Black Point Gas Supply Project - EIA Study (EIA Study Brief ESB-208/2009)

EIA Report

 
Table of Contents

1

Introduction

2 Consideration of Aliternatives
3 Project Description
4 Air Quality Assessment
5 Noise Assessment
6 Water Quality Assessment
7 Waste Management Assessment
8 Marine Ecology Assessment
9 Fisheries Assessment
10 Landscape Visual Impact Assessment
11 Cultural Heritage Assessment
12 Quantitative Risk Assessment
13 Summary of Environmental Outcomes
14 Environmental Monitoring & Audit Measures
15 Conclusions
   
Figure List  
Figure 2.1 Proposed GRS Site Locations
Figure 3.1 Preliminary Indicative Layout for the Proposed Black Point Gas Supply Project
Figure 3.2 Preliminary Layout of the Proposed Vertical Seawalls and Typical Section for the Reclamation at Black Point Power Station
Figure 3.3 Preliminary Indicative Layout for the Proposed Reclamation at Black Point Power Station
Figure 3.4 A Schematic Process Flow Diagram for the Proposed New Gas Receiving Station (GRS) (Indicative Only)
Figure 3.5a Construction of the co-located GRS at BPPS (Stage 1)
Figure 3.5b Construction of the co-located GRS at BPPS (Stages 2 & 3)
Figure 3.5c Construction of the co-located GRS at BPPS (Stage 4)
Figure 3.6 Sections of the Submarine Gas Pipelines
Figure 3.7 Submarine Gas Pipelines – Preliminary Trenching & Protection Details
Figure 3.8 Preliminary Construction Programme for This Project
Figure 4.1 Location of GRSs and Air Sensitive Receivers
Figure 4.2 Location of Emission Sources Under Different Assessment Scenarios
Figure 4.3a Maximum Hourly NO2 Concentration at 1.5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.3b Daily NO2 Concentration at 1.5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.3c Annual Average NO2 Concentration at 1.5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.4a Maximum Hourly NO2 Concentration at 5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.4b Daily NO2 Concentration at 5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.4c Annual Average NO2 Concentration at 5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.5a Maximum Hourly NO2 Concentration at 10m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.5b Daily NO2 Concentration at 10m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.5c Annual Average NO2 Concentration at 10m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4)
Figure 4.6a Cumulative Maximum Hourly NO2 Concentration at 1.5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 4.6b Cumulative Daily NO2 Concentration at 1.5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 4.6c Cumulative Annual Average NO2 Concentration at 1.5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 4.7a Cumulative Maximum Hourly NO2 Concentration at 5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 4.7b Cumulative Daily NO2 Concentration at 5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 4.7c Cumulative Annual Average NO2 Concentration at 5m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 4.8a Cumulative Maximum Hourly NO2 Concentration at 10m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 4.8b Cumulative Daily NO2 Concentration at 10m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 4.8c Cumulative Annual Average NO2 Concentration at 10m above ground (Project Emission Only under Scenario 4 + Other Emissions + Background)
Figure 5.1 Study Area for Noise Impact Assesment
Figure 6.1 EPD Water Control Zones in the vicinity of the Project Site
Figure 6.2 EPD Routine Water and Sediment Quality Monitoring Stations in the vicinity of the Project Site
Figure 6.3 Surrounding Environment in the vicinity of Black Point
Figure 6.4 Water Quality Sensitive Receivers and EPD Routine Water/Sediment Quality Monitoring Stations in the Vicinity of the Proposed Project at Black Point
Figure 6.5 Proposed Reclamation at Black Point Power Station and Emission Points Defined in the Model
Figure 6.6 Sections of the Submarine Gas Pipeline
Figure 6.7 Preliminary Layout of the Proposed Vertical Seawalls and Typical Section for the Reclamation at Black Point Power Station
Figure 6A.7 Surrounding Environment in the Vicinity of Black Point
Figure 6A.8 Water Quality Sensitive Receivers and EPD Routine Water/Sediment Quality Monitoring Stations in the Vicinity of the Proposed Project at Black Point
Figure 6A.9 Sections of the Submarine Gas Pipeline
Figure 6A.10 Submarine Gas Pipelines – Preliminary Trenching & Protection Details
Figure 6A.11 Proposed Reclamation at Black Point Power Station and Emission Points Defined in the Model
Figure 6A.12 Preliminary Construction Programme for This Project
Figure 7.1 Management Framework for Dredged/ Excavated Sediment Outlined under ETWBTC(W) No. 34/2002
Figure 7.2 Marine Sediment Sampling Locations
Figure 8.1 Intertidal Habitats Identified within the Study Area at Black Point
Figure 8A.1 Study Area for Marine Ecological Impact Assessment
Figure 8A.2 Black Point Intertidal Sampling Transect Locations (Reproduced from ERM (2006))
Figure 8A.3 Black Point Subtidal Soft-Bottom Sampling Stations (Reproduced from ERM (2006))
Figure 8A.4 Comparison of Mean Biomass of Subtidal Infaunal Assemblages around Hong Kong (Reproduced from ERM (2006); +ERM (2006), *CityU Professional Services (2002), ºERM (1998) and #ERM (2000))
Figure 8A.5 Number of Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Sightings in Different Survey Areas in Hong Kong and Mainland Chinese Territorial Waters during 1996-2005 (Reproduced from Hung (2008))
Figure 8A.6 Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Sighting Densities (Mean SPSE ± SD; Top) and Dolphin Densities (mean DPSE ± SD; Bottom) among Six Survey Areas from1996-2005 (Reproduced from Hung (2008))
Figure 8A.7 Sighting Density of Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphins Normalized by Survey Effort per km2 in Waters around Lantau Island in 1996-2005 (SPSE = no. of on-effort dolphin sightings per 100 units of survey effort) (Reproduced from Hung (2008))
Figure 8A.8

Density of Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphins Normalized by Survey Effort per km2 in Waters around Lantau Island in 1996-2005 (DPSE = no. of dolphins per 100 units of survey effort) (Reproduced from Hung (2008))

Figure 8A.9 Distribution of Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Recorded during the 11 Months Survey (July 2005 – May 2006). Solid Line Indicates Transect Survey Line (Reproduced from ERM (2006))
Figure 8A.10 Density of Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphins with Corrected Survey Effort per km in Western Hong Kong Waters (Using data from ERM's July 2005-May 2006 survey combined with AFCD's monitoring data for the same period) (Reproduced from ERM (2006))
Figure 8A.11 Black Point Intertidal Sampling Transect Locations for Seasonal Surveys in 2009
Figure 8A.12 Subtidal Soft-Bottom Sampling Stations for Wet Season Survey in 2009
Figure 8A.13

Mean Numbers of Individuals and Biomass of Infaunal Organisms (Class level) per Stations from Grab Samples collected within the Study Area during the Wet Season Benthic Survey

Figure 8A.14 Subtidal Dive Survey Transects
Figure 8A.15 Representative Photographic Records of the Seabed taken during the Subtidal Dive Survey
Figure 8A.16 Location of Proposed Gas Pipelines Route and GRS Reclamation between the Deep Bay and Northwest Lantau Survey Areas in Hong Kong
Figure 8A.17 Distribution of Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Sightings in the Deep Bay and Western Northwest Lantau Survey Areas from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009
Figure 8A.18 Seasonal Distribution of Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Sightings in the Deep Bay and Western Northwest Lantau Survey Areas from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009
Figure 8A.19 Sighting Rate and Dolphin Encounter Rate of Chinese White Dolphins among Different Survey Areas in Hong Kong (Data from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009)
Figure 8A.20 Density Estimates of Chinese White Dolphins in Deep Bay (from 2005-09) and Other Survey Areas in Hong Kong (from 2004-06) among Different Seasons
Figure 8A.21 Distribution of Chinese White Dolphin Sightings with Different Group Sizes in Western Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009
Figure 8A.22 Comparison of Sighting Density (Mean SPSE) and Dolphin Density (Mean DPSE) along the Proposed Gas Pipeline Alignment, the Entire Study Area, Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay Survey Areas
Figure 8A.23 Sighting Density (SPSE) and Density (DPSE) of Chinese White Dolphins with Corrected Survey Effort per km2 in Western Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay, using Data from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009
Figure 8A.24 Distribution of Unspotted Calves (UCs) and Unspotted Juveniles (UJs) in Western Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009
Figure 8A.25 Density (DPSE) of Unspotted Juveniles (UJs) and Unspotted Calves (UCs) with Corrected Survey Effort per km2 in Western Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay, using Data from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009
Figure 8A.26 Densities (Mean DPSE) of Unspotted Calves (UCs) and Unspotted Juveniles (UJs) along the Proposed Gas Pipeline Alignment, the Entire Study Area, Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay Survey Areas
Figure 8A.27 Distribution of Dolphin Sightings Associated with Feeding and Socialising Activities in Western Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009
Figure 8A.28 Sighting Density (SPSE) of Feeding and Socialising Activities with Corrected Survey Effort per km2 in Western Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay, using Data from Jan 2005 – Jun 2009
Figure 8A.29 Sighting Densities (Mean SPSE) of Feeding and Socializing Activities along the Proposed Gas Pipelines Alignment, the Entire Study Area, Northwest Lantau and Deep Bay Survey Areas
Figure 8A.30 Ranging Patterns of Ten Individual Dolphins at 95%, 50% and 25% UD Levels using Kernel Estimator
Figure 9.1 Fisheries Sensitive Receivers at Black Point and along the Proposed Pipeline Routes
Figure 9.2 Distribution of Fishing Operations (All Vessels) in Hong Kong Waters as recorded by AFCD Port Survey 2006
Figure 9.3 Distribution of Fisheries Production (Adult Fish) in terms of Weight (kg ha-1) in Hong Kong Waters as recorded by AFCD Port Survey 2006
Figure 9.4 Distribution of Fisheries Production (Fish Fry) in terms of tails ha-1 in Hong Kong Waters as recorded by AFCD Port Survey 2006
Figure 9.5 Distribution of Fisheries Production (Adult Fish & Fish Fry) in terms of Value (HK$ ha-1) in Hong Kong Waters as recorded by AFCD Port Survey 2006
Figure 10.1 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Baseline Landscape Character Area
Figure 10.2 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Photographs of Landscape Character Areas
Figure 10.3 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power  Station Baseline Landscape Resources
Figure 10.4 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Photographs of Landscape Resources
Figure 10.5 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power  Station Landscape and Visual Mitigation Plan
Figure 10.6 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Viewshed Analysis for the GRS reclamation
Figure 10.9 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Hong Kong Climate
Figure 10.10 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Viewshed Analysis
Figure 10.11 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Photomontage From View Point-1
Figure 10.12 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Photomontage From View Point-2
Figure 10.13 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Photomontage From View Point-3
Figure 10.14 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Photomontage From View Point-4
Figure 10.15 Proposed Gas Receiving Station at Black Point Power Station Photomontage From View Point-5
Figure 11.1 Study Area for Marine Archaeological Investigation
Figure 11.2 Location of Sonar Contact, Wreck Removed by the Marine Department and Recorded Shipwrecks Maintained by UK Hydrographic Office in the Study Area
Figure 11.3 Survey Area for Geophysical Survey in March 2009
Figure 11.4 Survey Lines for March 2009 Geophysical Survey
Figure 11.5a Typical Images of the Survey Area collected in March 2009
Figure 11.5b Typical Images of Sonar Contacts Identified in March 2009
Figure 11.6 Seabed Features as Evaluated from March 2009 Geophysical Survey
Figure 11.6a Seabed Features as Evaluated from March 2009 Geophysical Survey
Figure 11.6b Seabed Features as Evaluated from March 2009 Geophysical Survey
Figure 11.7 Seabed in the Location of UKHO Wreck No. 46602
Figure 14A.1 Indicative Arrangement of Cage Type Silt Curtain