TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 ECOLOGY (TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC)
10.2 Environmental
Legislation, Standards and Guidelines
10.4 Description of
the Environment
10.6 Ecological
Value of Habitats and Species
10.7 Identification
of Potential Ecological Impacts
10.8 Evaluation of
Potential Ecological Impacts
10.9 Mitigation of
Adverse Environmental Impacts
10.10 Evaluation of
Residual Ecological Impacts
10.11 Environmental
Monitoring and Audit
List of tables
Table 10.1...... Baseline Information of Ecological Resources within
the Assessment Area
Table 10.2...... Schedule of Ecological Surveys
Table 10.4...... Habitats Identified within the Assessment Area
Table 10.5...... Habitats Identified within the Kam Sheung Road/Pat
Heung Area
Table 10.6...... Number of Nests Recorded at Kam Po Road Egretry
Table 10.8...... Habitats Identified within the Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Table 10.9...... Number and Species of Night Roost Ardeid Recorded at
Sha Po Ardeid Night Roost
Table 10.10.... Number and Species of Night Roost Ardeid Recorded at Ko Po Road Ardeid
Night Roost
Table 10.11.... Habitats Identified within the Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Table 10.12.... Habitats Identified within the San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Table 10.13.... Number of Nests Recorded at Mai Po Village Egretry
Table 10.14.... Number of Nests Recorded at Mai Po Lung Village Egretry
Table 10.15.... Habitats Identified within the Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Table 10.16.... Habitats Identified within the Tai Shu Ha Area
Table 10.18.... Ecological Evaluation of Pond and Watercourse within Kam Sheung Road/Pat
Heung Area
Table 10.19.... Ecological Evaluation of Dry Agricultural Land within Kam Sheung Road/Pat
Heung Area
Table 10.25.... Ecological Evaluation of Pond and Watercourse within Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Table 10.26 .. Ecological
Evaluation of Watercourse within Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Table 10.29.... Ecological Evaluation of Shrubland and Grassland within the Sha Po/Au Tau
Area
Table 10.31.... Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Table 10.32.... Ecological Evaluation of Marsh/Reed and Pond within Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai
Area
Table 10.33.... Ecological Evaluation of Watercourse within Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Table 10.34.... Ecological Evaluation of Dry Agricultural Land within Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai
Area
Table 10.38.... Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Ngau Tam Mei/Pok
Wai Area
Table 10.39.... Ecological Evaluation of Marsh/Reed and Pond within San Tin/Shek Wu Wai
Area
Table 10.40.... Ecological Evaluation of Watercourse within San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Table 10.43.... Ecological Evaluation of Shrubland and Grassland within the San Tin/Shek
Wu Wai Area
Table 10.45.... Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the San Tin/Shek Wu Wai
Area
Table 10.46.... Ecological Evaluation of Pond and Watercourse within Kwu Tung/Chau Tau
Area
Table 10.50.... Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Kwu Tung/Chau Tau
Area
Table 10.51.... Ecological Evaluation of Marsh/Reed and Pond within Tai Shu Ha Area
Table 10.55.... Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Tai Shu Ha Area
Table 10.56.... Summary of Ecological Value of Habitats within the Assessment Area
Table 10.57.... Direct Loss of Habitats within Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Table 10.59.... Direct Loss of Habitats within Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Table 10.61.... Direct Loss of Habitats within Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Table 10.63.... Direct Loss of Habitats within San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Table 10.65.... Direct Loss of Habitats within Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Table 10.67.... Direct Loss of Habitats within Tai Shu Ha Area
Table 10.68.... Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Requirements in Tai
Shu Ha Area
Table 10.96.... Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts to Marsh/Reed and Pond in Tai
Shu Ha Area
Table 10.101.. Summary of Mitigation Measures Proposed for Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Table 10.102.. Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Proposed for Sha
Po/Au Tau Area
Table 10.105.. Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Proposed for Tai Shu
Ha Area
Table 10.107.. Ecological Values of the Existing Habitats in the Proposed Compensatory
Wetland
Table 10.110 . Summary of Bat Shelter
LIST OF FIGURES
Assessment Areas of
Previous Relevant Studies in the Past Ten Years |
|
Proposed NOL Alignment and
500m Assessment Area (Key Plan) |
|
Ecological Assessment Area
and Walk Transects and Sampling Locations for Ecological Surveys (Sheet 1 to 12) |
|
Ecological Assessment Area
and Proposed Walk Transects and Sampling Locations for Ecological Surveys
(Temporary Explosive Magazine Site at Tai Shu Ha (Yuen Long)) |
|
Locations of Tung Shing
Lane Egretry and Sha Po Ardeid Night Roost and
Proposed Vantage Points |
|
Locations of Mai Po Village
and Mai Po Lung Village Egretries and Proposed
Vantage Points |
|
Location of the NOL
Alignment and 500 m Ecological Habitat Map (Key Plan) |
|
Habitat Map (Sheet 1 to 16) |
|
Representative Flight Paths
of Breeding Ardeids in Kam Po Road Egretry |
|
Representative Flight Paths
of Roosting Ardeids in Kam Po Road Ardeid Night Roost |
|
Representative Flight Paths
of Roosting Ardeids in Ko Po Road Ardeid Night Roost |
|
Representative Flight Paths
of Roosting Ardeids in Sha Po Ardeid Night Roost |
|
Representative Flight Paths
of Breeding Ardeids in Mai Po Village and Mai Po Lung Village Egretries |
|
Proposed Location for
Wetland Compensation |
|
Proposed Location for
Provision of Bat Shelter |
LIST OF appendiCES
Appendix 10.1 Representative Photographs of Habitat
Types within the Assessment Area
Appendix
10.2 Flora Species Recorded
within the Assessment Area
Appendix
10.3 Fauna Species Recorded
within the Assessment Area
Appendix 10.4 Representative Photographs of Species
of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Assessment Area
Appendix 10.5 Result of Flight Path Surveys
·
Environmental Impact
Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap. 499)
·
Technical Memorandum on
Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM) Annexes 8 and 16
·
EIAO Guidance Note No.
3/2010, 6/2010, 7/2010, and 10/2010
·
Forests and Countryside
Ordinance (Cap. 96)
·
Wild Animals Protection
Ordinance (Cap. 170)
·
Country Parks
Ordinance (Cap. 208)
·
Protection of
Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586)
·
Town Planning Ordinance
(Cap. 131)
·
Water Pollution Control
Ordinance (Cap. 358)
·
Chapter 10 of the Hong
Kong Planning Standard and Guidelines (HKPSG)
·
The International Union
for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species;
·
The List of Wild Plants
and Wild Animals Under Special State Protection under the Law of the People’s
Republic of China on the Protection of Wildlife; and
·
The Convention on
Biological Diversity (the CBD), and an associated city-level Biodiversity
Strategy and Action Plan (BSAP) developed by the Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department (AFCD) under the CBD.
Assessment Area of NOL Alignment
Table 10.1 Baseline
Information of Ecological Resources within the Assessment Area
Habitat and Vegetation |
Avifauna |
Terrestrial Mammal |
Butterfly and Odonate |
Herpetofauna |
Aquatic Community |
|
EIA Report for Yuen Long Barrage Scheme
(AEIAR-228/2021) (DSD, 2021) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
EIA Report for Upgrading of Remaining Sections of Kam
Tin Road and Lam Kam Road (AEIAR-222/2020) (HyD,
2020) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
EIA Report for Proposed
Low-rise and Low-density Residential Development at Various Lots and their
Adjoining Government Land in D.D. 104, East of Kam Pok Road, Mai Po, Yuen
Long. New Territories (AEIAR-205/2017) (Glory Queen Limited, 2016) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
EIA Report for Site Formation and Associated Infrastructural
Works for Development of Columbarium, Crematorium and Related Facilities at
Sandy Ridge Cemetery (AEIAR-198/2016) (CEDD, 2016) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
EIA Report for Operation of the Existing Tai Lam
Explosives Magazine at Tai Shu Ha, Yuen Long for Liantang
/ Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point Project (AEIAR-193/2015) (Dragages Hong Kong Ltd., 2015) |
✓(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
EIA Report for Comprehensive Development and Wetland Protection
near Yau Mei San Tsuen (AEIAR-189/2015) (Asia King Development Limited, 2015) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
EIA Report for Proposed Residential Cum Passive
Recreation Development within "Recreation" Zone and
"Residential (Group C)" Zone at Various Lots in DD 104, Yuen Long,
N.T. (AEIAR-182/2014) (Capital Chance Ltd, 2013) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
EIA Report for North East New Territories New
Development Areas (AEIAR-175/2013) (CEDD, 2013a) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
EIA Report for Development of Lok
Ma Chau Loop (AEIAR-176/2013) (CEDD, 2013b) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
EIA report for Sheung Shui to Lok Ma Chau Spur Line
(AEIAR-052/2002) (KCRC, 2002) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Environmental Review Report for Variation of
Environmental Permit (VEP) of Sheung Shui to Lok Ma Chau Spur Line
(VEP-461/2014) (MTRCL, 2021a) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
TPB Paper No. 9590 Land Use Review of Kam Tin South
and Pat Heung (TPB, 2014) |
✓(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Habitat Creation and Management Plan (Volume A and B)
for West Rail, Phase 1 (MTRCL, 2018) |
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓(2) |
✓ |
|
Egretry Habitat Creation and Management Plan for Development
of Kwu Tung North and Fanling
North New Development Areas, Phase 1 – Design and Construction (CEDD, 2020) |
|
✓ |
|
✓(2) |
|
|
Ecological Monitoring Information at MTR - West Rail
Wetland 2016-2021 (MTRCL, 2021b) |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
AFCD Newsletter: Hong Kong Biodiversity Issue No. 26
(AFCD, 2020) |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site Waterbird
Monitoring Programme, Egretry Counts in Hong Kong,
Summer Report 2014-2021 (Anon, 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2020; 2021a;
2021b; 2022) |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
Bird Survey of Selected Farmlands in the Proposed
Northern Metropolis, Hong Kong SAR: Interim Report (KFBG, 2022) |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
The Hidden Oases of Hong Kong: High Ecological Value Farmlands in the Proposed Northern Metropolis (Zheng
et al., 2023) |
|
✓ |
|
✓(2) |
|
|
Notes:
(1)
Habitats only.
(2)
Odonate only.
Identification of Information Gap
Ecological Survey Methodology
Habitat Mapping and Vegetation
Survey
Avifauna Survey
Bird Flight Path Survey
Terrestrial Mammal Survey
Table 10.2 Schedule
of Ecological Surveys
Proposed
Survey |
Dry Season |
Wet
Season |
Dry
Season |
|||||||||
2021 |
2022 |
|||||||||||
Feb |
Mar |
Apr* |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct* |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
|
Habitat survey |
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
Vegetation survey |
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
Avifauna survey (D&N) |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Flight Path Survey for Egretry |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
Flight Path Survey for Night Roost |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Terrestrial mammal survey (D&N) |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
Odonate survey |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
Butterfly survey |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
Amphibian survey (D&N) |
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
Reptile survey (D&N) |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
|
|
|
Aquatic communities survey |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
|
✓ |
|
|
Notes:
* Transitional month
D&N – Daytime and night-time survey
Table 10.3 Number of Nests Recorded at Mai Po
Village Egretry, Mai Po Lung Village Egretry, Kam Po Road Egretry and
Ho Sheung Heung Egretry in 2022 (1)
Species
|
Mai Po
Village Egretry
|
Mai Po Lung Village Egretry
|
Kam Po Road
Egretry
|
Ho Sheung
Heung Egretry
|
Chinese Pond Heron
(Ardeola bacchus)
|
8
|
65
|
20
|
4
|
Little Egret
(Egretta garzetta)
|
73
|
45
|
24
|
0
|
Total No. of Nests
|
81
|
110
|
44
|
4
|
Note:
(1)
Anon, 2022.
Overview
Table
10.4 Habitats Identified within
the Assessment Area
Habitat Type |
Approximate Size (ha) |
Percentage of Area |
Marsh/Reed |
20.25 |
1.22% |
WRCW |
10.83 |
0.65% |
Pond |
39.88 |
2.40% |
Watercourse |
49.42 (approx. 35.9
km) |
2.98% |
Seasonally Wet Grassland |
1.73 |
0.10% |
Wet Agricultural Land |
0.71 |
0.04% |
Dry Agricultural Land |
20.14 |
1.21% |
Woodland |
45.66 |
2.75% |
Mixed Woodland |
87.38 |
5.27% |
Plantation |
153.64 |
9.26% |
Shrubland |
68.21 |
4.11% |
Grassland |
176.07 |
10.61% |
Village/Orchard |
64.64 |
3.90% |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
920.78 |
55.49% |
Total |
1659.32 |
100.00% |
Remark:
The size and percentage included in this table is subject to rounding
adjustments. Any discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers
listed therein are due to rounding.
· Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung (KSRPH) area (Section 10.5.2;
Figure Nos. C1603/C/NOL/ACM/M57/320 to 321 refer);
· Sha Po/Au Tau (SPAUT) area (Section 10.5.3;
Figure Nos. C1603/C/NOL/ACM/M57/321 to 325 refer);
· Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai (NTMPW) area (Section 10.5.4;
Figure Nos. C1603/C/NOL/ACM/M57/323 to 328 refer);
· San Tin/Shek Wu Wai (SATSWW) area (Section 10.5.5;
Figure Nos. C1603/C/NOL/ACM/M57/326 to 332 refer);
· Kwu Tung/Chau Tau
(KTUCT) area (Section 10.5.6;
Figure Nos. C1603/C/NOL/ACM/M57/331 to 333 refer); and
· Tai Shu Ha area (Section 10.5.7;
Figure No. C1603/C/NOL/ACM/M57/334
refers).
Table 10.5 Habitats Identified within the Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Habitat Type |
Approximate Size (ha) |
Percentage of Area |
WRCW |
3.55 |
1.6% |
Pond |
0.07 |
<0.1% |
Watercourse |
5.73 (approx. 3.6 km) |
2.6% |
Dry Agricultural Land |
3.40 |
1.5% |
Mixed Woodland |
3.56 |
1.6% |
Plantation |
14.48 |
6.6% |
Shrubland |
7.64 |
3.5% |
Grassland |
29.76 |
13.5% |
Village/Orchard |
11.36 |
5.2% |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
140.78 |
63.9% |
Total |
220.33 |
100.0% |
Remark: The
size and percentage included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments.
Any discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein
are due to rounding.
Table 10.6 Number of Nests Recorded at Kam
Po Road Egretry
Species |
Apr 2021 |
May 2021 |
Jun 2021 |
Jul 2021 |
Aug 2021 |
Chinese Pond Heron |
26 |
28 |
17 |
8 |
- |
Little Egret |
22 |
19 |
21 |
5 |
2 |
Unidentified nests1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
Total |
50 |
49 |
40 |
16 |
3 |
Note:
(1)
Unidentified nests as to which ardeid species they
belonged to.
Table 10.7 Number and Species of Night Roosting Ardeid Recorded at Kam Po Road
Ardeid Night Roost
Survey Month |
Species
Recorded |
Sunset Time
during Survey |
Time of Return |
|||
Chinese Pond
Heron |
Little Egret |
Great Egret |
Total |
|||
Aug 2021 |
16 |
109 |
4 |
129 |
18:42 |
18:02-19:07 |
Sep 2021 |
24 |
30 |
- |
54 |
18:15 |
17:42-18:32 |
Oct 2021 |
17 |
15 |
- |
32 |
17:49 |
17:31-18:05 |
Nov 2021 |
15 |
13 |
1 |
29 |
17:40 |
17:25-18:01 |
Dec 2021 |
26 |
13 |
- |
39 |
17:44 |
16:55-17:51 |
Jan 2022 |
15 |
2 |
- |
17 |
18:00 |
17:11-17:51 |
Feb 2022 |
4 |
2 |
- |
6 |
18:20 |
17:45-18:06 |
Mar 2022 |
2 |
20 |
- |
22 |
18:37 |
18:05-18:46 |
Table 10.8 Habitats Identified within the Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Habitat Type |
Approximate Size (ha) |
Percentage of Area |
Marsh/Reed |
14.15 |
4.2% |
WRCW |
7.28 |
2.1% |
Pond |
21.32 |
6.3% |
Watercourse |
29.94 (approx. 9.7 km) |
8.8% |
Seasonally Wet Grassland |
1.71 |
0.5% |
Dry Agricultural Land |
1.97 |
0.6% |
Woodland |
7.07 |
2.1% |
Mixed Woodland |
3.32 |
1.0% |
Plantation |
14.53 |
4.3% |
Shrubland |
0.34 |
0.1% |
Grassland |
19.36 |
5.7% |
Village/Orchard |
3.75 |
1.1% |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
213.98 |
63.2% |
Total |
338.72 |
100.0% |
Remark: The
size and percentage included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments.
Any discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein
are due to rounding.
Table 10.9 Number and Species of Night Roost Ardeid Recorded at Sha Po Ardeid Night
Roost
Survey Month |
Species Recorded |
Sunset Time during Survey |
Time of Return |
||||
Great Egret |
Grey Heron |
Chinese Pond Heron |
Little Egret |
Total |
|||
Apr 2021 |
14 |
- |
- |
7 |
21 |
18:46 |
18:42-19:14 |
May 2021 |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
10 |
18:58 |
18:58-19:20 |
Jun 2021 |
2 |
- |
- |
13 |
15 |
19:09 |
18:28-19:21 |
Jul 2021 |
45 |
- |
- |
8 |
53 |
19:10 |
18:34-19:30 |
Aug 2021 |
22 |
- |
- |
3 |
25 |
18:57 |
18:41-19:16 |
Sep 2021 |
35 |
- |
- |
9 |
44 |
18:35 |
18:08-19:02 |
Oct 2021 |
27 |
1 |
2 |
- |
30 |
18:02 |
17:12-18:35 |
Nov 2021 |
37 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
51 |
17:39 |
17:24-18:01 |
Dec 2021 |
15 |
- |
- |
6 |
21 |
17:45 |
17:10-17:57 |
Jan 2022 |
24 |
1 |
- |
7 |
32 |
18:00 |
17:10-18:11 |
Table 10.10 Number
and Species of Night Roost Ardeid Recorded at Ko Po Road Ardeid Night Roost
Survey Month |
Species Recorded |
Sunset Time during Survey |
Time of Return |
|||
Eastern Cattle Egret |
Chinese Pond Heron |
Little Egret |
Total |
|||
Apr 2021 |
36 |
4 |
2 |
42 |
18:46 |
18:30-19:30 |
May 2021 |
- |
11 |
- |
11 |
18:57 |
18:45-19:15 |
Jun 2021 |
- |
- |
12 |
12 |
19:10 |
19:12-19:25 |
Jul 2021 |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
19:11 |
19:40 |
Aug 2021 |
- |
100 |
4 |
104 |
18:55 |
18:25-19:15 |
Sep 2021 |
- |
18 |
15 |
33 |
18:14 |
18:21-18:36 |
Oct 2021 |
- |
106 |
75 |
181 |
17:55 |
17:51-18:18 |
Nov 2021 |
45 |
38 |
29 |
112 |
17:40 |
17:45-18:08 |
Dec 2021 |
14 |
30 |
90 |
134 |
17:39 |
17:23-18:03 |
Jan 2022 |
6 |
27 |
53 |
87 |
18:06 |
17:40-18:36 |
Table 10.11 Habitats Identified within the Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Habitat Type |
Approximate Size (ha) |
Percentage of Area |
Marsh/Reed |
2.80 |
0.9% |
Pond |
8.08 |
2.7% |
Watercourse |
3.48 (approx. 5.5 km) |
1.2% |
Dry Agricultural Land |
4.25 |
1.4% |
Woodland |
32.29 |
10.9% |
Mixed Woodland |
17.36 |
5.8% |
Plantation |
12.45 |
4.2% |
Shrubland |
11.94 |
4.0% |
Grassland |
31.92 |
10.7% |
Village/Orchard |
13.62 |
4.6% |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
158.96 |
53.5% |
Total |
297.15 |
100.0% |
Remark: The
size and percentage included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments.
Any discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein
are due to rounding.
Table 10.12 Habitats
Identified within the San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Habitat Type |
Approximate Size (ha) |
Percentage of Area |
Marsh/Reed |
3.19 |
0.8% |
Pond |
9.13 |
2.3% |
Watercourse |
5.47 (approx. 6.8 km) |
1.4% |
Wet Agricultural Land |
0.71 |
0.2% |
Dry Agricultural Land |
7.87 |
2.0% |
Woodland |
2.47 |
0.6% |
Mixed Woodland |
47.63 |
12.0% |
Plantation |
33.36 |
8.4% |
Shrubland |
27.74 |
7.0% |
Grassland |
25.14 |
6.3% |
Village/Orchard |
16.82 |
4.2% |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
218.87 |
54.9% |
Total |
398.39 |
100% |
Remark: The
size and percentage included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments.
Any discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein
are due to rounding.
Table 10.13 Number
of Nests Recorded at Mai Po Village Egretry
Species |
Apr 2021 |
May 2021 |
Jun 2021(1) |
Jul 2021(1) |
Aug 2021(1) |
Chinese Pond Heron |
2 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Little Egret |
34 |
36 |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
36 |
37 |
- |
- |
- |
Note:
(1)
No nests were
observed in the survey.
Table
10.14 Number of Nests Recorded
at Mai Po Lung Village Egretry
Species |
Apr 2021 |
May 2021 |
Jun 2021 |
Jul 2021 |
Aug 2021 |
Chinese Pond Heron |
7 |
13 |
18 |
10 |
7 |
Little Egret |
8 |
9 |
5 |
11 |
1 |
Unidentified nests(1) |
73 |
91 |
76 |
77 |
75 |
Total |
88 |
113 |
99 |
98 |
83 |
Note:
(1)
Unidentified nests as to which ardeid species they
belonged.
Table 10.15 Habitats Identified within the Kwu
Tung/Chau Tau Area
Habitat Type |
Approximate Size (ha) |
Percentage of Area |
Pond |
1.09 |
0.4% |
Watercourse |
3.65 (approx. 8.1 km) |
1.2% |
Dry Agricultural Land |
2.03 |
0.7% |
Woodland |
3.82 |
1.2% |
Mixed Woodland |
13.00 |
4.2% |
Plantation |
7.32 |
2.4% |
Shrubland |
20.56 |
6.7% |
Grassland |
59.59 |
19.3% |
Village/Orchard |
18.14 |
5.9% |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
178.91 |
58.1% |
Total |
308.12 |
100.0% |
Remark: The
size and percentage included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments.
Any discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein
are due to rounding.
Table 10.16 Habitats Identified within the Tai Shu Ha Area
Habitat Type |
Approximate Size (ha) |
Percentage of Area |
Marsh/Reed |
0.11 |
0.1% |
Pond |
0.19 |
0.2% |
Watercourse |
1.15 (approx. 2.4 km) |
1.2% |
Seasonally Wet Grassland |
0.02 |
<0.1% |
Dry Agricultural Land |
0.61 |
0.6% |
Mixed Woodland |
2.51 |
2.6% |
Plantation |
71.49 |
74.0% |
Grassland |
10.30 |
10.7% |
Village/Orchard |
0.94 |
1.0% |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
9.28 |
9.6% |
Total |
96.59 |
100.0% |
Remark: The
size and percentage included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments.
Any discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein
are due to rounding.
Table 10.17 Ecological
Evaluation of West Rail Compensatory Wetland within Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung
Area
Criteria |
West Rail Compensatory Wetland |
Naturalness |
Low to moderate. A man-made habitat created to compensate
the loss of wetlands in the Kam Tin Valley due to the construction of WR Line
and under active management. |
Size |
Small (3.55 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate to high floral and moderate faunal diversity |
Rarity |
An uncommon habitat in Hong Kong. A total of 39 species of conservation
importance including 21 avifauna, 11 butterfly
and seven odonate species recorded in previous
studies. A total of 11 species of conservation
importance recorded in present survey, including one flora species (Saururus
chinensis), six avifauna species (Black Kite, Chinese Pond Heron, Greater
Coucal, Grey Heron, Little Egret and White-cheeked Starling), one butterfly species
(Small Cabbage White) and three mammal species (Chinese
Noctule, Japanese Pipistrelle, and Pallas’s Squirrel). |
Re-creatability |
High |
Fragmentation |
Moderate to high.
The WRCWs are divided into 11 parcels, three of which are within the Kam
Sheung Road/Pat Heung area. |
Ecological linkage |
Kam Po Road Egretry and ANR occurs within Parcel J. |
Potential value |
Moderate. WRCWs are
currently maintained and managed actively but are mostly surrounded by
developed area |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
Kam Po Road Egretry, which supported Chinese Pond Heron and Little
Egret, is recorded within Parcel J |
Age |
Relatively mature,
about 20 years |
Abundance / Richness of Wildlife |
Moderate (for Parcel J) Low to moderate (for Parcels C and I) |
Ecological value |
Moderate – for WRCW Parcel J Low to moderate – for WRCW Parcels C and I |
Table 10.18 Ecological Evaluation of
Pond and Watercourse within Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
Pond |
Watercourse
(S-KP-1, Ho Pui Channel, Upper Ho Pui Channel) |
Naturalness |
Low. A man-made habitat for the purpose of aquaculture and landscaping |
Low |
Size |
Very small (0.07 ha) |
Small (approx.
5.73 ha, 3.6 km in total) |
Diversity |
Low floral and faunal diversity |
Low to moderate floral and faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Uncommon. Mainly restricted to northwestern New
Territories No species of conservation importance was recorded in both previous studies and present survey. |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. One butterfly species of conservation importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of nine fauna species of conservation importance recorded in
present survey, including six avifauna species (Black-winged Stilt, Chinese
Pond Heron, Eurasian Teal, Grey Heron, Little Egret and Mandarin Duck), and three
mammal species (Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1 and unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2). |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
High |
Moderate to High |
Ecological linkage |
No notable ecological
linkage |
|
Potential value |
Low |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery
and breeding behaviour observed |
|
Age |
N/A |
|
Abundance / Richness of Wildlife |
Low |
|
Ecological value |
Low |
Low to Moderate |
Table 10.19 Ecological Evaluation of
Dry Agricultural Land within Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
Dry Agricultural
Land |
Naturalness |
Low. A man-made habitat
for the purpose of crop production. |
Size |
Small (approx.
3.40 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate to high
floral and low to moderate faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in
Hong Kong. No species of conservation importance was recorded in previous
studies. A butterfly species (Small
Cabbage White) of conservation importance was recorded
in present survey. |
Re-creatability |
High |
Fragmentation |
Low, usually connected
with adjacent dry agricultural land and village/orchard |
Ecological linkage |
Structurally
linked to adjacent habitats including seasonally wet grassland and wet
agricultural land to form a matrix of habitats (e.g. east to Pat Heung Depot) |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery
/ breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of Wildlife |
Low |
Ecological value |
Low to moderate |
Table 10.20 Ecological Evaluation of
Mixed Woodland, and Plantation within the Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
Mixed Woodland |
Plantation |
Naturalness |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Size |
Small (approx. 3.56 ha) |
Small (approx. 14.48 ha) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and low faunal diversity |
Low to moderate floral and low faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common
habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of three species of conservation importance was recorded in
present survey, including two avifauna species (Eastern Buzzard and Grey
Heron) and one butterfly species (Tiny Grass Blue). |
A
common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A mammal
species (Japanese Pipistrelle) of conservation importance was recorded in
present survey. |
Re-creatability |
Moderate. Re-creatable
if time is given for natural succession. |
High |
Fragmentation |
Moderate to high. Small patches of mixed woodland
scattered across the KSRPH area. |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
Small areas of mixed woodland habitat occur within
“CA” on
the eastern side of Tsing Long Highway near Pat Heung Depot |
A
few patches and/or strips of plantation fall within “CA” on both sides of
Tsing Long Highway and a large patch of hillside plantation within TLCP west
of Tsing Long Highway |
Potential value |
Moderate |
Low
to moderate for hillside plantation within “CA” west of Tsing
Long Highway as
long-term regeneration of native species is possible if time is given Low
for remaining plantations |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of Wildlife |
Moderate |
Low
to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to moderate
|
Low to Moderate – for plantation west of
Tsing Long Highway Low – remaining plantations |
Table 10.21 Ecological Evaluation of
Shrubland and Grassland within the Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
Shrubland |
Grassland |
Naturalness |
Moderate to high |
Moderate to high |
Size |
Small (approx. 7.64 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 29.76 ha) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and low faunal diversity |
Low to moderate floral and low faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation importance was recorded in previous
studies. A total of four species of
conservation importance recorded in present study, including one avifauna
species (Greater Coucal), two butterfly species (Danaid Eggfly,
Tiny Grass Blue) and one mammal species (unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation importance was recorded in previous
studies. A total of two species of
conservation importance recorded, including one avifauna species (Little
Egret) and one butterfly species (Small Cabbage White). |
Re-creatability |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Fragmentation |
High |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
Small areas occur within TLCP and “CA” on both sides
of Tsing Long Highway |
Hillside grassland partially falls within TLCP and
“CA” on both sides of Tsing Long Highway A few patches of low-lying grassland occur partially
near PHD. |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to Moderate |
Low to moderate – for hillside grassland Low – for low-lying grassland |
Table
10.22 Ecological
Evaluation of Village/Orchard and Developed Area/ Wasteland within the Kam
Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed
Area/Wasteland |
Naturalness |
Low |
Low |
Size |
Small (approx. 11.36 ha) |
Very large (approx. 140.78 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate floral (consisting of native ruderal and
exotic species) and low to moderate faunal diversity. |
Moderate to high floral (consisting of native
ruderal and exotic species) and moderate faunal diversity |
Rarity |
A
very common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation importance was recorded in previous
studies. A total of five species of conservation importance
recorded in present survey, including one avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron) and four
mammal species (Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2 and Pallas’s Squirrel). |
Very common
habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation importance was recorded in previous
studies. A total of 17 species of conservation importance recorded in
present survey, including one flora (Ailanthus fordii),
seven avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron, Collared
Crow, Eastern Buzzard, Greater Coucal, Grey Heron, Little Egret and White-cheeked Starling), two butterfly species (Small Cabbage White and Danaid Eggfly), seven mammal species (Chinese Noctule, Japanese
Pipistrelle, Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat, unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2, Lesser
Bamboo Bat and Pallas’s Squirrel).
|
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
High |
Low |
Ecological linkage |
No notable ecological linkage |
Small parts occur in “CA” on both sides on Tsing
Long Highway |
Potential value |
Low |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding
ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance /
Richness of Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Moderate |
Ecological value |
Low |
Low |
Table 10.23 Species of Conservation
Importance Recorded within the Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Species |
Recorded Habitat in Previous Studies (1) |
Recorded Habitat in Present Survey (1)(11) |
Protection Status |
Distribution in Hong Kong (2) |
Rarity (2) |
Flora |
|||||
Ailanthus (Ailanthus fordii) |
- |
DA |
Cap. 96 (3); Cat 4 (Near
Threatened) (4) |
Cape D'Aguilar,
Mount Gough, Sha Tin, Ma On Shan, Lamma Island. Also cultivated at gardens
and roadsides |
- |
Lizard’s Tail (Saururus chinensis) |
- |
WRCW |
- |
Tai Tam, Sha Tin,
Tai Po, Sha Lo Tung, Tai Mei Tuk |
Rare |
Avifauna |
|||||
Asian Barred Owlet (Glaucidium cuculoides) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in woodland of the north and
central New Territories. |
Locally common resident. |
Black Kite (Milvus migrans) (5) |
- |
WRCW, IF |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
(RC) (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident and winter visitor. |
Black-winged Stilt (Himantopus himantopus) (5) |
WRCW |
WC |
Cap.170
(3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Long Valley, Kam Tin. |
Common migrant and winter visitor. |
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola
bacchus) (5) |
WRCW |
WRCW, WC, V/O, DA,
IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Chinese Penduline Tit (Remiz consobrinus) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170
(3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area,
Tai O, Mui Wo, Long Valley, Luk Keng, Chek Lap Kok. |
Common autumn
migrant and winter visitor. |
Collared Crow (Corvus torquatus)
(5) |
- |
DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3); Near Threatened (8);
Vulnerable (9) |
Found in Inner Deep
Bay area, Nam Chung, Kei Ling Ha, Tai Mei Tuk, Pok
Fu Lam, Chek Lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Lam Tsuen. |
Locally common resident. |
Common Greenshank (Tringa nebularia) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Abundant winter visitor and migrant. |
Common Emerald Dove (Chalcophaps indica) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); Near Threatened (7) |
Widely distributed in woodland throughout Hong Kong |
Uncommon but widespread resident. |
Crested Serpent Eagle (Spilornis cheela) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
(LC) (3);
Class II (6); Vulnerable (7); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed in shrublands on hillsides
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Eastern Buzzard (Buteo japonicus) (5) |
WRCW |
MWL, DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3); Class
II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Eurasian Teal (Anas crecca) (5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Shuen Wan, Tai Lam Chung Reservoir, Victoria
Harbour, urban parks. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Greater Coucal (Centropus
sinensis) |
WRCW |
WRCW, SL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6);
Vulnerable (7) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal areas throughout Hong
Kong. |
Common winter visitor. |
Great Egret (Ardea alba) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident, migrant and winter visitor. |
Grey-headed Lapwing (Vanellus cinereus) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Kam Tin, Tsim
Bei Tsui, Lo Wu, Tai Long Wan, Shuen Wan, Castle
Peak coast, Chek Lap Kok. |
Locally common winter visitor and migrant. |
Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea) (5) |
WRCW |
WRCW, WC, MWL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Starling Inlet, Kowloon Park,
Cape D'Aguilar. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Intermediate Egret (Egretta
intermedia) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Tai Long Wan,
Starling Inlet, Tai O, Cape D'Aguilar. |
Resident and passage migrant. |
Lanceolated Warbler (Locustella
lanceolata) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); Near Threatened
(8) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Uncommon autumn passage migrant. |
Little Egret |
WRCW |
WRCW, WC, GL, DA,
IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal area
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Little Grebe (Tachybaptus
ruficollis) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Common resident. |
Mandarin Duck (Aix galericulata)
(5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6); Vulnerable (7); Near
Threatened (8) |
Found in Mai Po,
Tai Tam, Shing Mun. |
Scarce winter
visitor. |
Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3); (LC) (3); Class II (6); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed
in Hong Kong. |
Locally common
resident and winter visitor. |
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
White-cheeked Starling (Spodiopsar
cineraceus) (5) |
- |
WRCW, DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Kam Tin, Long Valley. |
Locally common
winter visitor. |
Wood Sandpiper (Tringa glareola) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in wetland area throughout Hong Kong. |
Common migrant and
winter visitor. |
Zitting Cisticola (Cisticola juncidis) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in grassland throughout Hong Kong. |
Common passage
migrant and winter visitor. |
Butterfly |
|||||
Small Cabbage White (Pieris rapae
crucivora) |
WRCW |
WRCW, DAL, GL, DA |
- |
Shek Mun Kap, Fan Lau, Ngong Ping, Kam Tin, Ho Chung, Luk Keng, Tuen Mun
Ash Lagoon |
Rare |
Metallic Cerulean (Jamides
alecto) |
WRCW |
- |
- |
Victoria Peak, Fung Yuen, Chuen Lung, Mui Wo |
Very rare |
Forget-me-not (Catochrysops strabo) |
WRCW |
- |
Species of
conservation concern(2) |
Pui O, Tai Po Kau, Fung Yuen, Shing Mun, Sha Lo Wan |
Very rare |
Swallowtail (Papilio xuthus) |
WRCW |
- |
- |
Kap Lung, Ma On Shan, Tai Tam, Sha Lo Wan, Kat O, Lung Kwu Tan, Wu Kau
Tang, Lung Kwu Chau |
Rare |
Tiny Grass Blue (Zizula
hylax) |
WRCW |
MWL, SL |
Species of
conservation concern(2) |
Lung Kwu Tan, Fung Yuen, Sha Lo Wan |
Very rare |
Danaid Eggfly (Hypolimnas misippus) |
- |
SL, DA |
LC (3) |
Ngau Ngak Shan, Lung Kwu Tan, Hong Kong Wetland Park, Mount Parker, Cloudy
Hill, Lin Ma Hang |
Uncommon |
Peacock Royal (Tajuria cippus) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Ma On Shan, Wu Kau Tang, Tai Po Kau, Mount Nicholson,
Victoria Peak, Cloudy Hill |
Rare |
Glassy Bluebottle (Graphium cloanthus) |
WC |
- |
LC (3) |
Tai Po Kau, Shing Mun, Cloudy Hill, Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, Lam Tsuen, Lai Chi
Hang, Tai Lam Wu. |
Uncommon |
Grey Scrub Hopper (Aeromachus jhora) |
WRCW |
- |
- |
Yung Shue O, Kuk Po, Tai Lam, Sha Lo Tung |
Rare |
Yellow Dart (Potanthus pava) |
WRCW |
- |
Species of
conservation concern(2) |
Plover Cove |
Very rare |
Green Skirt Baron (Cynitia whiteheadi) |
WRCW |
- |
- |
North New Territories |
Rare |
Great Swift (Pelopidas assamensis) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Shan Liu, Fung Yuen, Tai Lam Wu, Sam A Chung |
Rare |
Malayan (Megisba malaya) |
WRCW |
- |
Species of
conservation concern(2) |
North Lantau Island |
Very rare |
Odonate |
|||||
Ruby Darter (Rhodothemis rufa) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Widely distributed in ponds and marshes with dense
floating plants; Scattered |
- |
Scarlet Basker (Urothemis signata signata) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Common in areas with abandoned fish ponds throughout
Hong Kong; Scattered |
- |
Blue Chaser (Potamarcha
congener) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Found in small weedy ponds, puddles and marshes.
Widely distributed in the New Territories; Scattered |
- |
Coastal Glider (Macrodiplax cora) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Frequents marshes and ponds with dense vegetation,
especially adjacent to coastal areas; Sparse |
- |
Emerald Cascader (Zygonyx iris
insignis) |
WRCW |
- |
PGC (3) |
Widely distributed in moderately clean, rapidly
flowing forested streams throughout Hong Kong; Widespread |
- |
Blue Sprite (Pseudagrion microcephalum) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Found in lowland streams and ponds; often perches on
aquatic plants just above the water surface. Population scattered all over
Hong Kong and established in Hong Kong Wetland Park; Scattered |
- |
Dingy Dusk-hawker (Gynacantha subinterrupta) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Found in well-shaded woodlands. Recorded in Hong Kong
Wetland Park, Lantau Island, Ping Shan Chai, Sha Lo Tung and Tai Mo Shan;
Sparse |
- |
Mammal |
|||||
Chinese Noctule (Nyctalus plancyi) |
- |
WRCW, DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Japanese Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus abramus) |
- |
WRCW, WC, PL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat (Hipposideros
armiger) |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3) |
Widely distributed in countryside areas throughout
Hong Kong. |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1 |
- |
WC, SL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2 |
- |
WC, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Lesser Bamboo Bat (Tylonycteris fulvida) |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3); Rare(10) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Pallas’s Squirrel (Callosciurus
erythraeus) |
- |
WRCW, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Fairly widely
distributed, with the styani subspecies found in
the New Territories (e.g. Tai Lam, Shing Mun and Tai Po Kau), and the thai subspecies found on the Hong Kong Island (e.g. Tai
Tam and Pok Fu Lam) |
- |
(1)
Habitats: MA=Marsh/Reed; WRCW=West Rail Compensatory Wetland;
WC=Watercourse; DAL=Dry Agricultural Land; MWL=Mixed Woodland; SL=Shrubland;
GL=Grassland; V/O=Village/Orchard; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland; IF=In Flight.
(2)
Distribution in Hong Kong and Rarity follows:
Flora: Wu and Lee (2000);
Xing and Chau (2000); Siu (2000).
Fauna: AFCD (2011); AFCD
(2022); Karsen et al. (1998); Shek
(2006a); Reels (2019).
(3)
Cap. 96: Protected under the Forests and Countryside
Ordinance (Cap. 96).
Cap. 170: Protected under Wild
Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170).
Cap. 586: Protection of
Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap.586).
Fellowes et al. (2002): LC=Local Concern;
RC=Regional Concern; PRC=Potential Regional Concern. Letters in parentheses
indicate that the assessment is on the basis of restrictedness in nesting
and/or roosting sites rather than in general occurrence.
(4)
Protection Status of Flora follows:
Hu et al.
(2003); List of Wild Plants Under State Protection (Ministry of Forestry in
1999); Fu (1992); Qin et al. (2017); Feng et al. (2002). Wu and
Hu. (1988).
(5)
Wetland-dependent species (including wetland-dependent
species and waterbirds).
(6)
The List of Endangered and Protected Species of China.
(7)
Zheng and Wang (1998).
(8)
Jiang et al.
(2016).
(9)
IUCN (2022).
(10) Wang (1998).
(11)
Habitat in bold type face = species recorded within
work site/area, or recorded within both works site/area and Assessment Area;
Habitat in unbold type face = species recorded
outside works site/area but within Assessment Area.
Table 10.24 Ecological Evaluation of
Marsh/Reed and West Rail Compensatory Wetland within Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
West Rail Compensatory
Wetland |
Naturalness |
Moderate. Succeeded from
man-made habitats e.g. ponds and agricultural lands through natural processes
though regular maintenance is conducted in some of the marshes e.g. Sha Po
Marsh and YLBFEW |
Low to
moderate. A man-made habitat created to compensate the loss of wetlands in
the Kam Tin Valley due to the construction of WR Line and under active
management. |
Size |
Small (approx. 14.15 ha) |
Small (approx. 7.28 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate to high floral and faunal diversity |
High floral and moderate to
high faunal diversity |
Rarity |
An uncommon habitat in Hong
Kong, particularly the brackish marsh/reed along S-SA-6 and S-SA-6a A total of three species of
conservation importance, including two butterfly and a reptile species, were
recorded in previous studies. A total of 21 species of
conservation importance recorded in present survey, including two flora
species (Persicaria orientalis and Schoenoplectus subulatus), seven avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron, Great Egret, Greater Coucal,
Grey Heron, Little Egret, Purple Heron and Von Schrenck’s Bittern), three butterfly
species (Swallowtail, Tiny Grass Blue and Danaid Eggfly), two odonate
species (Four-spot Midget and Mangrove Skimmer), and
seven mammal species (Chinese Horseshoe Bat, Intermediate Horseshoe Bat,
Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2, Lesser
Bamboo Bat and Small Asian
Mongoose). |
An uncommon habitat in Hong
Kong. A total of 54 species of
conservation importance, including 31 avifauna, six butterfly, six odonate, two amphibian and nine reptile species, were
recorded in previous studies. A total of 19 species of
conservation importance recorded in present survey, including one flora
species (Saururus chinensis), 12 avifauna species (Black-winged Stilt,
Chinese Grosbeak, Chinese Pond Heron, Collared Crow, Eurasian Teal, Great
Egret, Greater Coucal, Grey Heron, Intermediate Egret, Little Egret, Little
Grebe and White-cheeked Starling),
two butterfly species (Small Cabbage White and Tiny Grass Blue) and four odonate species (Mangrove Skimmer, Blue Chaser, Ruby
Darter and Scarlet Basker). |
Re-creatability |
Low to moderate |
High |
Fragmentation |
Low to moderate for the
middle and southern compartments of Sha Po Marsh and YLBFEW High for the northern
compartment of Sha Po Marsh and other marsh/reed scattered across the
Assessment Area |
Moderate to high. The WRCWs are divided into 11
parcels, six of which are within the SPAUT area. |
Ecological linkage |
Sha Po Marsh is structurally and functionally
connected to the modified watercourse habitat of KTMDC Some of the other marsh/reed occur within YLBFEW,
WCA, WBA and “CA”, or adjacent to YLBFEW, WRCWs and ponds |
WRCW Parcels A, B, B1, D and M are structurally and
functionally linked to other wetland habitats such as fishponds and
watercourse habitat of KTMDC Part of WRCW Parcel A and B, and the whole of
Parcels D and E are within “CA” No notable ecological linkage for WRCW Parcel F |
Potential value |
Moderate to high for the
middle and southern compartments of Sha Po Marsh and YLBFEW, which are currently maintained and managed actively Moderate for the northern
compartment of Sha Po Marsh and other marsh/reed, whose values could be
increased if managed as wildlife habitat |
Moderate to high for Parcels A, B, B1, D and M. Moderate for Parcels E and F since they are mostly
surrounded by developed area Most of these WRCW parcels are currently maintained
and managed actively. |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
Sha Po Marsh is one of the
few known nursery/breeding grounds of Four-spot Midget No notable nursery and
breeding behaviour in the scattered marsh/reed |
Breeding behaviour of White-shouldered Starling was
observed in Parcels B, B1 and D. |
Age |
N/A |
Relatively mature, about 20 years |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Moderate for the middle and
southern compartments of Sha Po Marsh Low for the northern
compartment of Sha Po Marsh, YLBFEW and other marsh/reed |
Moderate for Parcels A, B, B1, D and M Low for Parcels E and F |
Ecological value |
Moderate to high – for the middle and southern compartments of Sha
Po Marsh Moderate –
for the brackish marsh/reed along
S-SA-6 and S-SA-6a Low to moderate – for the northern compartment of Sha Po Marsh, YLBFEW and other marsh/reed |
Moderate – for Parcels A, B, B1, D and M Low to Moderate – for Parcels E and F |
Table 10.25 Ecological
Evaluation of Pond and Watercourse within Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Pond |
Kam Tin Main Drainage
Channel |
Watercourse |
Naturalness |
Low. A man-made habitat for
the purpose of aquaculture, wetland compensation, flood retention and
landscaping |
Low |
Low to moderate (for watercourses S-SA-2 and S-SA-3 near/within Sha
Po Marsh, S-SA-7a, S-SA-11 and S-SA-12) Low (for other watercourses) |
Size |
Small (approx. 21.32 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 19.83 ha, 2.8 km) |
Small (approx. 6.86 ha, 5.6 km in total) S-SA-2 (approx. 0.3 km) S-SA-3 (approx. 0.3 km) S-SA-4 (approx. 0.4 km) S-SA-5 (approx. 0.6 km) S-SA-7 (approx. 0.9 km) S-SA-7a (approx. 0.2 km) S-SA-8 (approx. 0.7 km) S-SA-9 (approx. 0.4 km) S-SA-10 (approx. 0.6 km) S-SA-11 (approx. 0.2 km) S-SA-12 (approx. 0.2 km) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and
faunal diversity |
Low floral diversity,
moderate faunal diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
Uncommon. Mainly restricted to northwestern New Territories A floral species of conservation importance (Phymatodes longissima) was recorded in previous studies (previously
recorded in the habitat “agricultural/freshwater marsh”). A total of 21 species of
conservation importance recorded in present survey, 17 avifauna species
(Chinese Pond Heron, Citrine Wagtail, Collared Crow, Common Greenshank,
Eurasian Teal, Great Cormorant, Great Egret, Greater Coucal, Grey Heron,
Intermediate Egret, Kentish Plover, Little Egret, Little Grebe, Northern
Shoveler, Pacific Golden Plover, White-cheeked Starling and Wood Sandpiper), one odonate species
(Coastal Glider), and three mammal species (Japanese Pipistrelle, Pallas’s
Squirrel and Leopard Cat). |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. A total of 21 species of
conservation importance, including 20 avifauna and a
aquatic fauna species, were recorded in previous studies. A total of 18 fauna species
of conservation importance recorded in present survey, including 17 avifauna species (Black-winged Stilt, Chinese
Pond Heron, Common Greenshank, Common Redshank, Great Cormorant, Great Egret,
Eurasian Teal, Eurasian Whimbrel, Little Egret, Little Grebe, Grey Heron,
Grey-headed Lapwing, Marsh Sandpiper, Pied Avocet, Northern Shoveler,
Northern Pintail and Wood Sandpiper) and one
mammal species (Japanese Pipistrelle). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 15 fauna species of conservation
importance recorded in present survey, including nine avifauna species
(Black-winged Stilt, Chinese Pond Heron, Eurasian Teal, Greater Coucal,
Grey-headed Lapwing, Grey Heron, Little Egret, Northern Shoveler and Wood Sandpiper), one odonate species (Blue Chaser) and five mammal species
(Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat, Chinese Noctule, Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1 and unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2). |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Moderate (for watercourses (S-SA-2 and S-SA-3
near/within Sha Po Marsh and S-SA-7a) High (for other watercourses) |
Fragmentation |
Low to moderate for the active and inactive
fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen near Au Tau, within YLBFEW, west of
Nam San Wai Road and west of Mo Fan Heung in Pok Wai High for other scattered and isolated ponds |
No major fragmentation observed |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
Some ponds occur
within WBA, WCA and “CA” in Pok Wai Contiguous blocks
of active and inactive fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen are
functionally linked with adjacent wetland habitats e.g. WRCW, KTMDC and
marsh/reed. Inactive fishponds west of Nam San Wai Road are structurally
linked to the adjacent ponds and marsh/reed within YLBFEW. Some ardeids
roosting in Ko Po Road ANR foraged in the drained fishponds before returning
to the ANR Fishponds within WCA and “CA” west of Mo Fan Heung in Pok Wai are linked to
the extensive fishponds beyond the Assessment Area |
Part of KTMDC occurs within WCA and WBA. Structurally and functionally linked with other wetland
habitats e.g. Sha Po Marsh, fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Chuen Functionally
linked with the ANRs at Sha Po, Ko Po Road and Kam Po Road, and Kam Po Road Egretry KTMDC
and its downstream section beyond the Assessment Area is a key waterbody in
Au Tau and Kam Tin areas which ardeid commuting flight paths frequented along
and serves as an important foraging ground for many waterbirds including some
of the roosting ardeids |
Some watercourses within this area were structurally
and functionally included as part of the Sha Po Marsh Some watercourses occur within WBA and CA |
Potential value |
Moderate to high for the active and inactive
fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen near Au Tau, west of Nam San Wai
Road and west of Mo Fan Heung in Pok Wai. Active ones could be enhanced by
ecologically-friendly aquacultural measures and inactive ones could be
properly managed to maximise use by waterfowl and wildlife. Low for other scattered and isolated ponds |
Low to moderate |
Moderate for S-SA-3 Low for other watercourses |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Low |
Ecological value |
Moderate – for the active fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen near Au Tau
and west of Mo Fan Heung in Pok Wai Low to Moderate – for inactive fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen near Au Tau,
ponds within and next to YLBFEW west of Nam San Wai Road Low – for other ponds |
Moderate to High |
Moderate – for S-SA-3 Low to Moderate – for other watercourses |
Note: (1)
Excluding Kam Tin Main Drainage Channel, Meander S-SA-1 and S-SA-6 |
Table 10.26 Ecological Evaluation of Watercourse within
Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Meander (S-SA-1) |
Meander (S-SA-6) |
Naturalness |
Moderate to High |
Moderate to High |
Size |
Small (approx. 1.48 ha, 0.8 km) |
Small (approx. 1.77 ha, 0.5 km) |
Diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Low floral diversity, low
to moderate faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation importance was recorded in both previous studies and present survey. |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of nine fauna
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey, including
eight avifauna species of conservation importance recorded (Eurasian Teal,
Chinese Pond Heron, Great Egret, Grey Heron, Common Redshank, Greater Coucal,
Little Egret and Marsh Sandpiper) and one odonate species (Mangrove Skimmer). |
Re-creatability |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Fragmentation |
Low |
Low |
Ecological linkage |
The meander occurs within WBA Structurally connected with adjacent KTMDC |
Structurally and functionally linked with adjacent
wetland habitats such as marsh/reed, ponds, and KTMDC |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to Moderate |
Moderate |
Table 10.27 Ecological
Evaluation of Seasonally Wet Grassland and Dry Agricultural Land within Sha
Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Seasonally Wet Grassland |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Naturalness |
Moderate |
Low. A man-made habitat for the purpose of crop
production. |
Size |
Small (approx. 1.71 ha) |
Small (approx. 1.97 ha) |
Diversity |
Low floral and low to moderate faunal diversity. |
Low to moderate floral and low faunal diversity |
Rarity |
An uncommon habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two species of
conservation importance recorded in present survey, including two avifauna species
(Chinese Pond Heron and Greater Coucal). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two species of conservation importance
recorded in present survey, including one avifauna
species (Greater Coucal) and one butterfly species (Danaid Eggfly). |
Re-creatability |
Moderate |
High |
Fragmentation |
High |
High |
Ecological linkage |
No notable ecological linkage, though structurally
and functionally connected with adjacent wetland habitats, such as marsh/reed
and fish ponds |
No notable ecological linkage |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Moderate |
Ecological value |
Low |
Low |
Table 10.28 Ecological
Evaluation of Woodland, Mixed Woodland, and Plantation within the Sha Po/Au Tau
Area
Criteria |
Woodland |
Mixed Woodland |
Plantation |
Naturalness |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Size |
Small (approx.
7.07 ha) |
Small (approx. 3.32 ha) |
Small (approx. 14.53 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate to high
floral and low faunal diversity |
Low floral and low
faunal diversity |
Low to moderate
floral and low faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of six species of conservation importance was
recorded in present survey, including three flora species (Aquilaria
sinensis, Cibotium barometz and Gnetum luofuense),
three mammal species (East Asian Porcupine, Small Indian Civet and Small
Asian Mongoose) |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. A butterfly species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of six species of
conservation importance was recorded in present survey, including one avifauna (Collared Crow), one butterfly species (Small
Cabbage White) and four mammal species (unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1, Lesser Bamboo Bat, Leopard Cat and Red Muntjac). |
A common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of six species of conservation importance
were recorded in present survey, including one avifauna species (Little Egret) and
five mammal species (Chinese Noctule, Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2 and Lesser Bamboo Bat). |
Re-creatability |
Low to moderate. Re-creatable if time is
given for natural succession. |
Moderate. Re-creatable if time is given for natural
succession. |
High |
Fragmentation |
Low. A continuous
patch of woodland occurs on hillside of Kai Kung Leng |
Moderate. Small
areas of mixed woodland scattered across the Assessment Area. |
Moderate to high |
Ecological linkage |
Woodland occurs
near Mo Fan Heung within the “CA” and LTCP, structurally connected to the
plantation, shrubland, grassland on Kai Kung Leng |
Small areas of
mixed woodland habitat occur within the WBA and LTCP |
A few patches and/or strips of plantation
fall within LTCP, “CA” on Kai Kung Leng and WBA in Pok Wai and northwest of
Sha Po Ko Po Road Egretry and ANR is recorded within this habitat. |
Potential value |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
Ko Po Road ANR is
recorded. |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Moderate |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Moderate |
Low to
moderate |
Low to moderate – for the plantation utilized by Ko Po Road Ardeid Night Roost,
hillside plantation within “CA” and LTCP on Kai Kung Leng Low – remaining plantations |
Table 10.29 Ecological
Evaluation of Shrubland and Grassland within the Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Shrubland |
Grassland |
Naturalness |
Moderate to high |
Moderate to high |
Size |
Very small (approx. 0.34 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 19.36 ha) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity |
Moderate to high floral and
moderate faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation importance were recorded in both previous studies and present survey. |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 11
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey, including one
flora species (Thysanotus chinensis), three avifauna species
(Amur Falcon, Collared Crow and Greater Coucal), five
butterfly species (Spotted Angle, Swallowtail, Forget-me-not, Small
Three-ring and Danaid Eggfly), and two mammal species (Japanese Pipistrelle and Pallas’s Squirrel). |
Re-creatability |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Fragmentation |
High |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
No notable
ecological linkage |
A large area of
hillside grassland occurs within “CA” and LTCP on Kai Kung Leng A few patches of
low-lying grassland occur partially within WBA west of Mo Fan Heung and “CA”
northeast of Kam Ting Mung Yeung Public School |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate for
hillside grassland Low for low-lying grassland |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No record of
nursery or breeding ground |
No record of
nursery or breeding ground |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low |
Moderate – for hillside grassland Low –
for low-lying grassland |
Table 10.30 Ecological Evaluation of
Village/Orchard and Developed Area/Wasteland within the Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Naturalness |
Low |
Low |
Size |
Small (approx. 3.75 ha) |
Very large
(approx. 213.98 ha) |
Diversity |
Low floral (consisting
of native ruderal and exotic species) and faunal diversity. |
Moderate to high floral (consisting of native ruderal
and exotic species) and moderate faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
A very common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of four species of conservation
importance recorded in present survey, including one flora species (Aquilaria sinensis), one avifauna
species (Greater Coucal) and two mammal
species (Japanese Pipistrelle and Lesser Bamboo Bat). |
Very common habitat in Hong
Kong A total of two species of
conservation importance (including a mammal and a reptile species) was
recorded in previous studies. A total of 22 species of conservation importance recorded in present
survey, including eight avifauna species (Black Kite, Chinese Pond Heron,
Collared Crow, Crested Serpent Eagle, Greater Coucal, Little Egret,
Red-billed Starling and Yellow-breasted Bunting),
five butterfly species (Swallowtail, Small Cabbage White, Peacock Royal, Tiny
Grass Blue and Danaid Eggfly),
one herpetofauna species (Four-clawed Gecko) and eight mammal species
(Chinese Horseshoe Bat, Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat, Chinese Noctule, Japanese
Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1,
unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2, Lesser Bamboo Bat and Pallas’s Squirrel). |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
Moderate to High |
Low |
Ecological linkage |
Some parts occur
in “CA” south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen and WBA northwest of Sha Po |
Some parts occur
near “WCA” and “WBA” near northwest to Mo Fan Heung |
Potential value |
Low |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery
and breeding behaviour observed |
A day-roost of
Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat identified in Pok Wai Public School |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Ecological value |
Low |
Moderate – for Pok Wai Public School Low – for other developed area/wasteland |
Table 10.31 Species of Conservation
Importance Recorded within the Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Species |
Recorded Habitat in Previous Studies (1) |
Recorded Habitat in Present Survey (1)(11) |
Protection Status |
Distribution in Hong Kong (2) |
Rarity (2) |
Flora |
|||||
Incense Tree (Aquilaria sinensis) |
- |
WL, V/O |
Cap. 586 (3); Vulnerable (4);
Cat 2 & 3 (Near Threatened) (4); Category ll
(4); Vulnerable (4); Near Threatened (4);
Vulnerable (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Lamb of Tartary (Cibotium
barometz) |
- |
WL |
Cap. 586; Rare
and Precious Plants in Hong Kong (Status in China): Category 2 (Vulnerable);
Listed in Wild Plants under State Protection: Category ll |
|
|
Luofushan Joint-Fir (Gnetum luofuense) |
- |
WL |
Near Threatened (4) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Prince’s Feather (Persicaria
orientalis) |
- |
MA |
- |
Sha Po, Yuen Long |
Rare |
Phymatodes longissima |
PO |
- |
- |
- |
Rare |
Lizard’s Tail (Saururus chinensis) |
- |
WRCW |
- |
Tai Tam, Sha Tin, Tai
Po, Sha Lo Tung, Tai Mei Tuk |
Rare |
Coastal Bulrush (Schoenoplectus
subulatus) |
- |
MA |
- |
Plover Cove, Mai
Po |
Rare |
Chinese Frienge Lily (Thysanotus
chinensis) |
- |
GL |
- |
Aberdeen, Fanling, So Kwun Wat |
Rare |
Avifauna |
|||||
Amur Falcon (Falco amurensis) |
WRCW |
GL |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
Class II (6); Near Threatened (8); |
Found in Lok Ma Chau, Mai Po. |
Uncommon autumn passage migrant. |
Asian Barred Owlet (Glaucidium cuculoides) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in woodland of the north and
central New Territories. |
Locally common resident. |
Besra (Accipiter virgatus) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170
(3); Cap. 586 (3);
Class II (6) |
Found in Tai Po Kau, Deep Bay area, Chek Lap Kok,
Cheung Chau, Soko Islands. |
Common resident and migrant. |
Black Kite (Milvus migrans) (5) |
WRCW |
DA, IF |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
(RC) (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident and winter visitor. |
Black-faced Spoonbill (Platalea
minor) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
IF |
Cap.170
(3); PGC (3); Class II (6); Endangered (8) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Common winter visitor. |
Black-headed Gull (Chroicocephalus
ridibundus) (5) |
WC |
- |
Cap.170
(3); PPC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area and coastal waters. |
Abundant winter visitor. |
Black-winged Stilt (Himantopus himantopus) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
WRCW, WC |
Cap.170
(3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Long Valley, Kam Tin. |
Common migrant and winter visitor. |
Chinese Grosbeak (Eophona migratoria) |
- |
WRCW |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Kam Tin, Nam Chung, Shek Kong, Deep Bay
area, Ho Chung, Lam Tsuen, Hok Tau, Island House and Kowloon Park. |
Common winter visitor. |
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola
bacchus) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
MA, WRCW, PO, WC, SWG, DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Cinnamon Bittern (Ixobrychus cinnamomeus) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Long Valley, Tai Yuen (Sheung
Shui), Pui O." |
Uncommon passage migrant and scarce summer visitor. |
Citrine Wagtail (Motacilla
citreola) |
- |
PO |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3) |
Found in Tsim Bei Tsui, Shuen Wan, Mai Po, Long Valley. |
Uncommon migrant
and winter visitor. |
Collared Crow (Corvus torquatus)
(5) |
WRCW |
WRCW, PO, MWL, GL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3); Near Threatened (8);
Vulnerable (9) |
Found in Inner
Deep Bay area, Nam Chung, Kei Ling Ha, Tai Mei Tuk,
Pok Fu Lam, Chek Lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Lam Tsuen. |
Locally common resident. |
Common Greenshank (Tringa
nebularia) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
PO, WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Abundant winter visitor and migrant. |
Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common autumn migrant and winter visitor. |
Common Redshank (Tringa totanus) (5) |
WC |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Abundant passage migrant and winter visitor. |
Crested Serpent Eagle (Spilornis cheela) |
WRCW |
DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
(LC) (3);
Class II (6); Vulnerable (7); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed in shrublands on hillsides
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Eastern Buzzard (Buteo japonicus) (5) |
WRCW |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3); Class
II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) (5) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
LC (3);
Class II (6); Vulnerable (7); Near Threatened (8) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Uncommon winter
visitor. |
Eurasian Teal (Anas crecca)
(5) |
WRCW, WC |
WRCW, PO, WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Shuen Wan, Tai Lam Chung Reservoir, Victoria
Harbour, urban parks. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Eurasian Whimbrel (Numenius phaeopus)
(5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Sai Kung, Tung Ping Chau,
Ninepins, Cape D'Aguilar, Pok Fu Lam. |
Common passage migrant and scarce winter visitor. |
Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo)
(5) |
WRCW, WC |
PO, WC, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal areas throughout Hong
Kong. |
Common winter visitor. |
Great Egret (Ardea alba) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
MA, WRCW, PO, WC,
IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident, migrant and winter visitor. |
Greater Coucal (Centropus
sinensis) |
WRCW |
MA, WRCW, PO, WC, SWG, DAL, GL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6);
Vulnerable (7) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
MA, WRCW, PO, WC |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Starling Inlet, Kowloon Park,
Cape D'Aguilar. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Grey-headed Lapwing (Vanellus cinereus) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Kam Tin, Tsim
Bei Tsui, Lo Wu, Tai Long Wan, Shuen Wan, Castle
Peak coast, Chek Lap Kok. |
Locally common winter visitor and migrant. |
Intermediate Egret (Egretta
intermedia) (5) |
WRCW |
WRCW, PO |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Tai Long Wan,
Starling Inlet, Tai O, Cape D'Aguilar. |
Resident and passage migrant. |
Kentish Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) (5) |
- |
PO |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Chek Lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Sai Kung, Lantau Island. |
Abundant winter visitor and scarce migrant. |
Lanceolated Warbler (Locustella
lanceolata) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); Near Threatened
(8) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Uncommon autumn passage migrant. |
Little Egret |
WRCW, WC |
MA, WRCW, PO, WC, PL, DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal area
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Little Grebe (Tachybaptus
ruficollis) (5) |
WRCW |
WRCW, PO, WC |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Common resident. |
Marsh Sandpiper (Tringa
stagnatilis) (5) |
WC |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Shuen Wan, Long Valley, Kam Tin, Sai Kung. |
Abundant winter
visitor and migrant. |
Northern Pintail (Spatula clypeata)
(5) |
WC |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Shuen Wan, Long Valley, Kam Tin. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
Northern Shoveler (Spatula clypeata)
(5) |
WRCW, WC |
PO, WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
Pacific Golden Plover (Pluvialis
fulva) (5) |
WC |
PO |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Chek Lap Kok, Long Valley. |
Common migrant and
winter visitor. |
Pallas's Grasshopper Warbler (Helopsaltes certhiola) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in wetland
areas throughout Hong Kong. |
Common autumn
passage migrant. |
Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) (5) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3); (LC) (3); Class II (6); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed
in Hong Kong. |
Locally common
resident and winter visitor. |
Pied Avocet (Recurvirostra
avosetta) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
Purple Heron (Ardea purpurea) (5) |
WRCW |
MA |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Uncommon passage
migrant. |
Red-billed Starling (Spodiopsar
sericeus) (5) |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3); GC (3) |
Widely distributed
in Hong Kong. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
Red-throated Pipit (Anthus cervinus) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in dry agricultural areas throughout Hong Kong. |
Common passage
migrant and winter visitor. |
Spotted Redshank (Tringa erythropus) (5) |
WC |
- |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Common spring
passage migrant. |
Tufted Duck (Aythya fuligula)
(5) |
WC |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Nam Chung, Starling Inlet. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
Von Schrenck’s Bittern (Ixobrychus eurhythmus) (5) |
- |
MA |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Tai Long
Wan, Luk Keng, Long Valley |
Scarce passage
migrant. |
White-cheeked Starling (Spodiopsar cineraceus) (5) |
WRCW |
WRCW, PO |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Kam Tin, Long Valley. |
Locally common
winter visitor. |
Wood Sandpiper (Tringa
glareola) (5) |
WRCW, WC |
PO, WC |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in wetland area throughout Hong Kong. |
Common migrant and
winter visitor. |
Yellow-breasted Bunting (Emberiza aureola) |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3); Critically
Endangered (9) |
Widely distributed
in agriculture land and reed beds throughout Hong Kong. |
Scarce spring and
rare winter passage migrant. |
Zitting Cisticola (Cisticola juncidis) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in grassland throughout Hong Kong. |
Common passage
migrant and winter visitor. |
Butterfly |
|||||
Spotted Angle (Caprona
alida) |
- |
GL |
LC (3) |
Lantau South Country Park, Nam Chung, Lung Kwu Tan, Pat Sin Lang |
Very rare |
Swallowtail (Papilio xuthus) |
MA, WRCW |
MA, GL, DA |
- |
Kap Lung, Ma On Shan, Tai Tam, Sha Lo Wan, Kat O, Lung Kwu Tan, Wu Kau
Tang, Lung Kwu Chau |
Rare |
Small Cabbage White (Pieris rapae
crucivora) |
- |
WRCW, MWL, DA |
- |
Shek Mun Kap, Fan Lau, Ngong Ping, Kam Tin, Ho Chung, Luk Keng, Tuen Mun
Ash Lagoon |
Rare |
Peacock Royal (Tajuria
cippus) |
- |
DA |
LC (3) |
Ma On Shan, Wu Kau Tang, Tai Po Kau, Mount Nicholson,
Victoria Peak, Cloudy Hill |
Rare |
Forget-me-not (Catochrysops strabo) |
WCRW |
GL |
Species of conservation
concern(2) |
Pui O, Tai Po Kau, Fung Yuen, Shing Mun, Sha Lo Wan |
Very rare; |
Tiny Grass Blue (Zizula
hylax) |
WCRW |
MA, WRCW, DA |
Species of
conservation concern(2) |
Lung Kwu Tan, Fung Yuen, Sha Lo Wan |
Very rare |
Small Three-ring (Ypthima
norma) |
- |
GL |
Species of
conservation concern(2); LC (3) |
Pak Tam Chung, Ngau Kwo Lo, Kai Shan |
Very rare |
Danaid Eggfly (Hypolimnas misippus) |
- |
MA, DAL, GL, DA |
LC (3) |
Ngau Ngak Shan, Lung Kwu Tan, Hong Kong Wetland Park, Mount Parker, Cloudy
Hill, Lin Ma Hang |
Uncommon |
Metallic Cerulean (Jamides alecto) |
MA, WRCW |
- |
- |
Victoria Peak, Fung Yuen, Chuen Lung, Mui Wo |
Very rare |
Grey Scrub Hopper (Aeromachus jhora) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Tai Po Kau, Shing Mun, Cloudy Hill, Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, Lam Tsuen, Lai Chi
Hang, Tai Lam Wu. |
Uncommon |
Yellow Dart (Potanthus pava) |
WRCW |
- |
Species of
conservation concern(2) |
Plover Cove |
Very rare |
Common Awl (Hasora badra) |
MWL |
- |
LC (3) |
Wu Kau Tan, Lai Chi Wo, Hong Kong Wetland Park |
Very rare |
Odonate |
|||||
Four-spot Midget (Mortonagrion
hirosei) |
- |
MA |
GC (3); Near Threatened (9) |
Found mainly in the Northeast and Northwest New
Territories and west Lantau; Sparse |
- |
Coastal Glider (Macrodiplax
cora) |
- |
PO |
LC (3) |
Frequents marshes and ponds with dense vegetation,
especially adjacent to coastal areas; Sparse |
- |
Mangrove Skimmer (Orthetrum
poecilops poecilops) |
WRCW |
MA, WRCW, WC |
GC (3); Vulnerable (9) |
Occurs where small freshwater streams cascade into
tidal mangroves. Found mainly in the Northeast New Territories, including
Double Island, Lai Chi Wo, Nam Chung, So Lo Pun, Yim Tso Ha, Yung Shue Au and
Yung Shue O etc; also recorded in Tung Chung and Tai O; Scattered |
- |
Blue Chaser (Potamarcha
congener) |
WRCW |
WRCW, WC |
LC (3) |
Found in small weedy ponds, puddles and marshes.
Widely distributed in the New Territories; Scattered |
- |
Ruby Darter (Rhodothemis
rufa) |
WRCW |
WRCW |
LC (3) |
Widely distributed in ponds and marshes with dense
floating plants; Scattered |
- |
Scarlet Basker (Urothemis
signata signata) |
WRCW |
WRCW |
LC (3) |
Common in areas with abandoned fish ponds throughout
Hong Kong; Scattered |
- |
Blue Sprite (Pseudagrion microcephalum) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Found in lowland streams and ponds; often perches on
aquatic plants just above the water surface. Population scattered all over
Hong Kong and established in Hong Kong Wetland Park; Scattered |
- |
Sapphire Flutterer (Rhyothemis
triangularis) |
WRCW |
- |
LC (3) |
Widely distributed in weedy ponds, sluggish rivers
and marshes; Scattered |
- |
Herpetofauna |
|||||
Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus rugulosus) |
WCRW |
- |
PRC (3); Class II (6);
Endangered (8) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong |
- |
Spotted Narrow-mouthed Frog (Kalophrynus interlineatus) |
WRCW |
- |
Near threatened (8) |
Widely distributed from low to moderate altitudes in
northern and central New Territories. |
- |
Four-clawed Gecko (Gehyra mutilata) |
- |
DA |
Vulnerable (8) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Chinese Soft-shelled Turtle (Pelodiscus
sinensis) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); GC (3); Vulnerable (7); Endangered (8); Vulnerable (9) |
Locally found in reservoirs and fishponds in Deep Bay
area |
- |
Indo-Chinese Rat Snake (Ptyas korros) |
WRCW |
- |
PRC (3); Endangered (7); Vulnerable (8); Near Threatened (9) |
Widely distributed
throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Many-banded Krait (Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus) |
WRCW |
- |
PRC (3);
Vulnerable (7); Endangered (8) |
Common and widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
- |
Common Rat Snake (Ptyas mucosus) |
MA, WRCW |
- |
Cap.586 (3); PRC (3); Endangered (7); Endangered (8) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Common Wolf Snake (Lycodon aulicus) |
WRCW, DA |
- |
Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed at low elevations throughout Hong
Kong Island, Cheung Chau, Po Toi, Shek Kwu Chau and
Lamma Island. |
- |
Copperhead Racer (Coelognathus radiatus) |
WRCW |
- |
PRC (3); Endangered (7) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Taiwan Kukri Snake (Oligodon formosanus) |
WRCW |
- |
Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Burmese Python (Python bivittatus) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
PRC (3); Class I (4); Critically endangered (7); Critically endangered (8); Vulnerable (9) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Chinese Cobra (Naja atra) |
WRCW |
- |
Cap.586 (3); PRC (3); Vulnerable (7); Vulnerable (8); Vulnerable (9) |
Common and widely distributed in Hong Kong |
- |
Mammal |
|||||
Chinese Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus sinicus) |
- |
MA, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Widely distributed in countryside areas throughout
Hong Kong. |
- |
Intermediate Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus affinis) |
- |
MA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3) |
Widely distributed in countryside areas throughout
Hong Kong. |
- |
Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat (Hipposideros
armiger) |
- |
WC, DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3) |
Widely distributed in countryside areas throughout
Hong Kong. |
- |
Chinese Noctule (Nyctalus plancyi) |
- |
WC, PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Japanese Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus abramus) |
DA |
MA, PO, WC, PL, GL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1 |
- |
MA, WC, MWL, PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2 |
- |
MA, WC, PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Lesser Bamboo Bat (Tylonycteris fulvida) |
- |
MA, MWL, PL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3); Rare(10) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Pallas’s Squirrel (Callosciurus
erythraeus) |
- |
PO, GL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Fairly widely
distributed, with the styani subspecies found in
the New Territories (e.g. Tai Lam, Shing Mun and Tai Po Kau), and the thai subspecies found on the Hong Kong Island (e.g. Tai
Tam and Pok Fu Lam) |
- |
East Asian Porcupine (Hystrix
brachyura) |
- |
WL |
Cap.170 (3); PGC (3) |
Very widely
distributed in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong, except for Lantau
Island |
- |
Small Indian Civet (Viverricula
indica) |
- |
WL |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6); Vulnerable (8) |
Very widely distributed
in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong, except for Lantau Island |
- |
Small Asian Mongoose (Herpestes
javanicus) |
- |
MA, WL |
Cap.170 (3); Vulnerable (8) |
Fairly widely distributed
in countryside areas in the New Territories |
- |
Leopard Cat (Prionailurus
bengalensis) |
- |
PO, MWL |
Cap.170 (3); Vulnerable (8);
Vulnerable (10) |
Widely distributed
in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong, except for Lantau Island |
- |
Red Muntjac (Muntiacus
muntjak) |
- |
MWL |
PRC (3); Near Threatened (8) |
Very widely
distributed in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Aquatic Communities |
|||||
Gobiopterus macrolepis |
WC |
- |
Vulnerable (8) |
Recorded in Deep Bay |
- |
(1) Habitats: WRCW=West Rail Compensatory Wetland; WC=Watercourse; DAL=Dry Agricultural Land; MWL=Mixed Woodland; SL=Shrubland; GL=Grassland; V/O=Village/Orchard; PO= Pond; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland; IF=In Flight.
(2) Distribution in Hong Kong and Rarity follows:
Flora: Wu and Lee (2000); Xing and Chau (2000); Siu (2000).
Fauna: AFCD (2011); AFCD (2022); Karsen et
al. (1998); Shek (2006a); Reels (2019).
(3) Cap. 96: Protected under the Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap.
96).
Cap. 170: Protected under Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170).
Cap. 586: Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance
(Cap.586).
Fellowes et al. (2002): LC=Local
Concern; RC=Regional Concern; PRC=Potential Regional Concern. Letters in
parentheses indicate that the assessment is on the basis of restrictedness in
nesting and/or roosting sites rather than in general occurrence.
(4) Protection Status of Flora follows:
Hu et al. (2003); List of Wild Plants
Under State Protection (Ministry of Forestry in 1999); Fu (1992); Qin et al. (2017); Feng et al. (2002). Wu and Hu. (1988).
(5) Wetland-dependent species (including wetland-dependent species and waterbirds).
(6) The List of Endangered and Protected Species of China.
(7) Zheng and Wang (1998).
(8) Jiang et al. (2016).
(9) IUCN (2022).
(10) Wang (1998).
(11) Habitat in bold type face = species recorded within work site/area, or recorded within both works site/area and Assessment Area; Habitat in unbold type face = species recorded outside works site/area but within Assessment Area.
Table 10.32 Ecological Evaluation of
Marsh/Reed and Pond within Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
Pond |
Naturalness |
Moderate. Succeeded from man-made
habitats e.g. ponds and agricultural lands through natural processes. |
Low. A man-made habitat for
the purpose of aquaculture, flood retention and landscaping |
Size |
Small (approx. 2.80 ha) |
Small (approx. 8.08 ha) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and faunal diversity |
Low to moderate floral and
faunal diversity |
Rarity |
An uncommon habitat in Hong
Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two species of conservation
importance recorded in present study, including one flora species (Ceratopteris thalictroides)
and one avifauna species (Greater Coucal). |
Uncommon. Mainly restricted to northwestern New Territories A total of six avifauna species of conservation importance were
recorded in previous studies. A total of eight species of conservation importance
recorded in present study, including five avifauna species (Chinese Pond
Heron, Great Cormorant, Great Egret, Grey Heron and Little Egret) and three
mammal species (Japanese Pipistrelle, Lesser Bamboo Bat and unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1) |
Re-creatability |
Low to moderate |
High |
Fragmentation |
Moderate for marsh/reed west of San Tin
Highway High for marsh/reed in Ngau
Tam Mei |
High |
Ecological linkage |
A few patches west of San Tin Highway occur within
or in close proximity to “WBA” and connected to some ponds |
Some areas occur within or in close proximity to
“WBA” and connected to fishponds west to Long Ha Tsuen |
Potential value |
Low to moderate for
marsh/reed west of San Tin Highway Low for marsh/reed in Ngau
Tam Mei |
Moderate to high. Those inactive ponds west of San
Tin Highway could be properly managed to maximise use by waterfowl and
wildlife. |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and
breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery and
breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Low |
Ecological value |
Low |
Low to moderate – for ponds west
of San Tin Highway Low - for other ponds |
Table 10.33 Ecological
Evaluation of Watercourse within Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Ngau Tam Mei Drainage
Channel |
Watercourse (S-NP-1 to S-NP-11) (1) |
Naturalness |
Low |
Moderate for S-NP-1 to
S-NP-4, S-NP-9 Low for S-NP-5 to S-NP-8,
S-NP-10 to S-NP-11 |
Size |
Small (approx. 1.32 ha, 1.3 km) |
Small (approx. 2.16 ha, 4.2 km in total) S-NP-1 (approx. 0.5 km) S-NP-2 (approx. 0.3 km) S-NP-3 (approx. 0.3 km) S-NP-4 (approx. 0.2 km) S-NP-5 (approx. 0.6 km) S-NP-5a (approx. 0.1 km) S-NP-6 (approx. 0.4 km) S-NP-7 (approx. 0.2 km) S-NP-8 (approx. 0.6 km) S-NP-9 (approx. 0.1 km) S-NP-10 (approx. 0.5 km) |
Diversity |
Low floral diversity, low
to moderate faunal diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 11 fauna species of conservation importance recorded in present study,
including nine avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron, Little Egret, Great
Egret, Grey Heron, Wood Sandpiper, Collared Crow, Greater Coucal, Northern
Shoveler and Common Greenshank) and two
mammal species (Lesser Bamboo Bat and unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two fauna
species of conservation importance recorded in present study, including one
avifauna species (Little Egret) and one butterfly species of conservation
importance (Swallowtail) recorded. |
Re-creatability |
High |
Moderate to High |
Fragmentation |
No major fragmentation observed |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
No notable ecological linkage |
S-NP-9 is located partially within “CA” and LTCP;
S-NP-10 at Pok Wai occurs within WBA |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Ecological value |
Low to Moderate |
Low |
Note:
(1) Ngau Tam Mei
Drainage Channel excluded.
Table 10.34 Ecological
Evaluation of Dry Agricultural Land within Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Naturalness |
Low. A man-made habitat for the purpose of crop
production. |
Size |
Small (approx. 4.25 ha) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and low faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of four species of conservation importance
recorded in present study, including one
avifauna species (Greater Coucal) and three mammal species (Japanese
Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2 and Lesser Bamboo Bat). |
Re-creatability |
High |
Fragmentation |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
No notable ecological linkage, though the dry
agricultural land in Ngau Tam Mei are structurally connected with adjacent
habitats such as marsh/reed, pond and watercourse to form an extensive matrix
of habitats |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Ecological value |
Low |
Table 10.35 Ecological
Evaluation of Woodland, Mixed Woodland and Plantation within the Ngau Tam
Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Woodland |
Mixed Woodland |
Plantation |
Naturalness |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Size |
Moderate (approx. 32.29 ha) |
Small (approx. 17.36 ha) |
Small (approx. 12.45 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate to high
floral and low faunal diversity |
Moderate to high
floral and low faunal diversity |
Low to moderate
floral and faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of six species of conservation importance
were recorded in present study, including two flora species (Aquilaria sinensis
and Gnetum luofuense),
one avifauna species (Greater Coucal), and three mammal species (Masked Palm
Civet, Small Indian Civet and Leopard Cat). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 13 species of conservation importance were
recorded in present study, including three flora species (Aquilaria
sinensis, Aralia chinensis and Gnetum luofuense),
three avifauna species (Collared Crow, Crested Goshawk and Greater Coucal)
and seven mammal species (Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat, Japanese Pipistrelle,
unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1, Lesser Bamboo Bat,
Pallas’s Squirrel, Leopard Cat and Red Muntjac). |
A common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of four mammal species of conservation
importance (Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2 and Lesser Bamboo Bat) were recorded in present study. |
Re-creatability |
Low to moderate. Re-creatable if time is
given for natural succession. |
Moderate. Re-creatable if time is given for natural
succession. |
High |
Fragmentation |
Low. A continuous
patch of woodland occurs on hillside of Kai Kung Leng |
Moderate. Patches of
mixed woodland occur in knolls and hillside along Ching Yau Road |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
Extensive woodland
south to Long Ha Tsuen. Structurally connected to adjacent plantation,
shrubland and grassland areas in LTCP. |
The patch of mixed
woodland (e.g. southwest of Ching Yau Road) form continuous linkage with
adjacent woodland and grassland at LTCP and “CA”. |
A few patches of hillside plantation fall
within “CA” on Kai Kung Leng. A strip of plantation is within WBA. |
Potential value |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Moderate |
Low to
moderate |
Low to moderate – for hillside plantation on Kai Kung Leng Low – remaining plantations |
Table 10.36 Ecological
Evaluation of Shrubland and Grassland within the Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Shrubland |
Grassland |
Naturalness |
Moderate to high |
Moderate to high, hillside grassland within LTCP occasionally subject
to hill fire |
Size |
Moderate (approx. 11.94 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 31.92 ha) |
Diversity |
Low floral and low to
moderate faunal diversity |
Moderate to high floral and
moderate faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two species of conservation importance recorded in present
study, including one flora species (Gnetum luofuense) and one herpetofauna
species (Spotted Narrow-mouthed Frog). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong A reptile species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of nine species of conservation
importance recorded in present study, including two flora species (Aralia chinensis and Thysanotus chinensis), three avifauna species (Chinese
Francolin, Chinese Pond Heron and Collared Crow) and four
butterfly species (Swallowtail, Tiny Grass Blue, Small Three-ring and Danaid Eggfly). |
Re-creatability |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Fragmentation |
Low to moderate
for hillside shrubland on Kai Kung Leng High for shrubland
in Ngau Tam Mei |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
The hillside
shrubland on Kai Kung Lneg is within “CA” and LTCP,
structurally connected to adjacent woodland, plantation and grassland (e.g.
Kai Kung Leng) No notable
ecological linkage, though the scattered patches of shrubland in Ngau Tam Mei
are structurally connected to adjacent dry agricultural land, marsh/reed and
ponds to form an extensive matrix of habitats |
A large area of
hillside grassland on Kai Kung Leng occurs within “CA” and LTCP, structurally
connected to adjacent shrubland, plantation and woodland A few scattered
patches of low-lying grassland, connecting to adjacent dry agricultural land,
marsh/reed and ponds to form an extensive matrix of habitats (e.g. Ngau Tam
Mei) A patch of
low-lying grassland is within WBA |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No record of
nursery or breeding ground |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to Moderate – for hillside shrubland on Kai Kung Leng Low –
for shrubland in Ngau Tam Mei |
Low to Moderate – for hillside grassland Low –
for low-lying grassland |
Table 10.37 Ecological Evaluation of
Village/Orchard and Developed Area/ Wasteland within the Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai
Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Naturalness |
Low |
Low |
Size |
Small (approx. 13.62 ha) |
Large (approx. 158.96 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate to high
floral (consisting of native ruderal and exotic species) and moderate faunal
diversity. |
High floral (consisting of native ruderal and exotic species)
and moderate to high faunal diversity |
Rarity |
A very common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of seven
species of conservation importance were recorded in present study, including one avifauna species (Greater Coucal),
one odonate species (Blue Chaser), one herpetofauna
species (Spotted Narrow-mouthed Frog) and four mammal species (Himalayan
Leaf-nosed Bat, Chinese Notcule, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1 and unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2). |
Very common habitat in Hong
Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 15 species of conservation importance were recorded in
present study, including four avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron, Collared
Crow, Greater Coucal and Little Egret), three
butterfly species (Common Birdwing, Small Cabbage White and Metallic Cerulean), one odonate species
(Blue Chaser), one herpetofauna species (Spotted Narrow-mouthed
Frog), six mammal species (Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat, Chinese Noctule,
Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae sp.
1, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2 and Lesser
Bamboo Bat). |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
Moderate to High |
Low |
Ecological linkage |
No notable
ecological linkage |
No notable
ecological linkage |
Potential value |
Low |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to Moderate |
Low |
Table 10.38 Species of Conservation
Importance Recorded within the Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Species |
Recorded Habitat in Previous Studies (1) |
Recorded Habitat in Present Survey (1)(11) |
Protection Status |
Distribution in Hong Kong (2) |
Rarity (2) |
Flora |
|||||
Incense Tree (Aquilaria sinensis) |
- |
WL, MWL |
Cap. 586 (3); Vulnerable (8);
Cat 2 & 3 (Near Threatened) (4); Category ll
(10); Vulnerable (4); Near Threatened (4);
Vulnerable (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Aralia chinensis |
- |
MWL, GL |
Vulnerable (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Water Fern (Ceratopteris
thalictroides) |
- |
MA |
Category 2 (Vulnerable) (4); Category ll (4); Vulnerable (10) |
- |
- |
Luofushan Joint-Fir (Gnetum luofuense) |
- |
WL, MWL, SL |
Near Threatened (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Chinese Frienge Lily (Thysanotus
chinensis) |
- |
GL |
- |
Aberdeen, Fanling, So Kwun Wat |
Rare |
Avifauna |
|||||
Black Kite (Milvus migrans) (5) |
PO |
IF |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
(RC) (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident and winter visitor. |
Chinese Francolin (Francolinus
pintadeanus) |
- |
GL |
Cap.170
(3); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed in grassland throughout Hong Kong |
Common resident. |
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola
bacchus) (5) |
PO |
PO, WC, GL, DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Collared Crow (Corvus torquatus)
(5) |
- |
WC, MWL, GL, DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3); Near Threatened (8);
Vulnerable (9) |
Found in Inner
Deep Bay area, Nam Chung, Kei Ling Ha, Tai Mei Tuk,
Pok Fu Lam, Chek Lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Lam Tsuen. |
Locally common resident. |
Common Greenshank (Tringa
nebularia) (5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Abundant winter visitor and migrant. |
Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common autumn migrant and winter visitor. |
Crested Goshawk (Accipiter trivirgatus) |
- |
MWL |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
Class II (6); Rare (7); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed in woodlands and shrublands
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Crested Serpent Eagle (Spilornis
cheela) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
(LC) (3);
Class II (6); Vulnerable (7); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed in shrublands on hillsides
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Eastern Buzzard (Buteo japonicus) (5) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3); Class
II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo)
(4) |
- |
PO |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal areas throughout Hong
Kong. |
Common winter visitor. |
Great Egret (Ardea alba) (5) |
- |
PO, WC, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident, migrant and winter visitor. |
Greater Coucal (Centropus
sinensis) |
- |
MA, WC, DAL, WL, MWL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6);
Vulnerable (7) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea) (5) |
PO |
PO, WC |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Starling Inlet, Kowloon Park,
Cape D'Aguilar. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Little Egret |
PO |
PO, WC, DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal area
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Little Grebe (Tachybaptus
ruficollis) (5) |
PO |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Common resident. |
Northern Shoveler (Spatula clypeata)
(5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
Purple Heron (Ardea purpurea) (5) |
PO |
- |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Uncommon passage
migrant. |
Wood Sandpiper (Tringa
glareola) (5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in wetland area throughout Hong Kong. |
Common migrant and
winter visitor. |
Butterfly |
|||||
Swallowtail (Papilio xuthus) |
- |
WC, GL |
- |
Kap Lung, Ma On Shan, Tai Tam, Sha Lo Wan, Kat O, Lung Kwu Tan, Wu Kau
Tang, Lung Kwu Chau |
Rare |
Common Birdwing (Troides
helena) |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3); Green
Status Moderately Depleted (9) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong |
Rare |
Small Cabbage White (Pieris rapae
crucivora) |
- |
DA |
- |
Shek Mun Kap, Fan Lau, Ngong Ping, Kam Tin, Ho Chung, Luk Keng, Tuen Mun
Ash Lagoon |
Rare |
Metallic Cerulean (Jamides
alecto) |
- |
DA |
- |
Victoria Peak, Fung Yuen, Chuen Lung, Mui Wo |
Very rare |
Tiny Grass Blue (Zizula
hylax) |
- |
GL |
Species of
conservation concern(2) |
Lung Kwu Tan, Fung Yuen, Sha Lo Wan |
Very rare |
Small Three-ring (Ypthima
norma) |
- |
GL |
Species of
conservation concern(2); LC (3) |
Pak Tam Chung, Ngau Kwo Lo, Kai Shan |
Very rare |
Danaid Eggfly (Hypolimnas misippus) |
- |
GL |
LC (3) |
Ngau Ngak Shan, Lung Kwu Tan, Hong Kong Wetland Park, Mount Parker, Cloudy
Hill, Lin Ma Hang |
Uncommon |
Odonate |
|||||
Blue Chaser (Potamarcha
congener) |
- |
V/O, DA |
LC (3) |
Found in small weedy ponds, puddles and marshes.
Widely distributed in the New Territories; Scattered |
- |
Herpetofauna |
|||||
Spotted Narrow-mouthed Frog (Kalophrynus
interlineatus) |
- |
SL, V/O, DA |
Near threatened (8) |
Widely distributed from low to moderate altitudes in
northern and central New Territories. |
- |
King Cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) |
GL |
- |
Cap.586 (3); PRC (3); Critically endangered (7); Endangered (8); Vulnerable (9) |
Common and widespread in Hong Kong |
- |
Mammal |
|||||
Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat (Hipposideros
armiger) |
- |
MWL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3) |
Widely distributed in countryside areas throughout
Hong Kong. |
- |
Chinese Noctule (Nyctalus plancyi) |
- |
V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Japanese Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus abramus) |
- |
PO, DAL, MWL, PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1 |
- |
PO, MWL, PL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2 |
- |
WC, DAL, PL, V/O,
DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Lesser Bamboo Bat (Tylonycteris fulvida) |
- |
PO, WC, DAL, MWL,
PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3); Rare(10) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Pallas’s Squirrel (Callosciurus
erythraeus) |
- |
MWL |
Cap.170 (3) |
Fairly widely
distributed, with the styani subspecies found in
the New Territories (e.g. Tai Lam, Shing Mun and Tai Po Kau), and the thai subspecies found on the Hong Kong Island (e.g. Tai
Tam and Pok Fu Lam) |
- |
Leopard Cat (Prionailurus
bengalensis) |
- |
WL, MWL |
Cap.170 (3); Vulnerable (8);
Vulnerable (10) |
Widely distributed
in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong, except for Lantau Island |
- |
Red Muntjac (Muntiacus
muntjak) |
- |
MWL |
PRC (3); Near Threatened (8) |
Very widely
distributed in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Small Indian Civet (Viverricula
indica) |
- |
WL |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6); Vulnerable (8) |
Very widely distributed
in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong, except for Lantau Island |
- |
Masked Palm Civet (Paguma larvata) |
- |
WL |
PRC (3); Cap.170 (3); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed
in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong, except for Lantau Island and
northwestern New Territories. |
- |
(1)
Habitats: MA=Marsh/Reed; PO=Pond; WC=Watercourse; DAL=Dry
Agricultural Land; WL=Woodland; MWL=Mixed Woodland; PL=Plantation;
SL=Shrubland; GL=Grassland; V/O=Village/Orchard; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland;
IF=In Flight.
(2)
Distribution in Hong Kong and Rarity follows:
Flora: Wu and Lee (2000); Xing and Chau (2000); Siu (2000).
Fauna: AFCD (2011); AFCD (2022); Karsen et al. (1998); Shek (2006a); Reels
(2019).
(3)
Cap. 96: Protected under the Forests and Countryside
Ordinance (Cap. 96).
Cap. 170: Protected
under Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170).
Cap. 586: Protection
of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap.586).
Fellowes et al. (2002): LC=Local Concern; RC=Regional
Concern; PRC=Potential Regional Concern. Letters in parentheses indicate that
the assessment is on the basis of restrictedness in nesting and/or roosting
sites rather than in general occurrence.
(4)
Protection Status of Flora follows:
Hu et al. (2003); List of Wild Plants Under State Protection (Ministry of
Forestry in 1999); Fu (1992); Qin et al. (2017); Feng et al. (2002). Wu and Hu.
(1988).
(5)
Wetland-dependent species (including wetland-dependent
species and waterbirds).
(6)
The List of Endangered and Protected Species of China.
(7)
Zheng and Wang (1998).
(8)
Jiang et al.
(2016).
(9)
IUCN (2022).
(10) Wang (1998).
(11) Habitat in bold type
face = species recorded within work site/area, or recorded within both works
site/area and Assessment Area; Habitat in unbold type
face = species recorded outside works site/area but within Assessment Area
Table 10.39 Ecological Evaluation of
Marsh/Reed and Pond within San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
Pond |
Naturalness |
Moderate. Succeeded from
man-made habitats e.g. ponds and agricultural lands through natural
processes. |
Low. A man-made habitat for
the purpose of aquaculture and wetland compensation |
Size |
Small (approx. 3.19 ha) |
Small (approx. 9.13 ha) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral
diversity for three patches, low for others; low faunal diversity |
Moderate floral and low
faunal diversity |
Rarity |
An uncommon habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of five species of
conservation importance were recorded in present survey, including one
avifauna species (Asian Barred Owlet), two butterfly species (Metallic
Cerulean and Danaid Eggfly),
two mammal species (Chinese Noctule and Japanese Pipistrelle). |
Uncommon. Mainly restricted to northwestern New Territories No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 11 species of
conservation importance were recorded in present survey, including ten
avifauna species (Black Kite, Chinese Pond Heron, Collared Crow, Great Egret,
Greater Coucal, Grey Heron, Intermediate Egret, Little Egret, Little Grebe and Tufted Duck), one butterfly species (Metallic Cerulean) |
Re-creatability |
Low to moderate |
High |
Fragmentation |
High |
High |
Ecological linkage |
No notable ecological linkage, though the scattered
patches of marsh/reed in Shek Wu Wai are structurally and functionally linked
to other wetland habitats such as ponds and watercourse |
The contiguous
ponds north of San Tin Highway occur within WBA, WCA and IBA, and are linked to the extensive fishponds beyond
the Assessment Area No notable
ecological linkage for scattered ponds in Shek Wu Wai, though they are
structurally and functionally linked to other wetland habitats such as
marsh/reed and watercourse |
Potential value |
Moderate |
Moderate to high. Active ones could be enhanced by
ecologically-friendly aquacultural measures and inactive ones could be
properly managed to maximise use by waterfowl and wildlife |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Moderate – for the contiguous ponds north of San Tin
Highway Low – for other ponds |
Ecological value |
Moderate – for the three marsh/reeds with higher coverage and diversity of
wetland plants Low to moderate – for other
marshes/reeds |
Moderate – for the contiguous ponds north of San Tin Highway Low – for other ponds |
Table 10.40 Ecological Evaluation of Watercourse
within San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
San Tin Eastern Main
Drainage Channel |
Watercourse (S-SS-1 to S-SS-7) 1 |
Naturalness |
Low |
Moderate for the downstream
section of S-SS-5 and S-SS-7 Low for other watercourses |
Size |
Small (approx. 1.97 ha, 1.6 km) |
Small (approx. 3.50 ha, 5.2 km in total) S-SS-1 (approx. 0.2 km) S-SS-2 (approx. 0.1 km) S-SS-3 (approx. 1.3 km) S-SS-4, 4a, 4b (approx.
0.4 km, 0.8 km, 0.8 km) S-SS-5, 5a (approx. 0.5
km, 0.5 km) S-SS-6 (approx. 0.4 km) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and
faunal diversity |
Low to moderate floral and
faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation importance
was recorded in previous studies. A total of seven fauna
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey, including five
avifauna species (Black-winged Stilt, Chinese Pond Heron, Little Egret, Wood
Sandpiper and Greater Painted-Snipe) and
two mammal species (Chinese Noctule and Lesser Bamboo Bat). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 12 fauna species of conservation
importance recorded in present survey, including four avifauna species
(Eurasian Teal, Chinese Pond Heron, Great Egret and Little Egret), one odonate species (Dusk-hawker), one reptile species (Many-banded Krait),
six mammal species (Least Horseshoe Bat, unknown Myotis sp., Chinese Noctule, Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1 and unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2) |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
Minor fragmentation by bridges and roads such as Kwu Tung Road and San Tin Highway. Surrounded by highly
developed areas. |
Low to moderate |
Ecological linkage |
The downstream section of this drainage channel
occurs within WBA |
S-SS-3, S-SS-4 functionally and structurally linked
with adjacent wetland habitats (e.g. marsh and ponds) in Shek Wu Wai S-SS-5, downstream sections of S-SS-5a and S-SS-6,
and S-SS-7 occur within WBA; a small downstream section of S-SS-5 also within
WCA Downstream sections of S-SS-5, S-SS-5a and S-SS-6,
and S-SS-7 occur within IBA |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
Nursery behaviour of Greater Painted-Snipe was
observed |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Ecological value |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Table 10.41 Ecological
Evaluation of Wet Agricultural Land and Dry Agricultural Land within San
Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Wet Agricultural Land |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Naturalness |
Low. A man-made habitat for the purpose of crop
production. |
Low. A man-made habitat for the purpose of crop
production. |
Size |
Very small (approx. 0.71 ha) |
Small (approx. 7.87 ha) |
Diversity |
Low flora and faunal diversity |
Moderate floral and faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in
Hong Kong. A total of 11 avifauna species of conservation
importance were recorded (in either dry or wet agricultural lands) in
previous studies. No species of conservation importance was recorded in present survey. |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. A total of 11
avifauna species of conservation importance were recorded (in either dry or
wet agricultural lands) in previous studies. A total of 11 species of conservation importance
recorded in present survey, including six avifauna
species (Chinese Pond Heron, Collared Crow, Common Greenshank, Great Egret,
Grey Heron and Little Egret),
one butterfly species (Metallic Cerulean) and four mammal species (unknown Myotis
sp., Japanese Pipistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1 and unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2) |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
High
|
High |
Ecological linkage |
No notable ecological linkage, though it is
structurally and functionally connected with adjacent habitats, such as dry
agricultural land and ponds to form an extensive matrix of habitats in Shek
Wu Wai |
No notable ecological linkage, though it is
structurally and functionally connected with adjacent habitats, such as
marsh/reed and ponds to form an extensive matrix of habitats in Shek Wu Wai |
Potential value |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Moderate |
Ecological value |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Table 10.42 Ecological
Evaluation of Woodland, Mixed Woodland and Plantation within the San Tin/Shek
Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Woodland |
Mixed Woodland |
Plantation |
Naturalness |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Size |
Small (approx. 2.47 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 47.63 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 33.36 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate floral
and low faunal diversity |
Moderate to high
floral and moderate faunal diversity |
Low floral and
faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. Two mammal species of conservation importance
(Japanese Pipistrelle and unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2) were recorded in present survey. |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of seven species of
conservation importance were recorded in present survey, including one flora species (Aquilaria sinensis), three avifauna species
(Black Kite, Collared Crow and Grey Heron) and three mammal species (Japanese
Pipistrelle, Lesser Bamboo Bat and Pallas’s Squirrel). |
A common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two species of conservation importance,
including one avifauna (Greater Coucal) and one butterfly species (Small
Three-ring) were recorded in present survey. |
Re-creatability |
Low to moderate. Re-creatable if time is
given for natural succession. |
Moderate. Re-creatable if time is given for natural
succession. |
High |
Fragmentation |
High |
Moderate. Small
areas of mixed woodland scattered on knolls. |
Moderate. Some
larger areas west to Shek Wu Wai. |
Ecological linkage |
No notable
ecological linkage |
No notable
ecological linkage |
A small knoll of plantation within the
WBA northeast of Shek Wu Wai |
Potential value |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery
/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
No notable
nursery/ breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Table 10.43 Ecological Evaluation of Shrubland and Grassland within the San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Shrubland |
Grassland |
Naturalness |
Moderate to high |
Moderate to high |
Size |
Moderate (approx. 27.74 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 25.14ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate to high floral and
low to moderate faunal diversity |
Moderate to high floral and
moderate faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. No species of conservation importance was recorded in present survey. |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of nine species of conservation importance recorded in present
survey, including two avifauna species (Grey Heron and Lesser Coucal), six butterfly species (Spotted Angle, Swallowtail,
Small Cabbage White, Peacock Royal, Small Three-ring and Danaid Eggfly), and one mammal species
(Japanese Pipistrelle). |
Re-creatability |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Fragmentation |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
No notable
ecological linkage |
No notable
ecological linkage |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No record of
nursery or breeding ground |
No record of
nursery or breeding ground |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to Moderate |
Low to moderate – for both hillside grassland and low-lying grassland |
Table 10.44 Ecological Evaluation of
Village/Orchard and Developed Area/Wasteland within the San Tin/Shek Wu Wai
Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Naturalness |
Low |
Low |
Size |
Small (approx. 16.82 ha) |
Very large
(approx. 218.87 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate floral (consisting
of native ruderal and exotic species) and low to moderate faunal diversity. |
Moderate to high floral (consisting of native ruderal
and exotic species) and moderate faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
A very common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of six
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey, including
three avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron, Collared Crow and Little Egret), three mammal
species (Japanese Pipistrelle, Lesser Bamboo Bat and Pallas’s Squirrel). |
Very common habitat in Hong
Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of ten species of conservation importance were recorded in
present survey, including four avifauna species (Black Kite, Chinese Pond
Heron, Greater Coucal and Little Egret), one
butterfly species (Metallic Cerulean) and five mammal species (Chinese
Noctule, Japanese Pispistrelle, unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1, Lesser Bamboo Bat and Pallas’s Squirrel). |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
Moderate to High |
Low |
Ecological linkage |
No notable
ecological linkage |
Some parts occur
within WCA, WBA and IBA |
Potential value |
Low |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery
and breeding behaviour |
No record of
nursery or breeding ground |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to Moderate |
Low |
Table 10.45 Species of Conservation Importance Recorded
within the San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Species |
Recorded Habitat in Previous Studies (1) |
Recorded Habitat in Present Survey (1)(11) |
Protection Status |
Distribution in Hong Kong (2) |
Rarity (2) |
Flora |
|||||
Incense Tree (Aquilaria sinensis) |
- |
MWL |
Cap. 586 (3); Vulnerable (8);
Cat 2 & 3 (Near Threatened) (4); Category ll
(4); Vulnerable (4); Near Threatened (4);
Vulnerable (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Avifauna |
|||||
Asian Barred Owlet (Glaucidium cuculoides) |
- |
MA |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in woodland of the north and
central New Territories. |
Locally common resident. |
Besra (Accipiter virgatus) |
DAL/WAL* |
- |
Cap.170
(3); Cap. 586 (3);
Class II (6) |
Found in Tai Po Kau, Deep Bay area, Chek Lap Kok,
Cheung Chau, Soko Islands. |
Common resident and migrant. |
Black Kite (Milvus migrans) (5) |
DAL/WAL* |
PO, MWL, DA, IF |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
(RC) (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident and winter visitor. |
Black-winged Stilt (Himantopus himantopus) (5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170
(3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Long Valley, Kam Tin. |
Common migrant and winter visitor. |
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola
bacchus) (5) |
DAL/WAL* |
PO, WC, DAL, V/O,
DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Collared Crow (Corvus torquatus)
(5) |
DAL/WAL* |
PO, DAL, MWL, V/O,
IF |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3); Near Threatened (8);
Vulnerable (9) |
Found in Inner
Deep Bay area, Nam Chung, Kei Ling Ha, Tai Mei Tuk,
Pok Fu Lam, Chek Lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Lam Tsuen. |
Locally common resident. |
Common Greenshank (Tringa
nebularia) (5) |
DAL/WAL* |
DAL |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Abundant winter visitor and migrant. |
Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common autumn migrant and winter visitor. |
Common Goshawk (Accipiter trivirgatus) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
RC (3);
Rare (7); Near Threatened (8) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Abundant passage migrant and winter visitor. |
Crested Serpent Eagle (Spilornis cheela) |
DAL/WAL* |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3);
(LC) (3);
Class II (6); Vulnerable (7); Near Threatened (8) |
Widely distributed in shrublands on hillsides
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Eurasian Spoonbill (5) (Platalea leucorodia) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3); RC (3); Class II (6); Vulnerable (7);
Near Threatened (8) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Uncommon winter visitor. |
Eurasian Teal (Anas crecca)
(5) |
DAL/WAL* |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Shuen Wan, Tai Lam Chung Reservoir, Victoria
Harbour, urban parks. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Great Egret (Ardea alba) (5) |
DAL/WAL* |
PO, WC, DAL |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident, migrant and winter visitor. |
Greater Coucal (Centropus
sinensis) |
DAL/WAL* |
PO, PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6);
Vulnerable (7) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Greater Painted-snipe (Rostratula
benghalensis) (5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Ha Tsuen, Lok Ma Chau, Kam Tin, Long Valley, Hong Kong Wetland
Park. |
Locally common resident. |
Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea) (5) |
- |
PO, DAL, MWL, GL |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Starling Inlet, Kowloon Park,
Cape D'Aguilar. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Intermediate Egret (Egretta
intermedia) (5) |
- |
PO |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Tai Long Wan,
Starling Inlet, Tai O, Cape D'Aguilar. |
Resident and passage migrant. |
Lesser Coucal (Centropus
bengalensis) |
- |
GL |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6);
Vulnerable (7) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Uncommon resident. |
Little Egret |
DAL/WAL* |
PO, WC, DAL, V/O,
DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal area
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Little Grebe (Tachybaptus
ruficollis) (5) |
- |
PO |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area. |
Common resident. |
Red-throated Pipit (Anthus cervinus) |
DAL/WAL* |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in dry agricultural areas throughout Hong Kong. |
Common passage migrant
and winter visitor. |
Tufted Duck (Aythya fuligula) |
- |
PO |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay
area, Nam Chung, Starling Inlet. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
Wood Sandpiper (Tringa
glareola) (5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in wetland area throughout Hong Kong. |
Common migrant and
winter visitor. |
Butterfly |
|||||
Spotted Angle (Caprona
alida) |
- |
GL |
LC (3) |
Lantau South Country Park, Nam Chung, Lung Kwu Tan, Pat Sin Lang |
Very rare |
Swallowtail (Papilio xuthus) |
- |
GL |
- |
Kap Lung, Ma On Shan, Tai Tam, Sha Lo Wan, Kat O, Lung Kwu Tan, Wu Kau
Tang, Lung Kwu Chau |
Rare |
Small Cabbage White (Pieris rapae
crucivora) |
- |
GL |
- |
Shek Mun Kap, Fan Lau, Ngong Ping, Kam Tin, Ho Chung, Luk Keng, Tuen Mun
Ash Lagoon |
Rare |
Peacock Royal (Tajuria
cippus) |
- |
GL |
LC (3) |
Ma On Shan, Wu Kau Tang, Tai Po Kau, Mount Nicholson,
Victoria Peak, Cloudy Hill |
Rare |
Metallic Cerulean (Jamides
alecto) |
- |
MA, PO, DAL, DA |
- |
Victoria Peak, Fung Yuen, Chuen Lung, Mui Wo |
Very rare |
Small Three-ring (Ypthima
norma) |
- |
PL, GL |
Species of
conservation concern(2); LC (3) |
Pak Tam Chung, Ngau Kwo Lo, Kai Shan |
Very rare |
Danaid Eggfly (Hypolimnas misippus) |
- |
MA, GL |
LC (3) |
Ngau Ngak Shan, Lung Kwu Tan, Hong Kong Wetland Park, Mount Parker, Cloudy
Hill, Lin Ma Hang |
Uncommon |
Odonate |
|||||
Dusk-hawker (Gynacantha sp.) |
- |
WC |
LC (3) |
- |
- |
Herpetofauna |
|||||
Many-banded Krait (Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus) |
- |
WC |
PRC (3);
Vulnerable (7); Endangered (8) |
Common and widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
- |
Mammal |
|||||
Least Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus pusillus) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in countryside areas throughout
Hong Kong |
- |
Myotis spp. |
- |
WC, DAL |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Chinese Noctule (Nyctalus plancyi) |
- |
MA, WC, DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Japanese Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus abramus) |
- |
MA, WC, DAL, WL, MWL, GL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1 |
- |
WC, DAL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2 |
- |
WC, DAL, WL |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Lesser Bamboo Bat (Tylonycteris fulvida) |
- |
WC, MWL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3); Rare(9) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Pallas’s Squirrel (Callosciurus
erythraeus) |
- |
MWL, V/O, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Fairly widely
distributed, with the styani subspecies found in
the New Territories (e.g. Tai Lam, Shing Mun and Tai Po Kau), and the thai subspecies found on the Hong Kong Island (e.g. Tai
Tam and Pok Fu Lam) |
- |
(1)
Habitats: MA=Marsh/Reed; PO=Pond; WC=Watercourse;
WAL=Wet Agricultural Land; DAL=Dry Agricultural Land; WL=Woodland; MWL=Mixed
Woodland; PL=Plantation; SL=Shrubland; GL=Grassland; V/O=Village/Orchard;
DA=Developed Area/Wasteland; IF=In Flight. (* indicates that the type of
agricultural land was not specified in the previous study (KFBG, 2022))
(2)
Distribution in Hong Kong and Rarity follows:
Flora: Wu and Lee (2000); Xing and Chau (2000); Siu
(2000).
Fauna: AFCD (2011); AFCD (2022); Karsen et al. (1998); Shek
(2006a); Reels (2019).
(3)
Cap. 96: Protected under the Forests and Countryside
Ordinance (Cap. 96).
Cap. 170: Protected under Wild Animals Protection
Ordinance (Cap. 170).
Cap. 586: Protection of Endangered Species of Animals
and Plants Ordinance (Cap.586).
Fellowes et al. (2002): LC=Local Concern; RC=Regional
Concern; PRC=Potential Regional Concern. Letters in parentheses indicate that
the assessment is on the basis of restrictedness in nesting and/or roosting
sites rather than in general occurrence.
(4)
Protection Status of Flora follows:
Hu et al. (2003); List of Wild Plants Under State Protection (Ministry of
Forestry in 1999); Fu (1992); Qin et al. (2017); Feng et al. (2002). Wu and Hu.
(1988).
(5)
Wetland-dependent species (including wetland-dependent
species and waterbirds).
(6)
The List of Endangered and Protected Species of China.
(7)
Zheng and Wang (1998); Zhao (1998)
(8)
Jiang et al. (2016).
(9)
IUCN (2022).
(10) Wang (1998).
(11) Habitat in bold type
face = species recorded within work site/area, or recorded within both works
site/area and Assessment Area; Habitat in unbold type
face = species recorded outside works site/area but within Assessment Area.
Table 10.46 Ecological Evaluation of
Pond and Watercourse within Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Criteria |
Pond |
Watercourse (S-KC-1 to
S-KC-11 and Sheung Yue River) |
Naturalness |
Low. A stormwater storage
pond maintained by DSD near Chau Tau Tsuen and an abandoned fishpond within
LVHSH Priority Site |
Low to moderate for S-KC-10
and S-KC-11 Low for S-KC-1 to S-KC-9
and Sheung Yue River |
Size |
Small (approx. 1.09 ha) |
Small (approx. 3.65 ha, 8.1 km in total) S-KC-2 (approx. 0.5km) S-KC-3a, 3b, 3c (approx.
0.2 km, 1.4 km, 0.2 km) S-KC-4 (approx. 0.3 km) S-KC-5 (approx. 0.2 km) S-KC-6 (approx. 0.6 km) S-KC-7 (approx. 1 km) S-KC-8 (approx. 1 km) S-KC-9 (approx. 0.2 km) S-KC-10 (approx. 0.2 km) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity |
Moderate to high floral and
moderate faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Uncommon. Mainly restricted to northwestern New Territories An amphibian species of conservation importance (Chinese Bullfrog) was
recorded in previous studies. A total of three avifauna
species of conservation importance recorded in
present survey, including Chinese Pond Heron, Grey Heron and Little
Egret. |
Common habitat in Hong Kong A total of two species of
conservation importance including a reptile and a freshwater crab species
were recorded in previous studies A total of 11 fauna species
of conservation importance were recorded in present survey, including eight
avifauna species (Ashy Drongo, Black-winged Stilt,
Chinese Pond Heron, Collared Crow, Common Greenshank, Great Egret, Grey Heron and Little Egret), one odonate (Blue Chaser),
one reptile species (Indo-Chinese Rat Snake) and one mammal species (Japanese
Pipistrelle) |
Re-creatability |
High |
Moderate to High |
Fragmentation |
High |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
Part of the pond
at Chau Tau Tsuen occurs within WBA |
Downstream of S-KC-1 to S-KC-3 and Sheung Yue River
partially within LVHSH Priority Site; Short section of watercourse S-KC-4 and
S-KC-9 near Chau Tau occurs in WBA |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate for Sheung Yue River Low for the
other minor watercourses |
Ecological value |
Low |
Low to moderate for Sheung Yue River Low for the other minor watercourses |
Table 10.47 Ecological
Evaluation of Dry Agricultural Land, Woodland and Mixed Woodland within Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Criteria |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Woodland |
Mixed Woodland |
Naturalness |
Low. A man-made habitat for the purpose of crop
production. |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Size |
Small (approx. 2.03 ha) |
Small (approx. 3.82 ha) |
Small (approx. 13.00 ha) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and faunal diversity |
Moderate to high floral and low faunal diversity |
Moderate to high floral and low faunal diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. A total of four species of conservation importance, including three
avifauna (previously recorded as in “wet agricultural land”) and an amphibian
species of conservation importance were recorded in previous studies. A total of five species of conservation importance
recorded in present survey, including three
avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron, Greater Coucal and Red-billed Starling), one
butterfly species (Small Cabbage White), one amphibian species (Chinese
Bullfrog). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. Two floral species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies. A
total of two species of conservation importance was recorded in both previous studies and present survey, including flora species (Aquilaria
sinensis and Gnetum luofuense). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two species of conservation importance including a floral
species (Aquilaria sinensis) and an avifauna species
(Greater Coucal) were recorded in
present survey. |
Re-creatability |
High |
Low
to moderate. Re-creatable if time is given for natural succession. |
Moderate. Re-creatable if time is given for natural
succession. |
Fragmentation |
Low to moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
A small patch in Kwu Tung occurs within LVHSH Priority Site and a small
patch in Chau Tau Tsuen occurs within WBA |
Some of the woodlands fall within “CA” on
Hadden Hill and LVHSH Priority Site |
Small mixed woodlands occur within “CA” on Hadden Hill |
Potential value |
Low to moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low to
moderate |
Table 10.48 Ecological
Evaluation of Plantation, Shrubland and Grassland within Kwu
Tung/Chau Tau Area
Criteria |
Plantation |
Shrubland |
Grassland |
Naturalness |
Low |
Moderate to high |
Moderate to high |
Size |
Small (approx. 7.32 ha) |
Small (approx. 20.56 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 59.59 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate to high floral and faunal diversity |
Moderate to high floral and
low faunal diversity |
Moderate floral and faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
A common habitat in Hong Kong An amphibian species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A
total of two species of conservation importance were recorded in present survey,
including one flora species (Aquilaria sinensis) and one butterfly
species (Danaid Eggfly). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of four species of conservation
importance recorded in present survey including a floral species (Aquilaria sinensis), an avifauna (Greater Coucal) and two
mammal species (Pallas’s Squirrel and Red Muntjac). |
Common habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of five species of
conservation importance recorded in present survey, including one flora (Brainea insignis) and four avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron, Great Egret, Greater
Coucal and Little Egret). |
Re-creatability |
High |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Fragmentation |
Moderate |
High |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
No
notable ecological linkage |
Small areas occur within “CA” on Hadden Hill |
Hillside grassland
partially falls within “CA” on Hadden Hill A few patches of low-lying grassland occur partially
within LVHSH Priority Site in Kwu Tung, WBA in Chau
Tau |
Potential value |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
No record of nursery or breeding ground |
No record of nursery or breeding ground |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low
to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low |
Low |
Low to moderate – for both hillside grassland and low-lying grassland |
Table 10.49 Ecological Evaluation of
Village/Orchard and Developed Area/Wasteland within Kwu
Tung/Chau Tau Area
Criteria |
Village / Orchard |
Developed Area / Wasteland |
Naturalness |
Low |
Low |
Size |
Moderate (approx. 18.14 ha) |
Large (approx. 178.91 ha) |
Diversity |
Moderate floral
(consisting of native ruderal and exotic species) and moderate faunal
diversity. |
Moderate to high floral (consisting of native ruderal
and exotic species) and moderate faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
A very common habitat in Hong Kong. A total of three species of
conservation importance, including an avifauna, an amphibian and a mammal
species, were recorded in previous studies. A total of two
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey, including two avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron
and Little Egret). |
Very common habitat in Hong
Kong A mammal species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 13 species of conservation importance recorded in present
survey, including four avifauna species (Black Kite, Eastern Buzzard, Greater
Coucal and Little Egret), one butterfly species (Danaid Eggfly),
one amphibian species (Spotted Narrow-mouthed Frog) and seven mammal species
(Chinese Noctule, Japanese Pipistrelle, Lesser Bamboo Bat, Pallas’s Squirrel,
Myotis sp., unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1 and unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2). |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
Moderate to High |
Low |
Ecological linkage |
Some parts occur
in LVHSH Priority Site in Kwu Tung and in WBA in
Chau Tau |
Some parts occur
in LVHSH Priority Site and IBA in Kwu Tung and in
WBA near Chau Tau |
Potential value |
Low |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery
and breeding behaviour |
No record of
nursery or breeding ground |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to Moderate |
Low |
Table 10.50 Species of Conservation
Importance Recorded within the Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Species |
Recorded Habitat in Previous Studies (1) |
Recorded Habitat in Present Survey (1)(11) |
Protection Status |
Distribution in Hong Kong (2) |
Rarity (2) |
Flora |
|||||
Incense Tree (Aquilaria sinensis) |
WL |
WL, MWL, PL, SL |
Cap. 586 (3); Vulnerable (4);
Cat 2 & 3 (Near Threatened) (4); Category ll
(4); Vulnerable (4); Near Threatened (4);
Vulnerable (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Luofushan Joint-Fir (Gnetum luofuense) |
WL |
WL |
Near Threatened (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Cycad-fern (Brainea
insignis) |
- |
GL |
Cat 2 (Vulnerable) (4); Category ll (4); Vulnerable (4) |
Restricted; common in Hong Kong |
- |
Avifauna |
|||||
Ashy Drongo (Dicrurus leucophaeus) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170
(3); LC (3) |
Found in Shing Mun, Tai Po Kau. |
Uncommon winter visitor. |
Black Kite (Milvus migrans) (5) |
- |
DA, IF |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3);
(RC) (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident and winter visitor. |
Black-winged Stilt (Himantopus himantopus) (5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170
(3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Long Valley, Kam Tin. |
Common migrant and winter visitor. |
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola
bacchus) (5) |
DAL |
PO, WC, DAL, GL,
V/O |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Collared Crow (Corvus torquatus)
(5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3); Near Threatened (8);
Vulnerable (9) |
Found in Inner
Deep Bay area, Nam Chung, Kei Ling Ha, Tai Mei Tuk,
Pok Fu Lam, Chek Lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Lam Tsuen. |
Locally common resident. |
Common Greenshank (Tringa nebularia) (5) |
- |
WC |
Cap.170 (3); RC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area. |
Abundant winter visitor and migrant. |
Eastern Buzzard (Buteo japonicus) (5) |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3); Cap.586 (3); Class
II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Great Egret (Ardea alba) (5) |
- |
WC, GL |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident, migrant and winter visitor. |
Greater Coucal (Centropus
sinensis) |
V/O |
DAL, MWL, SL, GL,
DA |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6);
Vulnerable (7) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea) (5) |
- |
PO, WC, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (3) |
Found in Deep Bay area, Starling Inlet, Kowloon Park,
Cape D'Aguilar. |
Common winter
visitor. |
Little Egret |
DAL |
PO, WC, GL, V/O, DA, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal area
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Red-billed Starling (Spodiopsar
sericeus) (5) |
- |
DAL |
Cap.170 (3); GC (3) |
Widely distributed
in Hong Kong. |
Abundant winter
visitor. |
Wood Sandpiper (Tringa glareola) (5) |
DAL |
- |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Widely distributed
in wetland area throughout Hong Kong. |
Common migrant and
winter visitor. |
Butterfly |
|||||
Small Cabbage White (Pieris rapae
crucivora) |
- |
DAL |
- |
Shek Mun Kap, Fan Lau, Ngong Ping, Kam Tin, Ho Chung, Luk Keng, Tuen Mun
Ash Lagoon |
Rare |
Danaid Eggfly (Hypolimnas misippus) |
- |
PL, DA |
LC (3) |
Ngau Ngak Shan, Lung Kwu Tan, Hong Kong Wetland Park, Mount Parker, Cloudy
Hill, Lin Ma Hang |
Uncommon |
Odonate |
|||||
Blue Chaser (Potamarcha
congener) |
- |
WC |
LC (3) |
Found in small weedy ponds, puddles and marshes.
Widely distributed in the New Territories; Scattered |
- |
Herpetofauna |
|||||
Chinese Bullfrog (Hoplobatrachus
rugulosus) |
PO, DAL, V/O |
DAL |
PRC (3); Class II (6);
Endangered (8) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong |
- |
Spotted Narrow-mouthed Frog (Kalophrynus
interlineatus) |
PL |
DA |
Near threatened (8) |
Widely distributed from low to moderate altitudes in
northern and central New Territories. |
- |
Indo-Chinese Rat Snake (Ptyas
korros) |
WC |
WC |
PRC (3); Endangered (7); Vulnerable (8); Near Threatened (9) |
Widely distributed
throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Mammal |
|||||
Chinese Noctule (Nyctalus plancyi) |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Japanese Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus abramus) |
V/O, DA |
WC, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Lesser Bamboo Bat (Tylonycteris fulvida) |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3); Rare (10) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Myotis spp. |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 1 |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae
sp. 2 |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Pallas’s Squirrel (Callosciurus
erythraeus) |
- |
SL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Fairly widely
distributed, with the styani subspecies found in the
New Territories (e.g. Tai Lam, Shing Mun and Tai Po Kau), and the thai subspecies found on the Hong Kong Island (e.g. Tai
Tam and Pok Fu Lam) |
- |
Red Muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak) |
- |
SL |
PRC (3); Near Threatened (8) |
Very widely distributed
in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Aquatic Communities |
|||||
Somanniathelphusa zanklon |
WC |
- |
GC (3);
Endangered (9) |
Endemic |
- |
(1)
Habitats: PO=Pond; WC=Watercourse; DAL=Dry Agricultural
Land; MWL=Mixed Woodland; PL=Plantation; SL=Shrubland; GL=Grassland;
V/O=Village/Orchard; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland; IF=In Flight.
(2)
Distribution in Hong Kong and Rarity follows:
Flora: Wu and Lee (2000); Xing and Chau (2000); Siu (2000).
Fauna: AFCD (2011); AFCD (2022); Karsen et al. (1998); Shek (2006a); Reels
(2019).
(3)
Cap. 96: Protected under the Forests and Countryside
Ordinance (Cap. 96).
Cap. 170: Protected under Wild
Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170).
Cap. 586: Protection of
Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap.586).
Fellowes et al. (2002): LC=Local Concern;
RC=Regional Concern; PRC=Potential Regional Concern. Letters in parentheses
indicate that the assessment is on the basis of restrictedness in nesting
and/or roosting sites rather than in general occurrence.
(4)
Protection Status of Flora follows:
Hu et al. (2003); List of Wild Plants Under State Protection (Ministry of
Forestry in 1999); Fu (1992); Qin et al. (2017); Feng et al. (2002). Wu and Hu.
(1988).
(5)
Wetland-dependent species (including wetland-dependent
species and waterbirds).
(6)
The List of Endangered and Protected Species of China.
(7)
Zheng and Wang (1998); Zhao (1998)
(8)
Jiang et al.
(2016).
(9)
IUCN (2022).
(10) Wang (1998).
(11) Habitat in bold type
face = species recorded within work site/area, or recorded within both works
site/area and Assessment Area; Habitat in unbold type
face = species recorded outside works site/area but within Assessment Area.
Table 10.51 Ecological Evaluation of
Marsh/Reed and Pond within Tai Shu Ha Area
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
Pond |
Naturalness |
Low-moderate. Succeeded
form man-made habitat, e.g. abandoned pond. |
Low. An artificial habitat
that is currently abandoned. |
Size |
Very small (approx. 0.11 ha) |
Very small (approx. 0.19 ha) |
Diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
An uncommon habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation importance
was recorded in both previous studies and present survey. |
An uncommon habitat in Hong
Kong. Mainly restricted to
northwestern New Territories. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two species of
conservation importance were recorded in present study, including one
avifauna species (Chinese Pond Heron) and one odonate
species (Scarlet Basker). |
Re-creatability |
Low-moderate |
High |
Fragmentation |
High |
High |
Ecological linkage |
Part of the marsh/reed
occurs in the “CA”. . |
One of the ponds was
adjacent to a marsh/reed habitat in “CA” |
Potential value |
Low due to the small size |
Low due to the isolation
between ponds |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Low |
Ecological value |
Low |
Low |
Table 10.52 Ecological
Evaluation of Watercourse, Seasonally Wet Grassland and Dry Agricultural Land
within Tai Shu Ha Area
Criteria |
Watercourse (S-TSH-1 to S-TSH-4) |
Seasonally Wet Grassland |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Naturalness |
Moderate. Generally natural
and some parts are modified. |
Moderate |
Low. An artificial habitat. |
Size |
Small (approx. 1.15 ha, 2.4 km in length) S-TSH-1 (approx. 0.9 km) S-TSH-2 (approx. 0.2 km) S-TSH-3 (approx. 0.8 km) S-TSH-4 (approx. 0.5 km) |
Very small (approx. 0.02 ha) |
Small (approx. 0.61 ha) |
Diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Very low floral and faunal
diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of four species of
conservation importance were recorded in present study, including one odonate species (Giant Hooktail),
one amphibian species (Lesser Spiny Frog) and two freshwater crab species (Somanniathelphusa zanklon
and Cryptopotamon anacoluthon). |
An uncommon habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. One mammal species of
conservation importance was recorded (Lesser Bamboo Bat) in present study. |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in both previous studies and present survey. |
Re-creatability |
Moderate |
Moderate |
High |
Fragmentation |
Low |
High. Only one isolated small patch of this habitat
recorded within Tai Shu Ha area. |
High |
Ecological linkage |
Majority of watercourses occur in either “CA” or
TLCP. |
Not linked with other high valued habitats |
Part of the dry
agricultural land occurs in the “CA”. |
Potential value |
Moderate as majority of the
watercourses is protected within “CA” and TLCP |
Low |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
S-TSH-1 serves as a breeding ground for Lesser Spiny
Frog No notable nursery and breeding behaviour in other
watercourses |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Ecological value |
Low-moderate
– S-TSH-1, S-TSH-3 and S-TSH-4 Low
– S-TSH-2 |
Low |
Low |
Table 10.53 Ecological Evaluation of Mixed
Woodland, Plantation and Grassland within Tai Shu Ha Area
Criteria |
Mixed Woodland |
Plantation |
Grassland |
Naturalness |
Moderate |
Low. A man-made habitat. |
Moderate |
Size |
Small (approx. 2.51 ha) |
Moderate (approx. 71.49 ha) |
Small (approx. 10.30 ha) |
Diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Low to moderate floral and
faunal diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of two species of
conservation importance, including a floral species (Gnetum
luofuense) and a mammal species (Pallas’s Squirrel), were recorded in present
survey. |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of 20 species of
conservation importance were recorded in present study, including two floral
species (Gnetum luofuense
and Brainea insignis), four avifauna
species (Collared Scops Owl, Rufous-capped Babbler, Chinese Grosbeak and
Besra), a butterfly (Tiny Grass Blue), two amphibian species (Short-legged
Toad and Lesser Spiny Frog) and 11 mammal species (Red Muntjac, Small Indian
Civet, East Asian Porcupine, Pallas’s Squirrel, Chinese Noctule, Himalayan
Leaf-nosed Bat, Japanese Pipistrelle, Least Horseshoe Bat, Lesser Bamboo Bat
and two unknown Vespertilionidae species). |
Common habitat in Hong
Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. Two avifauna of
conservation importance (Chinese Francolin and Little Egret) and a butterfly
species of conservation importance (Metallic Cerulean) were recorded in
present survey. |
Re-creatability |
Moderate. Re-creatable if time is given for natural
succession. |
High |
Moderate |
Fragmentation |
Moderate. Small areas of mixed woodland scattered
across Tai Sha Ha area. |
Low |
Moderate |
Ecological linkage |
Part of the mixed woodlands occur in “CA” and
TLCP. |
Majority of plantation
occurs in the either “CA” or TLCP. |
Most of the grasslands
occur in the “CA”. |
Potential value |
Moderate |
Moderate as majority of
plantation is protected within “CA” or TLCP and long-term regeneration of
native species is possible if time is given |
Low to moderate |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
Age |
N/A |
N/A for the overall
plantation, but plantation within the works area was established three years
ago (i.e. in 2019) |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Ecological value |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Table 10.54 Ecological Evaluation of
Village/Orchard and Developed Area/Wasteland within Tai Shu Ha Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Naturalness |
Low. An artificial habitat. |
Low. An artificial habitat. |
Size |
Small (approx. 0.94 ha) |
Small (approx. 9.28 ha) |
Diversity |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity |
Low floral and faunal
diversity |
Rarity |
A very common habitat in
Hong Kong. No species of conservation importance
was recorded in previous studies. A total of four species of
conservation importance were recorded in present study, including one floral
species (Aralia chinensis), two avifauna species (Greater Coucal and
Little Egret) and one mammal species (Pallas’s Squirrel). |
A very common habitat in
Hong Kong. No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies. A total of eight species of
conservation importance were recorded in present study, including eight bat
species (Chinese Noctule, Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat, Japanese Pipistrelle,
Least Horseshoe Bat, Lesser Bamboo Bat, one unknown Myotis species and
two unknown Vespertilionidae species) |
Re-creatability |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
High |
Low |
Ecological linkage |
Part of the village/orchard
occurs in the “CA” |
Some parts occur in the “CA” and TLCP. |
Potential value |
Low |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery / breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of
Wildlife |
Low |
Low |
Ecological value |
Low |
Low |
Table 10.55 Species
of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Tai Shu Ha Area
Species |
Recorded Habitat in
Previous Studies (1) |
Recorded Habitat in
Present Survey (1)(11) |
Protection Status |
Distribution in Hong Kong (2) |
Rarity (2) |
Flora |
|||||
Aralia chinensis |
- |
V/O |
Vulnerable (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Cycad-fern (Brainea
insignis) |
- |
PL |
Cat 2 (Vulnerable) (4); Cat II (4);
Vulnerable (4) |
Restricted; common in Hong Kong |
- |
Luofushan Joint-Fir (Gnetum luofuense) |
- |
MWL, PL |
Near Threatened (9) |
Common in Hong Kong |
- |
Avifauna |
|||||
Besra (Accipiter virgatus) |
- |
PL |
Cap.170
(3); Cap. 586 (3); Class II (6) |
Found in Tai Po Kau, Deep Bay area, Chek Lap Kok,
Cheung Chau, Soko Islands. |
Common resident and migrant. |
Black Kite (Milvus migrans) (5) |
- |
IF |
Cap.170
(3); Cap.586 (3); (RC) (3);
Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident and winter visitor. |
Chinese Francolin (Francolinus
pintadeanus) |
- |
GL |
Cap.170
(3); Near Threatened(8) |
Widely distributed in grassland throughout Hong Kong |
Common resident. |
Chinese Grosbeak (Eophona migratoria) |
- |
PL |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3) |
Found in Kam Tin, Nam Chung, Shek Kong, Deep Bay
area, Ho Chung, Lam Tsuen, Hok Tau, Island House and Kowloon Park. |
Common winter visitor. |
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola
bacchus) (5) |
- |
PO |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Collared Scops Owl (Otus lettia) |
- |
PL |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6) |
Widely distributed in shrubland throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Greater Coucal (Centropus
sinensis) |
- |
V/O |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6);
Vulnerable (7) |
Widely distributed in Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Little Egret |
- |
GL, V/O, IF |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in coastal area
throughout Hong Kong. |
Common resident. |
Rufous-capped Babbler (Stachyridopsis
ruficeps) |
- |
PL |
Cap.170 (3); LC (3) |
Found in Shing Mun, Tai Po Kau, Tai Mei Tuk,
Ng Tung Chai, Fo Tan, Tai Mo Shan, The Peak, Kadoorie Agricultural Research Centre. |
Common resident. |
Butterfly |
|||||
Metallic Cerulean (Jamides alecto) |
- |
GL |
- |
Victoria Peak, Fung Yuen, Chuen Lung, Mui Wo |
Very rare |
Tiny Grass Blue (Zizula hylax) |
- |
PL |
Species of
conservation concern(2) |
Lung Kwu Tan, Fung Yuen, Sha Lo Wan |
Very rare |
Odonate |
|||||
Giant Hooktail (Megalogomphus sommeri) |
- |
WC |
LC (3) |
Found in clean, shaded, and fast-flowing sandy
streams in woodlands. Mainly occurs in the central and northeast New
Territories; Scattered |
- |
Scarlet Basker (Urothemis signata signata) |
- |
PO |
LC (3) |
Common in areas with abandoned fish ponds throughout
Hong Kong; Scattered |
- |
Herpetofauna |
|||||
Short-Legged Toad (Megophrys
brachykolos) |
- |
PL |
PGC (3); Vulnerable (8); Endangered (9) |
Widely distributed in upland forest streams
throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Lesser Spiny Frog (Quasipaa
exilispinosa) |
- |
WC, PL |
PGC (3); Vulnerable (8) |
Widely distributed in upland forest streams
throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Mammal |
|||||
Least Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus
pusillus) |
- |
PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Widely distributed in countryside areas throughout
Hong Kong |
- |
Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat (Hipposideros armiger) |
- |
PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3) |
Widely distributed in countryside areas throughout
Hong Kong. |
- |
Chinese Noctule (Nyctalus plancyi) |
- |
PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); PRC (RC) (3) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Japanese Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus abramus) |
- |
PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Lesser Bamboo Bat (Tylonycteris
fulvida) |
- |
SWG, PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3); (LC) (3); Rare (10) |
Fairly widely distributed in countryside areas
throughout Hong Kong. |
- |
Myotis spp. |
- |
DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 1 |
- |
PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Unknown Vespertilionidae sp. 2 |
- |
PL, DA |
Cap.170 (3) |
- |
- |
Pallas’s Squirrel (Callosciurus erythraeus) |
- |
MWL, PL, V/O |
Cap.170 (3) |
Fairly widely distributed, with the styani subspecies
found in the New Territories (e.g. Tai Lam, Shing Mun and Tai Po Kau), and
the thai subspecies found on the Hong Kong Island
(e.g. Tai Tam and Pok Fu Lam) |
- |
East Asian Porcupine (Hystrix
brachyura) |
- |
PL |
Cap.170 (3); PGC (3) |
Very widely
distributed in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong, except for Lantau
Island |
- |
Small Indian Civet (Viverricula indica) |
- |
PL |
Cap.170 (3); Class II (6); Vulnerable (8) |
Very widely distributed in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong,
except for Lantau Island |
- |
Red Muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak) |
- |
PL |
PRC (3); Near Threatened (8) |
Very widely distributed in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong |
- |
Aquatic Communities |
|||||
Somanniathelphusa zanklon |
- |
WC |
GC (3);
Endangered (9) |
Endemic |
- |
Stream Crab (Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon) |
- |
WC |
PGC (3);
Vulnerable (9) |
Common; Endemic |
- |
(1)
Habitats: PO=Pond; WC=Watercourse; MA=Marsh/Reed;
SWG=Seasonally Wet Grassland; DAL=Dry Agricultural Land; MWL=Mixed Woodland;
PL=Plantation; GL=Grassland; V/O=Village/Orchard; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland;
IF=In Flight.
(2)
Distribution in Hong Kong and Rarity follows:
Flora: Wu and Lee (2000); Xing and Chau (2000); Siu (2000).
Fauna: AFCD (2011); AFCD (2022); Karsen et al. (1998); Shek (2006a); Reels
(2019); Dudgeon (2003).
(3)
Cap. 96: Protected under the Forests and Countryside
Ordinance (Cap. 96).
Cap. 170: Protected under Wild
Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170).
Cap. 586: Protection of
Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap.586).
Fellowes et al. (2002): LC=Local Concern;
RC=Regional Concern; PRC=Potential Regional Concern. Letters in parentheses
indicate that the assessment is on the basis of restrictedness in nesting
and/or roosting sites rather than in general occurrence.
(4)
Protection Status of Flora follows:
Hu et al. (2003); List of Wild Plants Under State Protection (Ministry of
Forestry in 1999); Fu (1992); Qin et al. (2017); Feng et al. (2002). Wu and Hu.
(1988).
(5)
Wetland-dependent species (including wetland-dependent
species and waterbirds).
(6)
The List of Endangered and Protected Species of China.
(7)
Zheng and Wang (1998); Zhao (1998)
(8)
Jiang et al.
(2016).
(9)
IUCN (2022).
(10) Wang (1998).
(11) Habitat in bold type
face = species recorded within work site/area, or recorded within both works
site/area and Assessment Area; Habitat in unbold type
face = species recorded outside works site/area but within Assessment Area.
Table 10.56 Summary of Ecological
Value of Habitats within the Assessment Area
Habitat Type(1) |
Area |
|||||
KSRPH |
SPAUT |
NTMPW |
SATSWW |
KTUCT |
TSH |
|
MA |
N/A |
· Moderate
to High for the middle and southern compartments of Sha Po Marsh · Moderate
for the brackish marsh/reed along S-SA-6 and S-SA-6a · Low
to moderate for the northern compartment of Sha Po Marsh, YLBFEW and other
marsh/reed |
Low |
· Moderate
for the three marsh/ reed with higher coverage and diversity of wetland
plants · Low
to moderate for other marsh/reed |
N/A |
Low |
WRCW |
· Moderate
for WRCW Parcel J · Low
to moderate for WRCW Parcels C and I |
· Moderate
for Parcels A, B, B1, D and M · Low
to Moderate for Parcels E and F |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
PO |
Low |
· Moderate
for the active fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen near Au Tau and and west of Mo Fan Heung in Pok Wai · Low
to moderate for the inactive and abandoned fishponds south of Cheung Chun San
Tsuen near Au Tau, ponds within and next to YLBFEW west of Nam San Wai Road · Low for other ponds |
· Low to moderate for ponds west of San Tin Highway · Low for other ponds |
· Moderate for the contiguous ponds north of San Tin
Highway · Low for other ponds |
Low |
Low |
WC |
· Low to Moderate |
· Moderate to High for KTMDC · Moderate for S-SA-3 and Meander S-SA-6 · Low to Moderate for other watercourses |
· Low to Moderate for NTMDC · Low for other water-courses |
· Moderate for STEMDC · Low to Moderate for other water-courses |
· Low to Moderate for Sheung Yue River · Low for other water-courses |
· Low to Moderate for S-TSH-1 · Low for the other water-courses |
SWG |
N/A |
Low |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Low |
WAL |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Low |
N/A |
N/A |
DAL |
Low
to Moderate |
Low |
Low |
Low
to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
Low |
WL |
N/A |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
N/A |
MWL |
Low
to Moderate |
Low to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
PL |
· Low to Moderate for plantation west of Tsing Long
Highway · Low for the remaining plantations |
· Low to moderate for the plantation utilized by Ko Po
Road Ardeid Night Roost, hillside plantation within “CA” and LTCP on Kai Kung
Leng · Low for remaining plantations |
· Low to moderate for hillside plantation on Kai Kung
Leng · Low for remaining plantations |
Low |
Low |
Low
to Moderate |
SL |
Low
to Moderate |
Low |
· Low to Moderate for hillside shrubland on Kai Kung Leng
· Low for shrubland in Ngau Tam Mei |
Low
to Moderate |
Low |
N/A |
GL |
· Low to Moderate for hillside grassland · Low for low-lying grasslands |
· Moderate for hillside grassland · Low for low-lying grasslands |
· Low to Moderate for hillside grassland · Low for low-lying grasslands |
Low
to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
Low |
VO |
Low |
Low |
Low
to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
Low
to Moderate |
Low |
DA |
Low |
· Moderate for Pok Wai Public School ·
Low for other developed
area/wasteland |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
(1)
Habitats: MA=Marsh/Reed; WRCW=West Rail Compensatory
Wetland; PO=Pond; WC=Watercourse; SWG=Seasonally Wet Grassland; WAL=Wet
Agricultural Land; DAL=Dry Agricultural Land; WL=Woodland; MWL=Mixed Woodland;
SL=Shrubland; PL=Plantation; GL=Grassland; V/O=Village/Orchard; DA=Developed
Area/Wasteland; N/A=No this habitat in this area.
·
Construction of Kam Sheung Road (KSR)(NOL) Station
and its overrun tunnels;
·
Enabling works for potential southern extension to
the south of KSR(NOL) Station; and
·
Underground
railway alignment.
Construction Phase – Direct Impact
No Direct Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance and Ecologically Sensitive Areas
Table 10.57 Direct Loss of Habitats within
Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Habitats(1) |
Approximate Size (ha) |
|||
WC |
DA |
V/O |
Sub-total (2) |
|
Permanent Loss |
||||
KSR(NOL) Station |
- |
1.42 |
- |
1.42 |
Total Permanent Loss (ha) |
- |
1.42 |
- |
1.42 |
Temporary Loss |
||||
KSR(NOL) Station |
0.15 |
2.50 |
- |
2.65 |
Overrun Tunnels and Enabling
Works |
0.14 |
4.56 |
0.01 |
4.71 |
Total Temporary Loss (ha) |
0.29 |
7.06 |
0.01 |
7.36 |
Notes:
(1)
Habitats:
WC=Watercourse; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland; V/O=Village/Orchard
(2)
The size and
percentage included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments. Any
discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein are
due to rounding.
·
Kam Tin South Public Housing Development;
·
Grand Mayfair;
·
Kam Sheung Road Package 2 Property Development; and
·
Tuen Ma Line.
Table 10.58 Summary
of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Requirements in Kam Sheung
Road/Pat Heung Area
Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated
Level of Impact |
Mitigation
Measures Required (Y/N) (1) |
Construction
Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation
Importance and Ecologically Sensitive Areas |
TLCP and “CA” |
No impact is
anticipated |
N.A. |
|
Direct Loss of Terrestrial Habitats and Impacts on
the Associated Fauna |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Minor |
N |
|
Watercourse |
Minor |
N |
||
Village/Orchard |
Minor |
N |
||
Associated fauna |
No impact is
anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Bird Collision |
Minor |
N |
||
Indirect Impacts |
||||
Potential Impacts due to Aboveground Construction
Works |
||||
Disturbance Impact on Recognized Sites of
Conservation Importance and Ecologically Sensitive Areas |
TLCP |
Minor |
N |
|
“CA” |
Minor |
N |
||
WRCW Parcels C, I and J |
Low to
moderate |
Y |
||
Kam Po Road Egretry and ANR |
Low to
moderate |
Y |
||
S-KP-1 (Upper tributary of Kam Tin River) |
Minor |
N |
||
Disturbances and Obstruction to Breeding and Roosting
Ardeid Flight Paths |
Breeding ardeids (utilizing flight paths 7 and 8) and
roosting ardeids (utilizing flight paths 8 and 9) at Kam Po Road |
Low to
moderate |
Y |
|
Breeding ardeids (utilizing flight path 9) and
roosting ardeids (utilizing flight path 10) at Kam Po Road |
Minor |
N |
||
Impact on Water Quality and Hydrology of Modified
Watercourse |
Ho Pui Channel and S-KP-1 |
Minor |
N |
|
Potential
Impacts due to Underground Tunnelling Construction Works |
||||
Hydrological Disruptions due to Groundwater Drawdown |
WCRW Parcels C and J |
Low to
moderate |
Y |
|
S-KP-1 |
No impact is
anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Ground-borne Noise and Vibration |
Kam Po Road Egretry and ANR
in WRCW Parcel J |
Minor |
N |
|
S-KP-1 and associated fauna |
Minor |
N |
||
Operation
Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct Injury / Mortality to Wildlife and Bird
Collision |
Low to
moderate |
Y |
||
Indirect Impacts |
||||
Disturbance to Habitats, Sites of Conservation
Importance and Ecologically Sensitive Areas |
Minor |
N |
||
Disturbance to Breeding and Roosting Ardeids |
Minor due to
KSR(NOL) Station |
N |
||
Disturbances and Obstruction to Breeding and Roosting
Ardeid Flight Paths |
Minor – due
to KSR(NOL) Station |
N |
||
|
Cumulative
Impacts |
|||
Concurrent Projects: ·
Kam Tin South Public Housing Development; ·
Grand Mayfair; ·
Kam Sheung Road Package 2 Property Development; and · Tuen Ma Line |
Minor
disturbance impacts (e.g. noise and glare) on recognized sites of
conservation importance, the associated natural habitats and wildlife |
N |
||
Minor on
obstruction of bird flight paths |
Note:
(1)
General good
site practices and erection of site hoarding will be implemented in works
sites/areas.
·
Shui Mei Road Ancillary Building (EAP/EEP/VB)
(SMA);
·
Au Tau (AUT) Station and a temporary CLP Substation
adjoining San Tam Road;
·
Pok Wai Ancillary Building (EAP/EEP/VB) (PWA); and
·
NOL
underground alignment tunnel.
Table 10.59 Direct
Loss of Habitats within Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Habitats (1) |
Approximate Size (ha) |
||||
MA |
WC |
V/O |
DA |
Sub-total (2) |
|
Permanent
Loss |
|||||
SMA |
0.12 |
< 0.01 |
- |
0.11 |
0.23 |
AUT Station |
- |
- |
- |
1.02 |
1.02 |
PWA |
- |
- |
- |
0.23 |
0.23 |
Total Permanent Loss (ha) |
0.12 |
< 0.01 |
- |
1.36 |
1.48 |
Temporary Loss |
|||||
SMA (3) |
0.14 |
<0.01 |
0.13 |
0.40 |
0.67 |
AUT Station and Temporary
CLP Substation |
- |
0.01 |
- |
2.60 |
2.61 |
PWA |
- |
- |
- |
0.53 |
0.53 |
Total Temporary Loss (ha) |
0.14 |
0.01 |
0.13 |
3.53 |
3.81 |
Notes:
(1)
Habitats:
MA=Marsh/Reed; WC=Watercourse; V/O=Village/Orchard; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland
(2)
The size
included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments. Any discrepancies
between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein are due to
rounding.
(3)
Part of the
works site of SMA will be occupied by a road works area by others thus is not
considered as direct habitat loss under the Project.
·
Sha Po Public Housing Development;
·
Park Yoho Phases 2 and 3 Development; and
·
Kam Tin North Housing Development.
Table 10.60 Summary of Potential Impacts and
Mitigation Measures Requirements in Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Sha Po/Au Tau Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated Level of Impact |
Mitigation Measures Required (Y/N) (1) |
Construction
Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct
Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance |
LTCP, “CA”,
WCA and WBA |
No impact is anticipated |
N |
|
Direct
Impacts on Ecologically Sensitive Areas |
Sha Po Marsh |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
|
S-SA-2 |
Low to moderate |
Y |
||
S-SA-6a |
minor |
N |
||
Active
fishponds at Cheung Chun San Tsuen |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Ko Po Road
ANR |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Direct Loss of
Bat Roost |
Day-roost of
the Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bats |
Low to moderate |
Y |
|
Direct Loss
of Terrestrial Habitats and Impacts on the Associated Species of Conservation
Importance |
Brackish
marsh along S-SA-6a |
Low to moderate |
Y |
|
Other
marsh/reed |
Minor |
N |
||
S-SA-2 |
Minor |
N |
||
S-SA-6a |
Low to moderate |
Y |
||
Village/orchard |
Minor |
N |
||
Faunal
species of conservation importance (excluding the potential roosting of
Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bats) |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Floral species
of conservation importance (i.e. Persicaria
orientalis) |
Moderate |
Y |
||
Bird
Collision |
- |
No impact is anticipated |
N |
|
Indirect
Impacts |
||||
Potential
Impacts due to Aboveground Construction Works |
||||
Habitat
Fragmentation |
Insignificant – due to the constructions of SMA and
AUT Station |
N |
||
Disturbance
Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance and Ecologically
Sensitive Areas |
Active, inactive
and abandoned fishponds in the west and south of SMA |
Minor |
N |
|
S-SA-5 |
Minor |
N |
||
S-SA-6 |
Low to moderate |
Y |
||
KTMDC |
Insignificant – from SMA |
N |
||
Sha Po Marsh
|
Low to moderate – from AUT Station |
Y |
||
LTCP |
Minor |
N |
||
Sha Po Ardeid
Night Roost |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Impacts on Water Quality, Hydrodynamics Properties
and Hydrology of Wetland Habitats |
S-SA-2 and
6a, and Marsh/reed |
Low to moderate |
Y |
|
Potential
Impacts due to Underground Tunnelling Construction Works |
||||
Hydrological
Disruptions due to Groundwater Drawdown |
WRCW Parcels |
Insignificant |
N |
|
Active and
inactive fishponds |
||||
Sha Po Marsh |
||||
Marsh/reed
and ponds |
||||
Ground-borne
Noise and Vibration |
Aboveground
habitats and associated wildlife |
Minor |
N |
|
Operation
Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct Injury / Mortality to Wildlife and Bird
Collision |
Potential flight
paths near AUT Station, SMA and PWA |
Insignificant |
N |
|
Indirect
Impacts |
||||
Disturbance
on Sites of Conservation Importance, Ecologically Sensitive Areas, Adjacent
Habitats and Associated Wildlife |
Adjacent
habitats |
Minor - From SMA and PWA |
N |
|
Minor - From AUT Station |
N |
|||
Sha Po Marsh |
Minor – from AUT Station |
N |
||
WCA |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
WBA |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Change in Hydrodynamics
Properties and Hydrology of Wetland Habitats |
S-SA-2, 6a
and associated wetlands |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
|
Cumulative
Impacts |
||||
·
Kam Tin North Housing Development; · Park Yoho Phases 2 and 3
Development; · Sha Po Public Housing
Development |
- |
Minor – for disturbance impacts (e.g. noise and
glare) on recognized sites of conservation importance, the associated natural
habitats and wildlife |
N |
Note:
(1)
General good
site practices and erection of site hoarding will be implemented in works
sites/areas.
·
Long Ha Tsuen Ancillary Building (EAP/EEP) (LHA);
·
Ngau
Tam Mei (NTM) Station;
·
Ngau Tam Mei Depot (NTD); and
·
NOL
Alignment and bifurcation tunnels.
Construction Phase – Direct Impact
No Direct Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance
No Direct Impact on Ecologically
Sensitive Resources
Direct Loss of Terrestrial Habitats
and Associated Fauna
Table 10.61 Direct Loss of Habitats
within Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Habitats (1) |
Approximate Size (ha) |
||||||||
WC |
DA |
PL |
SL |
GL |
MWL |
DAL |
V/O |
Sub-total (2) |
|
Permanent Loss |
|||||||||
LHA |
<0.01 |
0.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
0.1 |
NTM
Station |
- |
0.81 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.08 |
0.12 |
1.01 |
NTD |
0.05 |
11.30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.22 |
11.57 |
Total Permanent Loss (ha) |
0.05 |
12.21 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.08 |
0.34 |
12.68 |
Temporary Loss |
|||||||||
LHA
(3) |
0.02 |
0.92 |
0.02 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
- |
0.13 |
1.10 |
NTM
Station and NTD |
0.10 |
3.75 |
0.01 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.04 |
0.78 |
0.56 |
5.64 |
Total Temporary Loss (ha) |
0.12 |
4.67 |
0.03 |
0.20 |
0.21 |
0.04 |
0.78 |
0.69 |
6.74 |
Notes:
(1)
Habitats:
WC=Watercourse; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland; PL=Plantation; SL=Shrubland; GL=Grassland; MWL=Mixed Woodland; DAL=
Dry Agricultural Land; V/O=Village/Orchard
(2)
The size
included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments. Any discrepancies
between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein are due to
rounding.
(3)
Part of the
LHA work site would encroach onto the adjacent conservation area and woodland
habitat, and only demolition of existing temporary structures will be conducted
within these areas.
Direct Impacts on Fauna Species of Conservation Importance
Habitat Fragmentation
Bird Collision
Construction Phase – Indirect Impact
Potential Impacts due to Aboveground Construction Works
Disturbance Impacts on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance and
Ecologically Sensitive Area
Disturbance Impacts on Terrestrial Habitat, Vegetation and Fauna
Impacts on Resident and Migratory Birds, Egrets and Herons
Impacts on Water Quality in Nearby Watercourses and Wetland
Potential Impacts due to Underground Tunnelling Construction Works
No Additional Habitat Loss and Habitat Fragmentation
Direct Injury/Mortality to Wildlife and Bird Collision
Disturbance on Adjacent Habitats and Associated Wildlife
Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated Level of Impact |
Mitigation Measures Required (Y/N) (1) |
Construction Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct Impact
on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance and Ecologically Sensitive
Areas |
LTCP |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
|
“CA” |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
WBA |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
WCA |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Direct Impact on Ecologically Sensitive Resources |
Fishponds |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
|
Direct Loss
of Terrestrial Habitats and Associated Fauna |
Watercourse |
Minor |
N |
|
Developed
Area/Wasteland |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Plantation |
Minor |
N |
||
Shrubland |
||||
Grassland |
||||
Mixed
Woodland |
||||
Dry
Agricultural Land |
||||
Village/orchard |
||||
Direct
Impacts on Fauna Species of Conservation Importance |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Habitat
Fragmentation |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Bird
Collision |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Indirect Impacts |
||||
Potential Impacts due to Aboveground Construction
Works |
||||
Disturbance
Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance |
TLCP |
Minor |
N |
|
“CA” |
Minor |
N |
||
WBA |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Disturbance Impact
on Ecologically Sensitive Area |
Ponds |
Insignificant |
N |
|
Disturbance
Impacts on Terrestrial Habitat, Vegetation and Fauna |
Minor – due to NTM Station and NTD |
N |
||
Minor – due to LHA |
N |
|||
Impacts on Resident
and Migratory Birds, Egrets and Herons |
Minor |
N |
||
Impacts on
Water Quality in Nearby Watercourses and Wetland |
On S-NP-5
and S-NP-9 |
Insignificant |
N |
|
On other
wetland habitats e.g. ponds |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Potential Impacts due to Underground Tunnelling
Construction Works |
||||
Hydrological
Disruptions due to Groundwater Drawdown |
Minor |
N |
||
Ground-borne
Noise and Vibration |
LTCP |
Minor |
N |
|
“CA” |
Minor |
N |
||
Operation
Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Additional Habitat
Loss and Habitat Fragmentation |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Direct
Injury / Mortality to Wildlife and Bird Collision |
Minor |
N |
||
Indirect Impacts |
||||
Disturbance on
Adjacent Habitats and Associated Wildlife |
Minor |
N |
||
Obstruction
to Commuting Bird Flight Paths |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Cumulative Impacts |
||||
Concurrent
Project: • Proposed
Fresh Water Trunk Main under Ngau Tam Mei Water Treatment Works Extension |
- |
Minor – for disturbance impacts (e.g. noise and
glare) on recognized sites of conservation importance, the associated natural
habitats and wildlife |
N |
Note:
(1)
General good
site practices and erection of site hoarding will be implemented in works
sites/areas.
·
San Tin (SAT) Station;
·
Enabling works for potential bifurcation to LMC
Loop and Huanggang Port to the north of SAT Station;
·
San Tin Ancillary Building (EEP/VB) (SNA);
·
Ka Lung Road Ancillary Building (EEP/EAP) (KLA);
and
·
Underground railway corridor.
Construction Phase – Direct Impact
No Direct Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance
Direct Loss of Ecologically Sensitive Resources
Direct Loss of Terrestrial Habitats and Associated Wildlife
Table 10.63 Direct Loss of Habitats
within San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Habitats (1) |
Approximate Size (ha) |
|||||||||||
MA |
PO |
WC |
MWL |
PL |
SL |
GL |
WAL |
DAL |
V/O |
DA |
Sub-total (2) |
|
Permanent Loss |
||||||||||||
SAT
Station |
0.04 |
- |
<0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.01 |
1.05 |
SNA |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.05 |
0.17 |
0.05 |
- |
0.27 |
KLA |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.13 |
0.13 |
Total Permanent Loss (ha) |
0.04 |
- |
<0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.05 |
0.17 |
0.05 |
1.14 |
1.45 |
Temporary Loss (3) |
||||||||||||
SAT
Station and SNA (4) |
0.99 |
0.54 |
0.26 |
0.72 |
- |
0.21 |
0.66 |
0.26 |
2.49 |
0.88 |
12.98 |
19.99 |
KLA |
- |
- |
- |
<0.01 |
0.02 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.83 |
1.85 |
Total Temporary Loss (ha) |
0.99 |
0.54 |
0.26 |
0.72 |
0.02 |
0.21 |
0.66 |
0.26 |
2.49 |
0.88 |
14.81 |
21.84 |
Notes:
(1)
Habitats: MA=Marsh/Reed;
PO=Pond; WC=Watercourse; MWL=Mixed Woodland; PL=Plantation; SL=Shrubland;
GL=Grassland; WAL=Wet Agricultural Land; DAL=Dry Agricultural Land;
V/O=Village/Orchard; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland
(2)
The size in
this table is subject to rounding adjustments. Any discrepancies between total
and sums of individual numbers listed therein are due to rounding.
(3)
Temporary
loss arising from the Project would be accounted to the permanent loss of STLMC
DN.
(4)
SAT Station
and SNA share the same works site/area.
Direct Impact on Species of Conservation
Importance
Bird Collision
Construction Phase – Indirect Impact
Potential Impacts due to Aboveground Construction Works
Disturbance Impacts on Vegetation and Fauna
Disturbance and Obstruction of Flight Path to Breeding Ardeids
Impacts on Water Quality, Hydrodynamics Properties and Hydrology of
Watercourse
Operation Phase – Direct Impact
Direct Injury/Mortality to Wildlife and Bird Collision
Operation Phase – Indirect Impact
Obstruction of Ardeid Flight line
Water Quality Impact
Cumulative Impact
Table 10.64 Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation
Measures Requirements in San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
San Tin/Shek Wu
Wai Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated Level of Impact |
Mitigation Measures Required (Y/N) (1) |
Construction Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct Impact
on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance |
WCA |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
|
WBA |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Direct Loss
of Ecologically Sensitive Resources |
Shek Wu Wai
agricultural land |
minor |
N |
|
Marsh/reed |
||||
Ponds |
||||
Agricultural
area |
||||
S-SS-4a |
||||
S-SS4b |
||||
Direct Loss
of Terrestrial Habitats and Associated Wildlife |
Marsh/reed
of moderate ecological value |
Low to moderate |
Y |
|
Marsh/reed
of low ecological value |
Minor |
N |
||
Pond |
||||
Watercourse |
||||
Mixed woodland |
||||
Plantation |
||||
Shrubland |
||||
Grassland |
||||
Wet
agricultural land |
||||
Dry
agricultural land |
||||
Village/orchard |
||||
Developed
area/wasteland |
||||
Direct Impact
on Species of Conservation Importance |
Faunal
species of conservation importance |
No impact is anticipated |
N |
|
Bird
Collision |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Indirect Impacts |
||||
Potential Impacts due to Aboveground Construction
Works |
||||
Disturbance
Impacts on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance, Ecologically
Sensitive Areas and Terrestrial Habitats |
Ecologically
sensitive areas |
Low to moderate |
Y |
|
Natural terrestrial
habitats |
Low to moderate |
Y |
||
Disturbance
Impacts on Vegetation and Fauna |
Low to moderate – due to the construction works of
KLA |
Y |
||
Disturbance and
Obstruction of Flight Path to Breeding Ardeids |
Potential
flight paths |
Minor |
N |
|
Impacts on
Water Quality, Hydrodynamics Properties and Hydrology of Watercourse |
STEMDC |
Low to moderate |
Y |
|
Potential Impacts due to Underground Construction
Works |
||||
Hydrological
Disruptions due to Groundwater Drawdown |
STEMDC |
Minor |
N |
|
Ground-borne
Noise and Vibration |
Aboveground
ecological habitats and associated wildlife |
Minor |
N |
|
Direct
Impacts |
||||
Direct Injury/Mortality to Wildlife and Bird
Collision |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Indirect
Impacts |
||||
Obstruction of Ardeid Flight line |
Minor |
N |
||
Water Quality Impact |
On STEMDC and breeding location of Greater
Painted-snipe |
Minor |
N |
|
Cumulative
Impacts |
||||
San Tin/Lok Ma Chau Development Node |
- |
Minor – for
disturbance impacts (e.g. noise and glare) on recognized sites of
conservation importance, the associated natural habitats and wildlife |
N |
Note:
(1)
General good
site practices and erection of site hoarding will be implemented in works
sites/areas.
·
Kwu
Tung (KTU) (NOL) Station;
·
Kwu Tung
Road Ancillary Building (EAP/EEP) (KTA);
·
Pak Shek Au Ancillary Building (EAP/EEP) (PAA); and
·
NOL
Alignment Tunnel.
Construction Phase – Direct Impact
Table 10.65 Direct
Loss of Habitats within Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Habitats (1) |
Approximate Size (ha) (2) |
||||||
WC |
DA |
PL |
V/O |
SL |
MWL |
Sub-total (3) |
|
Permanent Loss |
|||||||
KTU(NOL) Station |
0.09 (2) |
0.60 |
0.13 (2) |
0.13 (2) |
- |
- |
0.95 |
KTA |
- |
0.27 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.27 |
PAA |
- |
0.17 |
- |
0.12 |
- |
- |
0.29 |
Total Permanent Loss (ha) |
0.09 |
1.04 |
0.13 |
0.25 |
- |
- |
1.51 |
Temporary Loss |
|||||||
KTU(NOL) Station |
0.02 (2) |
4.34 |
0.06(2) |
0.13(2) |
- |
- |
4.55 |
KTA |
- |
1.76 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.76 |
PAA |
0.10 |
2.74 |
- |
0.52 |
0.10 |
0.03 |
3.49 |
Total Temporary Loss (ha) |
0.12 |
8.84 |
0.06 |
0.65 |
0.10 |
0.03 |
9.80 |
Notes:
(1)
Habitats:
WC=Watercourse; DA=Developed Area/Wasteland; PL=Plantation;
V/O=Village/Orchard; SL=Shrubland; MWL=Mixed Woodland
(2)
The type of
habitats and the calculation of areas were based on the conditions during the
survey period of NOL although modification of habitats (i.e. conversion to
developed area/wasteland habitat) would have been expected from the
construction of two concurrent projects (KTN NDA and STLMC DN) at the
construction phase for NOL.
(3)
The size
included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments. Any discrepancies
between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein are due to
rounding.
Bird Collision
Table 10.66 Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation
Measures Requirements in Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated Level of Impact |
Mitigation Measures Required (Y/N) (1) |
Construction Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct Impact
on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance and Ecologically Sensitive
Areas |
LVHSH
Priority Site, WBA, “CA” and IBA |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
|
Direct Loss
of Terrestrial Habitats and Impacts on the Associated Fauna |
Developed
Area/Wasteland |
Minor |
N |
|
Watercourse |
||||
Plantation |
||||
Village/orchard |
||||
Shrubland |
||||
Mixed
Woodland |
||||
Direct
Impact on Species of Conservation Importance |
No impact is anticipated |
N.A. |
||
Bird
Collision |
Minor |
N |
||
Indirect Impacts |
||||
Potential
Impacts due to Aboveground Construction Works |
||||
Disturbance
Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance and Ecologically
Sensitive Areas |
LVHSH
Priority Site |
Minor |
N |
|
WBA |
||||
“CA” |
||||
IBA |
||||
Disturbance Impacts
on Terrestrial Habitats, Vegetation and Other Fauna |
Natural
terrestrial habitats |
Low to moderate |
Y |
|
Artificial
habitats |
Minor |
N |
||
Disturbance
Impacts on Species of Conservation Importance |
Minor |
N |
||
Impact on
Water Quality and Hydrology of Watercourse |
Minor |
N |
||
Potential Impacts due to Underground Tunnelling
Construction Works |
||||
Hydrological
Disruptions due to Groundwater Drawdown |
Minor |
N |
||
Ground-borne
Noise and Vibration |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Operation Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct Injury
/ Mortality to Wildlife and Bird Collision |
Minor |
N |
||
Indirect Impacts |
||||
Disturbance
to Adjacent Habitats and Associated Wildlife |
Insignificant |
N |
||
|
Cumulative Impacts |
|||
Concurrent
Projects: • KTN NDA • STLMC DN |
- |
Minor – for disturbance impacts (e.g. noise and
glare) on recognized sites of conservation importance, the associated natural
habitats and wildlife |
N |
Note:
(1)
General good
site practices and erection of site hoarding will be implemented in works
sites/areas.
Construction Phase – Direct Impact
Direct Impact of Terrestrial Habitats and Associated Wildlife in
Recognized Site of Conservation Importance
Table 10.67 Direct Loss of Habitats within
Tai Shu Ha Area
Habitats(1) |
Approximate Size (ha) |
||
DA |
PL |
Sub-total (2) |
|
Temporary Loss |
|||
Works Area |
0.12 |
0.28 |
0.40 |
Total Temporary Loss (ha) |
0.12 |
0.28 |
0.40 |
Notes:
(1)
Habitats:
DA=Developed Area/Wasteland; PL=Plantation
(2)
The size and
percentage included in this table is subject to rounding adjustments. Any
discrepancies between total and sums of individual numbers listed therein are
due to rounding.
Direct Impact on Species of Conservation Importance
Construction Phase – Indirect Impact
Disturbance Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance
Disturbance Impact on Terrestrial Habitats, Vegetation and Fauna
Impact on Water Quality in Nearby Watercourses
Operation Phase – Indirect Impact
Table 10.68 Summary of Potential Impacts and
Mitigation Measures Requirements in Tai Shu Ha Area
Tai Shu Ha Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated Level of Impact |
Mitigation Measures Required (Y/N) (1) |
Construction Phase |
Direct
Impacts |
|||
Direct Impact
of Terrestrial Habitats and Associated Wildlife in Recognized Site of
Conservation Importance |
“CA” |
Minor |
N |
|
Plantation |
Minor |
N |
||
Developed
Area/wasteland |
Minor |
N |
||
Direct Impact
on Species of Conservation Importance |
Insignificant |
N |
||
Indirect Impacts |
||||
Disturbance
Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation Importance and Ecologically
Sensitive Areas |
“CA” |
Minor |
N |
|
TLCP |
Minor |
N |
||
Disturbance Impacts
on Terrestrial Habitats, Vegetation and Fauna |
Vegetation |
Insignificant |
N |
|
Highly
mobile fauna |
Insignificant |
|
||
Less mobile
fauna |
Minor |
N |
||
Impact on
Water Quality in Nearby Watercourses |
Low to moderate |
Y |
||
|
Operation
Phase No direct or
indirect impacts is anticipated during the operation phase. No cumulative
impact is anticipated as there is no concurrent projects nearby. |
Note:
(1)
General good
site practices and erection of site hoarding will be implemented in works
sites/areas.
Table 10.69 Evaluation of Potential
Ecological Impacts to West Rail Compensatory Wetland and Pond in Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
West Rail Compensatory
Wetland |
Pond |
Habitat
Quality |
Moderate – for WRCW Parcel
J Low to moderate – for WRCW Parcels C and I |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Moderate to high floral and
faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance A total of 39 species of
conservation importance were recorded in previous studies, while 11 species of conservation importance including one flora, six
avifauna, one butterfly and three mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance
was recorded in both previous studies and present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low for WRCW Parcel C, I
and J Very low for WRCW Parcels
K1, K2, K3 and L |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.70 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Watercourse and Dry Agricultural Land in Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
Watercourse |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and
faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance One species of conservation
importance were recorded in previous studies, while nine species of
conservation importance including six avifauna and three mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Moderate to high floral and
low to moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while one butterfly species of conservation importance recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.29 ha would be
temporarily affected |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact from decking
over Ho Pui Channel from construction and operation phases (e.g. habitat
loss) would be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low to moderate for Ho Pui
Channel Low for other watercourses |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Low to moderate for
Ho Pui Channel Minor for other watercourses |
Insignificant |
Table 10.71 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Mixed Woodland and Plantation in Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
Mixed Woodland |
Plantation |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance A species of conservation importance
was recorded in previous studies, while three species of conservation importance including two avifauna and
one butterfly species were recorded
in present survey |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while one mammal species of conservation importance was recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Habitat would not be directly
affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.72 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts to Shrubland and Grassland in Kam
Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Criteria |
Shrubland |
Grassland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to Moderate |
Low to moderate – for
hillside grassland Low – for low-lying
grassland |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and
faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while four species of
conservation importance including one avifauna, two butterfly and one mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Moderate floral and low to
moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while two species of
conservation importance including one avifauna and one butterfly species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust, noise,
increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.73 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts
to Village/Orchard and Developed Area/Wasteland in Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung
Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Moderate floral and low to
moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while five species of conservation
importance including
one avifauna and four mammal species were recorded in
present survey |
Moderate to high floral and
moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while 17 species of conservation importance inkling one flora, seven avifauna,
two butterfly and seven mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.01 ha would be
temporarily affected |
1.42 ha would be permanently
affected 7.06 ha would be
temporarily affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor for directly impacted village/orchard Insignificant for other village/orchard |
Minor for directly impacted developed area/wasteland Insignificant for other developed area/wasteland |
Table 10.74 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts to Marsh/Reed and West Rail Compensatory Wetland in Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
West Rail Compensatory
Wetland |
Habitat
Quality |
Moderate to high – for the middle
and southern compartments of Sha Po Marsh Moderate – for the brackish
marsh/reed along S-SA-6 and S-SA-6a Low to moderate – for the
northern compartment of Sha Po Marsh, YLBFEW and other marsh/reed |
Moderate – for Parcels A,
B, B1, D and M Low to Moderate – for
Parcels E and F |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Moderate to high floral and
faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance A total of three species of
conservation importance were recorded in previous studies, while 21 species
of conservation importance including two flora, seven
avifauna, three butterfly, two odonate and seven
mammal species were recorded in present survey |
High floral and moderate to
high faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance A total of 54 species of
conservation importance were recorded in previous studies, while 19 species
of conservation importance including one flora, 12
avifauna, two butterfly and four odonate species
were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.12 ha of marsh/reed would
be permanently affected 0.14 ha of marsh/reed would be temporarily affected |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact from aboveground
permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g. habitat
loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Low to moderate for the brackish marsh/reed along S-SA-6 Minor for the directly affected small and scattered marshes/reeds located
south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen and near Au Tau Fisheries Office Insignificant for Sha Po Marsh and other small and scattered marshes/reeds which
would not be directly affected |
Insignificant |
Table 10.75 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts to Pond and Watercourse in Sha Po/Au
Tau Area
Criteria |
Pond |
Watercourse |
Habitat
Quality |
Moderate – for the active
fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen near Au Tau Low to moderate –for the
inactive and abandoned fishponds south of Cheung Chun San Tsuen near Au Tau,
ponds within and next to YLBFEW west of Nam San Wai Road and west of Mo Fan
Heung in Pok Wai Low – for other ponds |
Moderate to high – for
KTMDC Moderate – for S-SA-3 and
S-SA-6 Low to Moderate – for other
watercourses |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and
moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance A floral species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while 21 species of conservation
importance including 17 avifauna, one odonate and three
mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral diversity,
moderate faunal diversity – for KTMDC Low floral diversity, low
to moderate faunal diversity – for meander S-SA-6 Low floral and faunal
diversity – for other watercourses in SPAUT area Species of conservation
importance A total of 21 species of conservation importance
were recorded at KTMDC in previous
studies, while no species of
conservation importance recorded at remaining watercourses in previous studies A total of
18 species of conservation importance including 17 avifauna and one mammal
species were recorded at KTMDC in present survey, while a total of 15 species
of conservation importance including nine avifauna, one odonate
and five mammal species were recorded at remaining watercourses (except
S-SA-1 and S-SA-6) in present survey No species of conservation importance was recorded
in both previous studies and present survey at S-SA-1 No species
of conservation importance was recorded at S-SA-6 in previous studies, while
a total of nine fauna species of conservation importance including eight
avifauna and one odonate species were recorded at
S-SA-6 in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
<0.01 ha of S-SA-6a would be permanently affected <0.01 ha of S-SA-6a would be
temporarily affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact from aboveground
permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g. habitat
loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Minor for directly impacted watercourses Insignificant for other watercourse |
Table 10.76 Evaluation of Potential
Ecological Impacts to Seasonally Wet Grassland and Dry Agricultural Land in Sha
Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Seasonally Wet Grassland |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Habitat
Quality |
Low |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and low to
moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while two avifauna species of conservation importance were recorded in present survey |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance
was recorded in previous studies, while two species of conservation
importance including one avifauna and one butterfly species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.77 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Woodland and Mixed Woodland in Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Woodland |
Mixed Woodland |
Habitat
Quality |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Moderate to high floral and
low faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while six species of conservation importance including
three flora and three mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance A butterfly species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while six species
of conservation importance including one avifauna, one
butterfly and four mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.78 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Plantation and Shrubland in Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Plantation |
Shrubland |
Habitat Quality |
Low to moderate – for the plantation utilized by Ko Po Road Ardeid
Night Roost, hillside plantation within “CA” and LTCP on Kai Kung Leng Low – remaining plantations |
Low |
Species / Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and low faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of conservation importance was recorded in previous
studies, while six species of conservation importance including one avifauna and five mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of conservation importance recorded in both previous
studies and present survey |
Size / Abundance |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and vibration, air/dust) during construction
phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust, noise, increase in human disturbance)
during operation phase would be permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and vibration, air/dust) during construction
phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust, noise, increase in human disturbance)
during operation phase would be permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise,
glare) would be reversible. Operation phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise,
increase in human activities would be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise,
glare) would be reversible Operation phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise,
increase in human activities would be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.79 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Grassland, Village/Orchard and Developed Area/Wasteland in Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Criteria |
Grassland |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Habitat
Quality |
Moderate – for hillside
grassland Low – for low-lying
grassland |
Low |
Moderate – for Pok Wai
Public School Low – for other developed
area/wasteland |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and
faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while 11 species of conservation importance including one flora, three avifauna, five butterfly
and two mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while four species of conservation importance including one flora, one
avifauna and two mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Moderate to high floral and
moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance Two species of conservation
importance were recorded in previous studies, while 22 species of
conservation importance including eight avifauna, five butterfly, one herpetofauna, and eight
mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
0.13 ha would be
temporarily affected |
1.36 ha would be
permanently affected: -
0.23 ha developed
area/wasteland in Pok Wai Public School -
1.13 ha other developed
area/wasteland 3.53 ha would be temporarily
affected: -
0.53 ha developed
area/wasteland in Pok Wai Public School -
3.00 ha other developed
area/wasteland |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact at aboveground
works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would be
temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible. Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at aboveground
works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would be
reversible Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Moderate to high – for Pok
Wai Public School Very low – for other
developed area/wasteland |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Minor – for directly impacted village/orchard Insignificant – for other village/orchard |
Low to moderate – for Pok Wai Public School Insignificant – for other developed area/wasteland |
Table 10.80 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Marsh/Reed and Pond in Ngau Tam
Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
Pond |
Habitat
Quality |
Low |
Low to moderate – for ponds
west of San Tin Highway Low - for other ponds |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Very low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while two species of conservation
importance including one floral and one avifauna
species were recorded in present
survey |
Very low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance Six avifauna species of
conservation importance were recorded in previous studies, while eight species of conservation
importance including five avifauna and three mammal
species were recorded in present
survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible Operation
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, increase in human activities would
be irreversible |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.81 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Watercourse and Dry Agricultural Land in Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Watercourse (S-NP-1 to
S-NP-11 and NTMDC) |
Dry Agricultural
Land |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate – for NTMDC Low – for other watercourses |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while 12 species of conservation importance including nine avifauna, one
butterfly and two mammal were recorded in
present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while four species of conservation importance including one avifauna and
three mammal species were recorded in
present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.05 ha would be
permanently affected 0.12 ha would be
temporarily affected |
0.08 ha would be
permanently affected 0.78 ha would be
temporarily affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Permanent habitat loss
would be irreversible while temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Direct Impact Permanent habitat loss
would be irreversible while temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low-moderate |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted watercourses (i.e. S-NP-5, 5a and 9) Insignificant – for other watercourses (i.e. S-NP-1 to 4, S-NP-6 to 8 and NTM DC) |
Minor – for directly impacted dry agricultural land Insignificant – for other dry
agricultural land |
Table 10.82 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Woodland and Mixed Woodland in Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Woodland |
Mixed Woodland |
Habitat
Quality |
Moderate |
Low to moderate |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low-moderate floral and
faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while two floral, one avifauna
and three mammal species of conservation importance recorded in present
survey |
Low-moderate floral and
faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while three floral, three avifauna and seven mammal
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat would not be
directly affected |
0.04 ha would be
temporarily affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and vibration,
air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact No direct impact to
woodland would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increase human activities would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Direct Impact Temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Minor – for the directly impacted mixed woodland Insignificant – for other mixed woodland |
Table 10.83 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts to Plantation and Shrubland in Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Plantation |
Shrubland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate – for
hillside plantation on Kai Kung Leng Low – for remaining
plantations |
Low to Moderate – for
hillside shrubland on Kai Kung Leng Low – for shrubland in Ngau
Tam Mei |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while four mammal species of conservation importance
recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while two species of conservation
importance including one floral and one
amphibian species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.03 ha would be temporarily
affected |
0.20 ha would be
temporarily affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Direct Impact Temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted plantation Insignificant – for hillside plantation on Kai Kung Leng |
Minor – for directly impacted shrubland Insignificant – for hillside shrubland on
Kai Kung Leng |
Table 10.84 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Grassland, Village/Orchard and Developed Area/Wasteland in Ngau Tam Mei/Pok Wai Area
Criteria |
Grassland |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to Moderate – for hillside grassland Low – for low-lying grassland |
Low |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance A reptile species of conservation importance was
recorded in previous studies, while nine species of conservation importance including two floral, three avifauna and four butterfly
species were recorded in
present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while seven species of
conservation importance including one
avifauna, one odonate
species, one amphibian and four
mammal species were recorded in present
survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while 15 species of conservation
importance including four avifauna, three
butterfly, one odonate, one amphibian and six mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.21 ha would be temporarily affected |
0.34 ha would be
permanently affected 0.69 ha would be
temporarily affected |
12.21 ha would be permanently
affected 4.67 ha would be temporarily
affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and vibration,
air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and vibration,
air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary Indirect impact (air/dust,
noise, increase in human disturbance) during operation phase would be
permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Direct Impact Permanent habitat loss
would be irreversible while temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Direct Impact Permanent habitat loss
would be irreversible while temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increase human activities would be
reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted low-lying
grassland located within works site of LHA Insignificant – for hillside grassland, and other low-lying grassland |
Minor – for directly impacted village/orchard Insignificant – for other village/orchard
|
Minor |
Table 10.85 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts
to Marsh/Reed and Pond in San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
Pond |
Habitat
Quality |
Moderate – for the three marshes/reeds
with higher coverage and diversity of wetland plants Low to moderate – for other
marshes/reeds |
Moderate – for the
contiguous ponds north of San Tin Highway Low – for other ponds |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while a total of five species of
conservation importance including one avifauna, two butterfly and two mammal
species recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while 11 avifauna species of conservation
importance recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.04 ha would be
permanently affected by NOL 0.99 ha would be temporarily
affected by NOL |
0.54 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact from aboveground
permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g. habitat
loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact at aboveground
works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would be
reversible Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible. No operation phase indirect
impact |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Low to moderate – for the three directly impacted marshes/reeds of moderate ecological
value Minor – for directly impacted
marsh/reed of low to moderate ecological value Insignificant – for other marsh/reed |
Minor – for directly impacted ponds Insignificant – for the contiguous ponds
north of San Tin Highway |
Table 10.86 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts
to Watercourse and Wet Agricultural Land in San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Watercourse |
Wet Agricultural
Land |
Habitat
Quality |
Moderate – for STEMDC Low to moderate – for S-SS1 to S-SS-7 |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while 16 species of conservation
importance including seven avifauna, one odonate, one reptile and seven mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance A total of 11 avifauna
species of conservation importance were recorded in either wet or dry agricultural
lands (not specified in the literature) in previous studies. No species of conservation
importance recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
<0.01 ha of S-SS-4b
would be permanently affected by NOL 0.26 ha of S-SS-4, S-SS-4a and S-SS-4b would be temporarily affected by NOL |
0.05 ha would be
permanently affected by NOL 0.26 ha would be temporarily affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at aboveground
works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would be
temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted watercourse Insignificant – for other watercourse |
Minor – for directly impacted wet agricultural land |
Table 10.87 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts
to Dry Agricultural Land and Woodland in San Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Dry Agricultural
Land |
Woodland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance A total of 11 species of
conservation importance were recorded in either wet or dry agricultural lands
(not specified in the literature) in previous studies, while 11 faunal
species of conservation importance, including six avifauna, one butterfly and four mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while two mammal species of conservation importance recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.17 ha would be
permanently affected by NOL 2.49 ha would be temporarily affected by NOL |
Habitat would not be
directly affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and vibration,
air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Indirect Impact Construction
phase indirect impacts (air/dust, noise, glare) would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted dry agricultural land Insignificant – for other dry agricultural land |
Insignificant |
Table 10.88 Evaluation
of Potential Ecological Impacts to Mixed Woodland and Plantation in San
Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Mixed Woodland |
Plantation |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while seven species of conservation
importance including one flora, three avifauna and three mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while two species of conservation
importance including one avifauna
and one butterfly species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.72 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
0.02 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and vibration,
air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Temporary loss would be
reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increase human activities, would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Temporary loss would be
reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increase human activities, would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted mixed woodland Insignificant – for other mixed woodland |
Minor – for directly impacted plantation Insignificant – for other plantation |
Table 10.89 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Shrubland and Grassland in San
Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Shrubland |
Grassland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low to moderate – for both hillside grassland and low-lying grassland |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance
was recorded in both previous studies and present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation
importance was recorded in previous studies, while nine species of conservation
importance including two avifauna, six butterfly and one mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.21 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
0.66 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Temporary loss would be
reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increase human activities, would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted shrubland Insignificant – for other shrubland |
Minor – for directly impacted grassland Insignificant – for other grassland |
Table 10.90 Evaluation
of Potential Ecological Impacts to Shrubland and Grassland in San
Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while six species of conservation importance including three avifauna and three mammal species were recorded in present
survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while ten species of conservation importance including four avifauna,
one butterfly and five mammal species were recorded in present
survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.05 ha would be
permanently affected by NOL 0.88 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
1.14 ha would be
permanently affected by NOL 14.81 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact from aboveground
permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g. habitat
loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact from aboveground
permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g. habitat
loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impact |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted village/orchard Insignificant – for other village/orchard |
Minor – for directly impacted developed area/wasteland Insignificant – for other developed area/wasteland |
Table 10.91 Evaluation
of Potential Ecological Impacts to Pond and Watercourse in Kwu
Tung/Chau Tau Area
Criteria |
Pond |
Watercourse (S-KC-1 to
S-KC-11 and Sheung Yue River) |
Habitat
Quality |
Low |
Low to moderate for Sheung
Yue River Low for the other minor
watercourses |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance An amphibian species of conservation importance was
recorded in previous studies, while three avifauna species of conservation
importance recorded in present survey |
Low floral and low to
moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance Two species of conservation importance were recorded
in previous studies, while 11 species of conservation importance including eight avifauna,
one odonate, one reptile and one mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat
would not be directly affected by NOL |
0.10 ha of S-KC-6 would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be temporary Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction and operation
phases indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities
would be reversible |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be reversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low-Moderate |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Minor for
directly impacted S-KC-6 Insignificant for
other watercourses |
Table 10.92 Evaluation
of Potential Ecological Impacts to Dry Agricultural Land and Woodland in Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Criteria |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Woodland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance Four species of conservation importance were
recorded in previous studies, while three avifauna, one butterfly and one amphibian
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while two flora species of conservation importance
recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
Habitat
would not be directly affected by NOL |
Habitat
would not be directly affected by NOL |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be temporary Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be permanent |
Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be temporary Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be permanent |
Reversibility |
Indirect Impact Construction and operation
phases indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities
would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Indirect Impact Construction and operation
phases indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities
would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low-moderate |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Minor – for directly impacted woodland Insignificant – for other woodland |
Table 10.93 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Mixed Woodland and Plantation in Kwu
Tung/Chau Tau Area
Criteria |
Mixed Woodland |
Plantation |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while two species of conservation importance including one flora species
and one avifauna species were recorded in
present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance An amphibian species of conservation importance was
recorded in previous studies, while two species of conservation importance including one flora species
and one butterfly species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.03 ha would be temporarily affected by NOL |
0.13 ha would be
permanently affected by NOL 0.06 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact at aboveground
works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would be
temporary Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be temporary Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be permanent Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be temporary Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be temporary No operation phase indirect
impact |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be
irreversible |
Direct Impact Direct impact from
aboveground permanent structures from construction and operation phases (e.g.
habitat loss) would be irreversible Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible Indirect Impact Indirect impact (noise and
vibration, air/dust) during construction phase would be reversible |
Magnitude |
Low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor for
directly impacted mixed woodland Insignificant for
other mixed woodland |
Minor – for directly impacted plantation Insignificant – for other plantation |
Table 10.94 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Shrubland and Grassland in Kwu Tung/Chau
Tau Area
Criteria |
Shrubland |
Grassland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low |
Low to moderate – for both
hillside grassland and low-lying grassland |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and
low faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while four species of conservation importance including one flora, one
avifauna and two mammal species were recorded in
present survey |
Low floral and moderate
faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance No species of conservation importance was recorded
in previous studies, while five species of conservation importance including one flora species
and four avifauna species were recorded in
present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.10 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
Habitat
would not be directly affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact at aboveground
works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would be
temporary Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be temporary Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be permanent |
Direct Impact No direct impact would be
anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be temporary Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground works site/area from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would
be reversible. Indirect Impact Construction and operation
phases indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities
would be reversible |
Direct Impact No direct impact would be
anticipated Indirect Impact Construction and operation
phases indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities
would be reversible |
Magnitude |
Low-moderate |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted shrubland Insignificant – for
other shrubland |
Insignificant |
Table 10.95 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Shrubland and Grassland Village/Orchard and Developed Area/Wasteland
in Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Habitat
Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Species
/ Ecological Resources |
Low floral and low to
moderate faunal diversity Species of conservation
importance Three species of conservation importance were recorded
in previous studies, while two avifauna species of conservation importance
recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal
diversity Species of conservation
importance A mammal species of conservation importance was
recorded in previous studies, while 13 species of conservation importance including four avifauna, one
butterfly, one amphibian and seven mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Size
/ Abundance |
0.25 ha would be
permanently affected by NOL 0.65 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
1.04 ha would be
permanently affected by NOL 8.84 ha would be
temporarily affected by NOL |
Duration |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground structure from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would be
permanent Direct impact at the
aboveground construction works site/area would be temporary Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be temporary Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be permanent |
Direct Impact Direct impact at
aboveground structure from construction phase (e.g. habitat loss) would be
permanent Direct impact at the aboveground
construction works site/area would be temporary Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be temporary Operation phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be permanent |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Permanent habitat loss
would be irreversible while temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact Permanent habitat loss
would be irreversible while temporary habitat loss would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect
impacts due to disturbance and increased human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect
impacts would be anticipated |
Magnitude |
Low |
Moderate |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor – for directly impacted village/orchard Significant – for other village/orchard |
Minor – for directly impacted developed area/wasteland Significant – for other developed area/wasteland |
Table 10.96 Evaluation of Potential
Ecological Impacts to Marsh/Reed and Pond in Tai Shu Ha Area
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
Pond |
Habitat Quality |
Low |
Low |
Species / Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of conservation importance recorded in both previous
studies and present survey |
Low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while two species
of conservation importance including one avifauna species and one odonate
species were recorded in present survey |
Size / Abundance |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.97 Evaluation of Potential Ecological
Impacts to Watercourse and Seasonally Wet Grassland in Tai Shu Ha Area
Criteria |
Watercourse (S-TSH-1 to
S-TSH-4) |
Seasonally Wet Grassland |
Habitat Quality |
Low-moderate – S-TSH-1, S-TSH-3, S-TSH-4 Low – S-TSH-2 |
Low |
Species / Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while four species
of conservation importance including one odonate, one amphibian
and two freshwater species were recorded in present survey |
Very low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while one mammal
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey |
Size / Abundance |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Duration |
Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact No direct impact to watercourse would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Magnitude |
Low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Low to moderate for
S-TSH-1 Insignificant for
S-TSH-2, S-TSH-3, S-TSH-4 |
Insignificant |
Table 10.98 Evaluation of Potential
Ecological Impacts to Dry Agricultural Land and Mixed Woodland in Tai Shu Ha
Area
Criteria |
Dry Agricultural Land |
Mixed Woodland |
Habitat Quality |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Species / Ecological Resources |
Low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of conservation importance recorded in both previous
studies and present survey |
Low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while two species
of conservation importance including one flora and one mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Size / Abundance |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Table 10.99 Evaluation
of Potential Ecological Impacts to Plantation and Grassland in Tai Shu Ha Area
Criteria |
Plantation |
Grassland |
Habitat Quality |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Species / Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while 20 species
of conservation importance including two flora, four avifauna, one butterfly, two
amphibian and 11 mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while three
species of conservation importance including two avifauna and one butterfly species were recorded in present survey |
Size / Abundance |
0.28 ha would be temporarily affected |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact Temporary habitat loss of plantation habitat at explosive storage Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact Temporary habitat loss of plantation habitat would be reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Magnitude |
Low |
Very low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Minor |
Insignificant |
Table 10.100 Evaluation of Potential Ecological Impacts to Village/Orchard and
Developed Area/Wasteland in Tai Shu Ha Area
Criteria |
Village/Orchard |
Developed Area/Wasteland |
Habitat Quality |
Low |
Low |
Species / Ecological Resources |
Low to moderate floral and low faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while four species
of conservation importance including one flora, two avifauna and one mammal species were recorded in present survey |
Low floral and faunal diversity Species of conservation importance No species of
conservation importance was recorded in previous studies, while eight bat
species of conservation importance recorded in present survey |
Size / Abundance |
Habitat would not be directly affected |
0.12 ha would be temporarily affected |
Duration |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact Temporary habitat loss of developed area/wasteland habitat Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be temporary No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Reversibility |
Direct Impact No direct impact to these habitats would be anticipated Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Direct Impact Temporary habitat loss of developed area/wasteland habitat would be
reversible Indirect Impact Construction phase indirect impacts due to disturbance and increased
human activities would be reversible No operation phase indirect impacts would be anticipated |
Magnitude |
Very low |
Low |
Overall Impact Significance |
Insignificant |
Minor |
Table 10.101 Summary of Mitigation Measures
Proposed for Kam Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area
Kam
Sheung Road/Pat Heung Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated
Level of Impact |
Mitigation
Measures Proposed |
Construction
Phase |
Indirect
Impacts |
|||
Potential
Impacts due to Aboveground Construction Works |
||||
Disturbance Impact on Recognized Sites of
Conservation Importance and Ecologically Sensitive Areas |
WRCW Parcels C, I, and J |
Low to
moderate |
· Noise mitigation measures (e.g. site hoarding,
temporary noise barriers), glare reduction measures (e.g. night-time lighting
control) and dust suppression measures (e.g. regular spraying of haul roads) · Good site practices · Establishment of buffer zone of 100 m · Phasing of works and control of working hours |
|
Kam Po Road Egretry and ANR |
Low to
moderate |
|||
Disturbances and Obstruction to Breeding and Roosting
Ardeid Flight Paths |
Breeding ardeids (utilizing flight paths 7 and 8) and
roosting ardeids (utilizing flight paths 8 and 9) |
Low to
moderate |
· Noise mitigation measures (e.g. site hoarding,
temporary noise barriers), glare reduction measures (e.g. night-time lighting
control) and dust suppression measures (e.g. regular spraying of haul roads) · Establishment of buffer zone of 100 m · Phasing of works and control of working hours |
|
Potential Impacts due to Underground Tunnelling
Construction Works |
||||
Hydrological Disruptions due to Groundwater Drawdown |
WCRW Parcels |
Low to
moderate |
· Practical groundwater control measures during
underground tunnel construction |
|
Operation Phase |
Direct Impacts |
|||
Direct Injury / Mortality to Wildlife and Bird
Collision |
Due to KSR(NOL) Station |
Low to
moderate |
· Anti-bird collision measures (e.g. use of
non-transparent or non-glaring materials) |
Table 10.102 Summary
of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Proposed for Sha Po/Au Tau Area
Sha Po/Au Tau Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated
Level of Impact |
Mitigation
Measures Proposed |
Construction Phase |
Direct
Impacts |
|||
Direct Impacts on Ecologically Sensitive Areas |
S-SA-2 |
Low to
moderate |
· Temporary diversion of water flow · Control of construction runoff |
|
Direct Loss of Bat Roost |
Day-roost of the Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bats |
Low to
moderate |
· Bat inspection · Bat exclusion device · Provision of a bat shelter |
|
Direct Loss of Terrestrial Habitats and Impacts on the
Associated Species of Conservation Importance |
Brackish marsh along S-SA-6a |
Low to
moderate |
· Wetland compensation |
|
S-SA-6a |
Low to
moderate |
· Temporary diversion of water flow · Control of construction runoff |
||
Floral species of conservation importance |
Moderate |
· Transplantation or compensation |
||
|
Indirect
Impacts |
|||
Potential
Impacts due to Aboveground Construction Works |
|
|||
Disturbance Impact on Recognized Sites of Conservation
Importance and Ecologically Sensitive Areas |
S-SA-6 |
Low to
moderate |
· Noise mitigation measures (e.g. 3m high screening, temporary
noise barriers), glare reduction measures (e.g. night-time lighting control)
and dust suppression measures (e.g. regular spraying of haul roads) ·
Good site
practices |
|
Sha Po Marsh |
Low to
moderate – from AUT Station |
· Noise mitigation measures (e.g. site hoarding,
temporary noise barriers), glare reduction measures (e.g. night-time lighting
control) and dust suppression measures (e.g. regular spraying of haul roads) · Good site practices |
||
Impacts on Water Quality, Hydrodynamics
Properties and Hydrology of Wetland Habitats |
S-SA-2 and 6a, and Marsh/reed |
Low to
moderate |
· Control of construction runoff · Good site practices |
Table 10.103 Summary
of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Proposed for San Tin/Shek Wu Wai
Area
San
Tin/Shek Wu Wai Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated
Level of Impact |
Mitigation
Measures Proposed |
Construction Phase |
Direct
Impacts |
|||
Direct Loss of Terrestrial Habitats and Associated
Wildlife |
Marsh/reed of moderate ecological value |
Low to
moderate |
·
Wetland
compensation |
|
Indirect
Impacts |
||||
Disturbance Impacts on Recognized Sites of
Conservation Importance, Ecologically Sensitive Areas and Terrestrial
Habitats |
Ecologically sensitive areas |
Low to
moderate |
·
Noise mitigation
measures (e.g. site hoarding, temporary noise barriers), glare reduction measures
(e.g. night-time lighting control) and dust suppression measures (e.g.
regular spraying of haul roads) ·
Good site
practices |
|
Natural terrestrial habitats |
Low to
moderate |
|||
Disturbance Impacts on Vegetation and Fauna |
Due to constructions works of KLA |
Low to
moderate |
||
Impacts on Water Quality, Hydrodynamics Properties
and Hydrology of Watercourse |
STEMDC |
Low to
moderate |
·
Control of
construction runoff ·
Good site
practices |
Table 10.104 Summary
of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Proposed for Kwu
Tung/Chau Tau Area
Kwu Tung/Chau Tau Area |
||||
|
Impact |
Ecologically
Sensitive Receiver |
Unmitigated
Level of Impact |
Mitigation
Measures Proposed |
Construction
Phase |
Indirect
Impacts |
|||
Potential Impacts due to Aboveground Construction
Works |
||||
Disturbance Impacts on Terrestrial Habitats,
Vegetation and Other Fauna |
Natural habitats |
Low to
moderate |
· Noise mitigation measures (e.g. site hoarding,
temporary noise barriers), glare reduction measures (e.g. night-time lighting
control) and dust suppression measures (e.g. regular spraying of haul roads) ·
Good site
practices |
Table 10.105 Summary of Potential Impacts
and Mitigation Measures Proposed for Tai Shu Ha Area
Tai Shu
Ha Area |
|||
|
Impact |
Unmitigated
Level of Impact |
Mitigation
Measures proposed |
Construct-ion
Phase |
Indirect Impacts |
||
Impact on Water Quality in Nearby Watercourses |
Low to moderate |
· Control of construction runoff · Good site practices |
· Noise
mitigation measures by effective placing of temporary noise barriers where
practicable as screening, full enclosure for relatively fixed plant source,
shut down of machines and plants that are in intermittent use, and the use of
quality power mechanical equipment (PME) to limit noise emissions at source
(refer to Section 4 for details);
· Glare
reduction measures such as restriction of construction hours, hoarding
provision, night-time lighting control and avoidance of any directional
lightings to the adjoining habitats and roosts to minimise the impact to nearby
nocturnal fauna especially avifauna and bat; and
· Dust
suppression measures (such as regular watering on heavy construction works
areas and at the unloading point of spoils generated by the TBM excavation,
installation of blast door at the opening of tunnelling works by
drill-and-blast, proper storage of construction materials, and environmental
control measures as stipulated in the Air Pollution Ordinance (Construction
Dust) Regulation) to avoid and minimise emission and dispersal dust, which
would cover vegetation and potentially discourage usage of nearby wildlife
(refer to Section 3 for details).
· Probing Ahead: As normal practice,
the Contractor will undertake rigorous probing of the ground ahead of tunnel
excavation works to identify zones of significant water inflow. The probe
drilling results will be evaluated to determine specific grouting requirements
in line with the tunnel advance. In such zones of significant water inflow that
could occur as a result of discrete, permeable features, the intent would be to
reduce overall inflow by means of cut–off grouting executed ahead of the tunnel
advance;
· Pre–grouting: Where water inflow
quantities are excessive, pre–grouting will be required to reduce the water
inflow into the tunnel. The pre–grouting will be achieved via a systematic and
carefully specified protocol of grouting;
· In principle, the grout pre–treatment
would be designed on the basis of probe hole drilling ahead of the tunnel face; and
· The installation of waterproof
lining would also be adopted after the formation of the tunnels.
· Post–grouting: Groundwater drawdown
will be most likely due to inflows of water into the tunnel that have not been
sufficiently controlled by the pre–grouting measures. Where this occurs, post
grouting will be undertaken before the lining is cast. Whilst unlikely to be
required in significant measure, such a contingency should be allowed for
reduction in permeability of the tunnel surround (by grouting) to limit inflow
to acceptable levels.
· Nomination of approved personnel,
such as a site manager, to be responsible for implementation of good site
practices, arrangements for waste collection and effective disposal to an
appropriate facility;
· Training of site personnel in site
cleanliness, concepts of waste
reduction, reuse and recycling, proper waste management and chemical waste handling procedures;
· Provision of sufficient waste
reception / disposal points, and regular collection of waste;
· Adoption of appropriate measures to
minimise windblown litter and dust during transportation of waste by either
covering trucks or by transporting wastes in enclosed containers;
· Provision of regular cleaning and
maintenance programme for drainage systems, sumps and oil interceptors;
· Adoption of a recording system for
the amount of wastes generated, recycled and disposed (including the disposal
sites); and
· Preparation of
Waste Management Plan (WMP), as part of the
Environmental Management Plan (EMP).
· Permanent
and temporary direct loss of wetland within works areas and works sites
· Direct
impact from permanent aboveground structures (e.g. stations, depot and
ancillary buildings)
Table 10.106 Summary
of Construction and Operation Phases Direct Loss of Wetlands and Compensation
Requirement
Area |
Wetland Habitat Affected |
Ecological Value |
Direct Impact (ha) (1) |
Compensation Requirement
(ha) (1)
(2) |
||
Construction Phase |
Operation Phase |
Construction Phase |
Operation Phase |
|||
KSRPH |
Watercourse
|
Low
to moderate |
0.29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SPAUT |
Marsh/Reed |
Moderate
(3) |
0.16 |
0.09 |
0.16 |
0.09 |
Low
to moderate |
0.10 |
0.03 |
0 |
0 |
||
Watercourse
|
Low
to moderate |
0.01 |
< 0.01 |
0 |
0 |
|
NTMPW |
Watercourse |
Low |
0.17 |
0.05 |
0 |
0 |
SATSWW |
Marsh/Reed |
Moderate
|
0.86 |
0.04 |
0.86 |
0.04 |
Low
to moderate |
0.17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Pond |
Low |
0.54 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Watercourse |
Low
to moderate |
0.26 |
<0.01 |
0 |
0 |
|
Wet
Agricultural Land |
Low |
0.31 |
0.05 |
0 |
0 |
|
KTUCT |
Watercourse |
Low |
0.10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
2.97 |
0.26 |
1.02 |
0.13 |
Notes:
(1)
The numbers
in this table are subject to rounding adjustments. Any discrepancies between total
and sums of individual numbers listed therein are due to rounding.
(2)
Compensation
will be provided for directly impacted wetlands of moderate ecological value or
above.
(3)
Part of the
works site of SMA will be occupied for road works by others thus is not
considered as direct habitat loss under the Project.
Current Condition of Existing Habitats and
Proposed Wetland Habitat Creation
Table 10.107 Ecological Values of the
Existing Habitats in the Proposed Compensatory Wetland
Criteria |
Marsh/Reed |
Pond |
Village/Orchard |
Naturalness |
Moderate. Succeeded from man-made habitats e.g.
ponds and agricultural lands through natural processes |
Low. A man-made habitat for the purpose of
aquaculture, flood retention and landscaping |
Low |
Size |
Small (approx. 0.10 ha) |
Small (approx. 1.25 ha) |
Small (approx. 0.58 ha) |
Diversity |
Low floral and faunal diversity |
Low floral and low to moderate faunal diversity |
Low floral (consisting of native ruderal and exotic
species) and faunal diversity |
Rarity |
An uncommon habitat in Hong Kong No species of conservation importance was recorded
in present survey. |
Uncommon. Mainly restricted to northwestern New
Territories A total of five species of conservation importance
recorded in present survey, including three avifauna species (Eurasian Teal,
Great Cormorant, Northern Shoveler) and two mammal species (Pallas’s Squirrel
and Leopard Cat). |
A very common habitat in Hong Kong One floral species of conservation importance
(Incense Tree) was recorded in present survey. |
Re-creatability |
Low to moderate |
High |
High |
Fragmentation |
High |
Low to moderate |
Moderate to High |
Ecological linkage |
Partially within “CA” and adjacent to WRCWs and
ponds |
Partially “CA” and functionally linked with adjacent
wetland habitats e.g. WRCW, KTMDC and marsh/reed |
Partially within “CA” |
Potential value |
Moderate, as the values could be increased if
managed as wildlife habitat |
Moderate to high, could be properly managed to
maximise use by waterfowl and wildlife |
Low |
Nursery / Breeding ground |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
No notable nursery and breeding behaviour observed |
Age |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Abundance / Richness of Wildlife |
Low |
Low to moderate |
Low |
Ecological value |
Low to moderate |
Low to Moderate |
Low |
Village/ Orchard – Pond bund to Marsh/Reed
and Grassy bund
Inactive Fishpond to Enhancement Pond
Retention of Existing Marsh/Reed
Table 10.108 Summary of Wetland Compensation Requirement, Existing Habitats in the Proposed
Compensatory Wetland and Habitats to be Created/Retained
Wetland Compen-sation Requirement |
Ecological Value |
Area |
Existing Habitats in the site of Proposed Compen-satory Wetland |
Ecological Value |
Area (ha) (1) |
Change in Area of Existing Habitats Required for
Wetland Compensation (ha) (1) |
Target Habitats to be Created/ Retained in the
Proposed Compensatory Wetland |
Estimated Area (ha) (1) |
Marsh/Reed |
Moderate |
1.02 |
Pond
(Inactive) |
Low to
moderate |
1.25 |
-0.47 |
Enhancement
Pond |
0.78 |
|
|
|
Marsh/Reed |
Low to
moderate |
0.10 |
0 |
Marsh/Reed
(Created) |
1.02 |
|
|
|
Village/Orchard
(Pond bund – Dryland) |
Low |
0.58 |
-0.54 |
Marsh/Reed
(Retained/ enhanced) |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Grassy Bund/
Grassland |
0.04 |
||
Total: |
1.02 |
Total: |
1.94 |
1.02 |
Total: |
1.94 |
Note:
(1)
The numbers
in this table are subject to rounding adjustments. Any discrepancies between total
and sums of individual numbers listed therein are due to rounding.
Table 10.109 Examples of Native Wetland Plants Recorded in the Directly Impacted
Marsh/Reed of Moderate Ecological Value
Wetland Species |
Alocasia macrorrhizos |
Colocasia esculenta |
Cyclosorus
interruptus |
Cyperus difformis |
Hedychium coronarium |
Ludwigia octovalvis |
Ludwigia
perennis |
Phragmites australis |
· Implement routine grass cutting and
weed removal;
· Manage the tree cover under annual
tree monitoring;
· Maintain the proper functioning of
the sluice or water control device by clearance of any vegetation or debris
obstructing the device;
· Implement the water management
objective regarding water control system and water quality;
· Adjust water level as necessary e.g.
shedding of excess water after heavy downpour or preventing excessive influx of
water under extreme high tide;
· Inspect the structural condition of
slopes, bunds and paths and repair/maintain as necessary;
· Manage and maintain the site
boundary fence, with dog-proof design to reduce human and dog intrusion, and
wildlife tunnels for the use of land mammals and other terrestrial fauna;
· Undesired animal management e.g.
treatment of Fire Ant nests and manual removal of Apple Snail.
Table 10.110 Summary of Bat Shelter
Proposed
location |
South of Pok
Wai Public School |
Size and
dimension |
~75 m2
and Maximum possible height of 7.5m(1) |
Existing
habitat/future land use |
Woodland of
moderate ecological value |
Within
“CA”? |
Yes |
Distance
from the Pok Wai Public School bat roost |
~70-80 m
south |
Distance
from village/residence |
~25 m west |
Distance from
potential drinking and foraging sites |
~400 m from
the ponds in Pok Wai |
Adjacent
committed development |
-
NOL PWA (~25 m
north) -
Proposed Fresh
Water Trunk Main under Ngau Tam Mei Water Treatment Works Extension (~65 m
west) |
Note:
(1)
Actual height of the bat shelter should be subject to
the approval by AFCD.
AEC Ltd. (2012). Proposed
Comprehensive Development in the Other Specified Uses Zone, annotated
“Comprehensive Development and Wetland Enhancement Area (1)’ on the Nam Sang
Wai OZP and the Site of Special Scientific Interest at Lut
Chau on the Mai Po and Fairview Park
OZP. Ecological Impact Assessment Report.
Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department (AFCD) (2005). Hong Kong Biodiversity: Issue 10
(December 2005). Available at https://bih.gov.hk/filemanager/newsletter/en/upload/13/hkbonewsletter10.pdf (Accessed in July 2023).
Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department (AFCD) (2020). Hong Kong Biodiversity: Issue 26
(December 2020). Available at https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/publications/publications_con/files/Issue.No.26.pdf
(Accessed in February 2022).
Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department (AFCD). (2021a). Tai Lam Country Park. Available at
https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/country/cou_vis/cou_vis_cou/cou_vis_cou_tl/cou_vis_cou_tl.html. (Accessed in February 2022).
Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department (AFCD). (2021b). Lam Tsuen Country Park. Available
at https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/country/cou_vis/cou_vis_cou/cou_vis_cou_lt/cou_vis_cou_lt.html.
(Accessed in February 2022).
Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department (AFCD) (2021c).
New Nature Conservation Policy. Available at:
https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_nncp/con_nncp.html. (Accessed in February 2022).
Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department (AFCD) (2021d). Long Valley and Ho Sheung Heung.
Available at:
https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_nncp/con_nncp_list/files/08_LongValley_Public_18_E.pdf.
(Accessed in February 2022).
Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department (AFCD) (2022). Hong Kong Biodiversity Information
Hub. Available at https://bih.gov.hk/en/species-database/index.html
(Accessed in October 2022).
Allcock, J., Chow, G.
and Welch, G. (Eds.). (2017). Hong Kong Bird Report 2017. Hong Kong Bird
Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Anon. (2014). Summer
2014 Report: Egretry Counts in Hong Kong with
particular reference to the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site. Report by
The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society to the Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government.
Anon. (2021a). Summer
2020 Report: Egretry Counts in Hong Kong with
particular reference to the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site. Report by
The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society to the Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government.
Anon. (2021b). Summer
2021 Report: Egretry Counts in Hong Kong with
particular reference to the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site. Report by
The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society to the Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government.
Anon. (2022). Summer
2022 Report: Egretry Counts in Hong Kong with
particular reference to the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site. Report by
The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society to the Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government.
Asia King Development
Limited (2015). Development and Wetland Protection near Yau Mei San Tsuen – EIA
Report. Prepared by ENVIRON Hong Kong Limited for Asia King Development
Limited.
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird
Areas factsheet: Inner Deep Bay and Shenzhen River catchment area. Available
at:
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/inner-deep-bay-and-shenzhen-river-catchment-area-iba-hong-kong-(china).
(Accessed in February 2022).
Capital Chance Ltd
(2013). Proposed Residential Cum Passive Recreation Development within
"Recreation" Zone and "Residential (Group C)" Zone at
Various Lots in DD 104, Yuen Long, N.T. – EIA Report. Prepared by ENVIRON Hong
Kong Limited for Capital Chance Ltd.
Carey, G.J., Chalmers,
M.L., Diskin, D.A., Kennerley, P.R., Leader, P.J., Leven, M.R., Lewthwaite,
R.W., Melville, D.S., Turnbill, M. and Young, L. (2001). The Avifauna of
Hong Kong. Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Chan, H.S.R, Chau, W.K.,
Cheng, W.K., Chow, S.M., Ho, S.C.J., Kan, S.C.J., Lau, W.H.S and Ng, K.L.E.
(2012). Encyclopaedia of Hong Kong
Butterflies – Search for Butterflies. Hong Kong Lepidopterists’ Society
Limited.
Chan, K.F., Cheung,
K.S., Ho, C.Y., Lam, F.N, Tang, W.S., Lau, W.N. and Bogadek,
A. (2005). Field Guide to the Amphibians of Hong Kong. Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department, Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos
Books Ltd. Hong Kong.
Chan, K.F., Cheung,
K.S., Ho C.Y., Lam, F.N., Tang, W.S. and Tse, M.L. (2006). A Field Guide to
the Venomous Land Snakes of Hong Kong. Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department, Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books Ltd.
Hong Kong.
Civil Engineering and
Development Department (CEDD) (2013a). North East New Territories New
Development Areas – EIA Report. Prepared by Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong
Limited for Civil Engineering and Development Department and Planning
Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Civil Engineering and
Development Department (CEDD) (2013b). Development of Lok Ma Chau Loop – EIA
Report. Prepared by Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Limited for Civil
Engineering and Development Department and Planning Department, Government of
the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Civil Engineering and
Development Department (CEDD) (2016). Site Formation and Associated
Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium, Crematorium and Related
Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery – Design and Construction – Final EIA
Report. Prepared by Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Limited for Civil
Engineering and Development Department and Planning Department, Government of
the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Civil Engineering and
Development Department (CEDD) (2020). Development of Kwu
Tung North and Fanling North New Development Areas
Phase 1 – Design and Construction – Egretry Habitat
Creation and Management Plan. Prepared by AECOM Asia Company Limited for Civil
Engineering and Development Department and Planning Department, Government of
the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Dragages Hong Kong Ltd (2015). Operation of
the Existing Tai Lam Explosives Magazine at Tai Shu Ha, Yuen Long for Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point Project –
EIA Report. Prepared by ERM-Hong Kong Limited for Dragages
Hong Kong Ltd.
Drainage Services
Department (DSD) (2023). San Tin Stormwater Pumping Station and Yuen Long
Bypass Floodway. Available at: https://www.dsd.gov.hk/EN/HTML/20518.html.
(Accessed in September 2023).
Drainage Services
Department (DSD) (2021). Yuen Long Barrage Scheme. Prepared by Black &
Veatch Hong Kong Limited for Drainage Services Department, Government of the
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Dudgeon, D. (2003). Hillstreams. The Department of Ecology and
Biodiversity, The University of Hong Kong and Wan Li Book Co Ltd. Hong Kong.
Fellowes, J.R., Lau,
M.W.N., Dudgeon, D., Reels, G.T., Ades, G.W.J., Carey, G.J., Chan, B.P.L.,
Kendrick, R.C., Lee, K.S., Leven, M.R., Wilson, K.D.P. and Yu, Y.T. (2002).
Wild animals to watch: Terrestrial and freshwater fauna of conservation concern
in Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 25:
123-160.
Feng, Z.-J., Li, Z.-K.,
Li, B.-T., Xue, C.-G., Liu, J.-B. and He, Y.-Q. (2002). Study on Rare and
Endangered Plants and National Key Protected Plants in Guangdong. Journal of
South China Agricultural University 3: 24-27.
Fu, L. K. (1992). China
Plant Red Data Book – Rare and Endangered Plants – Volume 1. Science Press, Beijing, China.
Glory Queen Limited
(2016). Proposed Low-rise and Low-density Residential Development at Various
Lots and their Adjoining Government Land in D.D. 104, East of Kam Pok Road, Mai
Po, Yuen Long. New Territories – EIA Report. Prepared by Ramboll Environ Hong
Kong Limited for Glory Queen Limited.
Highways Department (HyD) (2020). Upgrading of Remaining Sections of Kam Tin
Road and Lam Kam Road – EIA Report. Prepared by Mannings (Asia) Consultants Ltd
for Highways Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region.
Hong Kong Bird Watching
Society (HKBWS) (2004). Important Bird
Areas (IBA) in Hong Kong. Available at:
http://www.hkbws.org.hk/archive/IBA/index.html. (Accessed in February 2022).
Hong Kong Herbarium.
(2012). Check List of Hong Kong Plants 2012. Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region.
Hong Kong Herbarium and
South China Botanical Garden. (2007). Flora of Hong Kong. Volume 1.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region.
Hong Kong Herbarium and
South China Botanical Garden. (2008). Flora of Hong Kong. Volume 2.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region.
Hong Kong Herbarium and
South China Botanical Garden. (2009). Flora of Hong Kong. Volume 3.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region.
Hong Kong Herbarium and
South China Botanical Garden. (2011). Flora of Hong Kong. Volume 4. Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region.
Hu, Q.M., Wu, T.L., Xia,
N.H., Xing F.W., Lai, C.C.P. and Yip, K.W. (2003). Rare and Precious Plants
of Hong Kong. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The
Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
International Union for
the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2022). The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species. Version 2022-1. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org.
(Accessed in October 2022).
Jiang, Z.G., et al. (2016).
Red List of China’s Vertebrates. Biodiversity Science 24(5):
500-951.
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG). (2023).
Notable observation of Himalayan Leaf-nosed Bat in Hong Kong. Available at: https://www.kfbg.org/en/KFBG-blog/post/Notable-observation-of-Himalayan-Leaf-nosed-Bat-in-Hong-Kong.
(Accessed in July 2023).
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG).
(2022). Bird Survey of Selected Farmlands in the Proposed Northern Metropolis,
Hong Kong SAR: Interim Report. Kadoorie Farm and
Botanic Garden Publication Series No. 18. Kadoorie
Farm and Botanic Garden, Hong Kong SAR. 24pp.
Kelleher, C. &
Marnell, F. (2006) Bat Mitigation Guidelines for Ireland. Irish Wildlife
Manuals, No. 25.
National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and
Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
Kowloon-Canton Railway
Corporation (KCRC) (1998). West Rail – West Kowloon to Tuen Mun Centre – Final
Assessment Report. Prepared by ERM-Hong Kong. Ltd. for Kowloon-Canton Railway
Corporation.
Kowloon-Canton Railway
Corporation (KCRC) (2001). Sheung Shui to Lok Ma Chau Spur Line – EIA Report.
Prepared by Binnie Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited for Kowloon-Canton
Railway Corporation.
Kowloon-Canton Railway
Corporation (KCRC) (2002). Sheung Shui to Lok Ma Chau Spur Line – EIA Report.
Prepared by Binnie Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited for Kowloon-Canton
Railway Corporation.
Lai, C.C., Yip. Y., Yip,
K.L., Ngar, Y.N. and Liu, K.Y. (2008). Field Guide
to Trees in Hong Kong's Countryside. Agriculture, Fisheries and
Conservation Department. Hong Kong.
Leisure and Cultural
Services Department (LCSD) (2008). Major Restoration to the Residence of Ip
Ting-sz, Lin Ma Hang Tsuen, Sha Tau Kok, N.T. –
Project Profile. Prepared by Cinotech Consultants
Limited for Leisure and Cultural Services Department, Government of the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region.
Lee, L.F., Lam, K.S.,
Ng, K.Y., Chan, K.T. and Young, L.C. (2004). Field Guide to the Freshwater
Fish of Hong Kong. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department,
Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books Ltd. Hong Kong.
Lo, Y.F. and Hui, W.L.
(2010). Hong Kong Butterflies (Third Edition). Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department, Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books Ltd.
Hong Kong.
MTR Corporation Limited
(MTRCL) (2009). Hong Kong Section of Guangzhou - Shenzhen - Hong Kong Express
Rail Link – EIA Report. Prepared by AECOM Asia Company Limited for MTR
Corporation Limited.
MTR Corporation Limited
(MTRCL) (2016). Northern Link Consultancy Agreement No. NEX/1057 Engineering
Review Study Preliminary Environmental Review Report. Prepared by Ove Arup
& Partners Hong Kong Limited for MTR Corporation Limited.
MTR Corporation Limited
(MTRCL) (2018). Habitat Creation and Management Plan (Volume A and B) for West
Rail, Phase 1. Prepared by AEC Ltd.
MTR Corporation Limited
(MTRCL) (2021a). Variation of Environmental Permit (VEP) of Sheung Shui to Lok
Ma Chau Spur Line Environmental Review Report (VEP-461/2014). Prepared by Ove
Arup & Partners Hong Kong Limited for MTR Corporation Limited.
MTR Corporation Limited
(MTRCL) (2021b). Ecological Monitoring Information at MTR - West Rail
Wetland 2016-2021. Unpublished raw data.
Qin, et al. (2017).
Threatened Species List of China's Higher Plants. Biodiversity Science 25(7):
696-747.
Reels, G. (2019).
Faunistic Studies in South-east Asian and Pacific Island Odonata: An Annotated
Check List of Hong Kong Dragonflies and Assessment of Their Local Conservation
Significance. Journal of the International Dragonfly Fund 30:
1-49.
Shek, C.T. (2006). A
Field Guide to the Terrestrial Mammals of Hong Kong. Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department, Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books Ltd.
Hong Kong.
Siu, L.P.G. (2000). Orchidaceae of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong
Natural History Society 23:137-148.
Sun Hung Kai Properties
Limited (SHKPL) (2017). Sustainability Report 2016/17. Available at: https://www.shkp.com/Html/CSR/SHKPSReport/SR2017/index_eng.html.
(Accessed in Jan 2022).
Tam, T.W., Leung, K.K.,
Kwan, B.S.P., Wu, K.K.Y., Tang, S.S.H., So, I.W.Y., Cheng, J.C.Y., Yuen,
E.F.M., Tsang, Y.M. and Hui, W.L. (2011). The Hong Kong Dragonflies.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region.
Town Planning Board
(TPB) (2014). TPB Paper No. 9590 for Consideration by the Town Planning Board
on 11.4.2014 Land Use Review of Kam Tin South and Pat Heung. Available at: https://www.info.gov.hk/tpb/en/papers/TPB/1056-tpb_9590.pdf.
(Accessed in Jan 2022).
Viney, C., Phillipps, K.
and Lam, C.Y. (2005). The Birds of Hong Kong and South China (Eighth
Edition). Information Services Department, The Government of the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region.
Wu, D.L. and Hu, C.X.
(1988). Illustrations of Rare and Endangered Plants in Guangdong Province.
China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. 46pp. (In Chinese only).
Wu, S.-H. & Lee,
T.-C.W. (2000). Pteridophytes of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural
History Society 23:5-20.
Xing, F.-W., Ng, S.-C.
and Chau, L.K.-C. (2000). Gymnosperms and Angiosperms of Hong Kong. Memoirs
of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 23: 21-136.
Zhao, E.-M. (1998). China Red Data Book of Endangered
Animals. Amphibia and Reptilia. First Edition. Beijing: Science Press.
Zheng, X., Chan, B.P.L.,
Au, T.K., Yang, J. & Lo, P.Y.F. (2023) The Hidden Oases of Hong Kong: High
Ecological Value Farmlands in the Proposed Northern Metropolis. Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Publication Series No. 19.
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, Hong Kong SAR,
China. 38pp.