
additional water quality impact and fisheries impact from changes of water
quality have been avoided. Furthermore,
the THEES maintenance discharge would avoid the blooming season of algae (i.e.
January to May) to minimise the potential water quality impacts. It is recommended that any THEES maintenance
period should be shortened as far as possible
Minimisation
9.6.1.3
Mitigation measures recommended in the water quality impact
assessment for controlling water quality impact will also serve to protect
fisheries from indirect impacts and ensure no unacceptable impact on fisheries
resources and operations. For more detailed mitigation measures regarding water quality refer
to Sections
5.7.2 and 5.13.2
of the EIA Report.
9.6.1.4
Relevant government departments including EPD, WSD and AFCD as well
as key stakeholders for mariculture and fisheries in Tolo Harbour should be
informed prior to the THEES maintenance / emergency discharge events.
9.7.1.1
There will be no loss of fishing ground arising from the
Project. The residual impacts would be
the indirect water quality impacts on the nearby fisheries resources. No additional water quality impact, and
hence, no additional fisheries impact from changes of water quality will be
induced by the proposed THEES connection works during construction phase. The Project would not cause any unacceptable
water quality impact to Tolo Harbour during normal operation of the
Project. The water quality impact associated
with the THEES maintenance discharge and emergency discharge would be
short-term and reversible. No
unacceptable water quality impact is expected from these temporary discharges
provided that all the recommended mitigation measures are properly implemented. Therefore, no unacceptable residual impacts
on fisheries resources due to water quality deterioration expected.
9.8
Environmental Monitoring and Audit
(EM&A)
9.8.1.1
No unacceptable residual fisheries impact is expected from the
Project. No monitoring program specific for fisheries is
required. However, monitoring of water quality parameters would be
required to ensure the effectiveness of the mitigation measures.
9.8.1.2
The potential water quality impact from the land-based construction
works can be controlled by the recommended mitigation measures. Regular site inspections should be undertaken
during the construction phase to inspect the construction activities and works
areas in order to ensure the recommended mitigation measures are properly
implemented. Details of the EM&A
programme are presented in the standalone EM&A Manual.
9.8.1.3
During normal plant / THEES operation, monitoring of the treated
effluent quality from the CSTW should be carried out in accordance with the
WPCO license to ensure that the effluent quality would comply with the design
standards, which is under the ambit of RO of EPD.
9.8.1.4
Marine water quality monitoring is recommended in Tolo Harbour for
THEES maintenance during both construction and operational phases of this
Project. Marine water quality parameters such as SS, BOD, E.coli,
chlorophyll-a, TIN, UIA and NH3-N should be monitored. A
seven-month baseline monitoring programme covering the period from June to
December (outside the algae blooming season) is proposed at a frequency of
twice per month to establish the baseline water quality conditions at selected
monitoring points. In case of THEES maintenance during the construction and
operational phases of this Project, marine water quality in Tolo Harbour should
be monitored at a frequency of 3 times per week throughout the maintenance
period until the baseline water quality is restored or at least 1 month after
termination of the effluent bypass (whichever is longer).
9.8.1.5
The monitoring programme for THEES maintenance during the
construction and operational phase of this Project as discussed above shall
continue in the first 3 years after commissioning of this Project. After 3 years of post-Project commission
period, a review shall be conducted by DSD to determine whether such monitoring
shall be continued. The review results
shall be submitted to EPD, AFCD, WSD and other relevant parties. Any amendment on the monitoring programme
shall be agreed by EPD, AFCD and WSD.
Details of the monitoring programme and an event and action plan for the
THEES maintenance are provided in the standalone EM&A Manual.
9.8.1.6
Marine water quality monitoring is also recommended in Tolo Harbour
for emergency discharge during operational phase of this Project. Marine water
quality parameters such as SS, BOD, E.coli, chlorophyll-a, TIN,
UIA and NH3-N should be monitored. A one-year baseline monitoring
programme covering both dry and wet seasons is proposed at a frequency of twice
per month to establish the baseline water quality conditions at selected
monitoring points. In case of emergency discharge during the operational phase
of this Project, marine water quality in Tolo Harbour should be monitored daily
throughout the emergency discharge period until the baseline water quality is
restored or at least 2 weeks after termination of the discharge (whichever is
longer).
9.8.1.7
The monitoring programme for emergency discharge during the
operational phase of this Project as discussed above shall continue in the
first 3 years after commissioning of this Project. After 3 years of
post-Project commission period, a review shall be conducted by DSD to determine
whether such monitoring shall be continued. The review results shall be
submitted to EPD, AFCD, WSD and other relevant parties. Any amendment on the
monitoring programme shall be agreed by EPD, AFCD and WSD. Details of the
monitoring programme and an event and action plan for the emergency discharge
are provided in the standalone EM&A Manual.
9.9
Environmental Benefits
9.9.1.1
The Project operation will improve the water quality in Tolo Harbour
as compared to the “without Project” condition.
This Project will not cause any unacceptable water quality impact upon
the Tolo Harbour. This Project will in
fact have a positive water quality effect in Tolo Harbour, minimising the
pollution level and thus potentially reduce the risk of algal bloom in the Tolo
Harbour (due to the predicted decrease in the chlorophyll-a and nutrient level)
in the long term.
9.10
Conclusion
9.10.1.1
A study based on existing information on commercial
fisheries resources and fishing operations within the waters of the assessment
area has been undertaken, following the criteria and guidelines for evaluating
and assessing fisheries impact as stated in Annexes 9 and 17 of the
EIAO-TM. Sites of fisheries importance have been identified, where
present.
9.10.1.2
No important spawning or nursery grounds were identified in the
immediate vicinity of the existing STSTW, while the nearest important nursery
area for commercial fisheries resources is located in Three Fathoms Cove in
Tolo Channel (approximately 6.5 km from the existing STSTW). The nearest FCZs (Yim Tin Tsai FCZ and Yim
Tin Tsai (East) FCZ) are located approximately 4.5 km away from the existing
STSTW. The importance of capture fisheries resources in
the vicinity of the existing STSTW was identified as low in terms of
both production weight and value. Fish fry
production was low in the immediate vicinity of the existing STSTW in Tolo
Harbour.
9.10.1.3
The Project will only involve land-based construction works. There will be no disturbance to marine or
riverbed sediments. Under the Project
design, any Project effluent bypass to the Tolo Harbour will
be discharged separately through the existing emergency outfall of the TPSTW
and STSTW. Construction of the connection pipes to
existing emergency outfall of STSTW by trenchless method underneath Shing Mun
River is proposed. The construction
method would not cause disturbance to the marine sediment. With the adoption of trenchless method, no
loss of fishing ground is anticipated.
9.10.1.4
During the construction phase, THEES connection works required for
this Project will be synchronized with the THEES maintenance windows. As such, no additional water quality impact,
and hence, no additional fisheries impact from changes of water quality will be
induced by the proposed THEES connection works.
Indirect fisheries impacts due to deterioration of water quality are
expected during operation phase. Changes
in water quality (e.g. SS, DO, TIN, chlorophyll-a) at Yim Tin Tsai FCZ, Yim Tin
Tsai (East) FCZ, potential subzone of Yim Tin Tsai FCZ, Yung Shue Au FCZ, Lo Fu
Wat FCZ and the important nursery area for commercial fisheries resources at
Three Fathoms Cove are expected during operation phase (i.e. discharge of
effluent to Tolo Harbour during the maintenance of THEES tunnel; and emergency
discharge of primarily treated sewage from the CSTW). However, no significant changes in water
quality parameters are predicted. No
unacceptable water quality impacts are expected. With the implementation of mitigation
measures for water quality, no unacceptable fisheries impacts are
expected.
9.11
References
Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department (2009). Environmental Management of Mariculture.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, the Government of the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (2001). Final Report. Consultancy Study on Fisheries and Marine
Ecological Criteria for Impact Assessment. Prepared by Centre for Coastal
Pollution and Conservation, City U Professional Services Limited for Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (2002). Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department Annual Report 2001-2002.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (2003). Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department Annual Report 2002-2003.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (2004). Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department Annual Report 2003-2004.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (2005). Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department Annual Report 2004-2005.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (2006). Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department Annual Report 2005-2006.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (2007). Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department Annual Report 2006-2007.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (2008). Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department Annual Report 2008-2009.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department (2009). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual
Report 2008-2009.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department. (2010). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department Annual Report 2009-2010.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (2011). Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department Annual Report 2010-2011.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department (2012). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual
Report 2011-2012.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department (2013). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual
Report 2012-2013.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department (2014). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual
Report 2013-2014.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department (2015a). Fisheries: Aquaculture.http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/fisheries/fish_aqu/fish_aqu_mpo/fish_aqu_mpo.html
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department. (2015b) Fisheries: Capture
Fisheries.http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/fisheries/fish_cap/fish_cap_latest/fish_cap_latest.html
Civil Engineering and Development Department
(2013). Agreement No. CE 43/2008(HY) Cross Bay Link, Tseung Kwan O –
Investigation. Environmental Impact Assessment Report.
Drainage Services Department
(2014). Relocation of Sha Tin Sewage
Treatment Works to Caverns – Feasibility Study – Preliminary Environmental
Report. Prepared by AECOM Asia Co. Ltd.
for Drainage Services Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region.
Environmental Resources Management
(1998). Fisheries Resources and Fishing Operation in Hong Kong Waters. Prepared
by ERM for Agriculture and Fisheries Department, HK SAR Government.
<End of Section 9>